Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][NFS] Inexplicable utime permission denied when launching instance

PS. Don't forget that if you change or disable AppArmor you will have to reboot the host so the kernel gets reloaded. Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 09:40, Erlon Cruz escreveu: > I think that there's a change that AppArmor is blocking the access. Have > you checked the dmesg messages r

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][NFS] Inexplicable utime permission denied when launching instance

I think that there's a change that AppArmor is blocking the access. Have you checked the dmesg messages related with apparmor? Em sex, 19 de out de 2018 às 09:38, Neil Jerram escreveu: > Wracking my brains over this one, would appreciate any pointers... > > Setup: Small test deployment with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [horizon][nova][cinder][keystone][glance][neutron][swift] Horizon feature gaps

Theres also this document with very detailed information: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ZtWC75BNCwFqLfFpCGGJ9uPVBvUXX0xuXP1yYG0NDA/edit#gid=0 Erlon Em qui, 18 de out de 2018 às 10:30, Jay S Bryant escreveu: > > > On 10/18/2018 7:21 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

Hey Amit, Welcome! Em ter, 9 de out de 2018 às 16:52, Tom Barron escreveu: > On 02/10/18 13:58 -0400, Tom Barron wrote: > >Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last > >couple of cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila > >core. > > > >Please respond with your +1 or

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][qa] Enabling online volume_extend tests by default

Hi Ghanshyam, Though I have concern over running those tests by default(making config > options True by default), because it is not confirmed all cinder backends > implements this functionality and it only works for nova libvirt driver. We > need to keep config options default as False and

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Do we need a "force" parameter in cinder "re-image" API?

If you are planning to re-image an image on a bootable volume then yes you should use a force parameter. I have lost the discussion about this on PTG. What is the main use cases? This seems to me something that could be leveraged with the current revert-to-snapshot API, which would be even better.

[openstack-dev] [cinder][qa] Enabling online volume_extend tests by default

Hey folks, Following up on the discussions that we had on the Denver PTG, the Cinder team is planning to enable online volume_extend tests[1] to be run by default. Currently, those tests are only run by some CI systems and infra jobs that explicitly set it to be so. We are also adding a negative

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

Em seg, 1 de out de 2018 às 05:26, Balázs Gibizer < balazs.gibi...@ericsson.com> escreveu: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check > > and gate queues. The job was added in Queens and was a specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

I don't know if our workflow supports this, but it would be nice to have a place to place cross-projec changes like that (something like, openstack-cross-projects-specs), and use that as a initial point for high level discussions. But for now, you can start creating specs for the projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg][cinder] Stein PTG Summary Page Ready ...

Thanks Jay! Em qua, 19 de set de 2018 às 06:53, Gorka Eguileor escreveu: > On 18/09, Jay S Bryant wrote: > > Team, > > > > I have put together the following page with a summary of all our > discussions > > at the PTG: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderSteinPTGSummary > > > > Please review

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Proper behavior for os-force_detach

volume attachment. > > Walt > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:02 AM, Gorka Eguileor > wrote: > >> On 17/07, Sean McGinnis wrote: >> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 04:06:29PM -0300, Erlon Cruz wrote: >> > > Hi Cinder and Nova folks, >> > > >>

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Proper behavior for os-force_detach

Hi Cinder and Nova folks, Working on some tests for our drivers, I stumbled upon this tempest test 'force_detach_volume' that is calling Cinder API passing a 'None' connector. At the time this was added several CIs went down, and people started discussing whether this (accepting/sending a None

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Planning Etherpad for Denver 2018 PTG

Thanks Jay! Em sex, 6 de jul de 2018 às 14:30, Jay S Bryant escreveu: > All, > > I have created an etherpad to start planning for the Denver PTG in > September. [1] Please start adding topics to the etherpad. > > Look forward to seeing you all there! > > Jay > > (jungleboyj) > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTG] Updates!

+1 on the game night! Reserve a room only for that :) Em qua, 20 de jun de 2018 às 15:25, Kendall Nelson escreveu: > Hello Everyone! > > Wanted to give you some updates on PTG4 planning. We have finalized the > list of SIGs/ Groups/WGs/Teams that are attending. They are as follows: > >- > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] backups need reserved space for LVM snapshots: do we have it implemented already?

Goirand escreveu: > On 06/14/2018 01:10 PM, Erlon Cruz wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > The reserved_percentage *is* taken in account for non thin provisoning > > backends. So you can use it to spare the space you need for backups. It > > is a per backend configur

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] backups need reserved space for LVM snapshots: do we have it implemented already?

Hi Thomas, The reserved_percentage *is* taken in account for non thin provisoning backends. So you can use it to spare the space you need for backups. It is a per backend configuration. If you have already tried to used it and that is not working, please let us know what release you are using,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] cinder-api image doesn't run as a cinder user.

2683/6/specs/liberty/non-eventlet-wsgi-app.rst > > Regards > > 2018-06-11 14:36 GMT+02:00 Erlon Cruz : > >> Hi Eduardo, >> >> Just for curiosity, do you know the motivation why many OS services were >> moved to run on apache instead of just listen? Any reference a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] cinder-api image doesn't run as a cinder user.

Hi Eduardo, Just for curiosity, do you know the motivation why many OS services were moved to run on apache instead of just listen? Any reference about that? Erlon Em seg, 11 de jun de 2018 às 06:02, Eduardo Gonzalez escreveu: > Hi, > > From Pike cinder-api only runs as a wsgi process and

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ptg] PTG Summary Now Available ...

Thanks Jay, that helps a lot! 2018-03-06 18:46 GMT-03:00 Ivan Kolodyazhny : > Jay, thanks a lot for this great summary! > > Regards, > Ivan Kolodyazhny, > http://blog.e0ne.info/ > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Jay S Bryant > wrote: > >> Team, >> >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][summit] Forum topic proposal etherpad created ...

I think I missed something about this. By Forum you mean Summit? Will that happen during the Vancouver Summit right? Will the forum be something similar to PTG? What is the target public? Operators, users admin? Erlon 2018-03-08 14:52 GMT-03:00 Jay S Bryant : > All, > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][cinder]Question about cinder as glance store

That will depend on the Cinder/OS-brick iscsiadm versions right? Can you tell what are the versions from where the problem was fixed? Erlon 2018-02-07 8:27 GMT-02:00 Gorka Eguileor : > On 07/02, Rikimaru Honjo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm planning to use cinder as glance

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Deprecation of Kaminario and Pure automatic calculation for max_over_subscription_ratio

Folks, In the Queens release, Cinder has implemented an internal mechanism to automatically calculate the max_over_subscription_ratio[1]. As Kaminario and Pure drivers already have a config option and are doing that internally, we kindly recommend that the driver maintainers deprecate those

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Leaving the Cinder Core team

Hey Scott, Very sorry too, to see you go. My best wishes in your new position. Erlon 2017-12-11 18:00 GMT-02:00 Jay S Bryant : > Scott, > > Very sorry to have you go. Thank you for letting us know that you won't > be able to continue participating. It has been a

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][3rd-party ci] Voting INSPUR-CI

Do you have the patch link? I don't see any report of it[1]. [1] http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project?project=cinder=7+days On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: > You can do it in your Zuul layout.yaml configuration file > > > > Ex: > > - name:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Project mascot available

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Walter Boring wrote: > How does Horse translate to Cinder block? > I don't get it. Our original Cinder block made a lot of sense, > considering the name of the project. > > > Horses uses horseshoes, which were created due the needs of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Cinder with remote LVM proposal

Hi Marco, What you are proposing is almost like to create an LVM storage box. I haven't seen any real benefit from the advantages you listed. For 1), the same problems you can have upgrading the services within the same node will happen if the LVM services are not in the same host. For, 2), now

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] [infra] Proposed new Cinder gate jobs

Thanks for giving this review Michal. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-01-19 11:10, Michal Dulko wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've seen some confusion around new Cinder CI jobs being proposed to > > project-config in yesterday's IRC scrollback. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Does cinder use novaclient?

Hi Jane, there is also some other uses, I know. In migration[1] when Cinder needs to migrate an attached volume, in some remotefs drivers [2], when Cinder needs to take a snapshot of an attached volume. Both seems to work fine with me. [1] http://bit.ly/2i6m1Pb [2] http://bit.ly/2i6m3GM On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Cloudbyte driver as unsupported

Hmm, nice! Thanks! On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 08:27:52AM -0200, Erlon Cruz wrote: > > Hi Sean, what is the command to generate this output? > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Sean McGi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Marking Cloudbyte driver as unsupported

Hi Sean, what is the command to generate this output? On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Checking name: CloudByte CI > last seen: 2016-09-27 11:49:45 (80 days, 5:38:50 old) > last success: 2016-09-27 11:49:45 (80 days, 5:38:30 old) > success rate: 72%

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

Kevin, Now that you had a first feedback about the idea, as Jay said, the next steps is to write a blueprint/spec so other folks in Cinder can better understand/suggest/vote on what you are proposing. Erlon On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > So

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] How to retrieve volume_driver

Hi Luzasz, This information (volume_driver) is only used on driver loading so, its not available outside Cinder context. Can you tell how and why you need that? And why parsing the conf file is not enough for you? Erlon On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:05 AM, wrote: > Dear all. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] Proposal to make multinode grenade job voting

+1 It seems good! On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Michał Dulko wrote: > On 09/29/2016 12:10 PM, Michał Dulko wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > We have a non-voting multinode grenade job in check queue for around a > > month now. > > > > https://goo.gl/Kr10s6 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

eason why you can't use the first approach? > The idea here is that all the volumes uses local disks. > I was wondering if we already have such a plan after the Resource Provider > structure has accomplished? > > Thanks > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Erlon Cruz <sombra

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

Not sure exactly what you mean, but in Cinder using the InstanceLocalityFilter[1], you can schedule a volume to the same compute node the instance is located. Is this what you need? [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/cinder/scheduler-filters.html#instancelocalityfilter On Fri, Sep 23, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] moving driver to open source

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Alon Marx wrote: > > Thank you ALL for clearing up this issue. > > > > To sum up the discussion (not going into too many details): > > From legal stand point, if one uses python libraries they should be part > > of

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The State of the NFS Driver ...

Hi Jay, Thanks for the update. I can give a look in the NFS job, it will need some care, like configuring the slave to be a Ubuntu Xenial and setting apparmor, so when you finish the cloning support we have an operational job. Erlon On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jay S. Bryant <

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][cinder] Clone feature toggle not in clone tests

He is mentioning about the Cinder side: https://review.openstack.org/# /c/147186/ On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Ben Swartzlander > wrote: > >> Originally the NFS driver did

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][cinder] Clone feature toggle not in clone tests

Hi Jordan, Slade, Currently NFS driver does not support cloning neither snapshots (which are the base for implementing cloning). AFAIC, the NFS driver was in Cinder before the minimum requirements being discussed and set, so, it just stood there with the features it already supported. There is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Scality volume driver

Hi sean, I think it would worth to CC the contact info informed in the CI Wiki (openstack...@scality.com). On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Tomorrow is the one week grace period. I just ran the last comment > script and it still shows it's been 112

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Midcycle Action item Summary

Thanks for the sum up Kendall! On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello All, > >We came out of the Midcycle with a lot of things on a lot of people’s > plates. Here is a summary of what everyone signed up for and what things > need owners. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Scott D'Angelo to Cinder core

+1 Not a core but surely is well deserved. Congrats Scott!! On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > > +2 > > Congrats Scott!! > > > On 27/06, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > I would like to nominate Scott D'Angelo to core. Scott has been very > > involved in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]The backend-group concept in Cinder

You can define several backends with the same volume_backend_name and call that a group. For example: [groupA-be1] volume_backend_name=fast-ssd [groupA-be2] volume_backend_name=fast-ssd [groupB-be3] volume_backend_name=slow-disk So, no matter what storage is behind every backend, it will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] A friendly reminder about reviews

Cinder is definitely lacking reviewing force. I remember 2 years ago comparing with today and I can tell that patches are taking a lot longer to get reviewed. This link is also very useful to triage incoming patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project:^openstack/.*cinder.*

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Cinder Datasource

Can you give a bit more of context? Where is the design you mentioned? By datasource you mean the Cinder service? There is already some work[1] to allow Cider to attach volumes in baremetal servers. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/use-cinder-without-nova On Tue, Apr 12, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About snapshot Rollback?

gt; > If you can solve the backwards compatibility problem mentioned further up > this thread, then I think there's a strong case for considering adding this > API. > > The next step is a spec and a PoC implementation. > > > > On 11 April 2016 at 20:57, Erlon Cruz <sombra...@gma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About snapshot Rollback?

t; > At that point, the device naming problems are identical. > > On 11 April 2016 at 20:22, Erlon Cruz <sombra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The actual user workflow is: >> >> 1 - User creates a volume(s) >> 2 - User attach volume to instance >> 3 -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About snapshot Rollback?

group and >> etc,we will spend some time to gather >> >> the user's scenarios and determin what to do next step. >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> zongliang chen >> >> >> >> *发件人:* Erlon Cruz [mailto:sombra...@gmail.com] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About snapshot Rollback?

Hi Chen, Not sure if I got you right but I brought this topic in #openstack-cinder some days ago. The idea is to be able to rollback a snapshot in Cinder. Today what is possible to do is to create a volume from a snapshot. From the user point of view, this is not ideal, as there are several

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Nominate Rodrigo Barbieri for core reviewer team

+1 Great addition. I'm not active in Manila, but we work in the same team in our company and I see he is doing a great work! Well deserved! On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Valeriy Ponomaryov wrote: > Rodrigo is the first person in queue for taking such responsibility.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] whether the ServiceGroup in Cinder is necessary

, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Michał Dulko <michal.du...@intel.com> wrote: > On 12/22/2015 01:29 PM, Erlon Cruz wrote: > > Hi Li, > > > > Can you give a quick background on servicegroups (or links to. The > > spec you linked only describe the process on Nova to change from what

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Manila] Will NFS stay with Cinder as a reference implementation?

Hi Vincent, Just to complement what Mike and Gorka said, Cinder NFS drivers does not provision FS services. It 'consumes' a FS export, and provisions block storage. To be more detailed, the Cinder NFS backend, mount a remote share from a NFS server, and create/stores the cinder volumes as files

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][all] New third-party-ci testing requirements for OpenStack Compatible mark

Hi Cris, There are some questions that came to my mind. Cinder has near zero tolerance to backends that does not have a CI running. So, can one assume that all drivers in Cinder will have the "OpenStack Compatible" seal? When you say that the driver have to 'pass' the integration tests, what

Re: [openstack-dev] [CINDER] [PTL Candidates] Questions

John, Thanks for the questions, it Ill really help me to make a the best choice. I hadn't pondered the first question . +1 to make those and other if suggest part of the candidate proposal. Erlon On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > Hi John. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Restrict volume creation based on type

Hi Eduard, What extra_specs do you configured in this volume_type? Yes you can force a volume to an specific node, or backend. You must configure the volume_backend_name on cinder.conf, and add an extra spec volume_backend_name='same_as_in_cinder_conf' on the volume type you created. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is there any way to put the driver backend error message to the horizon

begin with the “wrapper around the python-cinderclient” as George Peristerakis suggested. *发件人:* Erlon Cruz [mailto:sombra...@gmail.com] *发送时间:* 2015年4月27日 20:07 *收件人:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *抄送:* Luozhen; Fanyaohong *主题:* Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is there any way to put the driver backend error message to the horizon

Alex, Any scratch of the solution you plan to propose? On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM, liuxinguo liuxin...@huawei.com wrote: Thanks for your suggestion, George. But when I looked into python-cinderclient (not very deep), I can not find the “wrapper around the python-cinderclient” you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] cinder support matrix, chap support?

Yes On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Jordan Pittier jordan.pitt...@scality.com wrote: Hi, Isn't CHAP iscsi-specific ? Jordan On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote: Hi, Recently I have been curious as to which Cinder drivers support authentication. It

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack live migration using devstack

Had the same error, but with cinder. Did you find find out something about this error? 2015-04-17 14:12:31.957 TRACE cinder Traceback (most recent call last): 2015-04-17 14:12:31.957 TRACE cinder File /usr/local/bin/cinder-volume, line 10, in module 2015-04-17

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is there any way to put the driver backend error message to the horizon

I like Duncan's idea. To have a dash in horizon where admin can see error events. It can hide backend details from tenants and would save the time of browsing through logs seeking for the operations that caused errors (the request id also should be logged in the metadata to allow further

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Deadline For Volume Drivers to Be Readded

Hi Mike, The majority of the CIs don't run all 304 tests mostly because of these tempest problems. I remember there was a list in the Thirdparty CI Wiki with the common tests that used to fails to everyone, or at least most of people. IMO its better to have a more consistent CI than CIs with

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] All Cinder Volume Drivers Must Have A Third Party CI by March 19, 2014

Mike, for HDS and Hitachi, the contact person is the same: openstackdevelopm...@hds.com. Also, we have 5 drivers: - HDS HNAS NFS - HDS HNAS iSCSI - HBSD FC - HBSD iSCSI - HDS HUS This last one, HDS HUS, is deprecated by HBSD drivers and won't be maintained, so you can add it in the removal list.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us (HUSDriver) that is not maintained and also should be deprecated/removed. Liu, the best argument here would be a report from your CI in this patch

Re: [openstack-dev] Driver documentation for Kilo [cinder] [neutron] [nova] [trove]

Ok, thanks Anne! On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Erlon Cruz sombra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anne, Thanks for the quick answer. One thing that still not clear for me is about the documentation

Re: [openstack-dev] Driver documentation for Kilo [cinder] [neutron] [nova] [trove]

Hi Anne, How about driver documentation that is in the old format? Will it be removed in Kilo? The wiki says: Bring all driver sections that are currently just ‘bare bones’ up to the standard mentioned. Will this be performed by core team? Thanks, Erlon On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Anne

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] 3rd Party CI failures ignored, caused driver to break

Agreed, CI systems are not reliable. Most of failures are related to mis-configuration or devstack problems, not driver problems itself. What happen then, is that people just don't care if there's a red FAILURE in the CIs results. A 4) option would be to rate CIs according to their trustfulness

Re: [openstack-dev] Driver documentation for Kilo [cinder] [neutron] [nova] [trove]

...@justwriteclick.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Erlon Cruz sombra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anne, How about driver documentation that is in the old format? Will it be removed in Kilo? Hi Erlon, The spec doesn't have a specific person assigned for removal, and the only drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Etherpad for volume replication created ...

Do you have the log of the discussion as well? On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de wrote: Hi Jay, do you have a link to the etherpad? Danny Am 13.02.2015 um 05:54 schrieb Jay S. Bryant: All, Several members of the Cinder team and I were discussing

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K-2 Review-a-thon

Hi Mike, There is 2 features[1][2][3] of HNAS driver that still are not approved/targeted. Is there anything missing to then to be approved? Erlon [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/hds-hnas-ssh-backend [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/hds-hnas-pool-aware-sched

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

room during the Cinder meeting. Read discussion logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-14-16.00.log.html#l-21 /snip On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 09:03 Mon 12 Jan , Erlon Cruz wrote: Hi guys, Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Testi ng_requirements_for_Kilo_release_and_beyond Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Erlon Cruz sombra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, hi cinder core devs, I have read on IRC discussions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

-dev/2014-October/049512.html [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Testing_requirements_for_Kilo_release_and_beyond Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Erlon Cruz sombra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, hi cinder core devs, I have read on IRC

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

Hi all, hi cinder core devs, I have read on IRC discussions about a deadline for drivers vendors to have their CI running and voting until kilo-2, but I didn't find any post on this list to confirm this. Can anyone confirm this? Thanks, Erlon ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] how to delete a volume which is in error_deleting state

This is usually is related to mis-configuration on the backend driver. For example, if you create a volume, shutdown the driver to change some configuration, the backend driver can get confused while trying to delete the volume or even can't be able to locate the volume in the storage array. S On

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder driver] A question about Kilo merge point

Hi, Yes, I think that the changes of being merged after K1 are few. Check this docs with the priority list that the core team are working on: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-kilo-priorities Erlon On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:40 AM, liuxinguo liuxin...@huawei.com wrote: If a cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [Third-party] Voting for new Third-party CI weekly IRC meeting time

Both are fine, but A is better. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Kurt Taylor kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com wrote: So far it looks like we have centered around 2 options: Option A 1200 and 2200 UTC Option D 1500 and 0400 UTC There is still time to pick your best time. Please vote at

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party]Time for Additional Meeting for third-party

I agree that 2 meetings per week will mess things up. 1+ for alternating meetings. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Kurt Taylor kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com wrote: In my opinion, further discussion is needed. The proposal on the table is to have 2 weekly meetings, one at the existing time of 1800UTC

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party] [infra] New mailing lists for third party announcements and account requests

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On Fri 29 Aug 2014 12:47:00 PM PDT, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: Third-party-request This list is the new place to request the creation or modification of your third party account. Note that old requests sent to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

Leave the option about when to submit a design vs. when to submit code to the contributor. That's is what is being done so far right? Hard to know (mainly if you are a first contributor) when a change is big or not. I can see lots of patches being submitted without the spec getting rejected

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Review days? (open to ANYBODY and EVERYBODY)

Great John, I'll push fellows here to help. Couldn't join today but I'll put in my schedule for the next weeks. Do you plan to do this review force every Wednesday? Erlon On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Kerr, Andrew andrew.k...@netapp.com wrote: +1 Andrew Kerr On 6/13/14, 10:30 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required

Hi Asselin, Do you had problems with other ports? Is it need to have outbound access to other ports? Erlon On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote: All, I’ve been working on setting up our Cinder 3rd party CI setup. I ran into an issue where Zuul

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Third-Party CI Issue: direct access to review.openstack.org port 29418 required

Ok thanks. On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote: As far as I know, that’s the only non-standard port that needs to be opened in order to do 3rd party ci. Ramy *From:* Erlon Cruz [mailto:sombra...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2014 4:03 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Unit-test] Cinder Driver

Hi Yogesh, The best way to start writing tests is to get some examples from tests already implemented. Since icehouse release, all tests must be written with mock¹. Most of the tests on the codebase are written with the old framework (mox), please have a look on this implementations: