Hi folks,
Let's meet on #openstack-meeting on Thrsday, 21, at 14-00 UTC
We'll discuss current progress and design of some of proposed features.
Thanks,
Eugene.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 07:10:53PM -0500, Krishna Raman wrote:
We should probably meet on IRC or conf. call and discuss the suggested
architecture, open questions and REST API.
I have set up a doodle poll at http://doodle.com/w7y5qcdvq9i36757 to gather a
times when we can meet.
Please
Hi All,
Thanks for the response!
Amir,Mike: Is your implementation being done according to ML2 plugin
Regards,
Kanthi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Mike Wilson geekinu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kanthi,
Just to reiterate what Kyle said, we do have an internal implementation
using flows
Russell Bryant wrote:
My view of the outcome of the session was not it *will* be a new
service. Instead, it was, we *think* it should be a new service, but
let's do some more investigation to decide for sure.
The action item from the session was to go off and come up with a
proposal for
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Russell Bryant wrote:
My view of the outcome of the session was not it *will* be a new
service. Instead, it was, we *think* it should be a new service, but
let's do some more investigation to decide for sure.
The action
Hi stackers!!
I'd like to ask for your opinions about my idea of identifying request.
Challenges
==
We have no way to know the final result of an API request.
Indeed we can continuously get the status of allocated resources,
but this is just resource status, not request status.
It
On 19.11.2013 10:38, Kekane, Abhishek wrote:
Hi All,
Greetings!!!
Hi there!
And thanks for your interest in cinder and taskflow!
We are in process of implementing the TaskFlow 0.1 in Cinder for copy
volume to image and delete volume.
I have added two blueprints for the same.
1.
On 18/11/13 23:45, Anderson Mesquita wrote:
Hello fellows,
As suggested on our meeting last Wednesday (2013-11-13)
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2013/heat.2013-11-13-20.00.log.html#l-149,
we're trying to get the build_info discussion going.
The idea is that Heat should provide
Hi,
Some people have expressed interest in helping out with the V3 API related
work during Icehouse. The following are the relevant blueprints based on
ongoing work from Havana and discussions during the summit sessions:
Ongoing blueprints
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-v3-api
Hi,
I've updated the Nova review check list with some details for reviewing V3
API changesets and started a bit of a style guide for the API.
Checklist:
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=ReviewChecklist#Nova_Review_Checklist
Style Guide:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:55:49PM -0500,
Robert Kukura rkuk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 03:25 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Developers,
This topic has been discussed before but I do not remember if we have a
good solution or not.
The ML2 plugin addresses this by calling each
Hi Salvatore
I think you are mixing between the state machine (ACTIVE,PENDEING_XYZ,etc) and
the status description
All I want to do is to write a vendor specific error message when the state is
ERROR.
I DO NOT want to touch the state machine.
See:
For attention of maintainers of Nova virt drivers
A while back there was a bug requesting the ability to set the CPU
topology (sockets/cores/threads) for guests explicitly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1199019
I countered that setting explicit topology doesn't play well with
booting
Hi Roman,
I haven't but I will write a blueprint for the core pinning part.
I considered vcpu element usage as well but in that case you can not set
e.g. vcpu-0 to run on pcpu-0. Vcpus and emulator are sharing all pcpus
defined in cpuset so I decided to use cputune element.
Are you using
Hi,
As Horizon is recently undergoing a set of user interface changes, there
will be needed some effort in
getting Tuskar-UI up to date with new Horizon UI structure and features.
The changes are comming mostly from the update of Twitter Bootstrap
framework to latest version (3.0) and
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Tuomas Paappanen wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to hear your thoughts about core pinning in Openstack.
Currently nova(with qemu-kvm) supports usage of cpu set of PCPUs
what can be used by instances. I didn't find blueprint, but I think
this feature is
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:57:22AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:40 AM, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
But, from performance point of view it is better to exclusively
dedicate PCPUs for VCPUs and emulator. In some cases you may want
to guarantee that only one instance(and its VCPUs) is
Related BP:
Create a unified request identifier
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:04 AM, haruka tanizawa harube...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi stackers!!
I'd like to ask for your opinions about my idea of identifying request.
Hi,
On 11/15/13 9:17 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
You are right. At the same time heat feature should not enforce some
specific deployment requirements to other openstack components
especially taking into account different security considerations. I am
Hi Sam, Eugene, Avishay, etal,
Today I spent some time to create a write-up for SSL
Termination not exactly design doc. Please share your comments!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tFOrIa10lKr0xQyLVGsVfXr29NQBq2nYTvMkMJ_inbo/edit
Would like comments/discussion especially on
Hi,
It's an interesting feature.
But just to understand, what do you blame to the actual implementation with
iptables and linux bridge?
The OVS release 1.11.0 implements a new feature calls 'megaflows'
which reduce the number of kernel/usespace crossings.
Actually, OVS neutron agent uses simple
Sergey,
Thank you. I’ve edited information section related to assigning tags in bug
title.
Just added more examples.
Regards,
Alexander Ignatov
On 19 Nov 2013, at 15:13, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote:
Reminder: today is the bug triage day on Savanna project.
I’ve
Hi
I am excited to see containers getting such traction in the openstack
project.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 06:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
Not having been at the summit (maybe the next one), could somebody
give a really short
We have a team working on getting CI setup for DB2 10.5 in
sqlalchemy-migrate and they were asking me if there was a way to
calculate the patch load through that project.
I asked around in the infra IRC channel and Jeremy Stanley pointed out
that there might be something available in
A substantive reason for switching from mox to mock is the derelict
state of mox releases. There hasn't been a release of mox in three
years: the latest, mox-0.5.3, was released in 2010 [1, 2]. Moreover,
in the past 3 years, substantial bugs have been fixed in upstream mox.
For example, with the
Greetings,
One of the bits of feedback that came from the Nova Project Structure
and Process session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
skip having blueprints for smaller items.
In an effort to capture this, I updated the blueprint review criteria
[1] with the following:
Some
Hey OpenStackers,
I hope you all enjoyed Hong Kong Summit and for those who couldn't
attend, I hope we will see each other next time!
For all of you, I'd like to follow up on conversation from Summit about
Search project [0], which Dmitri introduced and I believe it has great
potential for
Hi All,
The agenda for todays Hyper-V meeting
* Cloudbase-init improvements
* Ceilometer fixes
* Puppet Module Status
* Ci Update
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
One of the bits of feedback that came from the Nova Project Structure
and Process session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
skip having blueprints for smaller items.
In an effort to capture this, I
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 to sticking something in hacking. FWIW I would probably do the following
to avoid the debate altogether:
result = self._path_file_exists(ds_browser, folder_path, file_name)
folder_exists, file_exists,
Hi folks,
I've been thinking about the AskBot UX website [0] and its lack of
visibility, particularly for new community members.
I think it would be valuable to have the first post from new
conversation threads be posted to the -dev list with the appropriate
[UX] tag, with a link to AskBot and a
Hi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Feiner pe...@gridcentric.ca wrote:
A substantive reason for switching from mox to mock is the derelict
state of mox releases. There hasn't been a release of mox in three
years: the latest, mox-0.5.3, was released in 2010 [1, 2]. Moreover,
in the
The current implementation is fairly generic, the plan is to get it into
the ML2 plugin.
-Mike
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Kanthi P pavuluri.kan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for the response!
Amir,Mike: Is your implementation being done according to ML2 plugin
Regards,
Kanthi
On 11/19/2013 11:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:56:10AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
One of the bits of feedback that came from the Nova Project Structure
and Process session at the design summit was that it would be nice to
skip having blueprints for
Hi all,
sorry if this is a bit OT now.
I contacted some hotels to see if we could get a special price if we book
many rooms. According to my research the difference in price is not much.
Also, as Anita was saying, booking for everybody is more complicated.
So I decided to booked a room for
Hi Paula,
Where can we see the source code for the prototype and any API specs
that you may have?
Best,
-jay
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your interest. Our prototype intercepts Swift REST requests
using proxy server middleware and uses Solr as the indexing/search back
end.
Our search API is
Excerpts from Vijay Venkatachalam's message of 2013-11-19 05:48:43 -0800:
Hi Sam, Eugene, Avishay, etal,
Today I spent some time to create a write-up for SSL
Termination not exactly design doc. Please share your comments!
Awesome guys,
Thanks for picking this up. I'm looking forward to the reviews :)
Walt
On 19.11.2013 10:38, Kekane, Abhishek wrote:
Hi All,
Greetings!!!
Hi there!
And thanks for your interest in cinder and taskflow!
We are in process of implementing the TaskFlow 0.1 in Cinder for copy
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Feiner pe...@gridcentric.ca wrote:
A substantive reason for switching from mox to mock is the derelict
state of mox releases. There hasn't been a release of mox in three
Sweet!
Feel free to ask lots of questions and jump on both irc channels
(#openstack-state-management and #openstack-cinder) if u need any help that can
be better solved in real time chat.
Thanks for helping getting this ball rolling :-)
Sent from my really tiny device...
On Nov 19, 2013, at
Thanks Jarda for the intro;
Hi Stackers,
The project Search is a service providing fast full-text search for
resources across OpenStack services.
The idea was introduced and discussed at the Summit. We confirmed the
need for Search service: 1) from core Horizon team and UX 2) from
integrators
Isaku,
Do you have in mind any implementation, any BP?
We could actually work on this together, all plugins will get the benefits
of a better implementation.
Thanks,
Edgar
On 11/19/13 3:57 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:55:49PM -0500,
Robert
On 11/19/2013 08:21 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
Related BP:
Create a unified request identifier
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id
And we have discussed workplans as well, which would be data to be
carried along with the request id
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Lu, Lianhao lianhao...@intel.com wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote on 2013-11-19:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lianhao Lu,
I briefly summarized my recollection of that session in
Hi Kanthi,
The issue is that the nova-api says that by default every instance needs to
be in a default security group that blocks all ingress traffic from outside
and allows all ingress from instances that belong to the same security
group. If an instance does not have an ip address we are unable
On 11/19/2013 11:33 AM, Paula Ta-Shma wrote:
Hi Paula,
Where can we see the source code for the prototype and any API specs
that you may have?
Best,
-jay
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your interest. Our prototype intercepts Swift REST requests
using proxy server middleware and uses Solr as the
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 12:52 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Tuomas Paappanen wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to hear your thoughts about core pinning in Openstack.
Currently nova(with qemu-kvm) supports usage of cpu set of PCPUs
what can be used
On 11/18/2013 06:47 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
An idea related to this, what would need to be done to make the DB have
the exact state that a compute node is going through (and therefore the
scheduler would not make unreliable/racey decisions, even when there are
multiple schedulers). It's not
Yes, my work has been on ML2 with neutron-openvswitch-agent. I’m interested to
see what Jun Park has. I might have something ready before he is available
again, but would like to collaborate regardless.
Amir
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:31 AM, Kanthi P
On 11/18/2013 11:35 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
There were some concerns expressed at the summit about scheduler
scalability in Nova, and a little recollection of Boris' proposal to
keep the needed state in memory. I also heard one guy say that he
thinks Nova does not really need a general SQL
Thanks Avishay.
I think the status description error was introduced with this aim.
Whether vendor-specific error descriptions can make sense to a tenant,
that's a good question.
Personally, I feel like as a tenant that information would not be a lot
useful to me, as I would not be able to do any
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:28 -0800, Stuart Fox wrote:
Hey all
Not having been at the summit (maybe the next one), could somebody
give a really short explanation as to why it needs to be a separate
service?
It sounds like it should fit within the Nova area. It is, after all,
just another
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-11-15 12:41:53 -0800:
Good news, everyone! I have created the missing whiteboard diagram that
we all needed at the design summit:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Blueprints/Multi_Region_Support_for_Heat/The_Missing_Diagram
I've documented 5
My apologies, I'm apparently coming into this quite late :) Would you
mind sharing a link to the HP proposal? I wasn't at the summit
unfortunately and am playing a bit of catch up.
Hi Jay,
Take a look at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MetadataSearch
There are links there to the REST API
Matt,
As an option you may estimate the load using Stackalytics data on number of
commits -
http://stackalytics.com/?release=icehousemetric=commitsproject_type=allmodule=sqlalchemy-migrateNumber
of commits is certainly less than number of patches, but for project
sqlalchemy-migrate the multiplier
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/11/13 11:15, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 15/11/13 08:46 -0600, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 15/11/13 02:48, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On
On 11/19/2013 01:08 PM, Paula Ta-Shma wrote:
My apologies, I'm apparently coming into this quite late :) Would you
mind sharing a link to the HP proposal? I wasn't at the summit
unfortunately and am playing a bit of catch up.
Hi Jay,
Take a look at
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi
I am excited to see containers getting such traction in the openstack
project.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 06:30 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
Not having
If you start adding these states you might really want to consider the
following work that is going on in other projects.
It surely appears that everyone is starting to hit the same problem (and
joining efforts would produce a more beneficial result).
Relevant icehouse etherpads:
-
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2013-11-19 09:29:00 -0800:
On 11/18/2013 06:47 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
An idea related to this, what would need to be done to make the DB have
the exact state that a compute node is going through (and therefore the
scheduler would not make
And also of course, nearly forgot a similar situation/review in heat.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49440/
Except theres was/is dealing with stack locking (a heat concept).
On 11/19/13 10:33 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
If you start adding these states you might really
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:02 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:28 -0800, Stuart Fox wrote:
Hey all
Not having been at the summit (maybe the next one), could somebody
give a really short explanation as to why it needs to be a separate
Sorry that was I prefer #3 (not #2) at the end there. Keyboard failure ;)
On 11/19/13 10:27 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Personally I would prefer #3 from the below. #2 I think will still have to
deal with consistency issues, just switching away from a DB doesn't make
magical
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks, I understand the Nova scheduler part. One of the gaps there is
related to the blueprint we have are working on [1]. I was wondering
regarding the role of Ironic, and the exact interaction between the user,
Nova
Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
of libvirt 0.9.6.
For cases where we use features newer than this, we have to do conditional
logic to ensure we operate correctly on old libvirt. We don't want to keep
adding conditionals forever since they complicate the code
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 13:46 -0500, Eric Windisch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:02 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:28 -0800, Stuart Fox wrote:
Hey all
Not having been at the summit (maybe the next one), could somebody
give a
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:02:45AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 14:28 -0800, Stuart Fox wrote:
Hey all
Not having been at the summit (maybe the next one), could somebody
give a really short explanation as to why it needs to be a separate
service?
It sounds like
On 11/17/2013 01:57 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 11/15/2013 05:19 AM, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/
I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for
autoscaling. It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple
subset of Markdown) and
On 11/19/2013 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Each scheduler process can own a different set of resources. If they
each grab instance requests in a round-robin fashion, then they will
fill their resources up in a relatively well balanced way until one
scheduler's resources are exhausted. At that
Hi,
I noticed that the Accept HTTP Header checked in the Version
Negotiation Middleware by Heat is the same MIME type used by Glance
(application/vnd.openstack.images-)
Is this OK, or should it be something like
application/vnd.openstack.orchestration-?
If this is the case
On 11/19/2013 12:27 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Personally I would prefer #3 from the below. #2 I think will still have to
deal with consistency issues, just switching away from a DB doesn't make
magical ponies and unicorns appear (in-fact it can potentially make the
problem worse if its done
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2013-11-19 11:37:02 -0800:
On 11/19/2013 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Each scheduler process can own a different set of resources. If they
each grab instance requests in a round-robin fashion, then they will
fill their resources up in a relatively
On 11/19/2013 10:02 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
It is possible to extend the Nova APIs to control containers more fully,
but there was resistance do doing this on the grounds that it's
expanding the scope of Nova, hence the new project.
How well received would another CLI/API to learn be among
On 11/19/2013 03:08 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
On 11/19/2013 10:02 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
It is possible to extend the Nova APIs to control containers more fully,
but there was resistance do doing this on the grounds that it's
expanding the scope of Nova, hence the new project.
How well
On 11/19/2013 08:37 PM, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 18.11.2013 21:52:04:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 18.11.2013 21:54
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration
refined after design
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Ladislav Smola lsm...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello. I have a couple of additional questions.
1. What about IPMI data that we want to get by polling. E.g. temperatures,
etc. Will the Ironic be polling these kind of
data and send them directly to collector(or
On 11/20/2013 09:50 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-11-18 12:52:04 -0800:
Regarding apply_config/remove_config, if a SoftwareApplier resource is
deleted it should trigger any remove_config and wait for the server to
acknowledge when that is complete. This
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-11-19 13:06:21 -0800:
On 11/20/2013 09:50 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message of 2013-11-18 12:52:04 -0800:
Regarding apply_config/remove_config, if a SoftwareApplier resource is
deleted it should trigger any remove_config
On 19/11/13 19:03, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2013-11-15 12:41:53 -0800:
Good news, everyone! I have created the missing whiteboard diagram that
we all needed at the design summit:
I'd like to propose an idea around a simplified and complimentary version of
devtest that makes it easier for someone to get started and try TripleO.
The goal being to get people using TripleO as a way to experience the
deployment of OpenStack, and not necessarily a way to get an experience of
Greetings,
We've made a lot of progress on reviewing blueprints over the last week
and have the icehouse-1 [1] list in reasonable shape. Note that
icehouse-1 development must be completed two weeks from today, and that
time frame includes a major holiday in the US. Please adjust plans and
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
The two candidates who nominated themselves in time for this election are:
* David Lyle
* Matthias Runge
The election will be set up tomorrow, and will stay open for voting for
a week.
The poll is now closed, and the winner is David Lyle !
You
On 11/19/2013 11:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
The poll is now closed, and the winner is David Lyle !
David, well done and honestly deserved!
Matthias
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
For what is worth we have considered this aspect from the perspective of
the Neutron plugin my team maintains (NVP) during the past release cycle.
The synchronous model that most plugins with a controller on the backend
currently implement is simple and convenient, but has some flaws:
-
On 19/11/13 19:40 +, Fuente, Pablo A wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the Accept HTTP Header checked in the Version
Negotiation Middleware by Heat is the same MIME type used by Glance
(application/vnd.openstack.images-)
Is this OK, or should it be something like
On 19/11/13 19:14, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 16/11/13 11:15, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 15/11/13 08:46 -0600, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:57
Can u explain a little how using celery achieves workflow reliability and
avoids races (or mitigates spaghetti code)?
To me celery acts as a way to distribute tasks, but does not deal with actually
forming a easily understandable way of knowing that a piece of code that u
design is actually
On Nov 15, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
We've talked a lot about requirements for new compute drivers [1]. I
think the same sort of standards shold be applied for a new third-party
API, such as the GCE API [2].
Before we can consider taking on a
Thanks for your reply Joshua,
some more comments inline; however I think I'm probably going off topic
here given the initial subject of this thread.
Talking about Taskflow, and moving aside for the plugins, which have not a
lot of community-wide interest, do you reckon Taskflow might be
On 16 November 2013 08:31, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
and building on unstable Nova APIs. Anything which we accept is a part
of OpenStack should not get randomly made unusable by one contributor
while other contributors constantly have to scramble to catch up. Either
stuff winds
On 20 November 2013 10:40, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to propose an idea around a simplified and complimentary version of
devtest that makes it easier for someone to get started and try TripleO.
I think its a grand idea (in fact it's been floated many times). For a
On 11/19/2013 03:46 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 16 November 2013 08:31, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
and building on unstable Nova APIs. Anything which we accept is a part
of OpenStack should not get randomly made unusable by one contributor
while other contributors constantly have
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 11/19/2013 03:46 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
As long as the metadataservice doesn't move out :) - that one I think
is pretty core and we have no native replacement [configdrive is not a
replacement :P].
Slightly off tangent
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2013-11-19 12:18:16 -0800:
On 11/19/2013 01:51 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2013-11-19 11:37:02 -0800:
On 11/19/2013 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Each scheduler process can own a different set of resources. If
On 20 November 2013 13:00, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
As long as the metadataservice doesn't move out :) - that one I think
is pretty core and we have no native replacement [configdrive is not a
replacement :P].
Slightly off tangent thread.
So we recently moved devstack gate to do
On 11/19/2013 08:19 AM, Julie Pichon wrote:
I've been thinking about the AskBot UX website [0] and its lack of
visibility, particularly for new community members.
Indeed, it's one of the drawbacks of splitting groups: information tends
not to flow very well.
I think it would be valuable to
Hello Stackers!
I'm Thiago and I'm here on dev list mostly to watch you guys...
Nevertheless, I want to say that I would love to test in deep, the IPv6
support in OpenStack IceHouse.
At at glance, what I'm looking for is more or less specified here, as
follows:
---
I have 1 native IPv6 /48
One more thing...
I'm thinking about the use case for Floating IPs in a NAT-less IPv6
OpenStack environment.
I can think in two use cases in a IPv6-Only Tenant Subnet:
1- the Floating IP might be used to allocate more IPv6 address for an
Instance (since there is no plans for NAT66, I believe
Re-send again because been rejected by system.
Best Regards,
-fengqian
From: Gao, Fengqian
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:06 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: 'Devananda van der Veen'; 'jbjoh...@us.ibm.com'; Lu, Lianhao; Wang, Shane
Subject: [Ironic] A question about getting IPMI
At yahoo at least 50+ simultaneous will be the common case (maybe we are
special).
Think of what happens on www.yahoo.com say on the olympics, news.yahoo.com
could need 50+ very very quickly (especially if say a gold medal is won by
some famous person). So I wouldn't discount those being the
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
