From: Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
moeller> When I wrote this, I had not yet read Claus Aßmann's message stating
moeller> that Sendmail uses SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback() too. We should
moeller> add the functionality without changing the existing interface -- i.e.,
moeller> add a functi
From: Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
moeller> If we add the paramter list declaration for app_verify_callback to
moeller> ssl/ssl.h and ssl/ssl_lib.c (which I think we should do for type
moeller> safety), applications written for old releases will not compile
moeller> without modification if th
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 06:30:04PM +0100, Bodo Moeller wrote:
[...]
> If we add the paramter list declaration for app_verify_callback to
> ssl/ssl.h and ssl/ssl_lib.c (which I think we should do for type
> safety), applications written for old releases will not compile
> without modification if t
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 06:17:47PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> I'm not sure I see the problem. Let's see, if an application with a
> certificate verification callback registered through
> SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback() is built for an older OpenSSL
> (i.e. doesn't take a us
I'm not sure I see the problem. Let's see, if an application with a
certificate verification callback registered through
SSL_CTX_set_cert_verify_callback() is built for an older OpenSSL
(i.e. doesn't take a user argument), what will happen is that the
callback gets an extra random argument that i
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:18:55AM -0800, D. K. Smetters wrote:
>
> > One comment made when I proposed the patch was that this functionality
> > is currently almost entirely unused. Therefore changing the expected
> > prototype is not likely to affect t
Hi folks!
I need to convert a certificate in PEM
format stored in char array to X509 certificate in DER format.
I have tried to use BIO_f_base64() and
PEM_read_bio_X509() to convert it but I haven´t got results.
Could anyone tell me how I can do it?
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:29:24AM +0100, Peter 'Luna' Runestig wrote:
> I just found a bunch of these things in crypto/rand/rand_win.c, that surprised me:
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> printf("randomness from PROV_RSA_FULL\n");
> #endif
>
> I'm using a standard debug build on Windows, and was, as I s
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:18:55AM -0800, D. K. Smetters wrote:
> One comment made when I proposed the patch was that this functionality
> is currently almost entirely unused. Therefore changing the expected
> prototype is not likely to affect that many people,
Well, maybe you and me are actuall
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
[...]
> If you look in conf.h, you'll also see why it includes e_os.h: an
> #ifndef NO_FP_API.
>
> BTW, in 0.9.7-dev, we have the same (or almost, it depends on
> OPENSSL_NO_FP_API) #ifndef, but that one is meaningles
Hi All,
I submit an ENGINE last week
and I have no answer or news about this.
So, i
have a few questions.
1)
As someone news about this submission or integration
in next release?
Is
“zencod” ENGINE too badly coded?
Should
we provide any card for testing?
2)
How c
Hi all,
I just found a bunch of these things in crypto/rand/rand_win.c, that surprised me:
#ifdef DEBUG
printf("randomness from PROV_RSA_FULL\n");
#endif
I'm using a standard debug build on Windows, and was, as I said, surprised by the
extra info on screen when running my app. Maybe
they s
12 matches
Mail list logo
