This is a test of the upgraded RT for openssl.org
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated L
Applied.
Thanks,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager majord...@ope
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 8 09:08:37 2002]:
> using the config --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl -threads
command.
> I do a sucessfull make
> I then run make test and get a segmentation fault.
>
> Please find attatched the output from a make report.
>
> I am using openssl 9.6g
> Re
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Sep 13 09:48:48 2002]:
> Hi,
> surprisngly I cannot find in FAQ at
> http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.cgi what is the default randfile
> compiled into openssl binary. I have Solaris 2.6 with kernel module from
> http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi/ and I want to make sure
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 3 13:09:11 2002]:
> Selon Ondrej Karpis via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > I have copied all header files from /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl to
> > /home/.../openssl-0.9.6g/include/openssl/ and it works.
> >
>
> I'll try to do this (Sorry if my english isn't
[guest - Thu Sep 5 12:30:40 2002]:
> This problem has been resolved.
>
> int EVP_EncryptInit_ex(EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx, const EVP_CIPHER *type,
> ENGINE *impl, unsigned char *key, unsigned char *iv);
>
> EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&ctx, EVP_bf_cbc(), NULL, key, iv);
>
> In the example at
> htt
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Aug 26 10:31:09 2002]:
> OpenSSL self-test report:
>
> OpenSSL version: 0.9.6g
> Last change: [In 0.9.6g-engine release:]...
> Options: no-idea --prefix=/usr/local --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl
> no-threads shared
> OS (uname): Linux binky 2.4.19 #1 Fr
[levitte - Mon Aug 19 11:33:34 2002]:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Aug 19 09:48:39 2002]:
>
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 08:15:04PM +0200, OpenSSL Project wrote:
> > >
> > > OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
> > > __ $Date: 2002
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Aug 18 12:30:48 2002]:
> Here is some info on this subject
>
> In crypto/rand/rand_win.c
>
> RegQueryValueEx(HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA, "Global", ...
>
> is called. This call lock registry access
>(_PredefinedHandleTableCriticalSection) and than load perfomance
>dl
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Aug 17 15:51:29 2002]:
...
> You should take a closer look at 0.9.7 (currently in beta), where a
> some of the stricter type handling has already been applied.
>
> We will probably not apply your change to the 0.9.6 line of
> development, because it's a rather big chang
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Aug 2 17:50:30 2002]:
>
> While compiling openssl-engine-0.9.6e as 64bit on Solaris 8 using gcc3.1,
> I get the following error when performing 'make test'.
...
Any news on this issue? Especially: does it still apply to 0.9.6g?
Best regards,
Lutz
___
When using client certificates with very large RSA key lengths, the SSL
handshake fails with "excessive message size" errors.
Reason: the maximum permitted size for the key is hardcoded to 512 bytes
in ssl3_get_cert_verify() (call to ssl3_get_message()).
This fails for 4096bit RSA keys due to the
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Oct 29 13:54:05 2002]:
>
> Hi,
> I'm encountering problems installing openssl-0.9.6.tar.gz on Red Hat
>7.2.
> 1.During untarring and installation I get error messages on issues
>concerning symbolic links.
> Does this mean I need to have an earlier version of open
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 23:41:35 2002]:
> I have updated the bc, the bc tests run further. But the test_ssl
>still
> failed!
Did you get any further with your problem? I did not find a problem
report similar to your's. I don't know yet whether this is a platform
specific problem or m
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 13:43:13 2002]:
> Apologies if this is dumb, but I am not a Perl expert...
> Having downloaded and unpacked 0.9.6g on my server, running the config
> gives
> the following perl error:
> fgc052:root-> ./config
> Operating system: 9000/800-hp-hpux11
> Can't locate st
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 11 09:03:32 2002]:
> When I compile WIN32, following error occured.
...
> s3_srvr.obj : error LNK2001:
> unresolved external symbol _OpenSSLDie
> out32dll\ssleay32.dll : fatal
> error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077:
> 'link' : return code
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Nov 8 12:19:04 2002]:
> Dear all,
> I identified that the Documentation in doc/apps/x509.pod is wrong if
> passed through pod2latex.
> The line
> =head1 NAME OPTIONS
> causes a wrong representation in the tex-File (and maybe in others
> too)
>
> I'm not a perl guru, I f
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:50:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The aCC is a C++/ANSI C combination compiler. The "cc" in our machine is
> an old-style c compiler. Unfortunately, we do not have gcc on our
> machine.
To my knowledge aCC is C++ only. At least it is at HP-UX 10.20.
gcc is avail
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:31:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think that is a bug. look at the following lines from mem_dbg.c
>
> 253 static int app_info_cmp(APP_INFO *a, APP_INFO *b)
> ...
> 258 static unsigned long app_info_hash(APP_INFO *a)
> ...
> 321 if ((amih=lh_new(
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 11:47:20 2002]:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 14 Nov
> 2002 11:24:16 +0100 (MET), "Ernst G Giessmann via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> rt> Run in your doc/apps directory
> rt>
> rt> fgrep "=head1 NAME" *.pod
> rt>
> rt> you'll get
> rt>
> rt> CA.p
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 15:31:34 2002]:
> Lütz, did you get anywhere with this?
>
No. I didn't have the time to look into it. And I don't know, whether
I will find the time before next week. Maybe some hours are available
on Saturday and/or Sunday...
Best regards,
Lutz
__
[levitte - Fri Nov 15 00:46:03 2002]:
> This ticket looks resolved, so I'll mark it as such.
No, it is not resolved. There is a reliable workaround
(REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG). As this is part of OP_ALL, the problem can
only arise for those few applications not enabling the default
workarounds. Th
[jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 09:38:15 2002]:
> I will fix it over the weekend.
Ok, I have finally decided to go with the solution proposed by Steve
Haslam and perform the check based on the id instead of the pointer
to the cipher object (c->id != s->session->cipher_id).
Best regards,
Lutz
___
As no more information came in with respect to this issue, I consider
this problem to be resolved in the meantime.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Develo
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 16 23:05:31 2002]:
> Hey, I didn't actually RUN the thing, I just noticed that "file" and
> like
> tools didn't report it as a shell script, which got me thinking...
:-D
> Thanks for a prompt reply, in any case.
Thanks, fixed.
Best regards,
Lutz
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 09:12:36 2002]:
> Hey guys, a low priority bug exists in the openssl command line tool
> modulo the documentation. If you run "openssl req" with the -verbose
> option mentioned in <> then you get an "unknown option -verbose"
error.
>
> Just thought I'd l
No more input came with respect to this report. I therefore suppose
that the problem has been solved by the requestor or the requestor gave
up.
I resolve the ticket,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
As no more information was sent with respect to this issue, I consider
this problem to be solved (or the requestor lost its interest in it).
I therefore close the ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Oct 12 11:42:13 2002]:
> Hello Richard,
>
> On Friday, October 11, 2002 at 10:15:30 AM +0200, Richard Levitte
via
> RT wrote:
>
> On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc
2.7.2.1,
> libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
> I guess that in this case
>
> =head1 B
>
> is less opportunistic and therefore a bit better workaround saving the section
>name for the next generation ;-)
Ok, I have finally chosen another workaround
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 18 18:19:17 2002]:
> On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 01:33 PM, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
> >
> > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Oct 23 09:12:36 2002]:
> >
> >> Hey guys, a low priority bug exists in the openssl command line tool
>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:18:13AM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
>
> Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:25:15PM +0100, Ernst G Giessmann via RT wrote:
> >
> > > I guess that in this case
> > >
> > >
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 20 09:21:07 2002]:
> Hi,
>
> When trying to use sessions under 0.9.7 beta 4 I get:
> "1424:error:140920C5:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_HELLO:old session cipher
> not re
> turned:.\ssl\s3_clnt.c:705:"
>
> This also seems to happen with s_server/s_client when specify
[jaenicke - Wed Nov 20 10:01:23 2002]:
> The change I made was that the cipher_id was compared instead of the
> pointer to the CIPHER structure. This made the external caching
> work fine (which I of course tested after the change) but made
> the internal cache fail (which I did not test, because
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 20 16:04:03 2002]:
> The test_rsa and test_sid targets fail in "make test" for beta 4 of
> OpenSSL 0.9.7 on a 64-bit Linux system (HP Itanium) using gcc 2.96.
> ...
This bug has just been reported as #350. I will merge both reports
to be handled under ticket #350.
B
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 21 14:36:48 2002]:
> We're making test on DUnix Tru 64 and we had problem with this
> library:
> We can send more informations if you want.
Please give details about the operating system, compiler and especially
the version of OpenSSL you are using. (Are you aware,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:22:37AM +0100, Romana Rubino via RT wrote:
>
> OUTPUT OF ./config -t
>
> Operating system: 9000/785-hp-hpux11
> Configuring for hpux11
> /usr/contrib/bin/perl ./Configure hpux11
>
> Following the error reported by the command "make"
> after running ./Configure hpux11-
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 25 11:14:15 2002]:
>
> Sorry
> (See attached file: err)
making all in crypto...
cc -I. -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT +DA2.0W -g
-D_HPUX_SOURCE -Aa -Ae +ESlit -c cryptlib.c
(Bundled) cc: warning 480: The -g option is available only with the
C/ANSI C
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Nov 25 12:02:08 2002]:
> I try what your technician suggested me. I use now gcc but my
> compilation
> failed because I don't have a file idea.h in my sources. See the
> message :
> making all in crypto...
> ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; \
> echo " /* aut
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:10:14PM +0100, Romana Rubino via RT wrote:
> "Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de> on
> 25/11/2002 12.04.38
>
> > I don't know, what is going on in your case. My copies of OpenSSL
> >
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Romana Rubino via RT wrote:
>
>
> Could you please send me the inlcude idea.h file?
Please download a recent version of openssl (0.9.6g is the latest stable
release) from www.openssl.org. All required components are included.
Case closed,
Lutz
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Romana Rubino via RT wrote:
> As I've already asked, where can I find this idea.h file? This ssl part is
> inserted in a greather environmet, sure can be there a "bsave" component.
> Sure I cannot compile my libssl.a library caused I cannot find idea.h.
A
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Nov 24 19:52:37 2002]:
> Hi!
>
> I have a small problem with SSL_get_error. This function starts like
> this:
>
> int SSL_get_error(SSL *s,int i)
> {
> int reason;
> unsigned long l;
> BIO *bio;
>
> if (i > 0) return(SSL_ERROR_NONE);
>
> /* Mak
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 27 14:49:04 2002]:
> Sometime in the last couple of weeks the following change was made to
> s3_clnt.c
>
> 698,699c699
> < if (s->hit && (s->session->cipher != c))
> ---
> > if (s->hit && (s->session->cipher_id != c->id))
...
This problem was already re
No more conversation took place and the problem could not be reproduced
by us or other people. I therefore don't know what to could be done more
about this issue.
I therefore close this ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 19:13:05 2002]:
> Bodo, if you haven't had more correspondence on this ticket, you
> probably should resolve it...
No more information, so I'll resolve now.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
No more information about this problem.
In the meantime, Ben performed a complete audit of the library and all
issues found were fixed.
I therefore "resolve" this ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project
[jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 22:52:05 2002]:
> The test_req script actually performs a
> ../apps/openssl req -config ../apps/openssl.cnf testreq.pem -inform
> p
> -outform d >f.d
>
> Can you run this manually?
Any updates?
Lutz
__
No more conversation took place and I don't see any more point to be
discussed.
I therefore resolve this ticket.
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 00:23:48 2002]:
> Please try an 0.9.6 snapshot, and tell us if that helped.
No updates. I therefore assume that the problem is resolved with the
latest modifications.
Resolving,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Pro
[levitte - Thu Nov 14 09:51:01 2002]:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 21 22:21:52 2002]:
>
> > When configuring OpenSSL 0.9.6g for solaris-sparcv8-gcc/solaris-x86-
> >gcc
> > shared, the way the shared libcrypto.so and libssl.so are built is
> >wrong:
> >
> > * gcc is invoked with gcc -G
No more information.
I therefore assume, that the problem is no longer an issue.
Resolving,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [E
[levitte - Tue Nov 5 08:40:04 2002]:
> Is this still an issue? If it is, do you have the possibility and
> knowledge to help us debug it? I just tried that command with your
> openssl.txt as configuration file, and I had no problems, but that
> was on Linux...
No more information on this
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
> - with 0.9.6g:
>
> [snip many same errors]
> installing man3/SSL_state_string.3
> /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_state_string.pod
> installing man3/SSL_want.3
> /usr/bin/pod2man: Inv
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:48:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
> happy to try the attached file ... as soon as you attach it!
>
> (with neither email :^)
Download it from the RT ticket. RT2 kindly did not sent the 100k attachement
to the whole list :-)
Best regards,
Lutz
--
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Nov 30 23:01:08 2002]:
> I'd like to report test failures on Mac OS X 10.2.2.
As has been pointed out by Nils Larsch, the problem has already been
discussed in the FAQ.
Hmm. For 0.9.7, a "Darwin" workaround has been implented for shared
library support. Maybe I a
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Nov 30 23:00:17 2002]:
> Building OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and snap 20021129 on RedHat 8.0 (gcc 3.2
&
> glibc 2.3) configured with 'no-asm shared --with-krb5-flavor="MIT"'
make
> fail with undeclared MAXHOSTNAMELEN in ssltest.c (line 693).
> After adding #include build
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
> There is just an alert at some point:
>
> | installing man3/engine.3
> | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 of engine.pod:
>head3
> | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in pa
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:35:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
>
> On December 2, 2002 05:53 am, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
> > > There is just an alert at some point:
> > &
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:08:25PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
> Well I decided to do a little fishing ... this is apparently not a
> limitation of groff/man (which is what counts, after all) but a
> limitation of the pod2man implementation in version 5.6 of perl. Version
> 5.8 gives
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Dec 9 08:58:54 2002]:
> The INSTALL file in openssl 0.9.7-beta5 mentions that RT is available
> at http://www.openssl.org/rt2.html. Trying to browse that URL gives
> me:
>
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL /rt2.html was not found on this server.
>
> Apache/1.3.27 Ser
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 07:20:22AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
> Side note: I sent on 1 Dec 2002 at 21:42:47 a mail (uninteresting:
> basically a question I answered myself in next mail) that got lost. Not
> received back from Request Tracker, no delivery bounce, and not reached
> http:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:14:13PM -0800, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> Or, a more consise list with only AES,
> /usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
> AES
> ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
> AES256-SHA:ADH-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA:
> AES128-SHA
> and, I
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:41:50PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
> I believe we can trace that back to ssl2.h, and remember that in SSL v2, there was
>only RSA for authentication...
>
> Is this enough to resolve the ticket, or at least give it the milestone 0.9.8?
I'll leave it open for
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Dec 13 07:34:55 2002]:
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to configure OpenSSL on Apache server which installed on
> Microsoft windows .Apache Server required compiled DLL's from OpenSSL
> source
> code to implement SSL. For compiling this source code on windows is
> lengthy
>
[levitte - Thu Dec 12 19:23:44 2002]:
> Any further work on this?
No more information received. I therefore consider the problem to be gone.
Ticket resolved,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 09:05:47 2002]:
> Hi
> I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I found
> some problem.
> my compile envirement is
> OS: AIX5L
> specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec)
This report is similar to report #115.
http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.d
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:48:57AM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> > ...
> > What about 0.9.7-beta6? The shared library build system was reworked for
> > 0.9.7 (with a special treatment to handle HP-UX).
>
> ok, tried building 0.9.7-beta6 usi
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 4 09:59:14 2002]:
> Hi,
>
> While using openssl to test caching of session id's, I noticed that
the
> session id of SSLv2 is not being extracted out of the message
correctly.
>
> The spec (http://wp.netscape.com/eng/security/SSL_2.html) says that
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 10:08:34 2002]:
(Error report from requestor deleted)...
> The same errors or different ones?
No more information could be obtained. I therefore consider this issue
to be resolved.
Best regards,
Lutz
___
[levitte - Tue Nov 19 09:41:32 2002]:
> I'll admit I don't know anything about Mingw32. And I know just a
> little bit about Windows. In Windows, there's the concept of import
> libraries, and if I understand the Mingw32 building procedures
> properly, libeay32.a and libssl32.a are import
The problem was not tackled in time for the 0.9.7 release.
I therefore move it forward to 0.9.7a!
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
[levitte - Tue Dec 10 09:03:57 2002]:
> This has been resolved in 0.9.7, where there are easier mechanisms to
> include platform information than has ever been available on 0.9.6.
>
> I don't know how to solve this elegantly in 0.9.6, which is
apparently
> the development branch you're ta
There was no time to solve this problem before the release of 0.9.7.
The ticket is therefore moved forward to 0.9.7a.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
De
[appro - Fri Dec 20 10:50:43 2002]:
> The bugexptest.c problem is already addressed in 0.9.7-beta6. As for
> HEAD/0.9.8 it will be addressed next year. Therefore the ticken
remains
> open.
If I understand you correctly, the 0.9.7 related part of the problem is
resolved. Therefore the Mil
[jaenicke - Fri Dec 13 10:43:35 2002]:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Dec 5 09:05:47 2002]:
>
> > Hi
> > I have a bug-report. when I compile the openssl-0.9.6g on AIX5L,I
> found
> > some problem.
> > my compile envirement is
> > OS: AIX5L
> > specfile: (See attached file: opensslg.spec)
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 18 08:58:59 2002]:
> starting big number library test, could take a while...
> test BN_add
> test BN_sub
> test BN_lshift1
> test BN_lshift (fixed)
> test BN_lshift
> test BN_rshift1
> test BN_rshift
> test BN_sqr
> Square test failed!
> *** Error code 1
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 31 13:21:06 2002]:
>
> i'm having a few problems building OpenSSL 0.9.7 on a HP-UX 11.00
>machine
> using the HP Ansi C compiler. here's a list of the issues i've
noticed
>so
> far (i've listed configuration options and error messages below):
I am
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
>
> > First of all it would facilitate if you could file a single problem per
> > report. In which the person who is considering to close the ticket won't
> > end up judging ov
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 13:06:10 2003]:
> Unfortunately it still does not appear (version 0.9.7) to be working
> correctly:
>
> $ openssl s_client -reconnect -ssl2 -connect www.openssl.org:443
>
> fails with:
>
> 1485:error:1406C0E7:SSL routines:GET_SERVER_FINISHED:ssl session
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 01:09:07AM +0100, via RT wrote:
>
> after completing ./config and make i get :
>
> cryptlib.c:109: #error "Inconsistency between crypto.h and cryptlib.c"
> make[1]: *** [cryptlib.o] Error 1
Do you have any more information, like operating system etc.?
Best regards,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:41PM +0100, Massimiliano Pala via RT wrote:
> forgive my ignorance but I am not at ease with your methods. You assigned
> me this number but what about your impression about the SCEP support
> integrated into OpenSSL ?
The ticket number was automatically assigned by
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:24:57PM +0100, Reiter, Robert W via RT wrote:
>
>
> FYI ... possibly insignificant, but the following fragment from output of
> running "make" shows the sole warning message that was generated during a
> build/compile of OpenSSH 0.9.7 on an HP-UX 11.0 machine today, an
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Jan 4 15:13:09 2003]:
> Yes, sorry about that. I am running the most recent version of
> Slackware Linux. I am running Apache webserver and looking to run secure
> webpages from the server. I have the folder with the openssl and I can
> run config fine, had to add full
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:01:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
>
> Is there something I can do, use a different file? Any help? Thanks
> much.
Hmm. Actually this should not happen at all. Your c compiler picks up the
wrong file. I actually remember reading a comment somewhere, that
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:52:22AM +0100, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> Running under a debugging malloc library causes a crash earlier on with
> a double free error on something which is only freed once.
>
> Very odd...
>
> What platform is this on?
>
> Does anyone else get a crash with:
>
>
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 08:21:38 2003]:
> When a non-blocking SSL_accept() returns -1 with SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
> or
> SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE set, the appropriate thing to do is to call
> SSL_accept() again.
>
> This is fine, but the current state machine in ssl3_accept() doesn't
>
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 06:45:12 2003]:
> I'm trying to compile 0.9.7 with Borland C++ 5.5 and NASM 0.98.35 on
> Windows XP Professional SP1 with all updates.
>
> I did
>
> perl Configure BC-32 no-idea no-mdc2 no-rc5
> ms\do_nasm
> make -f ms\bcb.mak
>
> It fails at:
>
>
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 2 13:14:21 2003]:
> Hello,
>
> I would configure and install a certification from openssl for
Windows
> 2000 IIS.
This is not a bug or enhancement report with respect to the OpenSSL
package. Please ask your question on the openssl-users mailing list.
Be
[levitte - Fri Dec 20 09:28:56 2002]:
> Looks to me like everything was successful, really, even index.txt is
> up to date. Do you have the possibility to debug and find out
exactly
> where the segfault happened?
>
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Dec 18 17:22:44 2002]:
>
> > While executin
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
> 2) error messages during 'make depend' when not using gcc and makedepend
>is installed on the system (HP Ansi C Developer's Bundle, imake
>package). seems like this version of makedepend is not supported. maybe
>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:12:19PM +0100, Marko Asplund via RT wrote:
> this is what 'what makedepend' said on my system (at the time of the above
> report):
>
> 109] % what /opt/imake/bin/makedepend
> /opt/imake/bin/makedepend:
> X Window System, Version 11 R6+ HP-UX B.11.00.00 +O2
>
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 13:06:10 2003]:
>
> > Thanks. Your analysis is correct. I have just checked in an
> according
> > patch, resolving the ticket.
>
> Unfortunately it still does not appear (version 0.9.7) to be working
> correctly:
>
> $ openssl s_client -reconnect -ssl2
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 08:21:38 2003]:
> When a non-blocking SSL_accept() returns -1 with SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
> or
> SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE set, the appropriate thing to do is to call
> SSL_accept() again.
>
> This is fine, but the current state machine in ssl3_accept() doesn't
>
Any new information?
[jaenicke - Thu Jan 9 09:00:58 2003]:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:01:37AM +0100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
> >
> > Is there something I can do, use a different file? Any help?
> Thanks
> > much.
>
> Hmm. Actually this should not happen at all. Your c c
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 21:07:58 2003]:
> i try building openssl-0.9.7 on an ncr server using ./Configure ncr-
> scde
> ( uname -a: cti1dev cti1dev 4.0 3.0 3360,3430-R Pentium(TM)-MCA
> login info: Welcome to the NCR MP-RAS SVR4 UNIX System
> UNIX System V Rele
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 15 12:12:43 2003]:
> Ivan D Nestlerode via RT wrote:
> > In OpenSSL 0.9.6h, there are a couple of BN_init() bugs in
> > crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c. The BN_init() calls in question are in the
> functions:
> > ...
> The same bug is in the ecdsa code in 0.9.8-dev (
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 15 17:27:58 2003]:
...
> -lc89 is sufficient
Thanks. I have added -lc89 to the ncr-scde target. Ticket resolved.
Best regards,
Lutz
__
OpenSSL Project http://
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 16 18:06:21 2003]:
> OpenSSL version: 0.9.7
> Platform: HP-UX 11.00
> Severity: Minor
>
> Hello,
>
> I just rebuilt OpenSSL 0.9.7 on several platforms (OpenVMS, Solaris,
> Linux,
> HP-UX, WinNT). The "make" failed on HP-UX due to a minor problem in
> the
> following
[jaenicke - Wed Jan 15 12:30:08 2003]:
> Any new information?
No response for another week.
I therefore close the ticket.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
