There appears to be some overlap of this proposal with 'climate' which provides
a resource reservation system.
They meet regularly ... see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Climate
for contacts.
Tim
From: Alan Tan [mailto:y...@students.waikato.ac.nz]
Sent: 16 December 2013 23:42
To:
On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
This is important note. From information architecture and user
interaction point of view, I don't think it makes sense to keep all the
three tabs visible together (Project, Admin, Infrastructure). There are
lot of reasons, but main points:
*
Hi all
I've looked at the wiki page and now I can say that Cafe have an overlap
with Climate. Feel free to contact us at #openstack-climate. Also, please
take a look at our patches on review.openstack.org:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/climate,n,z
Nikolay
Hi, Alan!
I'm really glad you have mentioned that problem, that was not really
covered by OpenStack projects for much time. Our (Climate) team is working
on implementing Reservation-as-a-Service. As I understand, you are
interested in reserving (managing) virtual resources on a time-based
On 17/12/13 09:04, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
[snip]
So by default, I would say that there should exist Project + Admin tab
together or Infrastructure. But never all three together. So when
Matthias say 'disabled by default', I would mean completely
Hello,
I am trying to get the Grizzly Glance service working with Apache2 through the
WSGI interface. I am having problems with the _upload method of file
glance/api/v1/images.py It appears that the req.body_file pointer is invalid
as I get the following error: (9, 'Bad file descriptor').
I
Sorry, forgot to add a link to our Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/climate
Thanks!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, Alan!
I'm really glad you have mentioned that problem, that was not really
covered by OpenStack projects for much time. Our
On 12/17/2013 09:04 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I think the disabled by default approach is the wrong one. Instead, we
should have some users with enough credentials that will have the
feature, and others will not.
Also, Horizon is a web interface. Most of its switches could be made
On 12/16/2013 08:48 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
On 12/13/2013 01:53 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
On 2013/13/12 11:20, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
These look good! Quick question - can you explain the purpose of Node
Tags? Are they
an additional way to filter nodes through nova-scheduler (is that even
Hi Folks.
I’m currently trying to understand the openstack mechanics in detail (e.g. to
fix various ec2 api shortcomings) and reached heat. I tried to add heat to our
on-premise installation and failed to try the ‚AutoScalingCeilometer.yaml‘ demo
template. Heat-api throwed a
==
On 16/12/13 17:14 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
I've pasted these into an etherpad[1] for anyone interested. Please
feel free to edit/augment etc, or even to query anything on this list.
It's really just an initial draft to get the ball rolling.
--Gordon
[1]
As I see on
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html,
there is type OS::Ceilometer::Alarm, not OS::Metering::Alarm... Maybe it's
somehow connected with your problem?
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Porombka
porom...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Hi Folks.
Replies Inline!
-Original Message-
From: Evgeny Fedoruk [mailto:evge...@radware.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 5:56 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate
as
Hi Dina, hi developers.
Thanks for the very very helpful hint.
The problem issuing this exception is the lack of
/etc/heat/environment.d/default.yaml in the ubuntu cloud reposity packages.
root@head2:# cd /etc/heat/
root@head2:/etc/heat# ls -alh environment.d/
total 12K
drwxr-xr-x 2 heat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I just wanted to raise a new feature proposal request we are
interested in. We are interested in sending additional API calls in
headers, in each openstack component.
A sample code i created (using keystone as target) is showed on that
link:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 08:59:19AM +, Sebastian Porombka wrote:
Hi Folks.
I’m currently trying to understand the openstack mechanics in detail (e.g. to
fix various ec2 api shortcomings) and reached heat. I tried to add heat to
our on-premise installation and failed to try the
On 16/12/13 23:49 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:53 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
TL;DR:
Incubation is getting harder, why not ask efforts to apply for a new
program first to get the visibility they need to grow.
Long version:
Last cycle we
On 2013/13/12 19:53, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
We start easy, so that's solely for UI needs of filtering and monitoring
(grouping of nodes). It is already in Ironic, so there is no reason why
not to take advantage of it.
-- Jarda
Okay, great. Just for further clarification, are you expecting this
Sebastian, you are welcome :)
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sebastian Porombka
porom...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Hi Dina, hi developers.
Thanks for the very very helpful hint.
The problem issuing this exception is the lack of
/etc/heat/environment.d/default.yaml in the ubuntu cloud
On 2013/16/12 20:48, Jay Dobies wrote:
I might be getting ahead of things, but will the tags be free-form
entered by the user, pre-entered in a separate settings and selectable
at node register/update time, or locked into a select few that we specify?
So what I would expect is completely
Horizoners,
As an alternative merge option, we could merge directly to Horizon code
base. After some conversation, we have realized that it is possible to
mix codebase of incubated and integrated projects, as Trove showed us.
Contrary to what was said in the last meeting, we do not require
Hi David,
I'm working on tempest tests for Ceilometer too.
I think this thread is a good place to make a reminder about our strategy
how to avoid duplications in change requests.
1. We have something like a test plan
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-test-plan
2. Ceilometer team's
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
I'm not totally convinced we need such formality around the TC
expressing its support for an early-stage program/project/effort/team.
This is a difficult balance.
You want to help a number of projects attract more contributors and
reach critical mass. For that, they want
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:37:05AM +0100, Yolanda Robla wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I just wanted to raise a new feature proposal request we are
interested in. We are interested in sending additional API calls in
headers, in each openstack component.
A sample
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote:
1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't
be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated
projects have.
I don't agree on this point. There might be supportive teams, which are
helping OpenStack in
Thank everybody who were on our weekly meeting :)
Meeting minutes are here:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-17-09.59.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2013/climate.2013-12-17-09.59.txt
Log:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We mostly want that to be able to send distro information into
Openstack, to be able to collect stats about it.
Here is the blueprint for it:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-server-app-banner-updates
El 17/12/13 11:20,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi David,
I'm working on tempest tests for Ceilometer too.
I think this thread is a good place to make a reminder about our strategy
how to avoid duplications in change requests.
1. We have something like a test
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 11:25 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
I'm not totally convinced we need such formality around the TC
expressing its support for an early-stage program/project/effort/team.
This is a difficult balance.
You want to help a number of projects
Hi all,
I would like to get your opinion/feedback about the implementation of the
blueprint Decrypt and display VM generated password[1]
Our use case is primarily targeting Windows instances with cloudbase-init, but
the functionality can be also used on Linux instances.
The general idea of
On 2013/13/12 23:11, Jordan OMara wrote:
On 13/12/13 16:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
However, on instance - 'instance' is a very well defined term in Nova
and thus OpenStack: Nova boot gets you an instance, nova delete gets
rid of an instance, nova rebuild recreates it, etc. Instances run
Hi,
thank you for catching this question. Sure, we'd like to enable Savanna by
default for d-g tests. We decided to have a separated jobs now to be able
to develop stable enough basic API tests in Tempest to potentially not
break gating. So, that's why we have savanna d-g jobs in exp pipeline of
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Yolanda Robla wrote:
We mostly want that to be able to send distro information into
Openstack, to be able to collect stats about it.
Here is the blueprint for it:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-s-server-app-banner-updates
Hi, guys:
I am reading the code in “constants.py” file as part of Change I5b2313ff:
Create a new attribute for subnets, to store v6 dhcp options”. One thing
captured my eyes is the definition of “RA_MODES”, which excluded “slaac” mode.
If my understanding of “RA_MODES” is correct, i.e. the
Hi,
Following the discussion yesterday I have updated the wiki - please see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics. The proposal is
backwards compatible and will hopefully provide us with the tools to be
able to troubleshoot VM issues.
Thanks
Gary
On 12/16/13 5:50 PM, Daniel P.
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on
each project would be listed?
That would give visibility to our feedback, without making it a yes/no
blessing. Ok, whether to list any feedback about the project on the page
is a yes/no decision,
Actually Daniel P. Barrange comment is interesting. He states that a
configuration per instance would also be beneficial for Cinder. The
configuration is essentially needed to change the bootstrap of the
image. If you look at a docker image in abstract way then that is the
same thing - a
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:44 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on
each project would be listed?
That would give visibility to our feedback, without making it a yes/no
blessing. Ok, whether to list any
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:04:33PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
eg use a 'env_' prefix for glance image attributes
We've got a couple of cases now where we want to overrides these
same things on a per-instance basis. Kernel command line args
is one other example. Other hardware overrides
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be
implemented and how to map the current expectations of the messaging
layer to the new protocol.
I think a separate thread to discuss this mapping
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:44 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on
each project would be listed?
That would give visibility to our feedback, without making it a yes/no
blessing. Ok,
On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
Added openstack-dev
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:34:05PM +0100,
Erik Moe emoe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have added a new document to the launchpad. Document should now be more
in line with what we discussed at
On 17/12/13 11:54 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote:
1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't
be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated
projects have.
I don't agree on this point. There might be
On 17/12/13 14:59 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 13:44 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
How about if we had an emerging projects page where the TC feedback on
each project would be listed?
That would give visibility to our
Hi,
thanks for your comments.
see answers below.
Thanks,
Erik
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.comwrote:
Added openstack-dev
The document is view-only. So I commented below.
- 2 Modeling proposal
What's the purpose of trunk network?
Can you
On 17/12/13 14:22 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/17/2013 01:53 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 16/12/13 10:37 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:14 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I've a draft in my head of how the amqp 1.0 driver could be
implemented and how to map the current expectations of
On 2013/17/12 11:04, Ladislav Smola wrote:
Horizoners,
As an alternative merge option, we could merge directly to Horizon code
base. After some conversation, we have realized that it is possible to
mix codebase of incubated and integrated projects, as Trove showed us.
Contrary to what was said
On 2013/13/12 23:11, Jordan OMara wrote:
On 13/12/13 16:20 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
However, on instance - 'instance' is a very well defined term in Nova
and thus OpenStack: Nova boot gets you an instance, nova delete gets
rid of an instance, nova rebuild recreates it, etc. Instances
I also like the idea of alternating each week.
Eric
On 12/17/2013 01:40 AM, Mike Perez wrote:
I agree with Qin here that alternating might be a good option. I'm not
opposed to being present to both meetings though.
-Mike Perez
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Qin Zhao
I think slaac was original excluded to make --enable-ra not specified when
only slaac is given to an subnet's dhcp mode.
However, when I checked the example conf file of dnsmasq:
http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/docs/dnsmasq.conf.example
enable-ra is explained as:
# Do router
Folks,
The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great
number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points
in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems to me)
agrees on, or suggested options where there was no consensus. Let me
I've been working on this blueprint's implementation, the first bullet
point has been implemented by the two following Gerrit reviews:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61754/3
and
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62442/
The first one is simply there to allow for any modal view to declare
Hello,
I was wondering what was the strategy to debug a failed run with tox?
I was trying to see which tests was failing with python-keystoneclient and
py33 and this is the type of error i am getting :
http://paste.openstack.org/show/gc3xMk34ELuSF5Fk1mvP/
(bet it with tox directly or from the
The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great
number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points
in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems to me) agrees
on, or suggested options where there was no consensus. Let me know
John,
I am flexible.
I am fine with trying to move the time to 04:00 or 05:00 UTC or we can
alternate. The one concern with alternation is that it may lead to
confusion and less attendance, but I am certainly open to trying it.
Jay S. Bryant
IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert
4 or 5 UTC works better for me. I can't attend the current meeting
time, due to taking my kids to school in the morning at 1620UTC
Walt
Hi All,
Prompted by a recent suggestion from Tom Fifield, I thought I'd gauge
some interest in either changing the weekly Cinder meeting time, or
proposing
On 12/17/2013 03:04 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/16/2013 10:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
This is important note. From information architecture and user
interaction point of view, I don't think it makes sense to keep all the
three tabs visible together (Project, Admin, Infrastructure). There
Hi Qui Xing,
We are planning to address the vCenter template issue by levering the OVF/OVA
capabilities.
Kiran's implementation is tied to a specific VC and requires to add Glance
properties that are not generic.
For existing templates, the workflow will be:
. generate an *.ova tarball
Yes, the man page is a little bit confusing. The “slaac” mode requires
“—enable-ra” since it needs to manipulate MOAL bits in the RA. As matter of
fact, all of the modes available for IPv6 rely on “—enable-ra”.
My understanding is, the ra-names option has nothing to do with RA. It resolves
the
So any additional feedback on this patch? I’d love to start working on porting
some of the other extensions to pecan, but want to make sure I’ve got approval
on this approach first.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61303/7
---
Ryan Petrello
Senior Developer, DreamHost
Could anyone tell me about the status of the Healthnmon project [1]? There
is a proposal [2] to integrate Ceilometer and Healthnmon, which is about 1
year old. I am interested in developing a monitoring solution, and
discovered that there may already be a project and community in place
around
This is a discussion document for starters -
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rOBOOu_OwixMStm6XJOb5PKkJA6eFbL_XCE7wlTfaPY.
It's lacking the names you asked for at the moment but have a comment
on
it (frequent commenters get edit rights) and from there we can generate and
tidy up the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday December 17th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting minutes and log here:
Minutes:
On 17 December 2013 18:57, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, the man page is a little bit confusing. The “slaac” mode requires
“—enable-ra” since it needs to manipulate MOAL bits in the RA. As matter of
fact, all of the modes available for IPv6 rely on “—enable-ra”.
My
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Ian Wells wrote:
1. The patch ties Neutron's parameters specifically to dnsmasq. It would
be, I think, impossible to reimplement this for isc-dhcpd, for instance.
While I agree in theory with this point - there are currently no
active blueprints to add
The simplest solution is already built into the Horizon framework. Any panel
or dashboard can be disabled by a check to determine if a service is available
in the service catalog. Since there is an inherent above/under cloud
separation here, the Tuskar service should not be available above
Hello Thomas,
I do understand your feelings. The problem is there were already many
points raised both pro and contra adopting Salt as an agent. And so far no
consensus was reached on that matter. Maybe someone else is willing to step
out and write a PoC for Salt-based agent? Then we can agree on
On 12/13/13, 7:56 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
1) Are each of the items you mention big enough to have a sustainable
team that can exist as its own program?
The answer here for Barbican and Keystone is yes.
2) Would there be a benefit of *changing* the scope and mission of the
On 12/13/13, 4:50 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
If you remove Jenkins and attach Paul Kehrer, jqxin2006 (Michael Xin),
Arash Ghoreyshi, Chad Lung and Steven Gonzales to Rackspace, then the
picture is:
67% of commits come from a single person (John Wood)
96% of commits come
I was able to pin down the image upload problem today:
The Store.add file input read loop using chunkreadable throws an error on the
very last read. Apparently the mod_wsgi.Input behaves differently than its
eventlet counterpart in that it throws an error if the requested data length is
Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote on 12/15/2013 12:00:32 PM:
From: Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 12/15/2013 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [policy]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 12/13/13, 4:50 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
If you remove Jenkins and attach Paul Kehrer, jqxin2006 (Michael Xin),
Arash Ghoreyshi, Chad Lung and Steven Gonzales to Rackspace, then the
You ran a listing:
./.tox/py33/bin/python -m subunit.run discover -t ./
./keystoneclient/tests --list
which outputs the discovered tests as subunit enumerations.
.tox/py33/bin/testr run
will run the tests for you
-Rob
On 18 December 2013 05:18, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@enovance.com wrote:
Inline.
- Original Message -
| From: Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent:
To add to Jarret's arguments, across OpenStack we have seen as subsystems grow
more mature and complex from additional feature extensions, they spawn off into
separate projects.
Case in point -- Neutron rose out of Nova Networking, and is marching on in
richness and community support. Common
Hi,
Murano project volunteers to be a first project applying to Emerging
projects program. Murano was here quite long time and it was developed
taking into account all OpenStack development processes.
I think Murano is a good candidate to be a first project in this new
program as it should be
Barbican, key manager is essential to openstack, paves the way to greater
security.
Instead of rejecting the project because of its current existence owed so
heavily to Rackspace and to John Wood, why not we adopt it, code review,
contribute code etc. We can have cores from multiple companies.
- Original Message -
| From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
| To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
| Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 2:11:37 PM
| Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules
Hi all,
Monday at 2000 UTC I held an IRC meeting for blueprint ovs-firewall-driver to
discuss implementation choices with the community. Only a handful of people
attended so I wanted to open the discussion to the mailing list.
(I’ve also uploaded this to the wiki
Hi All,
In today's weekly meeting we discussed the possibility of changing the time of
the weekly meetings to make it easier for everyone to attend. This seems to be
a difficult task since we are worldwide! Nevertheless, let's see if Doodle can
help us understand which times might be a better
At the design summit we had a discussion[1] about redesigning Neutron
resources to avoid the need for hidden dependencies (that is to say,
dependencies which cannot be inferred from the template).
Since then we've got close to fixing one of those issues[2] (thanks
Bartosz!), but the patch is
++
As someone who has required patches to Barbican (and not affiliated with
Rackspace) I can attest to the fact that my, albeit simple, changes have
been reviewed and merged in a timely and constructive manner. Even if the
project were to bring on a flood of new developers it wouldn't move this
Hi, team:
I created a new blueprint to reflect the work we accomplished in the previous
POC to enable dnsmasq in SLAAC mode. In addition, I took the action item two
weeks ago from weekly sub-team meeting to explore DHCPv6 options. The goal was
to run dnsmasq as DHCPv6 server and provide both
Hi Subra,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Subrahmanyam Ongole osm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stephan
Comments inline for redirect action. Perhaps we may want to discuss each
section in different email threads.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi guys,
We got password-less authentication properly working in Windows, implemented
and included in Cloudbase-Init.
Here’s a blog post explaining how it works:
http://www.cloudbase.it/windows-without-passwords-in-openstack/
And the gory details:
Great Shixiong. I can see that we have BPs from Sean / Da Zhao for providing
the modes via the neutron client cli, but have we seen how those modes are
provided through the dashboard?
Randy
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2013, at 9:07 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2013-12-17 08:01:38 -0800:
Folks,
The discussion didn't result in a consensus, but it did revealed a great
number of things to be accounted. I've tried to summarize top-level points
in the etherpad [1]. It lists only items everyone (as it seems
Hi Prasad,
Thanks for the comments, please see responses inline.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Prasad Vellanki
prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com wrote:
Hi
Please see inline
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi,
During Thursday's
On 12/17/13, 6:36 AM, Erik Moe wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your comments.
see answers below.
Thanks,
Erik
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Isaku Yamahata
isaku.yamah...@gmail.com mailto:isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote:
Added openstack-dev
The document is view-only. So I commented
Mark, I love that idea.
It seems to me nice to have 'projects kindergarten' were every one is
blessed because of youth and perspective from the point of OpenStack
future, but at the same time it will be some scale of being talented and
experienced for these 'children'.
It might solve problem of
Hi, all,
I am planning to extend bp
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling with
power and temperature. In other words, power and temperature can be collected
and used for nova-scheduler just as CPU utilization.
I have a question here. As you know, IPMI is used
Hi Stackers,
I just looked into the VMware Vcenter Driver, seems it manages a vcenter
cluster as a single compute node, even it contains more than 1 physical
servers. It's not very connivence to know what's the real resource I had in
my cluster.
Is there any reason why we don't identify every
Sorry, I forget to modify the subject.
Best Regards
-- Ray
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Ray Sun xiaoq...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
I just looked into the VMware Vcenter Driver, seems it manages a vcenter
cluster as a single compute node, even it contains more than 1 physical
Hi,
The next Git-workflow meeting is tomorrow at 8 AM PST.
(http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1lid=8,524901,2158177,100h=8date=2013-12-18sln=8-9)
Agenda:
Administrative:
* Skip meetings for next 2 weeks. Reconvene on Jan 8th.
Topics:
* Krishna and
94 matches
Mail list logo
