Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-06 Thread robert bonomi
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 08:25:57 +0100 (MET) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OCSP responder addresses? From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) pgut001 That may be a Netscape-ism, in earlier (and possibly still

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-06 Thread rsalz
Nit-pick: The spec says that one of the listed keys must be used. by the same token it means that _any_ of listed signings is valid. No, you are mis-reading the spec. It is like saying "the key must be one of red, yellow, or blue." That sentence in particular places no burden on what clients

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-06 Thread Dr S N Henson
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Gutmann) pgut001 That may be a Netscape-ism, in earlier (and possibly still pgut001 current) versions of their OCSP client they did something pgut001 funny like requiring that responses be signed by some CA cert pgut001

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-06 Thread Rich Salz
My interpretation of this is that it does not come under the "CA designated responder case" because the reponder certificate is signed by the root CA and not the CA that issued the end user certificate which would be the intermediate CA. However I suppose I should ask this on the PKIX list

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Gutmann
Michael StrM-vder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dr S N Henson wrote: So does anyone have some responder addresses I can test this stuff against? http://www.valicert.com/ocsp/ - you might already know this... Isn't that the one where all the certs (on the interop web page anyway) have expired?

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-05 Thread Michael Ströder
Peter Gutmann wrote: Michael Ströder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you let me know your test OCSP responders in case they are public? If there are any more they're pretty well hidden, the ones I know of all seem to be either undocumented or by invitation only. Hmm, I found some more

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-05 Thread Rodney Thayer
when I asked around at the IETF meeting in San Diego I was told there were at least three separate interoperable implementations, Valicert being one. Verisign should have one. ... So does anyone have some responder addresses I can test this stuff against? http://www.valicert.com/ocsp/ -

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-05 Thread Peter Gutmann
Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You might look at Identrus, www.identrus.com, since their requirement for OCSP drove many vendors, and see what partners and vendors they list. That's one of the by-invitation-only ones (they were nice enough to let me use it for interop testing, but I

OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-04 Thread Dr S N Henson
As some may know I'm currently messing around with the OpenSSL OCSP code. I've reached the point where I can fire off some sample requests to responders using some prototype code: not committed yet. So does anyone have some responder addresses I can test this stuff against? I currently know of

Re: OCSP responder addresses?

2001-01-04 Thread Peter Gutmann
Dr S N Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So does anyone have some responder addresses I can test this stuff against? I currently know of two and there must be several more out there. That may be all there are, I was testing this a while back and had a hell of a time finding any responders