Hi Markus -
There are only some bits of Kerberos currently available in the
source tarball. The rest is coming soon - I'm hoping in the
next build.
Kerberos and GSS are both on the list of what's not currently
available as source but is coming soon (check out the no_source
list on the website).
Hi Dennis -
The closed binaries are available under the OpenSolaris Binary License
which allows re-distribution. A pointer to the license text is on the
Downloads page.
Bonnie
Dennis Clarke wrote:
re : http://www.blastwave.org/dvd/dvd-info.html
I will assume that the only bit that I can
The roadmap hasn't been updated (I'll look into that), but libm is coming.
Source is targeted for January, and in the interim, we hope to get
binaries posted this week or next.
Hope that helps.
Bonnie
Venky wrote On 10/25/05 16:40,:
The biggest compatibility problem of OpenSolaris (compared to
Please note that as of build 26, the OpenSolaris Binary License has
changed. The text on the website has been updated, as have the text
files contained in the binary tarballs.
The specification of named binary tarballs in the license has been
removed. That specification restricted the use of
Hi Andrew -
Andrew wrote On 12/21/05 06:25,:
I'm considering contributing code to opensolaris, but I have some questions
about the SCA.
1. sun_contributor_agreement.pdf contains the following seven fields for
contact information:
Full Name
E-mail
Username(s)
Mailing Address
Country
Hi Joerg -
You might be reading an old copy of the roadmap. The current roadmap
was updated in mid-December. It lists open source for both of these
under Jan-Mar 2006. More detail:
- libm is on track for the end of January/early February.
- packaging tools are targeting mid-February.
Hope
Hi,
Two places to start:
There is a user group community:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/os_user_groups
The front page has information about setting up a page on
opensolaris.org, etc. This community also has pointers to existing
groups, presentations, etc.
And there is a user group
Joerg Schilling wrote On 05/04/06 03:39,:
Stephen Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean that Sun will stop using TeamWare?
It means that, for the development release, the ON consolidation will
stop using TeamWare. The other consolidations of Solaris and other
products are
Start with the instructions on the projects page. There is information
there about proposing a new project (which would presumably be needed)
and a pointer to information about what and how to post binaries and/or
source.
http://opensolaris.org/os/projects
Thanks.
Bonnie
Darren Reed wrote On
- I wasn't sure where to put links. I'll add one
here as you suggest.
Thanks.
Bonnie
Darren
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Start with the instructions on the projects page. There is information
there about proposing a new project (which would presumably be needed)
and a pointer to information
Alan DuBoff wrote On 05/31/06 22:28,:
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 08:50 pm, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
So, what is it? is Solaris a desktop or a server operating system? come on,
admit it, you're just burning to say, Matty, its a server OS!
No, most folks at this point are just burning to ask,
Hi,
I updated the request-sponsor table this afternoon with pubs work that
has been happening that wasn't captured on the table. Those items have
been inserted chronologically (and note that some information is missing
right now - I still have to finish up some detail). Which brought the
total
James C. McPherson wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
We don't have sgen even in closed bins. Without it we can not manage
SCSI tapes/changers. Any plans to include it in ON soon?
Any roadmap on those bits? What was the reason for not including them in
closed bins again? (sorry if this question were
My apologies - I'm behind.
Thanks to Jeremy Teo, Richard Lowe and Juergen Keil for these fixes
below and to Eric Saxe, Krishna Yenduri and Alan Perry for sponsoring
the work through to putback. 106 fixes have been integrated, 36 have
sponsors and 15 are awaiting sponsors:
Thanks to Ruben Rabadan, Richard Lowe, Peter Tribble, Mike Gerdts and
Stephen Potter for these fixes and to Ienup Sung, Sarah Jelinek, Dave
Miner, Dan Price and Cynthia Eastham for sponsoring the work through to
putback. 114 fixes have been integrated, 37 have sponsors and 18 are
awaiting
Martin Schaffstall wrote On 07/27/06 06:48,:
On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1] Well, considering that /bin/ksh is for some reason not part of the
Unix license we once bought and therefor in usr/closed
You're not going to file a bug to get the old /bin/ksh open
Thanks to Stephen Potter, Juergen Keil and Peter Tribble for these fixes
and to Steve Lau, Minskey Guo and Cindy Eastham for sponsoring the work
through to putback. 118 fixes have been integrated, 46 have sponsors
and 4 are awaiting sponsors:
Hi,
Some people have asked about the availability of things like libC and
the C pre-processor.
We are trying to get re-distributable binaries available for download in
September for:
- C pre-processor
- x86 assembler
- SPARC assembler
We're hoping to get binaries for libC out this month.
And
Joerg Schilling wrote On 08/21/06 12:40,:
Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check this:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
it is obvious from the list that the files from the lower half are completely
under the OBL.
That's wrong, that should probably say OBL,Others.
Moinak Ghosh wrote On 09/07/06 01:32,:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
David Comay wrote:
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up
the DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some
Hi Paul,
Linda Bernal forwarded me this question last week, and I am trying to
find an answer. It just may take me a few days.
Thanks.
Bonnie
Paul Durrant wrote On 10/02/06 09:14,:
At the risk of starting another flame war, I have a question concerning
CDDL...
If I contribute a driver
I propose the 'ON Tool Hg Conversion' project to convert the ON
tools that currently have knowledge of TeamWare and/or SCCS
to work with Mercurial.
The list of tools can be found at:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/tools/scm/ontools.html
The scope of this project is to lay out a plan and a
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Happy Christmas!
I am happy to announce the first porting results for SCCS:
SCCS now compiles and runs on SunOS 4, SunOS 5 and Linux.
The source is available at:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/sccs/
In order to make it run on Linux, several bugs have been fixed.
Cyril Plisko wrote:
Hi !
On Dec 20 the putback for
PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets
6433451 Solaris support for Reliable Datagram Sockets over Infiniband
- RDS (2006/356)
went into the ON. Among other things there were afew files carried over
from
OpenIB project. For example :
Look at:
http://opensolaris.org/os/about/no_source
This page has been available since shortly after the launch in June 2005.
Some drivers were held back originally at launch simply because I ran
out of time. Some have been moved to usr/src; others are waiting for
resources.
We have
Stephen Lau wrote:
IANAL, but afaik, you'd be relatively safe reverse-engineering it from
outside. If you get help from @sun.com folks, you'll need to make sure
they haven't seen the libc_i18n sources before-hand. I don't know this
guarantee is made...
Bonnie?
Non-Sun people are free to
Just FYI, there is a list of the bite-sized bugs:
http://opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/oss_bite_size
I have added link to this page to http://opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports
and we'll get a link on http://bugs.opensolaris.org as soon as we can.
Bonnie
Ben Rockwood wrote:
While that would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, James Carlson wrote:
The issues are complex, and there are notable exceptions
So I see:
(just to list a few)
bash
GFDL
hgignore
hgrc
pdfimages
gzip
gzcat
xine-config
zip
libfontconfig
I really don't like finding ersatz advertising in the
Some support for Xenix was in Solaris years ago in early 2.x releases.
That support eroded over time, and the last vestiges of it were removed
about three years ago.
Bonnie
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Bolin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does
If someone on the OGB can send the text you'd like used, we'll get it on
the Communities page.
I assume we don't just want to cut/paste from the constitution because
that text refers to terms defined elsewhere in the constitution (like
Members). And it's not specific about how the submitter
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
I know we approved it...
I take it that means either I missed something (if so, help please) or the
OGB is behind on publishing meeting minutes...
I think this is about more than meeting minutes. If there is a new
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:32PM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:41:52AM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
The process requires that this be sent to one or more community groups
for sponsorship
Portals are listed on the portals project page:
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/portals
There is a table there that indicates which are open (Japan, Poland,
China, France) and which are in progress.
Bonnie
Antonello Cruz wrote:
Hey Rafael,
I find two weird things: first is that your
Alan Burlison wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Absolutely! Go to http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/ and first on
the list is opensolaris-discuss. This is what it says:
OpenSolaris: discuss
OpenSolaris General Discussion. All topics involving OpenSolaris are
open for discussion.
Should we be
Hi,
Yes, there appears to be a problem.
As my team is severely understaffed and the remaining people don't know
much about OpenGrok, this could take some time.
We'll let you know when it's fixed.
Thanks for your patience.
Bonnie
angadhar Mylapuram wrote:
Hi
The OpenSolaris source code
Thanks very much to Steve Lau for performing some machine for us.
The browser should be working now.
Thanks.
Bonnie
Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Hi,
Yes, there appears to be a problem.
As my team is severely understaffed and the remaining people don't know
much about OpenGrok, this could take
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I talked to the PM from the Sun Download Center today and they
understand that the lack of wget access is a major issue.
Thanks for looking into this. It is, at least for me, a total show stopper
and ever since the migration to the new SDLC I have not bothered to update
Victoria Muntean wrote:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/roadmap/
This page does not mention a single version number.
This is not a roadmap of binary distribution releases. This was
originally a roadmap outlining when pieces of Solaris and other
processes and tools would be open sourced
Hi,
As most of you are probably aware, Sun is now a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Oracle.
An initial change resulting from that acquisition involves updating the
opensolaris.org website to reflect the new ownership.
Copyright text has been updated, and today the Oracle logo will be added
to
Hi Dennis,
Accounts that were not validated after the move to the Auth app in
August were marked inactive at the end of January.
You can get your account re-activated until late April by sending email
to website-ad...@opensolaris.org.
Thanks.
Bonnie
On 02/10/10 09:45 AM, Dennis Clarke
Hi,
I am forwarding your email to website-admin - the mailing list is
working and gets mail every day, so I don't know why your email was
returned.
Thanks.
Bonnie
On 11/30/10 06:37, hideo-san wrote:
Dear administrators.
I account was locked.
To unlock my account , I sent a e-mail to
Hi,
The opensolaris.org website does still exist.
But the downloads page refers people to the Oracle Technology Network
Solaris 11 Express Downloads site:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is no longer available for download
42 matches
Mail list logo
