On 11/15/2013 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Wow, lots of different opinions! let's try to summarize:
Arguments in favor of splitting openstack-dev / stackforge-dev
* People can easily filter out all non-openstack discussions
* Traffic would drop by about 25%
* Removes confusion as to
On 11/15/2013 12:08 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Adrian Otto wrote:
If OpenStack starts a culture of exclusion instead of inclusion, that would
start a dangerous trend that sets the wrong tone. It would quickly reach the
point where new projects like mine would simply not come here. We would
On 16/11/13 00:07, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
Hi,
With slight modifications of (2) one can benefit of availability:
1. There should not be a master node. Each heat engine should be able to
act as a master if someone asks it to deploy a template. Current master
engine will be responsible to
On 15/11/13 16:32 +0100, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 14/11/13 19:53, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
Thanks for the comments, Zane.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
A few comments...
#1 thing is that the launch configuration needs
On 15/11/13 08:46 -0600, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 15/11/13 02:48, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com
mailto:asalk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14/11/13
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 2:09:35 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 11/15/2013 12:08 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Adrian Otto wrote:
If OpenStack starts a culture of exclusion instead of inclusion, that would start a
dangerous trend that sets the wrong tone. It would quickly reach the point
On 11/16/2013 02:52 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 11/15/2013 05:06 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Wow, lots of different opinions! let's try to summarize:
Arguments in favor of splitting openstack-dev / stackforge-dev
* People can easily filter out all non-openstack discussions
* Traffic would drop
Awesome Mark! It's really useful to help us start next works to
organize, prioritize and realize icehouse BPs, thanks.
Seems here is a good place to continue our discussion around my
proposal so I have added some inline replies to Enhancing Image
Locations section, you know 50 mins is a little
I have just sent out emails asking for specific details for food and so
on to the 31 emails provided to me, thank you all for indicating your
intent.
If you would like to attend the code sprint and did not receive an email
from this email address anteaya at anteaya dot info (check your spam
I am one of those horizontal people (working on docs and basically one of
the people responsible at my organization for keeping a handle on what's
going on) and I'm totally against a split.
Of COURSE we need to maintain the integrated/incubated/proposed spectrum.
Saying that we need to keep all
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dan.
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we
determined the actual plan for deprecating non-compliant drivers. I put
together a page
For something to go in devstack, it has to be included in the base
server project. So first step is to work on getting your code upstream
into the relevant upstream.
We don't preintegrate into devstack, because it's job is not to be a
general installer, it's to be an opinionated development
Sean,
We have diff in three repositories.
Nova, Neutron and devstack. Each review is requiring other to happen first.
Do you have recommendation how do we deal with these dependencies?
Regards
-Harshad
On Nov 16, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
For something to go in
That is clearly a step in the right direction, and I have to commend the
neutron team for really kicking things into high gear in going after
some of these issues.
That said, we still have a long way to go. I think a very frank
evaluation at icehouse-2 is going to be required to figure out
On 11/15/2013 12:57 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 06:57 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
(Apologies, this started on the TC list, and really should have started
on -dev, correctly posting here now for open discussion)
There were a few chats at summit about this, mostly on the infra
On 11/15/2013 10:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Neutron Tempest code sprint
In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a
Neutron Tempest code sprint to improve the status of Neutron tests in
Tempest and to add new tests.
On 11/15/2013 01:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 12:47 -0500, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 11/15/2013 12:34 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/15/2013 12:16 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
Thanks for weighing in, I
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Harshad Nakil
hna...@contrailsystems.comwrote:
Sean,
We have diff in three repositories.
Nova, Neutron and devstack. Each review is requiring other to happen first.
Do you have recommendation how do we deal with these dependencies?
First off, if you rebase
On 11/14/2013 02:25 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure
that *usage
On 11/16/2013 12:42 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/15/2013 01:13 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 12:47 -0500, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 11/15/2013 12:34 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/15/2013 12:16 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Dan Smith
On 11/16/2013 12:37 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/15/2013 10:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Neutron Tempest code sprint
In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a
Neutron Tempest code sprint to improve the status of Neutron
Silly me and Saturday emails. I mistakenly sent out the emails to the
individual participants from my gmail account not this one. Sorry about
that.
Thanks,
Anita.
On 11/16/2013 10:12 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
I have just sent out emails asking for specific details for food and
so on to the 31
2013/11/16 Sean Dague s...@dague.net
On 11/14/2013 02:25 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote: It seems excessive, I
agree. But if your meeting time bounces on a
biweekly schedule to accommodate multiple timezones, I think its quite
necessary.
And the fact that people forget the times are in
On 11/16/2013 01:14 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 11/16/2013 12:37 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/15/2013 10:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:10 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Neutron Tempest code sprint
In the second week of January in Montreal, Quebec, Canadathere will be a
Neutron Tempest
On 11/16/2013 11:18 AM, Álvaro López García wrote:
On Fri 15 Nov 2013 (07:28), Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Dan.
As you know, Nova adopted a plan to require CI testing for all our
in-tree hypervisors by the Icehouse release. At the summit last week, we
determined the actual plan for
Hi Salvatore!
My responses (to your responses) are in-line. I think we could also use
some feedback from the rest of the community on this, as well ... would
it be a good idea to discuss the implementation further at the next IRC
meeting?
Good Stuff!!
Steven
On 11/15/2013 7:39 AM,
I think responding to this is worth breaking my vacation email embargo.
Although I seem to remember a certain PTL whose vacation we waited for the last
time we did core proposals...
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
It's post summit time, so time to evaluate our current core group for
Tempest.
On 11/13/2013 10:49 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
[...] Proposed Incubation requirements
Once something becomes an
integrated
28 matches
Mail list logo
