On 09/04/2014 07:42 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something.
.. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing
here, not the place really.
However, I do think it
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it, and as per [1] cores can sponsor their own FFEs so that's 3.
N.
[1]
On 09/05/2014 04:48 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Quick response as not to hijack the thread:
I think we all agree on the benefits of having resources you can turn
off and on at will.
I don't agree at all. There's no cost whatsoever in turning on a
resource. It doesn't need to be extensible.
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:20:14PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it,
On 09/05/2014 11:20 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 5 September 2014 13:59, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Since this did not get an 'Approved' as of yet, I want to make sure that
this is not because the number of sponsors. 2 core members have already
sponsored it, and as per [1] cores
For better or for worse we have already merged about half of the
patches for this series, so I think stopping now because of concerns
about CI is pretty arbitrary. I do think Sean's point about scheduler
tests outside of tempest is valid though and I'd like to see it
reflected in the review
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the
gate race.
Rejecting it makes little sense really, as it
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the
gate
On 09/04/2014 12:58 PM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been approved in time and just lost the
gate
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some reasons why we may want to grant it:
First of all all patches have been
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some
On 09/04/2014 09:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at
On 9/4/14, 4:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 09/04/2014 09:21 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the
On 4 September 2014 14:07, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the subject (find
specs at [1] and outstanding changes at [2]).
Some
On 09/04/2014 04:51 PM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
On 4 September 2014 14:07, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/04/2014 02:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 09/04/2014 07:58 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hi team,
I am requesting the exception for the feature from the
-Original Message-
From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:22 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][FFE] Feature freeze exception for virt-
driver-numa-placement
On 09/04/2014 04:51 PM, Murray
Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something.
.. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing
here, not the place really.
However, I do think it is very harmful to respond to FFE request with
such blanket statements and generalizations,
18 matches
Mail list logo