Hi Rich,
On 13.08.2014 22:59, Salz, Rich wrote:
Is anyone willing to step up and maintain the Netware port?
If not, then we will probably remove it after the next release.
please dont do that! I maintained it in the past (and try to do in
future as my time permits), and currently it still
Hi,
I was working a lot with Netware some 10-15 years ago.
I wonder if you have some recent install media with ev. licence to
donate to polarhome.com
I am building up a jenkins farm with polarhome servers that would
build OpenSSL, Vim and other opensource projects and follow up CI.
That
please dont do that! I maintained it in the past (and try to do in future as
my
time permits), and currently it still builds (except for asm support were ich
Okay. Thanks for your efforts.
The NETWARE port is really messy, with about 130 #ifdef flags in 70 files. It
would be great if we
Rich,
On 14.08.2014 16:19, Salz, Rich wrote:
Okay. Thanks for your efforts.
The NETWARE port is really messy, with about 130 #ifdef flags in 70 files.
It would be great if we could reduce that impact.
perhaps its possible to introduce some macros and then kill some code
paths - but since a
Thanks for the info!
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA
IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Very old release.
Netware is no longer supported.
After trying to carefully read the text of the RT, I don't *think* there's an
OpenSSL bug; please file a new RT if I'm wrong about that.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
I did not realize that ERR_remove_state() worked that way. In looking at the code, it appears that it does indeed delete the table making ERR_free_state_table() unnecessary in properly coded applications.
Thanks.
Verdon "Richard Levitte via RT" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/28/2004 5:47:58 AM
Just a
Hi.
I just added the latest diff to the contribution files (it should appear
on the contributions page within an hour).
I've looked back at the ERR_free_state_table() discussion, and I can't
find any message where we came to a resolution. Looking at the patch
right now, I still fail to see
Just a comment on what I just wrote...
[levitte - Mon Jun 28 13:37:50 2004]:
I've looked back at the ERR_free_state_table() discussion, and I can't
find any message where we came to a resolution. Looking at the patch
right now, I still fail to see what that function does that
Fix applied, and will be visible in tomorrow's snapshot. Thanks for the
contribution.
Ticket resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Fix applied, and will be visible in tomorrow's snapshot. Thanks for the
contribution.
Ticket resolved.
Following caught my eye. In crypto/rand/rand_nw.c:
+ #ifdef __MWERKS__
asm
{
rdtsc
mov tsc, eax
}
+ #else
+ asm volatile(rdtsc:=A (tsc));
+
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard,
Any chance yet to reconsider applying this patch to 0.9.7?
Verdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/2/2003 3:38:32 PM
Addressing the points in order:
ERR_free_state_table() is not meant to do the same as
ERR_remove_state(). It is indeed meant to clean up the entire table
and
is used for
Addressing the points in order:
ERR_free_state_table() is not meant to do the same as
ERR_remove_state(). It is indeed meant to clean up the entire table and
is used for process cleanup, not thread cleanup. NetWare will clean up
process resources, but does complain when you don't clean up after
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 27 09:23:09 2003]:
This patch adds support for the NetWare OS to OpenSSL 0.9.7. After
applying this patch, the instructions for building for NetWare can be
found in the INSTALL.NW file in the root directory. This patch
attempts to minimize impact on other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 27 09:22:54 2003]:
This patch adds support for the NetWare OS to OpenSSL 0.9.8. After
applying this patch, the instructions for building for NetWare can be
found in the INSTALL.NW file in the root directory. This patch
attempts to minimize impact on other
This patch adds support for the NetWare OS to OpenSSL 0.9.8. After
applying this patch, the instructions for building for NetWare can be
found in the INSTALL.NW file in the root directory. This patch
attempts to minimize impact on other platforms through the judicious use
of the preprocessor
I hate to be a pest, but has anything changed on this?
Verdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/7/2003 11:07:00 PM
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:10:39 -0600, Verdon Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
VWalker Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch yet? Is it on
VWalker anyone's to
Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch yet? Is it on anyone's to
do list if not?
Thanks for any feedback.
Verdon Walker
(801) 861-2633
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of information solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/27/2003 11:35:43 AM
This
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 07 Jul 2003 13:10:39 -0600, Verdon Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
VWalker Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch yet? Is it on
VWalker anyone's to do list if not?
I've got it on my todo list.
--
Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 3 \ [EMAIL
I meant to send this to the group last week and accidentally sent it only to Richard.
It looks like all these problems still exist in the latest development snapshot so I
figured I resend to the group in case it got lost.
The first error I see with the latest developement snapshot when
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:35:20 -0600, Verdon Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
VWalker The first error I see with the latest developement snapshot when compiling
for Windows is:
VWalker
VWalker cl /Fotmp32.dbg\ech_ossl.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32.dbg /MDd /W3 /WX /Zi
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:43:03 -0600, Verdon Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
VWalker I have also applied the patch to the latest 0.9.8 development
VWalker snapshot. It applies (with the exception of changes to
VWalker hw_aep.c which does not exist in the 0.9.8 tree),
the
netwarepatch-0.9.6h.diff.gz file on the Contributions page with this
patch, we would be very appreciative. We are working to submit a patch
to add NetWare support to the development branch in 0.9.7, but this
will
give NetWare developers an option until that occurs.
Note: Since this submission is from
developers who want NetWare support will need to apply
this patch manually to OpenSSL 0.9.6h. We do plan to move these
changes forward into the 0.9.7 branch, but have not done so yet
and
if some enterprising developer beats us to the task we will not
be
offended. :-)
Note: Since
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 24 Dec 2002 16:59:34
+0100 (MET), Verdon Walker via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt This does not seem to have shown up in the contributions area. Are we
rt still waiting for an update or did something go wrong?
Something went wrong, index.html wasn't
and NetWare 6 platforms. This support
has been added to the 0.9.6h source and has been tested on the
platforms listed. Shared library support (nlm) is not supported at
this time.
We understand that 0.9.6h was the last released version on the 0.9.6
branch so developers who want NetWare
at this time.
We understand that 0.9.6h was the last released version on the 0.9.6
branch so developers who want NetWare support will need to apply this
patch manually to OpenSSL 0.9.6h. We do plan to move these changes
forward into the 0.9.7 branch, but have not done so yet and if some
enterprising
that 0.9.6h was the last released version on the 0.9.6 branch so
developers who want NetWare support will need to apply this patch manually to OpenSSL
0.9.6h. We do plan to move these changes forward into the 0.9.7 branch, but have not
done so yet and if some enterprising developer beats us
30 matches
Mail list logo
