On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 10:19 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013 3:39 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
Great
Hi Eugene, Iwamoto
You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API
compatibility reasons.
I agree with you.
I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have
different providers or not. (I think it should be same.)
Thanks
Itsuto Ofa
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:30
On 12/02/2013 05:09 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
* Process
** Project must be hosted under stackforge (and therefore use git as
its VCS)
I see that barbican is now on stackforge, but python-barbicanclient is
still on github. Is that being moved soon?
** Project must obey OpenStack
Hi,
I have failed tests in gate-solum-python33 because kesytoneclient fails to
import xmlrpclib.
The exact error is:
File
/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-solum-python33/.tox/py33/lib/python3.3/site-packages/keystoneclient/openstack/common/jsonutils.py,
line 42, in module
2013-11-28 18:27:12.655 |
Hi Jarret,
2013/12/2 Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.com
It's also pretty easy for a stackforge project to opt-in to the global
requirements sync job now too.
Are there some docs on how to do this somewhere? I added a task for us to
complete the work as part of the incubation request
In order to provide Devstack a better certificate management example, we
want to make devstack capable of calling Certmaster.
This package is in Debian, but not in Ubuntu.
For example
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/certmaster
How does one go about installing a package like this for
On 12/02/2013 06:15 PM, Adam Young wrote:
In order to provide Devstack a better certificate management example, we
want to make devstack capable of calling Certmaster.
This package is in Debian, but not in Ubuntu.
For example
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/certmaster
How does
Hi Adam and David,
Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good progress.
I have replied to your comments and also added some to support my proposal
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
David, I like your suggestion for role-def scoping
Hi Sean, David, Marc
I have one question about negative tests.
Now we are in moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/018748.html
Is it OK to consider this kind of patch(separating negative tests from
positive test file,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:46 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 12/02/2013 11:53 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
* Scope
** Project must have a clear and defined scope
This is missing
** Project should not inadvertently
Hi Vijay
I was thinking about we should store this kind of information on the keystone.
However, I changed my mind after checking keystone API.
The keystone api is very generic, so we can't provider application
specific helper method and validations on that.
The form of certificate is different
I have created a child blueprint to define scope for the minimal implementation
of the CLI to consider for milestone 1.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/cli-minimal-implementation
Spec for the minimal CLI @
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Kenichi Oomichi
oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jpwrote:
Hi Sean, David, Marc
I have one question about negative tests.
Now we are in moratorium on new negative tests in Tempest:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/018748.html
Is it OK
Hi!
In order to improve the javascript quality of Horizon, we have to change the
testing framework of the client-side. Qunit is a good tool for simple tests,
but the integration of Angular need some powerful features which are not
present in Qunit. So, I have made a little POC with the
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 12/02/2013 06:15 PM, Adam Young wrote:
In order to provide Devstack a better certificate management example, we
want to make devstack capable of calling Certmaster.
This package is in Debian, but not in Ubuntu.
For
I've been anxious to try out Barbican, but haven't had quite enough time to try
it yet. But finding out it won't work with Qpid makes it unworkable for us at
the moment. I think a large swath of the OpenStack community won't be able to
use it in this form too.
Thanks,
Kevin
On 12/02/2013 06:46 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:46 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 12/02/2013 11:53 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
* Scope
** Project must have
On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
I have created a child blueprint to define scope for the minimal
implementation of the CLI to consider for milestone 1.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/cli-minimal-implementation
Spec for the minimal CLI @
On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
I have created a child blueprint to define scope for the minimal
implementation of the CLI to consider for milestone 1.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/cli-minimal-implementation
This link doesn't work. The right one is:
On 12/02/2013 04:49 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
That is a good point. If the forklift is still talking to nova's
db then it would be significantly less duplication and i could see
doing it in the reverse order. The no-db-stuff should be done
before trying to implement cinder support so we
On 11/29/2013 10:06 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
Anyone got an update on this?
The keystone blueprint for KDS was marked approved on Tuesday:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
and a new keystone review was added on Sunday, but it must be a draft
There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a significant
portion
of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not
work with their deployed messaging architecture.
See another reply in this thread for an example of someone that sees the
inability
1) memcached based scheduler
2) Scheduler as a Service (recent email activity)
3) Instance groups
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
I've been anxious to try out Barbican, but haven't had quite enough time
to
try it yet. But finding out it won't work with Qpid makes it unworkable
for us
at the moment. I think a large swath of the OpenStack community won't be
able to use it in this form too.
As mentioned in the other
Sorry, I changed the link. We originally started with hyphenated noun-verbs but
switched to the current proposal upon receipt of advice that it would be more
compatible with the next version of the cliff based CLI for OpenStack. If I
remember correctly this advice came from Doug Hellman.
--
Hello folks,
I've created a blueprint to move over to oslo.messaging per Jarret's comments
below: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/barbican
I'd also note that out of the box barbican does not use celery in order to
simplify demo/standalone deployments...asynchronous calls simply invoke their
Hi all,
Recently, I found a bug at API layer in Cinder, but the modifications
relate to CinderClient Tempest.
So, I'm confused how to commit it. Can 'git --dependence' cross different
Repo?
Any help would be much appreciated.
Regards,
wingwj
___
Hi Daniel,
I too found the original bp a little hard to follow, so thanks for
writing up the wiki! I see that the wiki is now linked to the BP,
which is great as well.
The ability to express CPU topology constraints for the guests
has real-world use, and several drivers, including VMware, can
Dmitry,
You are correct. I made the same comment on the review before seeing this
thread. Let's see how both patches turn out and we'll choose one. :)
Thanks,
Avishay
From: Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 12/02/2013 09:32 PM
Lianhao Lu, Shuangtai Tian and I are also willing to join the team to
contribute because we are also changing scheduler, but it seems the team is
full. You can put us to the backup list.
Thanks.
--
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent:
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
