Re: [opensource-dev] Making progress compiling the viewer, but still having some issues

Jonathan Welch wrote: > 2) Note to Merov perhaps: I was initially getting a lot of errors > about missing boost.h files. I was told how to manually install that > component. Then I was getting similar messages about missing files in > the GL directory. I let the compiler run and eventually they

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

Glen Canaday wrote: > [14:57] GC Continental: anything not on the TPV list as of yesterday > can't connect to the grid at all. This one does. Just wanted to point out, that isn't true. The TPV list is merely for advertisement, and an unlisted viewer can still connect. Cool SL and Rainbow, for in

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

On 2010-05-01, at 17:53, Glen Canaday wrote: > Me too, but I don't think it's against TOS. A sim owner can do what a > sim owner wants, and if it's to trust client/copybot detection to an > inworld device they didn't make themselves, that's not against the > rules > afaik. Of course, I'm complete

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

Me too, but I don't think it's against TOS. A sim owner can do what a sim owner wants, and if it's to trust client/copybot detection to an inworld device they didn't make themselves, that's not against the rules afaik. Of course, I'm completely unaware of any method that's not going to result i

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Glen Canaday wrote: > > [15:05] GC Continental: Compile it yourself - use the svn sources > [15:05] zFire Xue: but being that I have IDed Snowglobe over 2800 times > with the system, and then there is you, and 2 others... it doesnt look > good that you are such a ra

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

On 2010-05-01, at 16:50, Bryon Ruxton wrote: > Is that thing really exploiting a quicktime hack? > I.e. Trying to protect Computer Crimes Law by violating the very > same laws. Setting a media stream and looking at the query string isn't violating any laws. It's sleazy, and HTML on a prim wil

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

EDIT: The rest of the conversation was actually very gracious. I do expect his product not to be the only one to provide false positives. He is checking into it to see how it could be changed to properly detect unchanged clients - after now, it's likely going to be th beta grid for any testing

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

Well OSS devs, be prepared to be banned by anyone using the redzone thing even when using unpatched LL svn. Sorry to spam, but this type of attitude is spreading, and I thought that *EVERYONE* on this list best know. [14:54] zFire Xue: Your comming up as Community Developer [14:55] zFire Xue: wh

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

Is that thing really exploiting a quicktime hack? I.e. Trying to protect Computer Crimes Law by violating the very same laws. If so, isn't that against the LL TOS and shouldn't it be taken down by LL? The below reviews have me raising eyebrows... https://www.xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketpl

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer blacklist to replace the TPV directory ?

Jonathan Irvin wrote: > Just an idea I think would be cool is if LL made a tool (perhaps a > script) that users could click on if they suspected their viewer to be > bad or something and it would cause the viewer to send the info to LL > for investigation. > > Perhaps also LL can have hashes of

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

I don't know if this store is (badly) detecting client versions/channels through the media plugins' user agent strings, or if it's just that I didn't move enough for their taste after teleporting. I went there with my test alt, using Snowglobe 2.0.0 () Apr 22 2010 00:11:09 (CommunityDevelope

Re: [opensource-dev] Banning by client

That's me on the list. You go in Snowglobe V2? My partner was also there in Emerald and did not get banned - that's why I was asking about client-based ban (and hence why I even brought it up on this list, even though it's only on topic in a very cursory way). --GC On 05/01/2010 12:45 AM, And

[opensource-dev] build instructions overhaul

Hi all As discussed at the Thursday meeting (and demanded by new community members on this list, on IRC and at previous meetings), we should update the build instructions on the wiki to reflect the steps needed to compile Vie

Re: [opensource-dev] Making progress compiling the viewer, but still having some issues

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Sat, 1 May 2010 06:55:48 -0400, Jonathan Welch wrote: > >> I was thrilled to see the viewer to start to compile more or less a >> little while ago but have >> hit another stumbling block. >> >> I'm trying to compile SG 1.4 on Win XP using

[opensource-dev] [WEB] Viewer 2 JIRA meta issues

I created some issues in PJIRA about Viewer 2: Viewer 2 problems meta-issue https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-19310 (I thought it already existed, but I couldn't find it) Viewer 2 Inventory problems meta-issue https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-19308 also see: Meta-Issue: Viewer 2 Si

[opensource-dev] [JIRA] 'Affects viewer' use

What I'm supposed to do when I verify that a bug filed against Viewer 2.0 also affects Viewer 2.0.1 ? Should I really file a new, almost identical new ticket for Viewer 2.0.1? This seems to be the meaning of the "Please ONLY select a single version" phrase that appears near the "Affect Version

Re: [opensource-dev] Making progress compiling the viewer, but still having some issues

On Sat, 1 May 2010 06:55:48 -0400, Jonathan Welch wrote: > I was thrilled to see the viewer to start to compile more or less a > little while ago but have > hit another stumbling block. > > I'm trying to compile SG 1.4 on Win XP using VC 2005 Express Edition / VC80 > > 1) Now I'm getting a lot o

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer blacklist to replace the TPV

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 05:21:20PM +0800, Boy Lane wrote: > The questions I raised remain and I hope someone from LL can answer them. Lindens will only reply with already published official statements here, if at all. Ie, someone (once it gets Monday) will quote this from the TPV policy: 6. The V

[opensource-dev] 1 more compiling issue

I am also getting about a dozen of messages along these lines...any ideas? Build Log Build started: Project: lltrustedmessageservice_test_ok, Configuration: RelWithDebInfo|Win32 Command Lines Creating temporary file "C:\DOCUME~1\jhwelch\LOCALS~1\Temp\BAT00014D13562988.bat" with contents

[opensource-dev] Making progress compiling the viewer, but still having some issues

I was thrilled to see the viewer to start to compile more or less a little while ago but have hit another stumbling block. I'm trying to compile SG 1.4 on Win XP using VC 2005 Express Edition / VC80 1) Now I'm getting a lot of lines like this 26>apr-1.lib(time.obj) : warning LNK4099: PDB 'apr-1_i