Re: [openssl-project] VOTE on travel reimbursement policy

2018-02-14 Thread Tim Hudson
[kurt] > So I think we should either all vote in public, or nobody should vote in public. You make a good point there - I agree. Tim. ___ openssl-project mailing list openssl-project@openssl.org https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-project

Re: [openssl-project] VOTE on travel reimbursement policy

2018-02-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:40:29PM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <20180214212414.ga13...@roeckx.be> on Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:24:14 > +0100, Kurt Roeckx said: > > kurt> The call for votes should probably also not go to the project list > kurt> based on that current

Re: [openssl-project] VOTE on travel reimbursement policy

2018-02-14 Thread Tim Hudson
> Now, the initial posting went to both the OMC and the project list, > and some chose to vote with a simple "Reply All" without editing the > recipients. If that was on purpose or because attention wasn't payed > to that detail, I cannot say. For my part, it was just a reply-all - but if I had

Re: [openssl-project] VOTE on travel reimbursement policy

2018-02-14 Thread Richard Levitte
In message <20180214212414.ga13...@roeckx.be> on Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:24:14 +0100, Kurt Roeckx said: kurt> The call for votes should probably also not go to the project list kurt> based on that current rules say that we vote on the omc list kurt> afaik. This is exactly contrary

Re: [openssl-project] VOTE on travel reimbursement policy

2018-02-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:06:44PM +, Salz, Rich wrote: > The policy is in the bureau (not a public repo) so that we have something > concrete to vote on. It is exactly the same as I posted to the project list > before. I would like to see all votes contain the full text and not a