On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/24/2014 03:11 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Dan Smith wrote:
3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in
cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?.
After some
On 11/13/2014 01:12 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 11 November 2014 13:30, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all
I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the
outcomes and what the next steps for the versioned objects session are.
1. There is a lot of
3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in
cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?.
After some discussion with some of the interested parties, we're
planning to add a third .z element to the version numbers and use that
to handle
Dan Smith wrote:
3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in
cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?.
After some discussion with some of the interested parties, we're
planning to add a third .z element to the version numbers and use
On 11/24/2014 03:11 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Dan Smith wrote:
3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in
cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?.
After some discussion with some of the interested parties, we're
planning to add a third
On Nov 24, 2014, at 13:06, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
That said, I don't think it's wise to make oslo-versionedobjects be a totally
new thing. I think we should use nova.objects as the base of a new
oslo-versionedobjects library, and we should evolve oslo-versionedobjects
slowly
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/24/2014 03:11 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Dan Smith wrote:
3. vish brought up one draw back of versioned objects: the difficulty in
cherry picking commits for stable branches - Is this a show stopper?.
After some
On 11 November 2014 13:30, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all
I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the
outcomes and what the next steps for the versioned objects session are.
1. There is a lot of interest in other projects using oslo versioned
, 2014 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Versioned objects cross project sessions
next steps
On 11 November 2014 13:30, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all
I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the
outcomes and what the next steps
On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all
I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the
outcomes and what the next steps for the versioned objects session are.
1. There is a lot of interest in other projects using oslo
Hi all
I just wanted to make sure we are all under the same understanding of the
outcomes and what the next steps for the versioned objects session are.
1. There is a lot of interest in other projects using oslo versioned
objects and it is worth progressing with this (
11 matches
Mail list logo
