: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
Thank you for the feedback Flavio and Gary!
I've noted down your concerns and will address them in a separate thread. So, I
think we'd go ahead with nominations mentioned here (by Monday) and start the
core-member discussion later.
Thanks,
-Nikhil
: Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com
Sent: Sunday, March 8, 2015 11:45 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
On 3/8/15, 2:34 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/03/15 23:16 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote
7:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
I like the idea of a 'core-member'. But, how are core-members different from
core-reviewers? For instance, with core-reviewers it is very clear that these
are folks you
: Hemanth Makkapati hemanth.makkap...@rackspace.com
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
I like the idea of a 'core-member'. But, how are core-members different
from
core-reviewers
, at least for the time being!
Cheers
-Nikhil
From: Hemanth Makkapati hemanth.makkap...@rackspace.com
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 7:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
I
.
-Hemanth.
From: Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 4:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
Thank you all for the input outside of the program
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com
wrote:
I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s guidelines?
FYI, the core reviewer guidelines for Neutron are in-tree now [1], along
with all of our other policies around operating in Neutron [2].
I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s guidelines?
On 3/5/15, 17:38, Mikhail Fedosin mfedo...@mirantis.com wrote:
I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called
Glance Review Guidelines
rotation in the following weeks.
Hope it works!
Regards,
-Nikhil
From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:45 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations
: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:45 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ian Cordasco
ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote:
I like that idea. Can you start it out with Nova or Neutron’s
for taking care of this,
Flavio
Regards,
-Nikhil
From: Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 12:45 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
On Fri
I think yes, it does. But I mean that now we're writing a document called
Glance Review Guidelines
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Iia0BjQoXvry9XSbf30DRwQt--ODglw-ZTT_5RJabsI/edit?usp=sharing
and it has a section For cores. It's easy to include some concrete rules
there to add more clarity.
On 3/4/15 11:31 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I personally don't think adding new cores without cleaning up that
list is something healthy for our community, which is what we're
trying to improve here. Therefore I'm still -2-W on adding new folks
without removing
Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
I personally don't think adding new cores without cleaning up that
list is something healthy for our community, which is what we're
trying to improve here. Therefore I'm still -2-W on adding new folks
without removing non-active core members.
It's also *extremely*
Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have official
rules for that:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam
where it says: A member of the team may be removed at any time by the PTL.
This is typically due to a drop off of involvement by the member such that
they are no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/05/2015 11:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have
official rules for that:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam where it says: A
member of the team may be removed at any time by
-Original Message-
From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:09 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
On 03/03/15 16:10 +, Nikhil Komawar
: Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:48 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
Berrange
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
Nikhil,
If I recall correctly this matter was discussed last time
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:38:42AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I'm sorry but no. I don't think there's anything that requires extra
patience than 2 (or even more) cycles without provaiding reviews or
even any kind of active contribution.
I personally don't think adding new cores without
From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:10 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
Berrange
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
If it was not clear in my
kuv...@hp.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:48 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P.
Berrange
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
Nikhil,
If I recall correctly this matter was discussed last time at the start
From: Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:48 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel
P. Berrange
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
Nikhil,
If I recall correctly
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
+1 on both proposals: rotation is definitely a step in right direction.
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.commailto:berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24
From: Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 7:26 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Cc: krag...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
+1 on both
24 matches
Mail list logo
