Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2015-04-14 13:13:47 -0700:
On 4/14/2015 12:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hello! There's been some recent progress on python3 compatibility for
core libraries that OpenStack depends on[1], and this is likely to open
the flood gates for even more
Excerpts from Ken Giusti's message of 2015-04-14 12:54:20 -0700:
Just to be clear: you're asking specifically about the 0-10 based
impl_qpid.py driver, correct? This is the driver that is used for
the qpid:// transport (aka rpc_backend).
I ask because I'm maintaining the AMQP 1.0 driver
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2015-04-13 14:07:28 -0700:
On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 21:06 +, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Hello,
Id like to propse a standard for consistently documenting our
diskimage-builder elements. I have pushed a review which transforms the
apt-sources element to
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-04-06 19:55:37 -0700:
Hi all
For quite some time we (Heat team) have wanted to be able to send messages
to our
users (by user I do not mean the Operator, but the User that is interacting
with the client).
What do I mean by user messages, and
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-04-07 14:06:52 -0700:
Hello,
Id like to propse a standard for consistently documenting our
diskimage-builder elements. I have pushed a review which transforms the
apt-sources element to this format[1][2]. Essentially, id like to move
in the
Excerpts from Boris Bobrov's message of 2015-04-03 18:29:08 -0700:
On Saturday 04 April 2015 03:55:59 Morgan Fainberg wrote:
I am looking forward to the Liberty cycle and seeing the special casing we
do for SQLite in our migrations (and elsewhere). My inclination is that we
should (similar
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-04-03 10:08:07 -0700:
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 04/03/2015 08:55 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
I was wondering..
Is the OpenStack CI/CD Infra using Heat in any way? Do the commits
trigger a new build of DevStack/OpenStack that is based on a
Excerpts from Lingxian Kong's message of 2015-03-23 21:11:28 -0700:
2015-03-21 23:31 GMT+08:00 Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com:
I would vote that we not make this pleasant or easy for vendors who are
wanting to add a feature to the API. As a person who uses several clouds
daily, I can
Excerpts from Russell Bryant's message of 2015-03-23 07:51:43 -0700:
On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
Excerpts from Adam Lawson's message of 2015-03-18 11:25:37 -0700:
The aim is cloud storage that isn't affected by a host failure and major
players who deploy hyper-scaling clouds architect them to prevent that from
happening. To me that's cloud 101. Physical machine goes down, data
disappears,
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-03-13 08:06:43 -0700:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-03-11 05:59:10 -0700:
=
Additional Interesting Bits
=
Rabbit
--
There was a whole session on Rabbit -
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PHL-ops-rabbit-queue
Rabbit is a top
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-03-12 10:04:57 -0700:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-03-11 05:59:10 -0700:
=
Additional Interesting Bits
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-03-12 09:59:35 -0700:
On 03/12/2015 12:47 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-03-11 05:59:10 -0700:
=
Additional Interesting Bits
=
Rabbit
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
work, even with a streamlined workflow of single-key-press-per-thread.
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these announcements being
on the
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-03-12 13:58:20 -0700:
On 2015-03-12 13:22:04 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these announcements
being on the discussion list.
[...]
The main thing I get from them is that they're being
Excerpts from David Stanek's message of 2015-03-08 11:18:05 -0700:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
can you elaborate on your reasoning that FK constraints should be used less
overall? or do you just mean that the client side should be mirroring the
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-03-09 10:26:37 -0700:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from David Stanek's message of 2015-03-08 11:18:05 -0700:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
can you elaborate on your reasoning that FK
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2015-03-09 17:26:36 -0700:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
So I think I didn't speak clearly enough here. The benchmarks are of
course needed, but there's a tipping point when write activity gets to
a certain level where it's cheaper to let
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-03-04 02:19:48 -0800:
James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:59 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
Actually, this is possible: look at Linux, it freezes for 10 weeks of a
12 month release cycle (or 6 weeks of an 8
Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2015-03-02 12:47:14 -0800:
On Mar 2, 2015, at 1:13 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote:
Stefano branched this thread from an older one to talk about
auto-abandon. In the previous thread, I believe I explained my
concerns, but since the
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-03-02 17:08:15 -0800:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:45 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:05 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
The key observations
Excerpts from Gary Kotton's message of 2015-03-01 02:32:37 -0800:
Hi,
I am just relaying pain-points that we encountered in neutron. As I have
said below it makes the development process a lot quicker for people
working on external drivers. I personally believe that it fragments the
community
I'm not sure I understand your statement Gary. If Ironic defines
what is effectively a plugin API, and the vendor drivers are careful
to utilize that API properly, the two sets of code can be released
entirely independent of one another. This is how modules work in the
kernel, X.org drivers work,
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2015-02-27 09:25:37 -0800:
On 02/27/2015 03:54 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
Maybe some of the folks in the meeting who felt more strongly that it
should be a separate document can respond with their thoughts?
I don't feel very
Excerpts from Victor Stinner's message of 2015-02-25 02:12:05 -0800:
Hi,
I also just put up another proposal to consider:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156711/
Sew over eventlet + patching with threads
My asyncio spec is unclear about WSGI, I just wrote
The spec doesn't change
Excerpts from Salvatore Orlando's message of 2015-02-23 04:07:38 -0800:
Lazy-Stacker summary:
I am doing some work on Neutron IPAM code for IP Allocation, and I need to
found whether it's better to use db locking queries (SELECT ... FOR UPDATE)
or some sort of non-blocking algorithm.
Some
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2015-02-25 10:51:00 -0800:
Hi
So a review [1] was recently submitted to cinder to fix up all of the H302
violations, and turn on the automated check for them. This is certainly a
reasonable suggestion given the number of manual reviews that -1 for
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2015-02-25 12:51:35 -0800:
Clint
This rule is not currently enabled in Cinder. This review fixes up all
cases and enables it, which is absolutely 100% the right thing to do if we
decide to implement this rule.
The purpose of this thread is to
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-02-17 08:52:46 -0800:
Excerpts from Anita Kuno's message of 2015-02-17 07:38:01 -0800:
On 02/17/2015 09:21 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
There has been a recent monumental shift in my focus around OpenStack,
and it has required me to take most of my
Excerpts from Anita Kuno's message of 2015-02-17 07:38:01 -0800:
On 02/17/2015 09:21 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
There has been a recent monumental shift in my focus around OpenStack,
and it has required me to take most of my attention off TripleO. Given
that, I don't think it is in the best
FYI: Recently HP's focus for deployment has changed, and as such, some of
the resources we had dedicated for TripleO are being redistributed. As
such, the HP CI region won't be returning to the pool (it is currently
removed due to some stability issues). Nor will we be adding region #2,
which
There has been a recent monumental shift in my focus around OpenStack,
and it has required me to take most of my attention off TripleO. Given
that, I don't think it is in the best interest of the project that I
continue as PTL for the Kilo cycle.
I'd like to suggest that we hold an immediate
Excerpts from Daniel P. Berrange's message of 2015-02-17 02:37:50 -0800:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:14:39PM +0100, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
## Cores are *NOT* special
At some point, for some reason that is unknown to me, this message
changed and the feeling of core's being some kind
Excerpts from Ed Leafe's message of 2015-02-17 10:11:01 -0800:
On Feb 17, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Shaming a person is a last resort, when that person may not listen to
reason. It's sometimes necessary to bring shame to a practice, but even
then, those who
Thanks Robert. I share most of your views on this. The project will
certainly miss your reviews. I'll go ahead and remove you from the
permissions and stats.
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-02-15 13:40:02 -0800:
Hi, I've really not been pulling my weight as a core reviewer in
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
Hi,
I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
identity_uri.
I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the
information in a single directive, which means that a script that would
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-02-12 00:13:35 -0800:
On 11/02/15 09:37 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Stefano Maffulli's message of 2015-02-11 06:14:39 -0800:
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 10:55 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
This email is dedicated to the openness of our
Excerpts from Stefano Maffulli's message of 2015-02-11 06:14:39 -0800:
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 10:55 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
This email is dedicated to the openness of our community/project.
It's good to have a reminder every now and then. Thank you Flavio for
caring enough to notice bad
Excerpts from Nikola Đipanov's message of 2015-02-11 05:26:47 -0800:
On 02/11/2015 02:13 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
If core team members start dropping off external IRC where they are
communicating across corporate boundaries, then the local tribal effects
start taking over. You get people
Excerpts from Alexander Tivelkov's message of 2015-02-10 07:28:55 -0800:
Hi folks,
One of the key features that we are adding to Glance with the
introduction of Artifacts is the ability to have multiple versions of
the same object in the repository: this gives us the possibility to
query
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-09 12:36:45 -0800:
CAS is preferred because it is measurably faster and more
obstruction-free than SELECT FOR UPDATE. A colleague of mine is almost
ready to publish documentation showing a benchmark of this that shows
nearly a 100% decrease in
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-09 10:15:10 -0800:
On 02/09/2015 01:02 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
I do not see why not to use `FOR UPDATE` even with multi-writer or
Is the retry/swap way really solves anything here.
snip
Am I missed something ?
Yes. Galera does not replicate
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-02-06 06:25:57 -0800:
On 03/02/15 14:12, Clint Byrum wrote:
The visible change in making things parallel was minimal. In talking
about convergence, it's become clear that users can and should expect
something radically different when they issue
Excerpts from Angus Lees's message of 2015-02-04 16:59:31 -0800:
On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 9:02:49 AM Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:24, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
How interesting,
Why are people using galera if it behaves like
Excerpts from Avishay Traeger's message of 2015-02-04 22:19:53 -0800:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 5 February 2015 at 10:24, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
How interesting,
Why are people using galera if it behaves
Excerpts from Tristan Cacqueray's message of 2015-02-04 09:02:19 -0800:
On 02/04/2015 06:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
What solutions do we have ?
(1) we could get our act together and audit and fix those filter
Excerpts from Daniel P. Berrange's message of 2015-02-04 03:57:53 -0800:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
The first one is performance -- each call would spawn a Python
interpreter which would then call the system command. This was fine when
there were just a
Excerpts from Matthew Booth's message of 2015-02-04 08:30:32 -0800:
* Write followed by read on a different node can return stale data
During a commit, Galera replicates a transaction out to all other db
nodes. Due to its design, Galera knows these transactions will be
successfully committed
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-02-04 13:24:20 -0800:
How interesting,
Why are people using galera if it behaves like this? :-/
Note that any true MVCC database will roll back transactions on
conflicts. One must always have a deadlock detection algorithm of
some kind.
Galera
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-02-03 02:40:44 -0800:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to choose
whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations. For some
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-02-03 10:00:44 -0800:
On 02/02/15 19:52, Steve Baker wrote:
A spec has been raised to add a config option to allow operators to
choose whether to use the new convergence engine for stack operations.
For some context you should read the spec first
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-01-29 08:41:36 -0800:
I got a question today about creating keystone users/roles/tenants in
Heat templates. We currently support creating users via the
AWS::IAM::User resource, but we don't have a native equivalent.
IIUC keystone now allows you
Excerpts from Vishvananda Ishaya's message of 2015-01-29 10:21:58 -0800:
On Jan 29, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.com wrote:
Jeremy,
I don't have exact numbers, so yeah, it's just an assumption based on
looking at the nova-api/scheduler logs with
Excerpts from Johannes Erdfelt's message of 2015-01-28 15:33:25 -0800:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
I can envision turning this driver into a total monster, adding
C-speedups where needed but without getting in the way of async
patching, adding new APIs for
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-01-27 02:46:03 -0800:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
I'm open to alternative suggestions on where the list of tags, their
definition and the list projects they apply to should live. If you
Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2015-01-25 22:10:10 -0800:
This is often mentioned as one of those items which catches every OpenStack
cloud operator at some time. It's not clear to me that there could not be a
scheduled job built into the system with a default frequency (configurable,
-offs that may or may not work well
for your site.
Excerpts from John Dewey's message of 2015-01-27 10:41:33 -0800:
This is one reason to use the memcached backend. Why replicate these tokens
in the first place.
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-01-26 12:29:37 -0800:
On 27 January 2015 at 09:01, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 01/20/2015 08:15 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 21 January 2015 at 10:21, Clark
Hello! Now that we've added James, I have some suggestions for members
that should be dropped.
I have communicated with some of these individuals and confirmed they
are not interested in continuing. So for posterity sake I'm noting
these two removals, effective immediately:
Tzu-mainn Chen
Imre
In about 24 hours we've seen 9 core +1's, one non-core +1, and only one
dissenting opinion from James himself which I think we have properly
dismissed. With my nomination counting as an additional +1, that is 10,
which is 50% of the 20 cores active the last 90 days.
I believe this vote has
Excerpts from Chuck Carlino's message of 2015-01-15 09:43:41 -0800:
On 01/15/2015 08:49 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
Clint Byrum said on Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:14:45AM -0800:
holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
and a commitment to the project that shows broad
Excerpts from James Polley's message of 2015-01-14 12:46:37 -0800:
Thanks for the nomination Clint (and +1s from people who have already
responded)
At this stage, I believe we've traditionally[1] asked[2] the potential new
Core Reviewer to commit to 3 reviews per work-day.
I don't feel
Hello! It has been a while since we expanded our review team. The
numbers aren't easy to read with recent dips caused by the summit and
holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
and a commitment to the project that shows broad awareness of the
project.
Below are the
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2015-01-09 14:57:21 -0800:
On 08/01/15 05:39, Anant Patil wrote:
1. The stack was failing when there were single disjoint resources or
just one resource in template. The graph did not include this resource
due to a minor bug in dependency_names(). I
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-08 09:37:55 -0800:
Hi all,
I'm trying to test a fedora-software-config image with some updated
components. I need:
- Install latest master os-apply-config (the commit I want isn't released)
- Install os-refresh-config fork from
Excerpts from Chris Jones's message of 2015-01-08 10:16:14 -0800:
Hi
On 8 Jan 2015, at 17:58, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-08 09:37:55 -0800:
So you can probably setup a devpi instance locally, and upload the
commits you want
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800:
Hi All,
I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I
was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the
list instead.
We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we
Happy New Year!
Just a friendly reminder to those of you who are interested in TripleO,
we have a three-day Meetup scheduled for February 18-20 in Seattle, WA.
All are welcome, though space is limited to 30 participants. Thus far we
have 8 people signed up in the etherpad:
Excerpts from Renat Akhmerov's message of 2014-12-24 03:40:22 -0800:
Hi
Ok, I'm quite happy to accept this may be a better long-term solution, but
can anyone comment on the current maturity level of Mistral? Questions
which spring to mind are:
- Is the DSL stable now?
You can
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-12-16 07:36:58 -0800:
On 16-Dec-14 00:59, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-12-15 07:15:30 -0800:
On 13-Dec-14 05:42, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
-Original Message
Excerpts from Ihar Hrachyshka's message of 2014-12-15 07:21:04 -0800:
Hash: SHA512
On 14/12/14 09:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
As I am slowing fixing all systemd issues for the daemons of
OpenStack in Debian (and hopefully, have this ready before the
freeze of Jessie), I was
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-12-15 07:15:30 -0800:
On 13-Dec-14 05:42, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 12/12/14 05:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 6:37 AM
To:
Excerpts from Ari Rubenstein's message of 2014-12-15 12:32:08 -0800:
Hi there,
I'm new to the list, and trying to get more information about the following
issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1353670
Is there anyone on the list who can explain under what conditions a user
might
I'm happy to announce we've cleared the schedule and the Mid-Cycle is
confirmed for February 18 - 20 in Seattle, WA at HP's downtown offices.
Please refer to the etherpad linked below for details including address
and instructions for access to the building.
PLEASE make sure you add yourself to
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-12-11 05:43:46 -0800:
On 12/11/2014 07:22 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
Hello everyone!
In neutron there is a rather old bug [1] about adding uniqueness for
security group name and tenant id. I found this idea reasonable and
started working on
Just FYI, we ran into a last minute scheduling conflict with the venue
and are sorting it out, so please _do not book travel yet_. Worst case
it will move to Feb 16 - 18 instead of 18 - 20.
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2014-12-01 14:58:58 -0800:
Hello! I've received confirmation that
Excerpts from Yuriy Zveryanskyy's message of 2014-12-09 04:05:03 -0800:
Good day Ironicers.
I do not want to discuss questions like Is feature X good for release
Y? or Is feature Z in Ironic scope or not?.
I want to get an answer for this: Is Ironic a flexible, easy extendable
and
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-12-09 15:25:59 -0800:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org
wrote:
On 12/09/2014 06:04 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
We already have a solution for tracking the contributor-IRC
mapping--add it to your
Excerpts from marios's message of 2014-12-04 02:40:23 -0800:
On 04/12/14 11:40, James Polley wrote:
Just taking a look at http://doodle.com/27ffgkdm5gxzr654 again - we've
had 10 people respond so far. The winning time so far is Monday 2100UTC
- 7 yes and one If I have to.
for me it
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-12-04 01:09:18 -0800:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 06:54:48PM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-12-03 18:35:15 -0800:
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 10:11 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
Lately I've been
Excerpts from Steve Kowalik's message of 2014-12-03 20:47:19 -0800:
Hi all,
I'm becoming increasingly concerned about all of the code paths
in tripleo-incubator that check $USE_IRONIC -eq 0 -- that is, use
nova-baremetal rather than Ironic. We do not check nova-bm support in
CI, haven't
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-12-04 11:12:10 -0800:
FWIW, I think the correct thing to do here is to get our Juno jobs up
and running and have one of them verify the nova-bm code paths for this
cycle, and then remove it next cycle.
That said, I have no idea how close we are to
Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2014-12-04 15:20:53 -0800:
Hello TripleOers,
I got a patch together to move us off of our upstart exec service |
logger -t service hack [1] and this got me wondering - why aren't we
using the python logging.conf supported by most OpenStack projects
Excerpts from Chris Jones's message of 2014-12-03 02:47:30 -0800:
Hi
I am very sympathetic to this view. We have a patch in hand that improves the
situation. We also have disagreement about the ideal situation.
I +2'd Ian's patch because it makes things work better than they do now. If
Excerpts from Dan Prince's message of 2014-12-03 18:35:15 -0800:
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 10:11 +, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi all,
Lately I've been spending more time looking at tripleo and doing some
reviews. I'm particularly interested in helping the no-mergepy and
subsequent
Excerpts from Danny Choi (dannchoi)'s message of 2014-12-02 08:34:07 -0800:
Hi Andrea,
Though both interfaces come up, only one will response to the ping from the
neutron router.
When I disable it, then the second one will response to ping.
So it looks like only one interface is useful at
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-12-02 10:37:31 -0800:
Yes, that's the synchronization block for which we use the stack lock.
Currently, a thread spin waits to acquire the lock to enter this critical
section.
I don't really know how to do application level transaction. Is there an
Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2014-12-02 11:22:31 -0800:
On 12/02/2014 03:46 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
1) Conform all o-r-c scripts to the logging standards we have in
OpenStack, or write new standards for diskimage-builder and conform
them to those standards. Abolish non-conditional
Excerpts from Anant Patil's message of 2014-11-30 23:02:29 -0800:
On 27-Nov-14 18:03, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi Zane,
At this stage our implementation (as mentioned in wiki
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/ConvergenceDesign) achieves your
design goals.
1.
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-11-28 11:27:20 -0800:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sullivan, Jon Paul
jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com]
Sent: 26 November 2014 17:03
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-11-19 10:05:35 -0800:
On Nov 18, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi neutron folks,
There is an ongoing effort to refactor some neutron DB logic to be
compatible with galera/mysql which doesn't support
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-11-17 08:46:19 -0800:
Greetings,
Regardless of how big/small bugs backlog is for each project, I
believe this is a common, annoying and difficult problem. At the oslo
meeting today, we're talking about how to address our bug triage
process and
Excerpts from Chris Jones's message of 2014-11-14 00:42:48 -0800:
Hi
My thoughts:
Shoe-horning the ephemeral partition into Cinder seems like a lot of pain for
almost no gain[1]. The only gain I can think of would be that we could bring
a node down, boot it into a special ramdisk that
Excerpts from Samuel Merritt's message of 2014-11-14 10:06:53 -0800:
On 11/13/14, 10:19 PM, Sachin Goswami wrote:
In OpenStack Swift - xfs file system is integrated which provides a
maximum file system size of 8 exbibytes minus one byte (263-1 bytes).
Not exactly. The Swift storage nodes
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 05:54:03 -0800:
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions
over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack lifecycle will be
controlled by
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 00:45:07 -0800:
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow in heat (or at least
concept [1]) 'to many code change'.
Both seem like change of similar levels ;-)
I've tried a few times to dive into refactoring
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 09:55:43 -0800:
On 13/11/14 09:58, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 05:54:03 -0800:
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending
Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-11-13 15:20:47 -0800:
On 11/10/2014 05:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:45:02AM +, Derek Higgins wrote:
Tl;dr oslo.config wasn't logging warnings about deprecated config
options, do we need to support them for another
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 14:01:14 -0800:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 00:45:07 -0800:
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow in heat
501 - 600 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
