-Original Message-
From: Rich Salz via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
2)Perhaps I did not make it clear but our policy is not to include
any cryptographic software directly
is expected since 1.0 release?
Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
1)I just got aix64-cc shared build succeed
is expected since 1.0 release?
Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
1)I just got aix64-cc shared build succeed
2)Perhaps I did not make it clear but our policy is not to include
any cryptographic software directly into our applications.
You might want to reconsider this policy. Do you expect much revenue
from the banned country list? Is it worth the development and support
cost of keeping track with
-Original Message-
From: Rich Salz via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 11:15 AM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
2)Perhaps I did not make it clear but our policy is not to include
any cryptographic software directly
1)Unless I understood you correctly, could you please send me
the complete implementation for aix-shared which you want.
You have to understand that I don't have access to AIX machine and
therefore can't be completely sure what I actually want. What I asked in
previous letter is to run the
As you don't appear to be interested in 64-bit build I've decided to
settle for following. We leave the code as is [as in
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030119.tar.gz or later] and document the
aix64-cc case in PROBLEMS in wait for more appropriate solution
(covering even gcc:-). BTW. Can use verify
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
As you don't appear to be interested in 64-bit build I've decided to
settle for following. We leave the code as is [as in
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20030119
]
Subject: RE: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
1)I just got aix64-cc shared build succeed with -bautoexp. It was possible to
modify Makefile pretty similar to aix43-cc.
***
SHARED_LDFLAGS=-q64
1)I just got aix64-cc shared build succeed with -bautoexp. It was possible to
modify Makefile pretty similar to aix43-cc.
^^ But the challenge is to construct the rule which can be
parametrized through configure line. But as already mentioned, I'd
appreciate if you could verify if 'env
modified (this less important though).
Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 7:25 AM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
??? I wasn't ready with it... Pressed
./Configure aix64-cc ... shared - build fails with
only libcrypto.a built (no libssl.a) and message
+ ld -r -o libcrypto.o -bnogc libcrypto.a
ld: 0711-245 WARNING: No csects or exported symbols have been saved.
+ nm -Pg libcrypto.o
+ grep [BD]
+ cut -f1 -d
+ 1
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
./Configure aix64-cc ... shared - build fails with
only libcrypto.a built (no libssl.a) and message
+ ld -r -o libcrypto.o -bnogc libcrypto.a
ld: 0711-245 WARNING: No csects or exported symbols have been saved
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
Similar result:
+ ld -b64 -r -o libcrypto.o -bnogc libcrypto.a
+ nm -Pg libcrypto.o
+ grep [BD]
+ cut -f1 -d
+ 1 libcrypto.exp
0654-210 libcrypto.o
: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
Similar result:
+ ld -b64 -r -o libcrypto.o -bnogc libcrypto.a
+ nm -Pg libcrypto.o
+ grep [BD]
+ cut -f1 -d
+ 1 libcrypto.exp
0654-210 libcrypto.o is not valid in the current object file mode.
Use the -X option to specify the desired object mode
Wrong button again? I wasn't ready with it...
It builds shared libraries indeed!
Can you test one last thing. Assuming that you have the tree configured
with './Configure aix64-cc shared' left. Would following work:
cc -q64 -Wl,-bnogc,-bautoexp,
'cc -q64 -qmkshrobj -o libcrypto.so
and 0.9.7 seem to be compatible on solaris and linux but not on AIX.
Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
Wrong button
.
Thank you very much for your attention,
Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Andy Polyakov via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:27 PM
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
Current version,
openssl-0.9.7
Current version,
openssl-0.9.7, does not support shared libraries on AIX platform.
To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly in Makefile.org?
Just wondering...
I am sending you the changes
which allow to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:26:40
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Current version,
rt openssl-0.9.7, does not support shared libraries on AIX platform.
rt
rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt treatment?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 17 Jan 2003 23:26:40
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Current version,
rt openssl-0.9.7, does not support shared libraries on AIX platform.
rt
rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt
rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly in Makefile.org?
rt Just wondering...
Well, that one is an experiment.
Then why AIX specific flags like -bnogc, -bE:lib$$i.exp, -bM:SRE?
rt and aix43-cc.
rt
To: Shklover, Vladimir
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #463] PATCH
Current version,
openssl-0.9.7, does not support shared libraries on AIX platform.
To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:01:39
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt rt treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly in Makefile.org?
rt rt Just wondering...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:01:39
+0100 (MET), Andy Polyakov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt rt To openssl-dev mainly. How come did do_aix-shared deserve so special
rt rt treatment? I mean SHAREDFLAGS being hardcoded directly in Makefile.org?
rt rt Just wondering...
25 matches
Mail list logo