[openssl.org #1180] NetWare patch to add gcc support to 0.9.8

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #1107] NetWare patch for 0.9.8-beta4

diff -cr openssl-0.9.8-beta4.clean/apps/s_socket.c openssl-0.9.8-beta4/apps/s_socket.c *** openssl-0.9.8-beta4.clean/apps/s_socket.c Tue Apr 26 17:43:52 2005 --- openssl-0.9.8-beta4/apps/s_socket.c Thu Jun 09 20:02:39 2005 *** *** 87,94 #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_SOCK static

Re: [openssl.org #1043] Updated 0.9.7g NetWare Patch for the Contribution page

This is marked fixed, but checking the website again today shows it still has the old patch from 0.9.7d. Is there something else that needs to happen? Thanks. Verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/5/2005 5:48:03 PM Added the 0.9.7g diff. Thanks!Ticket resolved.-- Richard Levitte[EMAIL

Re: [openssl.org #1043] Updated 0.9.7g NetWare Patch for the Contribution page

This is marked fixed, but checking the website again today shows it still has the old patch from 0.9.7d. Is there something else that needs to happen? Thanks. Verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/5/2005 5:48:03 PM Added the 0.9.7g diff. Thanks! Ticket resolved. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL

[openssl.org #1098] NetWare patch for 0.9.8-beta3

diff -cr openssl-0.9.8-beta3/Configure openssl-0.9.8-beta3.nw/Configure *** openssl-0.9.8-beta3/Configure Wed May 18 02:17:26 2005 --- openssl-0.9.8-beta3.nw/Configure Thu Jun 2 11:05:34 2005 *** *** 484,493 # NetWare from David Ward ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - requires

Re: [openssl.org #1043] Updated 0.9.7g NetWare Patch for the Contribution page

In updating the NetWare patch for 0.9.8, I also noticed that my latest 0.9.7g NetWare patch hasnot been added to the "Contributions" page. Is it possible to have that happen as well? Thanks for everything. Verdon

Root level Makefile and Makefile.bak in tarball for 0.9.7e

It looks like a couple of extra files hitched a ride in the latest 0.9.7e tarball. Unless I am mistaken, the root level directory has a "Makefile" and "Makefile.bak" that shouldn't be there since "Makefile" is created automatically from "Makefile.org".

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

I did not realize that ERR_remove_state() worked that way. In looking at the code, it appears that it does indeed delete the table making ERR_free_state_table() unnecessary in properly coded applications. Thanks. Verdon "Richard Levitte via RT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/28/2004 5:47:58 AM Just a

[openssl.org #902] Updated NetWare Patch for the Contribution page

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #903] [PATCH] Defect fix for NetWare Support in OpenSSL 0.9.8

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SSE2 code in OpenSSL

and FXRSTOR instructions during context switches) then the OSFXSR bit won't be set. When the OSFXSR bit is not set, the SSE2 instructions aren't available; if you try to execute one, you will get an invalid opcode exception - even if you are running on the latest CPUs that support SSE2. Verdon Walker(801

Re: SHA-256/-384/-512, Netware...

software install the appropriate version; or 2) have the code be dynamic and detect the CPU type when it runs and adjust itself as necessary. [/Embedded Response] I hope that answers the questions. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions

Re: Regarding crypto/md32_common.h

I had already made the change you suggest even before reading your email. It works great with the latest Metrowerks compiler. Unfortunately, further testing with older versions of the compiler (the only one available when the code was first ported to NetWare) produced undefined symbols for __rol.

Re: Regarding crypto/md32_common.h

Here's the assembly output for the two funtions. BTW, _MSC_VER was not defined so I changed it to __NETWARE__ which was defined (to my surprise): foo: : 55 push ebp 0001: 89E5 mov ebp,esp 0003: 6A02 push 0x2 0005:

Re: Regarding crypto/md32_common.h

with OpenSSL in general. I hope this answers the question. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com Andy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/12/2004 4:49:47 PM crypto/md32_common.h currently reads: # if 0

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

versions of OpenSSL including building and testing them in each release (and pre-release) of OpenSSL. Thank you so VERY much for your consideration of this work! Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com

[openssl.org #784] Library cleanup functionality

if called inappropriately. What are people's thoughts on the matter? Should OpenSSL formalize a mechanism for cleaning up global library resources? Or is it sufficient to let the OS do that work? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions

Re: [openssl.org #781] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

much for your consideration of this work! Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/28/2003 5:39:44 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 27 09:23:09 2003]: This patch adds support

Library cleanup functionality

if called inappropriately. What are people's thoughts on the matter? Should OpenSSL formalize a mechanism for cleaning up global library resources? Or is it sufficient to let the OS do that work? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions

[openssl.org #780] [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.8

on both platforms with the patch applied. Thank you for your consideration of this work. Note: This is a repeat of a request made in June. The patch file has been updated, however, to address a couple of minor issues. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider

A few minor issues building 0.9.8 for Windows

out32dll.dbg\ssleay32.lib : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals LINK : fatal error LNK1141: failure during build of exports file NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x475' Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http

Defect? regarding Session ID's

. For a server implementation, they are only checked if mutual authentication is turned on. The code should really either check the session id anytime it is being reused or ignore it always if it is not set. I'm not sure which is better, but I am sure the code should be consistent. Verdon Walker (801

Re: Defect? regarding Session ID's

Thanks for the information. Verdon Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/26/03 7:08 PM On Fri, Sep 26, 2003, Verdon Walker wrote: I noticed a small inconsistency in OpenSSL

A couple more FIPS questions

it to build the FIPS cryptography module? 2) It doesn't appear that optimized assembly code is part of the FIPS module. Is that correct? 3) Once I have the FIPS crypto built, how do I use OpenSSL so that all SSL crypto work is done using that FIPS crypto? Thanks. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.8

I hate to be a pest, but has anything changed on this? Verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/7/2003 11:07:00 PM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:10:39 -0600, Verdon Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: VWalker Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch yet? Is it on VWalker anyone's

Re: [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.8

Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch yet? Is it on anyone's to do list if not? Thanks for any feedback. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/27/2003 11:35:43 AM

Compiling/Linking OpenSSL 0.9.8 for Windows

. The easiest way to work around this problem is to remove the references to the functions in util\libeay.num. This results in a number of warnings, but the code compiles, links and tests properly. I am not sure what the correct solution is. Hope this helps. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] NetWare Support for OpenSSL 0.9.7

not have a number assigned when configuring the make files. Verdon Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/11/2003 4:45:24 PM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:43:03 -0600, Verdon Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: VWalker I have also applied the patch to the latest

Submitting a Patch

it does not find the include file openssl/store.h which is referenced by engine.h Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Updated Patch for NetWare Support in OpenSSL 0.9.6i

No action was ever taken on this request. Is there something more I need to do? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2003 5:23:20 PM This patch adds support for static OpenSSL

Re: Thread Question

:53:32 -0700, Verdon Walker wrote: First, thank you for your responses. I appreciate the feedback, but I don't think I understand the points you are making in your last email. Perhaps, I did not explain myself well enough, but the idea of allowing long operations to be cancelled is hardly rare

Re: Thread Question

:23 PM On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 11:26:46 -0700, Verdon Walker wrote: I know from looking in the archives that this question has been asked before, but I am wondering if anything has been done in the 0.9.7 branch to address it. We have an application that uses separate threads for its readers

Re: Thread Question

First, thank you for your responses. I appreciate the feedback, but I don't think I understand the points you are making in your last email. Perhaps, I did not explain myself well enough, but the idea of allowing long operations to be cancelled is hardly rare. Suppose for example, you want to

Thread Question

they are using the same SSL structure. In particular, the rwstate flag can get trashed and confuse one thread or the other about what is happening. I know that OpenSSL does not support this in the 0.9.6 branch, but was anything done to address it in 0.9.7 or is anything planned in 0.9.8? Verdon

Re: [openssl.org #415] [PATCH] NetWare support for OpenSSL 0.9.6h

This does not seem to have shown up in the contributions area. Are we still waiting for an update or did something go wrong? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] NetWare support for OpenSSL 0.9.6h

Would it be possible to have this patch added to the OpenSSL Contributions area until we are able to get it merged into the 9.7 development branch? Thanks. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL

[openssl.org #415] [PATCH] NetWare support for OpenSSL 0.9.6h

to the task we will not be offended. :-) Note: Since this submission is from the USA, we have CC'd the appropriate US government office as outlined in the Readme. Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com

Status of 0.9.6h?

What is the status of the 0.9.6h defect release? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com __ OpenSSL Project

uni2asc asc2uni naming conflict

avoid this naming conflict, but also to make these two function names more consistent with the other functions defined in pkcs12.h? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com

Re: PATCH: Elimination of unused 10k stack variable

feedback and for correcting my misunderstanding. Verdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/09/02 12:15PM In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 08 May 2002 17:31:41 -0600, Verdon Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: VWalker This patch fixes the routine BIO_vprintf in VWalker crypto\bio\b_print.c so that no longer allocates

Question about b_print.c

. Can this change be made? Do I need to submit a patch to do it? Or am I missing something? Verdon Walker (801) 861-2633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com __ OpenSSL

Postal Address for OpenSSL Group

Is there an official postal address for the OpenSSL group? We are filing some paperwork related to our use of OpenSSL and it requires an address. What would a person list? Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com

Error Stack Question

. Is there a specific reason it is needed? Thanks for any help. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com

Re: Out of the office

Can Tina please be dropped from the developer list until January 8th to eliminate this reoccuring email? Some with group rights, please help! Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/02/02 04

Re: OpenSSL for Novell NetWare

to release that work for general consumption. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/02/01 01:40PM Hi,I want to compile openssl for Novell NetWare. Was this done before? If so, can anyone

Re: Delivering a Single Library

Did you modify the configuration scripts to set up the single library or did you just edit the makefiles directly? That is the issue I am looking into now. (If you have anything you want to share, we'd love to see it.) Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading

Delivering a Single Library

We would like to deliver one library to our customers instead of separate libraries for cryptography (libeay) and SSL (ssleay). Has anyone done the work to support this already? If not, can anyone think of any problems in doing it? Or any reasons not to do it? Thanks for your help. Verdon

[PATCH] Digest Processing Always using EVP layer HMACProcessing

contact me. Thanks. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com

[PATCH] Digest Processing Always using EVP layer HMACProcessing

questions, comments or concerns, please contact me. Thanks. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com hmacdigest.patch.20010503

Re: [PATCH] HMAC Processing

specify the difference between being really done and just ready for a value but still planning to do some more processing. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/28/01 06:41AM I'd missed

Re: Engine vs. Crypto Lib Question

are making (EVP implementation of digests, ciphers, etc.) in that context and hope that it can be of benefit to all of us. Cheers. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/01 05:30PM Hi there,If you're

Re: [PATCH] Digest Processing Always using EVP layer +Addendum to [PATCH]

use when determining what patches to submit? We are making a number of changes to OpenSSL in order to replace the standard crypto lib, but I only want to submit changes that are generally useful to whole OpenSSL community. Any guidelines would be appreciated. Thanks. Verdon Walker(801) 861

Engine vs. Crypto Lib Question

at this time. Am I incorrect in any of my assumptions or conclusions? Are there other considerations I have missed that would make the Engine more palatable for what we are doing? You time and consideration of these questions is greatly appreciated. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCH] Digest Processing Always using EVP layer +Addendumto [PATCH]

someone already done this work? Thanks again. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/26/01 04:48PM Verdon Walker wrote: I appreciate your feedback. In general, is this type of patch useful for me

[PATCH] Digest Processing Always using EVP layer

previously submitted a small Patch for HMAC processing and never saw anything. Am I doing something wrong or do I need to do something differently? Thanks for your help on these matters. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.

How many times can handshake messages be digested?

finished messages, but I believe we need a third in case a CertificateVerify is sent. Do we need more than 3? Thanks, as always, for your insight and help. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com

Re: Handshake Failure with some ciphers

that this is a completely clean build of 0.9.6a. (I just downloaded it and built it yesterday.) Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/12/01 11:12AM I wrote a little batch file to check that I can

Re: Handshake Failure with some ciphers

nt side, I run (from the out32dll directory) openssl s_client -cipher EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA and it doesn't handshake. What certificate file should I be using for this cipher designation? Doesthis work for everyone else? Thanks again for your help. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novel

[PATCH] HMAC Processing

me. Thanks. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED]Novell Inc., the leading provider of Net Services Softwarewww.novell.com diff.out

Re: How to build openssl without certain license-encumberedalgorithms ?

The key is to update the ms\do_ms.bat file. I'm not sure that Configure does much on the Win32 platform. If you edit the do_ms.bat and pass no-rc4 no-rc5 no-idea into the perl scripts mk1mf.pl and mkdef.pl, you should see a difference. Good luck. Verdon Walker(801) 861-2633[EMAIL PROTECTED