Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

uot; mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 12:19 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi Miguel, Both time slot

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Muguel: Either works for me. Carol From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:49 AM To: Miguel Ángel Ajo Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Miguel, Voting for timeslot: b. Thanks Vikram From: Sandhya Dasu (sadasu) [mailto:sad...@cisco.com] Sent: 07 April 2015 21:49 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting Hi Miguel, Both time slots work

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

esday, April 7, 2015 1:45 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: On Mon, Apr

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 7, 2015, at 11:05 , Veiga, Anthony mailto:anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com>> wrote: On Apr 7, 2015, at 10:50 , Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi Anthony, nice to hear about it! :) Is the implementation available somewhere?, Yes, it’s been posted on github[

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 7, 2015, at 10:50 , Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: Hi Anthony, nice to hear about it! :) Is the implementation available somewhere?, Yes, it’s been posted on github[1]. IMHO, the design should be what’s best for the whole neutron project looking into futur

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Anthony, nice to hear about it! :) Is the implementation available somewhere?, IMHO, the design should be what’s best for the whole neutron project looking into future extension of the design, by this I mean that we should not influence the design by what was already designed D/S, *but*,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Raghunath, feel free to look at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings and suggest other timeslots with a free meeting room, this is a very wide community, and it’s impossible to get a timeslot in everybody working hours. Please note that option

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Apr 6, 2015, at 11:56 , Miguel Ángel Ajo mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, Sean has been leading this effort [1] and we believe we should get into a c

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi  Miguel, I am interested to join this meeting. I assume that CC of this mail are from different time zones.Please provide time slot with common time zone. With Best Regards Raghunath Dudyala Tata Consultancy Services Limited Mailto: raghunat...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com _

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

Hi Miguel, Thank you for leading this. On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando > wrote: > > > > On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 6 April 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

> On Apr 6, 2015, at 10:45 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando > > wrote: >> >> >> On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. > > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Tuesday, 7 de April de 2015 at 3:14, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando (mailto:sorla...@nicira.com)> wrote: > > > > > > On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. > (mailto:arma...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > > On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. wrote: > >> >> On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: >> >>> I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, >>> >>> In the last few years, the interest for Qo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On 7 April 2015 at 00:33, Armando M. wrote: > > On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > >> I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, >> >> In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, >> Sean has been leading >> this effort [1] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

On 6 April 2015 at 08:56, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, > > In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, > Sean has been leading > this effort [1] and we believe we should get into a consensus about how to

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [QoS] QoS weekly meeting

I’d like to co-organized a QoS weekly meeting with Sean M. Collins, In the last few years, the interest for QoS support has increased, Sean has been leading this effort [1] and we believe we should get into a consensus about how to model an extension to let vendor plugins implement QoS capab

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit I have reserved the 2:35 slot for Friday. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-kilo-meetup-slots -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

I have reserved the 2:35 slot for Friday. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-kilo-meetup-slots -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

Hi, +1 thanks On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > I believe "Déjà vu" is an appropriate term here. :-) > > Count me in. > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Collins, Sean > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If there is interest, I can >> schedule

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

I believe "Déjà vu" is an appropriate term here. :-) Count me in. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If there is interest, I can > schedule a time to talk about the QoS API extension. > > -- >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit Hi, Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If there is interest, I can schedule a time to talk about the QoS API extension. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Pod time at Paris Summit

Hi, Like Atlanta, I will be at the summit. If there is interest, I can schedule a time to talk about the QoS API extension. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

m: Carlino, Chuck [mailto:chuck.carl...@hp.com<http://hp.com>] Sent: 19 September 2014 04:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota When you say 'associate to VMs', that would be associat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

t for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota > > Sorry, forgot to include a link. > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-qos-api > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > > Well there is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

e >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: Carlino, Chuck [mailto:chuck.carl...@hp.com] >>>> Sent: 19 September 2014 04:52 >>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Subject: Re: [openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

teresting! Are hp or community working to implement it? >> >> Giuseppe >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Carlino, Chuck [mailto:chuck.carl...@hp.com] >>> Sent: 19 September 2014 04:52 >>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage question

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

ember 2014 04:52 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota >> >> When you say 'associate to VMs', that would be associating to neutron > ports, >> right? If so,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

define to keep > track the network resources. > > Giuseppe > > From: Veiga, Anthony > [mailto:anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com<http://cable.comcast.com>] > Sent: 10 September 2014 15:11 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota Using the quota system would be a nice option to have. Can you clarify what you mean by cumulative bandwidth for the tenant? It would be possible to rate limit at the tenant router, but having a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

Stack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota Using the quota system would be a nice option to have. Can you clarify what you mean by cumulative bandwidth for the tenant? It would be possible to rate limit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

Using the quota system would be a nice option to have. Can you clarify what you mean by cumulative bandwidth for the tenant? It would be possible to rate limit at the tenant router, but having a cumulative limit enforced inside of a tenant would be difficult. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:03 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

Using the quota system would be a nice option to have. Can you clarify what you mean by cumulative bandwidth for the tenant? It would be possible to rate limit at the tenant router, but having a cumulative limit enforced inside of a tenant would be difficult. On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Gius

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Applying QoS as Quota

Hello everyone, Looking at the QoS blueprint (proposed for incubation), I suggest to consider adding some parameters to Neutron Quotas. Let's suppose using rate-limit for managing QoS. The quota parameters could be such as rate_limit (per port) and max_bandwidth (per tenant). In this way it is pos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

On 19 August 2014 23:15, Alan Kavanagh wrote: > +1, I am hoping this is just a short term holding point and this will > eventually be merged into main branch as this is a feature a lot of > companies, us included would definitely benefit from having supported and > many thanks to Sean for stickin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

this. >> /Alan >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] >> Sent: August-19-14 8:33 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Req

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

let PORT uuid be applied on SG object then indeed no foreign key is needed. From: Kevin Benton [blak...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 2:14 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

einvent these overlapped concept. > > -- > *From:* Salvatore Orlando [sorla...@nicira.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:12 AM > > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

e overlapped concept. From: Salvatore Orlando [sorla...@nicira.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:12 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator In the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

ean for sticking with this and continue to push this. > /Alan > > -Original Message- > From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] > Sent: August-19-14 8:33 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

-Original Message- From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] Sent: August-19-14 8:33 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator Hi, The QoS API extension has lived

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

Actually, whether the incubator is involved for not, this might be a great candidate for implementation using an ML2 extension driver. See https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89211/ for the code under review for Juno, and also https://docs.google.com/a/noironetworks.com/document/d/14T-defRnFl6M2xR

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

+1. This work in particular brings up a question about the incubator. One of the rules was that the neutron core code can't import code from the incubated projects. The QoS requires a mixin to annotate the port and network objects with QoS settings. How exactly would we actually use the QoS code f

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Request to be considered for neutron-incubator

Hi, The QoS API extension has lived in Gerrit/been in review for about a year. It's gone through revisions, summit design sessions, and for a little while, a subteam. I would like to request incubation in the upcoming incubator, so that the code will have a more permanent "home" where we can coll

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [Qos] Question about rate limit for VM use OVS

Hi folks, Anyone try that rate limit configuration for OVS(port)? Now i am trying to implement it on my ovs_lib.py, actually it just call OVS command[1]. There is a way to do that for me: > sudo ovs-vsctl set port tap42d7bb69-68 qos=@newqos \ -- --id=@newqos create qos type=linux-

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Meeting agenda for Today's meeting

Hi, I have posted a preliminary agenda for today. I will be unable to attend the meeting, Kevin Benton will be chairing the meeting today. Please do add items to the agenda that you wish to discuss! https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronQoS -- Sean M. Collins _

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] First meeting minutes

http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2014/neutron_qos.2014-05-27-18.01.html See everyone next week! -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/op

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:51:56PM EDT, Itsuro ODA wrote: > BTW, where do you begin a discussion ? I thought you countinue > work in Icehose. Or do you argue from the beginning of the API > definition ? My plan is to introduce the REST API and the work that has already been done, and help bring

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:47:48PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote: > +1 Looks like we have consensus - I'll conduct a meeting today (Tue May 27th 2014) at 1800 UTC. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lis

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

Hi, I am interested in the meeting but cannot participate (it's 3:00am). I will check the meeting log later. BTW, where do you begin a discussion ? I thought you countinue work in Icehose. Or do you argue from the beginning of the API definition ? Thanks. Itsuro Oda (oda-g) On Wed, 21 May 201

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

+1 to attend, Regards, Irena -Original Message- From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 5:59 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting? Hi, The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

+1 On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The session that we had on the Quality of Service API extension was well > attended - I would like to keep the momentum going by proposing a weekly > IRC meeting. > > How does Tuesdays at 1800 U

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

Hi Sean, Sounds good! +1 - Stephen On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The session that we had on the Quality of Service API extension was well > attended - I would like to keep the momentum going by proposing a weekly > IRC me

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

+1 On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The session that we had on the Quality of Service API extension was well > attended - I would like to keep the momentum going by proposing a weekly > IRC meeting. > > How does Tuesdays at 1800 U

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

Hi, The session that we had on the Quality of Service API extension was well attended - I would like to keep the momentum going by proposing a weekly IRC meeting. How does Tuesdays at 1800 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt sound? -- Sean M. Collins ___ Op

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Reminder - 2:30 PM tomorrow at the Networking pod

y 14, 2014 12:01 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Reminder - 2:30 PM tomorrow at the Networking pod Be there or be square :) -- Sean M. Collins ___

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Reminder - 2:30 PM tomorrow at the Networking pod

Be there or be square :) -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:02:28PM EDT, Stephen Wong wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Perfect (I assume it is local time, i.e. 2:30pm EDT). > > And I also assume this will be at the Neutron pod? > Correct on both counts. See everyone soon! -- Sean M. Collins _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Hi, I am also interested. /Erik On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > Sounds good. Thanks. > > Mohammad > > > On May 8, 2014, at 3:02 PM, "Stephen Wong" > <*s3w...@midokura.com*> > wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > Perfect (I assume it is local time, i.e. 2:30pm EDT). > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Sounds good.  Thanks. Mohammad On May 8, 2014, at 3:02 PM, "Stephen Wong" wrote: Hi Sean,     Perfect (I assume it is local time, i.e. 2:30pm EDT).     And I also assume this will be at the Neutron pod? - Stephen On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Hi Sean, Perfect (I assume it is local time, i.e. 2:30pm EDT). And I also assume this will be at the Neutron pod? - Stephen On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:17:26PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

+1 On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:17:26PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > > > > There are networking talks in the general session in the afternoon on > > Thursday including the talk on Network Policies from 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:17:26PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > > There are networking talks in the general session in the afternoon on > Thursday including the talk on Network Policies from 1:30 to 2:10pm. > Anything after that is ok with me. How does 2:30PM on Thursday sound to everyone?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

+1 would be interested. -Original Message- From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] Sent: May-06-14 12:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

At Tue, 6 May 2014 16:19:22 +, Collins, Sean wrote: > > For those attending, to discuss the QoS API current status? > I'd like to attend (as a proxy for Itsuro Oda), too. I'm wondering if the Neutron flavor framework could be used/enhanced for QoS purposes. The framework currently tries to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

I would like to join this discussion. Thanks, Irena -Original Message- From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 7:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

tions)" , Date: 05/06/2014 07:08 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit? +1 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: On Tue, May 06, 2014 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

+1 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:04:09PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > > > > +1. > > > > Please announce a date/time here so we can perhaps avoid any conflicts > with > > others who plan to use the network

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:04:09PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote: > > +1. > > Please announce a date/time here so we can perhaps avoid any conflicts with > others who plan to use the networking pod. > > Best, Agreed. So - Thursday seems to be a pretty light in the afternoon - there are only de

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Yes, I am interested as well. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > For those attending, to discuss the QoS API current status? > > -- > Sean M. Collins > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit? Hi Sean,     Yes. Please count me in (we need to integrate QoS parameters as possible actions for group-policy). Thanks, - Stephen On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Col

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Hi Sean, Yes. Please count me in (we need to integrate QoS parameters as possible actions for group-policy). Thanks, - Stephen On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Collins, Sean < sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > For those attending, to discuss the QoS API current status? > > -- > Sean

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

For those attending, to discuss the QoS API current status? -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Quick update

Just a couple quick notes, since I've been pinged off-list. The summit proposal for the QoS API was rejected due to time constraints, but I'm hoping that we can still meet in Atlanta and discuss the next steps. In the meantime, I have created a draft spec in neutron-specs, but it's mostly just a c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] API Design Document v2

Hi, Sorry for the late response. Currently I am working on just getting support for a single QoS policy on a network or port merged, before we get into more complex operations. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.opens

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] API Design Document v2

Hi, API Design Document v2 Includes following example: Response: { "qos": [ {"id": "1234-5678-1234-5678", "description": "Gold level service", "type": "ratel

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][QOS]How is the BP about ml-qos going?

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:13:47PM EDT, Yuzhou (C) wrote: > Hi stackers, > > The progress of the bp about ml2-qos is code review for long time. > Why didn't the implementation of qos commit the neutron master ? For a while, I did not believe that this API extension would ever get merged, s

[openstack-dev] [neutron][QOS]How is the BP about ml-qos going?

Hi stackers, The progress of the bp about ml2-qos is code review for long time. Why didn't the implementation of qos commit the neutron master ? Anyone who knows the history can help me or give me a hint how to find the discuss mail? Thanks. Zhou Yu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] It's back from the dead!

No surprise, the code is quite stale, so bear with me while I debug the failures. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] It's back from the dead!

Hi, I'd like to apologize for the long delays in updating the QoS API patch sets - I am working on cleaning them up so that they are ready for review. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.open

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update

hisat least that’s my thinking on > it! > > Will send BP as soon as its finalised ;-) > > BR > Alan > > -Original Message- > From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com] > Sent: October-16-13 12:08 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Su

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update

;-) BR Alan -Original Message- From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com] Sent: October-16-13 12:08 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:45:29PM +, Alan Kavanagh wrote: > Will hopefu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:45:29PM +, Alan Kavanagh wrote: > Will hopefully submit that really soon. Perhaps we can look at combining both > of them and discuss this in Hong Kong as I have looked over your BP and I can > see some benefit in combining them both. Hi Alan, That sounds great -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update

On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > Hello, > > Just a quick update on the QoS API Extension - I plan on attending the > summit in Hong Kong and have registered a summit proposal to discuss the > current work that has been done. > > Currently I have two reviews under way: > > A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update

both. BR Alan -Original Message- From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com] Sent: October-16-13 10:55 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update Hello, Just a quick update on the QoS API Extension - I plan on attending

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] QoS API Extension update

Hello, Just a quick update on the QoS API Extension - I plan on attending the summit in Hong Kong and have registered a summit proposal to discuss the current work that has been done. Currently I have two reviews under way: API Extension & Database models: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28313

<    1   2