I don't see much of a point in an OpenStack Technical blog. After all,
those who want to blog likely already have blogs that are syndicated
through the OpenStack digest mechanism.
What problem or existing shortcoming is sought to be addressed by this
blog? And is there some reason that existing
Very cool, thanks Sean!
-amrith
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Sean McGinnis
wrote:
> Hello PTL's, release liaisons, and all those interested.
>
> The changes on our side to support a release cycle highlights page have
> been
> completed, and things have settled a
t;
>
>
>
> Can you throw some light or give us some guidance on this as it has halted
> the implementation of our Production Openstack Pike.
>
> Your support and co-operation is highly appreciated.
>
>
> FYI: Controller and compute node are running CentOS7.
>
>
>
&g
b.com/openstack/trove/tree/master/
> integration/ however, it still throws me the same error. Please find the
> log file attached.
>
>
> Regards,
> Ritesh
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Amrith Kumar <amrith.ku...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Please see inline
t;
>Please guide us where are going wrong on this.
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Ritesh Vishwakarma <
> ritesh.vishwaka...@indusnet.co.in> wrote:
>
>> ++Looping my fellow engineer.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Amrith Kumar <amrit
I
> came across the https://github.com/openstack/trove-integration which I am
> going to try out today, kindly let me know if it is the right one or please
> share any relevant reference on which we can work.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ritesh
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:16 AM, A
Ha, it isn't often that I get called out by name in a mailing list thread.
What are the issues that you are facing? Currently there are complete notes
about how to build guest images but the issues you may be facing may not
relate to the images you are building.
So please provide some more
Agreed, please also see[1].
-amrith
[1] https://review.openstack.org/515084
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Trove team,
>
> with the retirement of stable/newton, you can now retire
> trove-integration AFAIU.
>
> For information on what to do, see:
>
OCT
17
OCT
17
Sorry about that folks!
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
OCT
17
Morgan;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:mihali...@gmail.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;CN=Amrith
Kumar;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com
RECURRENCE-ID:20171017T14Z
CREATED:20171017T132030Z
DESCRIPTION:Hello\,\n The Ops Meetups Team will meet as usual at 14:00
=ACCEPTED;CN=Amrith
Kumar;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;CN=op
enstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:openstack-opera
t...@lists.openstack.org
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20171017T14Z
DTEND:20171017T15Z
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;BYDAY=TU
DTSTAMP:20171017T132030Z
ORGANIZER;CN=Amrith Kumar:mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com
UID:7t214egarhh0r96r54s7js5...@google.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=Amrith
Mike,
Thanks for sending this out. Long lines in descriptions of many events
are not being wrapped, take Rochelle's session "Refstack: OpenStack to
OPNFV, Vertical, Integrated, Interop" at 3:30pm on Wednesday.
Any chance the descriptions could be wrapped?
-amrith
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:43
gt; On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 08:15:51AM -0400, Amrith Kumar wrote:
>> Full disclosure, I'm running for election as well. I intend to also
>> provide an answer to the question I pose here, one that I've posed
>> before on #openstack-tc in an office hours session.
>>
>>
Full disclosure, I'm running for election as well. I intend to also
provide an answer to the question I pose here, one that I've posed
before on #openstack-tc in an office hours session.
Question 1:
"There are M open slots for the TC and there are N (>>M) candidates
for those open slots. This is
Thanks Doug, I didn't know what caused the "Welcome New Contributor"
thing show up in reviews, but that is exactly what I used to look for.
-amrith
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Amrith Kumar's message of 2017-10-13 13:32:54 -0400:
Flavio,
Some months back I looked at a slide that Thierry showed at a meeting;
it showed contributor statistics and it showed that there were a large
number of contributors who made exactly 1 commit which sometimes got
merged, but there was a huge drop off from 1 commit to 2 commits!
So I got to
Zane, thanks for the question.
Let me answer from the perspective of an OpenStack user (I work for
Verizon) and from a developer (both now, and in the past as part of
Tesora). OpenStack has multiple different users:
- Deployers: People who deploy OpenStack and operate a cloud environment.
-
Clay,
Great question and one that made me think quite a bit. I believe that
while the commits in the Governance repo represent the visible actions
of the TC, the real leadership ability of the TC is often in the
actions that it inspires in people in the community. The TC is a body
that has to
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hey everybody!
>
> I have decided not to seek reelection for the TC.
>
> I have had the honor and privilege of serving you on the TC and it's
> predecessor the PPB since the fall of 2011 (with one six month absence that
I agree with Jeremy that we shouldn't attempt to implement technical
solutions for non-technical problems. But to that end, I'd be curious
to know what the problem was with this. In my experience it has been
an asset to have the meeting start on time even if the regular chair
is for some reason
I wish to submit my candidacy for election to the OpenStack Technical
Committee. I have never been elected to the Technical Committee before
but, I have never believed that being elected is a requirement to
participate in the deliberations. I have therefore been a frequent
participant and a
Steve, thanks for all you've done on the TC, and for OpenStack.
Looking forward to continuing to work with you,
-amrith
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Steve Martinelli
wrote:
> Folks, due to changes in my day job I will not be running in the next TC
> election. I
As Tony says, there's a base image that you can use for RHEL 7.4. Yes, you
can install Oracle onto the image using dib.
In saying that I only mean that it is possible. I make no statement about
the supportability of that solution by any vendors involved.
To do it, you would create elements (the
Sean,
Each fix is a valid change, in and of itself. But what kind of lazy person
would fix (in three patches) the exact same thing, in three places in a
single project?
Or which person would submit the exact same kind of patch multiple times to
change URL's from http:// to https:// in places
Sean, I quantified it in 2016 for some of the patches that came in to
Trove; approximately 130 hours of CI time per patch given the number of
hacks that the person took before even getting pep8 to run.
Close to a release boundary, that had very bad results on an already
fragile Trove gate.
Thanks Matt for highlighting this (again). Please also see
http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/iaqsha7hbiitwqe2
http://markmail.org/thread/k62gcehxg6gv5ep4
http://markmail.org/thread/n753w3wljii67yug
When can we take some concrete action to stop these same kinds of things
from coming up again
Fan Zhang,
The patch to tag Trove with maintenance mode is [1] and as I type this, it
has not yet merged. Yes, I realize that the Trove tests are currently
broken and I've spoken with the other members of the trove team about it at
the PTG in Denver.
I'm sorry I am not able to look into the test
Pl
ease join me in welcoming Samuel Matzek, Luke Browning and Manoj Kumar to
the Trove core team.
-amrith
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
The amount of time taken to create a trove instance (or cluster) is largely
related to how long it takes to create a nova instance of the same size.
So, how long does it take to create a nova instance of the same size on
your system?
Does your trove image install the database statically into the
out of the current ditch that
we are in, multi-tenancy may not be the thing that would materially benefit the
project.
But, we shall discuss in a week or so at PTG.
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com <mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com>
From: Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@c
Luke, please see inline below.
--
Amrith Kumar
mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com
>From: Luke Browning [mailto:lukebrown...@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:00 PM
>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Future Trove development
>
>Amrit
GCB, Ken, thanks for doing this. It will help immensely.
-amrith
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Ken Giusti wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:24 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote:
>
>> Hi ALL,
>>
>> We discussed a little about how to avoid breaking
The email thread below is an one that I have been having with Luke and
some others at IBM who have been working on Trove.
I feel that these kind(s) of conversations are better had in the mailing
list, and in replying to this email, I let the participants know that
absent any objections, I would
; responsibility of the cloud provider rather than the end user. Some
> quota/telemetry would be needed to allocate costs to the project.
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> *From: *Amrith Kumar <amrith.ku...@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not fo
Now that we have successfully navigated the Pike release and branched
the tree, I would like to restart the conversation about how to revive
and restart the Trove project.
Feedback from the last go around on this subject[1] resulted in a
lively discussion which I summarized in [2]. The very quick
Matt, we're trying our best to and the reason they were (recently) moved
back to NON-experimental is that in moving them to experimental, no one
monitored them.
Yes, I am trying to get them to voting and like everything else in Trove,
we could use some help.
Yes, I realize that there are no
This email is to announce my candidacy for the PTL of Trove for the
Queens cycle. My candidacy has been formally submitted in[1].
I have been the PTL for the Trove project since the Trove release (in
March 2016). During this time, we've seen significant improvements
during the Newton and Ocata
TC, Trove folks,
I've submitted [1] a request to the TC to consider applying the
status:maintenance-mode tag to the Trove project for the Queens cycle. If
you would like to comment on this, I suggest that you do it on the review
rather than this email thread.
Thanks
-amrith
[1]
off
> > instance.
> >
> > Don't reinvent the orchestration piece.
> >
> > Fewer DB's better support
> >
> > Clusters are first class citizens, not an afterthought
> >
> > Clusters spanning regions and openstack deployments
> >
> > Rest
This is an early warning that the openstack/trove-integration repository
was last used for Trove in the Newton release. Ocata, and now Pike use
elements and things that are in the trove repository.
This is a heads-up that when Newton goes EOL, the trove-integration
repository will be retired.
If
Kevin,
In interests of 'keeping it simple', I'm going to try and prioritize the
use-cases and pick implementation strategies which target the higher
priority ones without needlessly excluding other (lower priority) ones.
Thanks,
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
P.S. Verizon is hiring OpenStack
tinue this
conversation and hope you will all be able to attend. As soon as time
slots for PTG are announced, I will try and pick this slot and request
that you please attend.
Thanks,
-amrith
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Amrith Kumar <amrith.ku...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Trove has evol
we believe
> that it will cause people to walk away from the community and likely
> OpenStack as well.
>
> - Manoj
>
>
>
> From:Amrith Kumar <amrith.ku...@gmail.com>
> To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <open
Colette,
First of all, thank you for all that you have done in leading the charge
around the SWG (since long before it got that name). I had the good fortune
of being able to work with the first group of members of the TC who
attended the training in Michigan at Zing Train and I think the
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> (Top posting. Deal with it ;)
>
>
Yes, please keep the conversation going; top posting is fine, the k8s
issue isn't 'off topic'.
> You're both right!
>
> Making OpenStack monolithic is not the answer. In fact,
Kevin, just one comment inline below.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> No, I'm not necessarily advocating a monolithic approach.
>
> I'm saying that they have decided to start with functionality and accept
> whats needed to get the task done. Theres
Thank you Kevin. Lots of container (specific?) goodness here.
-amrith
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Fox, Kevin M <kevin@pnnl.gov> wrote:
> Thanks for starting this difficult discussion.
>
> I think I agree with all the
Trove has evolved rapidly over the past several years, since integration in
IceHouse when it only supported single instances of a few databases. Today
it supports a dozen databases including clusters and replication.
The user survey [1] indicates that while there is strong interest in the
" with
any more clarity than before.
So I'm missing something and judging by the follow-up's I'm not the only
one.
And yes, "friends of OpenStack" only begs the question who are not friends
of OpenStack :)
-amrith
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
On
I guess this mail thread and the questions asked here fell on deaf ears because
I see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472891/1 marching its way to merging.
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com]
> Sen
Thanks, Sean.
I will heartily second that request/proposal.
-amrith
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 02:53 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is your pro
down in flames with the new
pylint and I'm wondering what benefit this has for projects in general. The
notion of accumulating more technical debt (enable pylint 1.7.1 and disable
the new tests, cleanup code later) strikes me as less than ideal.
Thanks,
-amrith
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean McGinnis [mailto:sean.mcgin...@gmx.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:48 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) d...@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests
>
for queens (which
I still don't understand, I've been told).
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
> -Original Message-
> From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:38 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Thierry, isn't the py35 goal continuing for Queens?
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:35 AM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack
goal. My 2c worth.
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike [mailto:thin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 4:39 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) d...@lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: Sean Dag
nstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.201
7-05-31.log.html#t2017-05-31T15:39:33
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:24 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f
rum wrote:
> > Either way, it should be much simpler to manage slave lag than to deal
> > with a Galera cluster that won't accept any writes at all because it
> > can't get quorum.
>
> Would CockroachDB be any better at achieving quorum?
>
> Genuinely curious.
Thx Monty, jroll, smcginnis, zzzeek_ ...
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
> On 05/31/2017 08:51 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
>
>> This email thread relates to[1], a change that aims to
[2]https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-postgresql
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:u
for the project to get
new contributors (update: if you are interested in contributing to an
openstack project, trove is looking for new participants).
It would have been nice to have them video taped.
-amrith
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:20 PM
(non cross project) topics to one of the days and
give a preference to cross project things on another day. This may help
with scheduling cross project participation.
Thanks,
-amrith
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
Phone: +1-978-563-9590
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Thierry Carrez <t
gt; On 5/23/2017 7:50 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote:
> > TL;DR
> >
> > When IaaS projects in OpenStack deprecate their API's after milestone
> > 1, it puts PaaS projects in a pickle. I think it would be much better
> > for PaaS projects if the IaaS projects could please
...
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
://review.openstack.org/#/c/466381/
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Trove_(DBaaS)_Team_Meeting
[3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveMeeting
--
Amrith Kumar
GPG: 0x5e48849a9d21a29b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
In keeping with the brevity of the email below,
YES
Enough others have opined on the why, I have nothing new to add and I am happy
to just say +1 ...
-amrith
> -Original Message-
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dava...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:39 AM
> To: OpenStack
Thanks for doing this Trevor, I am hoping that this patch merges soon so we can
do the new meeting time on Wednesday.
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: MCCASLAND, TREVOR [mailto:tm2...@att.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 2:49 PM
> T
That link again
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-summit-may-2017-boston-tickets-283756
75409
Sorry for the duplication.
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Amrith Kumar [mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017
down to the last ticket type.
Thanks,
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
And thanks to the election officials, Kendall, Tristan, and Tony.
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Tristan Cacqueray [mailto:tdeca...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 8:35 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.or
example (attached).
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1682845
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
amrith@amrith-work:/opt/stack/trove$ openstack server group create
affinity-policy --policy affinity
+--+--+
| Field| Value
Hmm, all the cool kids didn’t receive the email but I did. Now I feel bad ☹
-amrith
From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 9:53 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
I've not seen anything new on the agenda and I have a late scheduling
conflict today. Let's catch up on IRC if there is anything that needs
discussing.
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development
parallel conversations going on
> during a TC meeting and it's pretty frustrating to follow along, or get a
> thought in the mix. That has to be much worse for a non-native English
> speaker.
>
> So yeah, slow down folks. :)
[Amrith Kumar] A huge +1000 to that. I have found it very hard
be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed
> changes and pushing your own) ? If there was ONE thing, one initiative, one
> change you will actively push in the six months between this election round
> and the next, what would it be ?
>
[Amrith Kumar] I have th
My name is Amrith Kumar, I've been around OpenStack since a little
before the IceHouse release (about 3 years ago). During this time,
I've worked mostly on Trove, and a little bit on other projects but
mostly in service of Trove. I've also served as a member of the
Stewardship Working Group
There's nothing to discuss on the agenda today so I'm canceling the meeting
for today.
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack
Great idea, happy to try it out for Trove. We love o.m.rpc :) But it needs to
be secure; other comment has been posed in review, I'm doing a talk about o.m
use by trove in Boston anyway, maybe we can get Melissa to join me for that?
-amrith
-Original Message-
From: Deja, Dawid
on IRC and hopefully get to a better understanding of this.
Thanks,
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 11:16 AM
To: openstack-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.
Just a reminder that the Trove weekly meeting[1] is at 1800 UTC and with the
DST correction, the meeting is now
1400EDT
1100PDT
Thanks,
-amrith
[1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Trove_(DBaaS)_Team_Meeting
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
uniquely searchable, such that a search result set uniquely relates to a
specific problem. Conversely, if we go the route of message translation in
the future should all messages include some searchable code (like Microsoft
does with their crash codes).
Thanks,
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku
LEASE_MAP). That looks there is no support for Newton in Trusty,
> >therefore I can not use Trove in Newton.
> >
> >As for the Xenial release, here is a bug where Amrith Kumar (CTO
> >Tesora) says there is no support for Newton also -
> >https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+
LEASE_MAP). That looks there is no support for Newton in Trusty,
> >therefore I can not use Trove in Newton.
> >
> >As for the Xenial release, here is a bug where Amrith Kumar (CTO
> >Tesora) says there is no support for Newton also -
> >https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+
Sounds like a good candidate for a cross-project release goal.
A non-controversial situation, the work is a no-op for most, a specific
deliverable for a few, and a mechanism to close the loop and make sure it
gets done in a specific timeframe?
Thanks for surfacing it Matthew.
-amrith
While I try to schedule my life to not conflict with the weekly Trove
meeting, it appears that Wednesday afternoon at 1pm is a particularly
popular time for people to want to meet me.
This week, and next week are no exception. While I'd tried to avoid these
conflicts, I've managed to be unable
> -Original Message-
> From: Evgeniy Ivanov [mailto:e601...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 3:34 AM
> To: Amrith Kumar <amrith.ku...@gmail.com>;
> openstack@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Trove is skipped in Newton
>
> Amrith Kum
The last supported release is Mitaka (I checked the
> > RELEASE_MAP). That looks there is no support for Newton in Trusty,
> > therefore I can not use Trove in Newton.
> >
> > As for the Xenial release, here is a bug where Amrith Kumar (CTO
> > Tesora) says there is no s
s for Trusty in The Ubuntu Cloud
> Archive. The last supported release is Mitaka (I checked the RELEASE_MAP).
> That looks there is no support for Newton in Trusty, therefore I can not
use
> Trove in Newton.
>
[Amrith Kumar] This appears to be more of a question for the Ubun
related, the #openstack-trove
channel is your best bet.
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
+1-978-563-9590
GPG: 0x5e48849a9d21a29b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
OpenStack Development
://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-pike-ptg-topics
--
Amrith Kumar
GPG: 0x5e48849a9d21a29b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ
Trove team members,
Please see email below from the Openstack Foundation with a link to the Trove
logo files.
-amrith
From: Heidi Joy Tretheway [mailto:heidi...@openstack.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 4:53 AM
To: Amrith Kumar
Subject: Trove logo files
Hi Amrith
tack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22OpenStack+Clean+%253Copenstack.
clean%2540gmail.com%253E%22
--
Amrith Kumar
amrith.ku...@gmail.com
+1-978-563-9590
GPG: 0x5e48849a9d21a29b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
Sergio,
Sounds like I may have been replying only to you, not the list.
A couple of things to recap from the emails I’d sent you.
1. From the description of what you are doing, I’m not sure that single tenant
remote (or shadow tenant) would be my first choice.
2. If you go the route of
I'd like to add the same call-to-action for Trove as well.
When you see a gate failure, please don't simply recheck. Let's start
tracking failure patterns in Launchpad and fix them. I know this is a change
from what we've been doing a lot of in Trove of late so I realize that it
will take some
before we get to Ocata. But for the
present, the gate is running again.
-amrith
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/426535/
> -Original Message-
> From: Amrith Kumar [mailto:amrith.ku...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 12:06 PM
> To: 'OpenStack Development
to you as soon as I can. For something urgent, please
include a telephone number where I can call you. Thanks for understanding.
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar
GPG: 0x5e48849a9d21a29b
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
1 - 100 of 423 matches
Mail list logo