Hi All,
Minutes from this weeks IRC meeting can be found here:
Meeting ended Tue Mar 17 16:23:45 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2015/hyper_v.2015-03-17-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
Hi Everyone,
Here are the meeting minutes from today's meeting.
Meeting ended Tue May 27 16:13:45 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-05-27-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today’s Hyper-V Meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-04-15-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-04-15-16.02.txt
Log:
Is there a plan to get Hyper-V CI working better? It looks like it is
failing significantly more frequently then Jenkins.
http://www.rcbops.com/gerrit/reports/nova-cireport.html
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Peter Pouliot ppoul...@microsoft.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes
Hi everyone,
Here is the log from today's Hyper-v Meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Feb 18 16:17:57 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-02-18-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
Hi All,
Here are the minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-22-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-22-16.01.txt
Log:
On Oct 16, 2013, at 05:48 , Dan Smith
d...@danplanet.commailto:d...@danplanet.com wrote:
The last thing that OpenStack needs ANY more help with is velocity. I
mean, let's be serious - we land WAY more patches in a day than is
even close to sane.
Thanks for saying this -- it doesn't get said
On Oct 16, 2013, at 08:45 , Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people
to be cross-functional. I guess my main issue
On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:19 , Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netmailto:robe...@robertcollins.net
wrote:
On 16 October 2013 20:14, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.commailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
wrote:
Drivers are IMO not part of the core of Nova, but completely
Sean Dague wrote:
The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
(i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack project), over a history of 10
years, of people doing the right things, you build trust in their judgment.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez
thie...@openstack.orgmailto:thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
(i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack
Alessandro, please fix your email program so that it does not send
HTML email to the list, and correctly quotes text you are replying
to with ' '. Your reply comes out looking like this which makes it
impossible to see who wrote what:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:42:45AM +, Alessandro Pilotti
Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
The other two alternatives are to accept the delays and work within Nova
(slowly building the trust that will give you more autonomy), or ship it
as a separate add-on that does not come with nova-core's
Sorry guys about this, my OS X Mail client had no issues
in doing the proper indentation, so I never noticed it. Darn.
I made a test with Daniel with a private email before spamming
here for nothing. Hope it worked out here as well.
Thanks for the heads up.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:47 , Daniel
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 16 October 2013 20:14, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
Drivers are IMO not part of the core of Nova, but completely separated
and decoupled entities, which IMO should be treated
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
(i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack project), over a history of
On 10/16/2013 01:19 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
snip
Sean, you got called out in the meeting not because you asked to put a
refernce link to the specs which was perfectly reasonable, but because
after we did what you asked for in a timely manner, you didn't bother to
review the patch again
On 10/16/2013 01:45 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people to
be cross-functional. I guess my main issue is with how we get there. I
On Oct 16, 2013, at 15:16 , Sean Dague s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/16/2013 01:19 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
snip
Sean, you got called out in the meeting not because you asked to put a
refernce link to the specs which was perfectly reasonable, but because
after we did what you asked
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:59:26PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
When somebody (especially a core reviewer) puts a -1 and a new patch is
committed to address it,
I noticed that other reviewers wait for the guy that put the -1 to say
something before +1/+2 it.
I think that depends on
+1 - I think we really want to have a strong preference for a stable
api if we start separating parts out
So, as someone who is about to break the driver API all to hell over the
next six months (er, I mean, make some significant changes), I can tell
you that making it stable is the best way
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
+1 - I think we really want to have a strong preference for a stable
api if we start separating parts out
So, as someone who is about to break the driver API all to hell over the
next six months (er, I mean, make some
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:51:50AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
+1 - I think we really want to have a strong preference for a stable
api if we start separating parts out
So, as someone who is about to break the driver API all to hell over the
next six months (er, I mean, make some significant
On 10/16/2013 08:59 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
When somebody (especially a core reviewer) puts a -1 and a new patch is
committed to address it,
I noticed that other reviewers wait for the guy that put the -1 to say
something before +1/+2 it.
My feeling on this is that if somebody reviews
On 10/16/2013 06:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
The other two alternatives are to accept the delays and work within Nova
(slowly building the trust that will give you more autonomy), or ship it
as a
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's hyper-v meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-15-16.03.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-15-16.03.txt
Log:
On 10/15/2013 12:52 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today’s hyper-v meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-15-16.03.html
Minutes (text):
On 16 October 2013 09:54, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This
is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend
our circle of trust.
When nova started it was
On 2013-10-15 17:02, Robert Collins wrote:
On 16 October 2013 09:54, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different
sides. This is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple
further and extend our
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend our
circle of trust.
When nova started it was very easy to do feature
On 10/15/2013 08:36 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different
sides. This is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple
further and extend our circle of trust.
When
The last thing that OpenStack needs ANY more help with is velocity. I
mean, let's be serious - we land WAY more patches in a day than is
even close to sane.
Thanks for saying this -- it doesn't get said enough. I find it totally
amazing that we're merging 34 changes in a day (yesterday) which
On Oct 16, 2013, at 02:36 , Sean Dague s...@dague.netmailto:s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and
Hi Sean,
I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people to
be cross-functional. I guess my main issue is with how we get there. I believe
in encouragment over punishment. In my mind
Hi everyone,
Today’s Hyper-V meeting minutes.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.txt
Log:
Hi everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's Hyper-V meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Sep 3 17:01:15 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-03-16.01.html
Minutes
Today's Hyper-V meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-27-16.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-27-16.06.txt
Log:
Thank you. I appreciate you handling it.
P
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: Alessandro Pilotti apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com
Date: 08/27/2013 12:40 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] Hyper-V
Today's Hyper-V meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-20-16.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-20-16.06.txt
Log:
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's Hyper-V meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.txt
Log:
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-30-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-30-16.02.txt
Log:
Hi All,
Here's the minutes for today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-09-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-09-16.00.txt
Log:
Meeting ended Tue Jun 25 16:18:14 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-06-25-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
43 matches
Mail list logo
