On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:02:45PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
Avery Pennarun via RT wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
Good question, but this problem does not appear to apply to C, and
anyway it only makes *existing* code uglier -- for new code, the
modified
I have totally removed that '#ifdef' condition, now we include
string.h on all systems (which is what we do in most other header
files anyway, so this cannot break anything unless it is broken
elsewhere too).
__
OpenSSL Project
Thanks a lot to Doug Kaufmann for the MSDOS patches for djgpp. But one thing I don't
understand. In ./crypto/bn/bn_mul.c:
#if defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM) || !(defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__)) || \
defined(__DJGPP__) /* Assembler implementation exists only for x86 */
I haven't studied the
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:43:18PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
redhat linux never upgraded libraries are rpm's glibc-2.1.92-14 and
glibc-devel-2.1.92-14. it's redhat 7.0. I think sysconf is unistd.h. Some other
headers are in /usr/i386-glibc21-linux/include, and since I'm not
Lutz Jaenicke schrieb:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 01:01:08AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Jun 2002
20:59:59 +0200 (MET DST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jaenicke diff -u -r1.7.8.1 -r1.7.8.2
jaenicke --- c_all.c 2002/02/23 02:09:25
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:38:45PM +0200, Götz Babin-Ebell wrote:
Building OpenSSL with debug (at least on linux)
will generate build lines like
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5
-DBN_DEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DCONF_DEBUG -DBN_CTX_DEBUG -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -ggdb
-g2
Bodo Moeller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:02:45PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
Avery Pennarun via RT wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
Good question, but this problem does not appear to apply to C, and
anyway it only makes *existing* code uglier -- for
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
Bye
Goetz
--
Goetz Babin-Ebell, TC TrustCenter AG, http://www.trustcenter.de
Sonninstr. 24-28, 20097 Hamburg, Germany
Tel.: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -0, Fax: +49-(0)40 80 80 26 -126
diff -u -r openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020618/crypto/engine/eng_dyn.c
openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020618_new/crypto
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Thanks a lot to Doug Kaufmann for the MSDOS patches for djgpp. But one thing I don't
understand. In ./crypto/bn/bn_mul.c:
#if defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM) || !(defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__)) || \
defined(__DJGPP__) /* Assembler implementation
Hello Prashant,
Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 12:21:58 AM, you wrote:
PK Hello Group,
PK How can I configure OpenSsl to build shared library (.so) on QNX 6
PK Operating
PK System.
Have you tried ./config shared
--
Best regards,
Henrimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have difficulties to install Openssl 0.9.7 beta2 on a W2000 platform
(for VC++ without using assembly)
the ntdll.mak generated by the do_ms command seems erroneous :
some lines are broken :
SSL
OBJ=$(OBJ_D)\ssl.obj \
CRYPTO
OBJ=$(OBJ_D)\crypto.obj \
(instead of SSLOBJ=... I suppose)
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Doug Kaufman wrote:
a chance to check this yet. Before doing this routinely for DJGPP, we
should probably verify that there are no instructions that won't work
on a 386 processor. Otherwise tha code won't be portable to many of
the low-powered machines (i.e. 386 and 486
Hello there, I have dowloaded an openssl-0.9.6D and openssl-engine-0.9.6D. However, I
am having a problem using this program. What do I need to do in order to be able to
convert a certificate from a . PFX file to a .PEM file ? or where can I get some
documentation on how to use this program ?
The handling of PKCS12 et al is explained in Steve Henson's excellent
FAQ:
http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/pkcs12faq.html
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Hi there,
OK, finally got round to taking a look at this ticket [#98] - apologies
for the delay on my part.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jun 14 21:37:50 2002]:
There is a possible problem with the string param handling of
ENGINE_ctrl():
(At least I will get a problem...)
In the
Hi there,
Just a couple of thoughts on this ticket [#11]..
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 30 17:39:08 2002]:
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are
there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general
Hi there,
I've taken ownership of this ticket (#86) for now, but I don't think
it'll last long.
IMHO, this bug is not a bug. If you look at the implementation of
RSA_check_key() you'll realise that this function is designed to test an
RSA key structure - not just the essential key elements
This sounds like the same old problem with passing an RSA public key to this
function and getting a segv, which seems to bite new users quite often. Can
this function be fixed to do a sanity check on the key before proceeding? I
assume it's the same with a hardware key. If a user ends up with
Now that openssl sends a empty record as part of the known IV attack
fix, I noticed that SSL_read returns -1 if the only record available is
one without a body (our setup uses mem BIOs). Is this behavior
desirable? It seems to me that returning 0 would make more sense. Also,
if this is the way
20 matches
Mail list logo
