[openssl.org #3217] [PATCH] changes in 1.0.0l and 1.0.1f required for OpenVMS

2014-01-10 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: "Stephen Henson via RT" > Thanks for the report. Is there some way you can generate diff files in a= > more > standard form? [...] Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:05:10 -0500 (CDT) From: sms@antinode-info (Steven M. Schweda) Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. V

OpenSSL version 1.0.1g v. VMS

2014-04-07 Thread Steven M. Schweda
NINGS+ OPT_TEST +$ ENDIF $ IF CCDISABLEWARNINGS .EQS. "" $ THEN $ CC4DISABLEWARNINGS = "DOLLARID" I don't have one, so I haven't actually tested this change using a compiler which accepts MAYLOSEDATA3, but it looks plausible (to me). 1.0.2-be

Re: OpenSSL version 1.0.1g v. VMS

2014-04-07 Thread Steven M. Schweda
where. These are all Informational ("-I-") complaints, so they cause less trouble than a real warning ("-W-"). Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 ___

Re: argv/Argv hacks in openssl.c

2014-07-05 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ected by it in the future will be able to find easily the (hard-won) solution after you discard it. ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 38

Re: argv/Argv hacks in openssl.c

2014-07-05 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: "Salz, Rich" > Thanks for the explanation. I'll refactor it a bit, and keep it. Whew. Now that I look again, I see that there's already an apps/vms_decc_init.c, so if adding something like an apps/vms_argv64_bug.c to do the real work would improve the appareance, it'd be ok with me

Re: argv/Argv hacks in openssl.c

2014-07-13 Thread Steven M. Schweda
still has the defect. I suspect that I'm not alone. (But what do I know?) ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Stre

Re: argv/Argv hacks in openssl.c

2014-07-13 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ining support for VMS is not a complete waste of time. But what do I know? ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 _

Re: argv/Argv hacks in openssl.c

2014-07-16 Thread Steven M. Schweda
he (small?) performance penalty where/when it's not needed, but what do I know? ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818

Re: VMS building rework

2014-08-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
UNCTIONS referenced in symbol vector option [...] but I haven't investigated that one. I haven't yet tried 1.0.0n, either, but complete success there would be amazing, too. Steve

Re: VMS building rework

2014-08-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ld probably be persuaded, but it might take a few days. ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 __ OpenSSL Project

Re: VMS building rework

2014-08-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > There is some similar package for Perl, isn't there? Is that very > much of a pain? [...] I expect it to be one more thing which many people won't have. I seem to have a Compaq/HP-sourced v5.8.6 ("Compiled at Mar 6 2008 06:07:12"), and newer stuff is probably avail

[openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 v. VMS

2016-02-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
PENIN, error opening openssl:*.h as input -RMS-F-FNM, error in file name %MMS-F-ABORT, For target INSTALL_DEV, CLI returned abort status: %X1067109C. ALP $ I haven't yet looked into that one. Things seem to be improved, but not yet perfect. --

Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.1.0 pre release 3 v. VMS

2016-02-16 Thread Steven M. Schweda
7;s not the most elegant > coding) I'll see if I can work up some ambition. Before it died, the installation procedure seemed to create a new/strange/bad directory for the header files: Directory ALP$DKC100:[UTILITY.SOURCE.OPENSSL.1_1_0-pre3.include.openssl] aes.h;1

[openssl-dev] 1.1.0-pre5-dev (2016-03-20) v. VMS

2016-03-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
kard Development Company, L .P. ALP $ cc /version HP C V7.3-010 on OpenVMS Alpha V8.4 (I haven't verified it yet, but I believe that the "-010" compiler, recently made available to us lowly hobbyists, fixes the 64-bit argv[] NULL-termination problems on Alpha.)

Re: [openssl-dev] 1.1.0-pre5-dev (2016-03-20) v. VMS

2016-03-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
n place hurt in any way? It'll waste a little time, but not enough to matter. Probably safer to leave it in there until the newer compiler diffuses more. A recent posting in comp.os.vms said: $ cc /version HP C V7.3-009 on OpenVMS Alpha V8.3 so it's clearly not yet re

Re: [openssl-dev] 1.1.0-pre5-dev (2016-03-20) v. VMS

2016-03-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
as I was assembling this message. More/less/different quotation again? -------- Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 -- openssl-

OpenSSL 1.0.0b released (but not tested on VMS, apparently)

2010-11-17 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ening SYS$SYSDEVICE:[UTILITY.SOURCE.OPENSSL.OPENSSL-1_0_0B.ALPHA.CRYPTO]OPENSSLCONF.H; as input -RMS-E-DNF, directory not found -SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file -------- Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382

Re: [openssl.org #2373] OpenSSL 1.0.0b released (but not tested on VMS, apparently)

2010-11-18 Thread Steven M. Schweda
,PQ_TEST,LH_TEST,DIVTEST,TABTEST as well? $! $! Additional directory information. +$ T_D_ASN1TEST := [-.test] $ T_D_BNTEST := [-.crypto.bn] $ T_D_ECTEST := [-.crypto.ec] $ T_D_ECDSATEST := [-.crypto.ecdsa] These changes let me get to the test/cms-test.pl problems (27-APR-2010

Re: [openssl.org #2393] [PATCH] 32/64 bit pointer_size choice in the VMS build

2010-12-17 Thread Steven M. Schweda
tination directory renders this file broken. Having it look at where it is when it's run (as previously suggested) makes more sense to me. -------- search [...]*.com arguement ! "argument". -

Re: [openssl.org #2099] [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release (OpenVMS)

2010-12-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
LITY.SOURCE.OPENSSL.OPENSSL-1_0_1-STABLE-SNAP-20101217.CRYPTO.BN]BN_NIST.C;1. [...] ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street

Re: [openssl.org #2099] [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release (OpenVMS)

2010-12-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> [...] A revised "test/CA.com" may be found at: > > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_1/apps/CA.com That should have been 'A revised "apps/CA.com"', of course. SMS. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #2099] [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release (OpenVMS)

2010-12-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ot;: if [ -z "$CATOP" ] ; then CATOP=./demoCA ; fi It seemed reasonable to me for "apps/CA.com" to do that, too, so now it does. It must be perfect, now. ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@ant

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-14 Thread Steven M. Schweda
passed (or returned)." I'd guess that you'll need to disable that code on VMS, at least when 64-bit pointers are used. (It may be unwise to have the behavior on VMS depend on the pointer size, so it might be better to disable it always on VMS.) Any such change should include a g

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
to decide how to make it work. I suspect that some string copying will be needed for the RMS stuff. ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 Sout

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
27;m not holding my breath while we wait to hear from them. ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
he whole idea was to get the OpenSSL builder(s) to create SSL_LIBCRYPTO_SHR.EXE/OLB, SSL_LIBCRYPTO_SHR32.EXE/OLB, SSL_LIBSSL_SHR.EXE/OLB, and SSL_LIBSSL_SHR32.EXE/OLB, that is, 32- and 64-bit libraries and shared images. (Even if no one wanted to add the "SSL_" prefixes.) Did I miss some

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-22 Thread Steven M. Schweda
macro/typedef/whatever, so I didn't try to find and fix every place where it ought to be used. If someone could decide how to do that, then I could revise, collect, and submit my suggested changes. (Most of which, if experience is any guide, would probably then vanish without a trace, but that

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-23 Thread Steven M. Schweda
MS => PKCS#7 compatibility test" sequence. Perhaps some file I/O thing? The perl script doesn't seem to handle an explosion here very well. A search for "fail" in the test results transcript won't detect the absence of an "ALL TESTS SUCCESSFUL" message, mak

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-23 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: "Steven M. Schweda" >On a different point, a closer look at the 64-bit-pointer test > results shows a problem on Alpha (but not on IA64) somewhere in the "CMS > => PKCS#7 compatibility test" sequence. Perhaps some file I/O thing? > The perl script

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-27 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ader file, "crypto/vms_rms.h" to reduce the code clutter involved with NAM versus NAML (RMS file name) structures (in "crypto/LPdir_vms.c" and "crypto/dso/dso_vms.c"). I use essentially similar stuff in many other pr

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-02-28 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ter size. The OpenSSL builders trust the user, and don't try to check anything. I assume that something will explode, but I don't know what or where. Wake me when it catches fire. ---

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-02 Thread Steven M. Schweda
#x27;" 64 ; show time Note the "64" arguments on all the procedures for the 64-bit build. Omit the "libz" path, if you don't have/want zlib support. As one might expect, I'm still awaiting some discussion of the pending mysteries, so there's still work l

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-02 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> IT $ type [-]btsi_z.com > $ pipe show time ; - >@ makevms.com ALL "" NODEBUG DECC TCPIP "" - >utility_root:[source.zlib.zlib-1_2_5l] ; - >show time > $ pipe show time ; @ [.test]tests.com ; show time > $ pipe show time ; @ [.vms]mkshared.com - >utility_root:[source.zlib.zlib-1_2_5

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s2.zip For an "install.com" which works better (perhaps even properly): http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s2a.zip > $ pipe show time ; @ install.com ""'p1'" ; show time That > ""'p1'" < should have

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
>2. The argv-using "apps/*.c" programs need reform to use "argc" > instead of looking for a NULL terminator at the end of "argv[]". > (Looking for a NULL makes sense for "envp[]", which is expected to be > NULL-terminated, but not so much for "argv[]", where it causes bad > behavior on VMS Alp

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-05 Thread Steven M. Schweda
I apparently forgot to include the modified/new start-up procedures ("VMS/openssl_startup.com", "VMS/openssl_undo.com") in previous update collections: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s2c.zip SMS. _

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-06 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Arpadffy Zoltan > I am sorry, I could not test your changes yet - I'll do it, hopefully, duri= > ng this week. > ...but to be honest, I am more curious what is Richard's opinion about your= > changes. I'm curious about anyone's opinion, but you know as much as I do. Please let me know

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-07 Thread Steven M. Schweda
http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s2e.zip Bad "crypto/crypto-lib.com". (Minor error on VAX.) Trust no one, I always say. (Especially me.) It'll be a while before the VAX build gets finished, so stay tuned. There seems to be some evidence that argv[] _should_ b

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-08 Thread Steven M. Schweda
orget that I'm still waiting for wisdom on what to add where to get around the "crypto/bn" problems caused by sizeof size_t != sizeof void*. ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Wa

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-08 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: "Dr. Stephen Henson" > [...] A simple workaround would be to copy > argv into a malloced copy that is properly NULL terminated if you haven't done > that already. As all the apps go through main() code in apps/openssl.c you > should only need to change one place. http://antinode.info

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-09 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s3.zip > > Unless I've missed something, [...] Naturally, that was too good to be true. I now have enough Perl on my VAX system to run into a test failure: [...] ---> TEST_CMS CMS consistency test CMS => PKCS#7 compatibility test

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-10 Thread Steven M. Schweda
Today's project: Restore command-line case preservation for "openssl.exe" (on modern non-VAX systems, with Parse Style: Extended). New: "apps/vms_decc_init.c". Modified: "apps/makeapps.com", plus a bunch of "test/*.com" files which depended on DCL+C command-line downcasing (or were in danger o

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-10 Thread Steven M. Schweda
VMS before V8.3 did not support symlinks, so VMSTAR typically extracted symlinks as text files containing a message with the link text. This tended to create useless junk in "./include/openssl/" instead of useful symlinks to actual header files. The "makevms.com" procedure worked around this b

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-11 Thread Steven M. Schweda
Ooh. So close. http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s3d.zip Less buggy editions of: crypto/install-crypto.com ssl/install-ssl.com VMS/mkshared.com SMS. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-11 Thread Steven M. Schweda
>Ooh. So close. Progress continues. In my never-ending quest for fun, I tried linking an OPENSSL.EXE using the shared images (SSL_*_SHR*.EXE) instead of the object libraries (SSL_*.OLB), which is something the normal VMS builders don't do. Naturally, it didn't work. But it was pretty cl

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s3e.zip >Wheee. Will the fun never end? Perhaps after I run "VMS/mkshared.com" on a VAX, and notice a few other careless errors therein. http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s3f.zip Sigh. No doubt t

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-14 Thread Steven M. Schweda
New (complete) replacement file kit: http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-1_0_0d_s4.zip This includes a "util/libeay.num" with OPENSSL_strcasecmp, and updated builders. Previously, LINK commands in the builders lacked explicit /[NO]MAP options, so, in batch mode, where the de

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-14 Thread Steven M. Schweda
olding my breath. It would be nice, of course, to have a release actually work properly on VMS when it's released. (0.9.8r was a pleasant surprise that way, I recently discovered.) Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Sai

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> There are probably more such items, lost in the mists of time, but these > were easy to find in the old-complaint pile. Going back to 3-APR-2010, for example, I provided a fix for a test problem involving multi-dot file names on an ODS2 file system. I'll try again. [...] 2496048:error:02001

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-17 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > Got openssl-1_0_0d_s4.zip and openssl-1_0_0d_s4a.zip couple of days > ago, it's getting tested right now. My VAX just finished its run through the latest stuff, and it seems to be happy. (The Perl build finished, some of its tests passed, and it seems to work well eno

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-18 Thread Steven M. Schweda
More VMS builder mysteries... In "makevms.com", I see: $! P6, if defined, sets a compiler thread NOT needed on OpenVMS 7.1 (and up). I find this about as clear as mud. Can anyone explain what "sets a compiler thread" means? What, exactly, is "NOT needed on OpenVMS 7.1 (and up)"? "A comp

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte To: openssl-dev@openssl.org, sms@antinode-info R: I'm subscribed to the list, so the extra copy isn't needed. > about your latest changes, it seems that it has SSL_LIBCRYPTO32.OLB > and SSL_LIBSSL32.OLB as default names (when have specified "" for the > bits para

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> Also, it seems that /POINTER_SIZE=64=ARGV isn't supported with HP C > 7.1. [...] I can believe that. SYS$HELP:CC073.RELEASE_NOTES puts it under "5.2 Enhancements in V7.1", but SYS$HELP:CC071.RELEASE_NOTES doesn't mention it. Trust no one, I always say. >That's depressing. My first im

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-19 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > sms>I'm subscribed to the list, so the extra copy isn't needed. > > Plus the extra copy bounces... Hmmm. I was getting two. Anyway, ... > However, there's a point here. When /NOPOINTER_SIZE is used ("" was > specified for size), are the pointers long or short

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > sms> But all the "64" consumers would need to be changed to deal with the new > sms> "64A" option. Or an explicit "64" or "64=ARGV"... > Naah... this is only needed in makeapps.com, as far as I can tell, > and it wouldn't be too hard to have a spot in the code simply

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > (we're still talking about the case when the user explicitely asks for > 64 bit pointers, saying "64" to the build scripts, right?) Right. > Hmm, previously, we had a hard case with 64=ARGV when the user gave > "64", no choice there... Now, the build script adapts to

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-20 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > richard> sms> 64 Automatic choice of "64" or "64=ARGV". > richard> sms> 64=ARGVManual choice of "64=ARGV". > richard> sms> 64=NOARGV Manual choice of plain "64". > richard> sms> > richard> sms> Easy for the normal victim, flexible enough for

SNAP-20110321 v. VMS: New %CC-I-QUESTCOMPARE in crypto/evp/evp_enc.c

2011-03-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
utl = n; return 1; } Several other problems, too, but this one looked easy. Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 ___

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-22 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> 64 Automatic choice of "64" or "64=ARGV". > 64=ARGVManual choice of "64=ARGV". > 64=Manual choice of plain "64". Seems to be done, and the compiler test activity no longer leaves junk object and/or listing files lying around. Original (*.*_orig) and chan

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-22 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte > sms> > http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/1_0_0d/openssl-SNAP-20110321_s1.zip > > Just to clarify, you used openssl-SNAP-20110321.tar.gz for this? > That's a different branch than the one 1.0.0d comes from... Yes. (Or "openssl-SNAP-20110321^.tar.gz;1", as it's k

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-23 Thread Steven M. Schweda
g mistake to be made.) This stuff was not in 1.0.0d. Is this the kind of optional-feature module which can be omitted from the build on VAX, or is "long long"-free code available, or are we doomed now (on VAX)?

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-25 Thread Steven M. Schweda
; TEST_CA Generate and certify a test certificate via the 'ca' program Making CA certificate ... Generating a 512 bit RSA private key [...] I may be running out of complaints. ------------ Steven M. Schweda

Re: [openssl.org #2449] [BUG] openssl 1.0.0d warnings during build and ACCVIO on OpenVMS

2011-03-29 Thread Steven M. Schweda
but what could go wrong now? ------------ Steven M. Schweda sms@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 __ OpenSSL Project

Re: crypto\ecdsa\ecdsatest.c needs a cast?

2012-01-07 Thread Steven M. Schweda
directly. Around here, _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED seems usually to get more things enabled, not disabled, so it might be safer eleswhere, too. Steven M. Schweda

1.0.0h apps/s_client.c mystery

2012-03-13 Thread Steven M. Schweda
r what? VMS is, by the way, another one of those systems where select() is good only on sockets, not on files, so a bunch of the Windows/MSDOS/et-al. conditionality in this and nearby modules probably needs to be extended to include VMS. -

Re: 1.0.0h apps/s_client.c mystery

2012-03-14 Thread Steven M. Schweda
I/O (CR, LF, et c.), I would not bet that any of this stuff would actually look right (without some extra effort, anyway). Of course, I'm not overly fond of programs which wait for user input without putting out an obvious prompt first, so what's my

Re: 1.0.0h apps/s_client.c mystery

2012-03-14 Thread Steven M. Schweda
t? > I find it weird that the particular \n there would fail... isn't that > something that C library is supposed to deal with properly? Of > course, s_client uses BIO_printf(), but that one in turn uses the > usual C library... so it's to wonder why \n would

1.0.1b v. VMS

2012-05-04 Thread Steven M. Schweda
.0.0h 12 Mar 2012 built on: 14-MAR-2012 00:22:59.46 platform: VMS ALPHA_64 V8.3 options: bn(64,64) md2(int) rc4(ptr,int) des(ptr,risc1,16,long) idea(int) blowfish(idx) compiler: /POINTER_SIZE=64 /DEFINE=ZLIB OPENSSLDIR: N/A ------------

Re: 1.0.1b v. VMS

2012-05-10 Thread Steven M. Schweda
still haven't looked closely at anything. (With the current no-patches-for-hobbyists policy, I'm unlikely to know of, or be able to obtain, anythings newer than these any time soon.) Steve

0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
s, so actual test runs may still collide. (So far, I've tried not to learn too much about the actual tests.) If there is interest, how should I package the changes? ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-in

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
of those positive tests for Alpha instead of .NOT. VAX. The (truly sloppy) fixes used in the builder to accomodate IA64 left the VAX build broken (and the Alpha build suboptimal, apparently unnoticed). It's a trend. I'll take my chances. -

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-01-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
------- Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 __ OpenSSL Project

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
able, now. Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org De

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
when the VAX re-build is finished. (Those 20-year-old computers just aren't as fast as they were when they were new.) ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-04 Thread Steven M. Schweda
One more oops (all my fault): http://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/test/tests.com ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-981

Re: 0.9.8j v. VMS

2009-02-22 Thread Steven M. Schweda
://antinode.info/ftp/openssl/0_9_8j/notes_0_9_8j.txt More builder and installer changes. Shared images now seem to work on VAX and non-VAX systems. I may have run out of unimportant things to change. Steven M. Schweda

0.9.8k v. VMS

2009-03-30 Thread Steven M. Schweda
iginal ".tar.gz" kit. ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 __ OpenSSL Project

Re: 0.9.8k v. VMS

2009-03-30 Thread Steven M. Schweda
/util/libeay.num > [...] I changed the handling of the > "capi" problems in the shared image. [...] Well, now I have. (I _thought_ that I was being careful. Sigh.) ------------ Steven M. Schweda

Re: [openssl.org #1829] [PATCH] DTLS Timer Bug

2009-04-03 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ing used, and SEARCH finds it in (0.9.8k) SPEED.OBJ and OPENSSL.EXE, so I'd guess that there would already be build problems on pre-V7.0 systems, where gettimeofday() would not be available in the run-time libraries. -----------

Re: [openssl.org #1894] [patch] typos / linguistic bugs in docs/comments

2009-04-09 Thread Steven M. Schweda
Especially not a native English speaker. As Count Aristid Karpathy once said, "The English do not know how to speak their own language. Only foreigners who have been taught to speak it speak it well." The story's about the same for writing as it is for speaking.

OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta 2 v. VMS

2009-04-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ffect. Does anyone care about this stuff on VMS? Is it too much work to rip the VMS-specific files out of the kit? I see little point in leaving in what's there now. Applying an occasional band-aid to the corpse seems to me like a waste of time. --

Re: Compilation results on OpenVMS

2009-05-07 Thread Steven M. Schweda
the changes I made for 0.9.8j or 0.9.8k, or are you still working with some Alpha-only scheme with randomized file/module lists? -------- Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 65

Re: All active branches pass on OpenVMS! :-)

2009-05-13 Thread Steven M. Schweda
changes I made for 0.9.8j or 0.9.8k, or are you still working with some Alpha-only scheme with randomized file/module lists? -------- Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 65

Re: All active branches pass on OpenVMS! :-)

2009-05-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
far back do you really expect to go? Wake me when you have a valid complaint. ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547

Re: All active branches pass on OpenVMS! :-)

2009-05-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
l-0_9_8k_s1.zip ---- Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547 ___

Re: All active branches pass on OpenVMS! :-)

2009-05-17 Thread Steven M. Schweda
se by everyone, which would make changes easier when the ideal algorithm is determined, but I was trying to rewrite less than everything. (It may not look that way, but I really was being about as lazy as I could be. Alphabetical file/module name lists, for example, make it easier for a lazy person (l

Re: OpenVMS build issues

2009-05-29 Thread Steven M. Schweda
in with the 1.0.0 beta code. Having had exactly zero apparent success in getting any changes into the (miserably bad) standard code, I don't feel qualified to advise anyone on this topic. Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street

Re: OpenVMS build issues

2009-05-29 Thread Steven M. Schweda
fy> far? > > ;-) well, only you can say why you haven't contributed so far ;-) Yes, contribute, by all means. Or just take a nap. The results seem to be comparable, except one way you get more sleep. ---- Steve

Re: OpenVMS build issues

2009-05-29 Thread Steven M. Schweda
m with it. (There is certainly no shortage of problems with the released code.) -------- Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547

OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-07-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
ter than it seems, or does someone think that it works, or what? ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
"diff" for VMS: http://antinode.info/dec/sw/diffutils.html No guarantees, but it has worked for me. Wake me (directly) if you have any questions on it or problems with it. ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@ant

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
how, and so on, and why it wouldn't break a lot of existing stuff. ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1) 651-699-9818 Saint Paul MN 55105-2547

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-17 Thread Steven M. Schweda
e of those changes seem to have made it to 1.0.0 beta 3, but not all, and I don't know why. I've asked, but I hear nothing. I can't see a good reason to make the same changes over and over again if they do not get adopted, and no one says why they do not get adopted. What am I miss

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Schweda
> and I'll play... I'd spend some time looking for a user who would care about VAX C before I spent any time trying to use it to compile any modern code. DEC C has been around since about when, mid-1994? On my fastest VAX (4000 model 200), building this stuff takes a whole d

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release

2009-11-11 Thread Steven M. Schweda
operly before the actual release? The beta kits so far have not been encouraging. I've given up on seeing several previously suggested changed adopted, but it would be nice if, for example, a simple build simply worked.

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release

2009-11-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
find out what happened when I see the next "betaN" kit. It's not very satisfying, and I've largely stopped caring. (This may or may not be seen as much of a loss.) ---- Steven M. Schweda s..

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta4 release

2009-11-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
a time. If any of this stuff was even close to working when I downloaded it, then that argument might carry a little more weight. (Call me a whiner.) Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warw

Re: [openssl.org #2079] Mismatch in makefiles -> compilation error on cygwin

2009-11-24 Thread Steven M. Schweda
nto a local object/executable? (Surely some lame/goofy rule could be devised, even in that situation.) ------------ Steven M. Schweda s...@antinode-info 382 South Warwick Street(+1

OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release v. VMS

2010-01-21 Thread Steven M. Schweda
odule T1_LIB file ALP$DKA0:[UTILITY.SOURCE.OPENSSL.openssl-1^.0^.0-beta5.ALPHA.EXE.SSL]LIBSSL.OLB;1 I assume that these things need to be added to "crypto/symhacks.h" and/or "util/libeay.num". ---- Steven M.

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release v. VMS

2010-01-22 Thread Steven M. Schweda
assume that these things need to be added to "crypto/symhacks.h" > > and/or "util/libeay.num". Well, "util/.num". Probably. (Perhaps?) Steven M. Schweda s...@antino

  1   2   >