I'm confused by the proposal; you've made a 1-1 substitution of "big tent" with "openstack project" and then there are some "openstack hosted projects".
How does that clarify the situation? It does not help me answer the question "Is Trove part of OpenStack?" with any more clarity than before. So I'm missing something and judging by the follow-up's I'm not the only one. And yes, "friends of OpenStack" only begs the question who are not friends of OpenStack :) -amrith -amrith -- Amrith Kumar Phone: +1-978-563-9590 On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: > > [...] > > I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head was > > "Friends of OpenStack" as a way to describe the openstack-hosted efforts > > that aren't official projects. It may be too informal, but I do think > > the OpenStack-Hosted vs. OpenStack might still mix up in people's head. > > My original thinking was to call them "hosted projects" or "host > projects", but then it felt a bit incomplete. I kinda like the "Friends > of OpenStack" name, although it seems to imply some kind of vetting that > we don't actually do. > > An alternative would be to give "the OpenStack project infrastructure" > some kind of a brand name (say, "Opium", for OpenStack project > infrastructure ultimate madness) and then call the hosted projects > "Opium projects". Rename the Infra team to Opium team, and voilà! > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
