Swift changed the permissions on the swift ring object file which
broke tripleo deployments of swift. (root:root mode 0600 files are not
readable by the 'swift' user). We've got a patch in flight
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83645/) that will fix this, but
until that lands please don't spend
Thanks to those projects that responded. I've proposed sessions in
swift, ceilometer, tripleO and horizon.
On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote:
All,
Many times we've heard a desire for more feedback and interaction from
users. However, their attendance at design summit sessions is met with
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Kurt Griffiths
kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com wrote:
P.S. - Any particular reason this script wasn't written in Python? Seems
like that would avoid a lot of cross-platform gotchyas.
I think it just need to have someone stepping up doing it.
Chmouel
Hi Iliia,
I would take a look into BSON http://bsonspec.org/
Cheers,
Serge Kovaleff
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Illia Khudoshyn ikhudos...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi, Openstackers,
I'm currently working on adding bulk data load functionality to MagnetoDB.
This functionality implies
Thomas Goirand wrote:
I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze
exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone, agree! :) ), then
would =0.8 or =0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 be better?
At this point I think it's safest to go with =0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7, *if*
Ceilometer folks confirm that
Joe Gordon wrote:
Now that nova and qa are beginning to use specs repos [0][1]. Instead of
being forced to read raw RST or relying on github [3], we want a domain
where we can publish the fully rendered sphinxdocs based specs (rendered
with oslosphinx of course). So how about:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
specs instead of docs because docs.openstack.org
http://docs.openstack.org should only contain what is actually
implemented so keeping specs in another subdomain is an attempt to avoid
confusion as we don't expect every approved blueprint to get implemented.
Great
Hi folks,
Running rests against 0.8. Will update you ASAP
Thanks,
Nadya
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
I'd like to ask everyone's opinion here. Is it ok to do a freeze
exception in this case? If yes (please, everyone,
On 27/03/14 18:11, Jay Dobies wrote:
It might be good to do a similar thing as Keystone does. We could keep
python-tuskarclient focused only on Python bindings for Tuskar (but keep
whatever CLI we already implemented there, for backwards compatibility),
and implement CLI as a plugin to
2014-03-28 11:29 GMT+02:00 Serge Kovaleff skoval...@mirantis.com:
Hi Iliia,
I would take a look into BSON http://bsonspec.org/
Cheers,
Serge Kovaleff
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Illia Khudoshyn
ikhudos...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi, Openstackers,
I'm currently working on adding bulk
Hi guys,
I suggest taking a look, how Swift and Ceph do such things.
2014-03-28 12:33 GMT+02:00 Maksym Iarmak miar...@mirantis.com:
2014-03-28 11:29 GMT+02:00 Serge Kovaleff skoval...@mirantis.com:
Hi Iliia,
I would take a look into BSON http://bsonspec.org/
Cheers,
Serge Kovaleff
Maksym Iarmak wrote:
I suggest taking a look, how Swift and Ceph do such things.
under swift (and CEPH via the radosgw which implement swift API) we are
using POST and PUT which has been working relatively well
Chmouel
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi folks,
I made a quick and dirty Dockerfile for creating a Docker image
containing Climate trunk and starting services.
You can find the source there : https://github.com/sbauza/docker_climate
That's a third option for deploying Climate, rather to be used for
correctly isolating Climate.
On 27 March 2014 20:52, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
It'd be nice to be able to do a heat template where you could specify
things like put these three servers on separate hosts from each other, and
these other two servers on separate hosts from each other (but maybe on the
Personally, I feel it is a mistake to continue to use the Amazon concept
of an availability zone in OpenStack, as it brings with it the
connotation from AWS EC2 that each zone is an independent failure
domain. This characteristic of EC2 availability zones is not enforced in
OpenStack Nova or
Great! Thank you, Sylvain!
Nikolay Starodubtsev
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Skype: dark_harlequine1
2014-03-28 14:57 GMT+04:00 Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.net:
Hi folks,
I made a quick and dirty Dockerfile for creating a Docker image containing
Climate trunk and starting
Le 28/03/2014 12:04, Nikolay Starodubtsev a écrit :
Great! Thank you, Sylvain!
The README.md file is a bit minimal, it still requires a Devstack
running elsewhere for accessing rabbitmq, Nova and Keystone.
I'm currently looking at dockenstack [1] for seeing how I could have a
running
Hi,
I installed devstack-havana on ubuntu-13.10. I see iptables-save with all
iptable rules. Can any one please help me how do I add a new rule or edit
iptables-save on Openstack?
Thanks
Shiva
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 03/28/2014 11:29 AM, Serge Kovaleff wrote:
Hi Iliia,
I would take a look into BSON http://bsonspec.org/
Cheers,
Serge Kovaleff
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Illia Khudoshyn
ikhudos...@mirantis.com mailto:ikhudos...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi, Openstackers,
I'm currently working
Dmitriy Ukhlov wrote:
I guess if we a talking about cassandra batch loading the fastest way
is to generate sstables locally and load it into Cassandra via JMX or
sstableloader
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/bulk-loading
Good idea, Dmitriy. IMHO bulk load is back-end specific task. So
Today I've tested 0.6 and 0.8. They are acceptable for us. But 0.4 is not.
So I'd like to support Thomas's suggestion about freeze exception for
happybase.
Thanks, Nadya
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi folks,
Running rests against 0.8. Will
+1 for Phil comments.
I agree that VMs should spread between different default avzs if user
doesn't define one at boot time.
There is a blueprint for that feature that unfortunately didn't make it for
icehouse.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/schedule-set-availability-zones
Belmiro
Given that some RCs have already shipped, I feel like the ship has
sailed here, because projects already have branches outside of master
with the requirements files they are going to have for icehouse, and the
normal auto propose requirements doesn't work here.
So I'm -0 on this for icehouse.
Sean, happybase is used only in Ceilometer.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Given that some RCs have already shipped, I feel like the ship has
sailed here, because projects already have branches outside of master
with the requirements files they are going to
Now that PTL nominations are open for the Juno cycle, it seems
appropriate that I should make my intentions clear. I do not plan to
run for PTL this cycle. Nova PTL is truly a full time job. I'm
planning to take a month off after the Icehouse release for personal
reasons so I feel it's best for
Hi all,
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute (Nova) PTL position.
Qualifications
-
I have been working almost exclusively on Nova since mid-2012, and have
been on the nova-core team since late 2012. I am also a member of
nova-drivers, where I help to target and
Hello everyone,
Currently I am working on adding persistence layer for create_volume api using
taskflow.
Could you please give your opinions on whether is it a good idea to add
taskflow tables in existing cinder database or to create a new database for
taskflow.
Thanks Regards,
Abhishek
Bulk loading with sstableloader is blazingly fast (the price to pay is that's
not portable of course).
Also it's network efficient thanks to SSTable compression. If the network is
not a limiting factor then LZ4 will be great.
Le Vendredi 28 mars 2014 13h46, Aleksandr Chudnovets
Hi,
I would like to announce my candidacy for the Infrastructure PTL.
I have developed and operated the project infrastructure for several
years and have been honored to serve as the PTL for the Icehouse cycle.
I was instrumental not only in creating the project gating system and
development
An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the taskflow
persistence backend.
Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a persistence
method for most usages) and then after this works there can be discussion
around moving those tables to something like
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 11:19 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce my candidacy for the Infrastructure PTL.
I have developed and operated the project infrastructure for several
years and have been honored to serve as the PTL for the Icehouse cycle.
I was instrumental
hi nader,
I don't think this parameter could be used in this case. As andre said
, tha original-network is usefull for update and delete commands. It
would led to misunderstandings if we use this param in other cases,
and particulary in create commands.
I'm still thinking that the result of
On 03/28/2014 12:15 PM, Hachem Chraiti wrote:
Hi,
Can i have some UML Diagrams for the Ceilometer Project??
Or even diagrams for Keystone too
Sincerly ,
Chraiti Hachem
software engineer
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi,
Can i have some UML Diagrams for the Keystoner Project??
for the objects like(User,Project,Domain,Ressource,Instance,...)
Sincerly ,
Chraiti Hachem
software engineer
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Reminder: This is the *last* day for ATCs to use their Atlanta summit
registration discount:
Original message
Sujet: [Openstack] ATC Reminder: Summit Registration
Date : Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:43:02 -0500
De :Claire Massey cla...@openstack.org
Hi everyone,
Just a quick
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
OK so I would be fine with happybase=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 as
On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
OK so I
On 03/27/2014 06:25 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Back to my point, when newcomers come into an opensource project with no
understanding of what opensource means or how to communicate in an
opensource project, that creates additional learning demand that might
not have been in evidence previously.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Now that nova and qa are beginning to use specs repos [0][1]. Instead of
being forced to read raw RST or relying on github [3], we want a domain
where we can publish the fully rendered sphinxdocs based specs
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 09:57 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
Now that PTL nominations are open for the Juno cycle, it seems
appropriate that I should make my intentions clear. I do not plan to
run for PTL this cycle. Nova PTL is truly a full time job. I'm
planning to take a month off after the
On 3/27/2014 8:00 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
On 26 March 2014 19:19, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org
mailto:jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com mailto:sorla...@nicira.com
writes:
On another note, we noticed that the duplicated jobs
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
OK so I would be fine with happybase=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7 as it allows 0.8
to be run
Hi Shiva,
This list is for development discussion and questions only. Please use the
Operator List
(http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators)
or the general list for questions about deploying or operating OpenStack.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 10:07 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute (Nova) PTL position.
Qualifications
-
I have been working almost exclusively on Nova since mid-2012, and have
been on the nova-core team since late 2012. I am also a
I would like to run for the QA Program PTL position.
I'm currently a core reviewer on the Tempest and elastic-recheck projects and a
member of the stable maint team. I have been working on Tempest and on improving
overall OpenStack quality since I started contributing to the project late in
the
Hi all!
I've been working on a prototype of Domains in Nova. In that prototype the
user is now able to do the following API calls with a domain scoped token:
GET v2/domains/{domain_id}/servers: Lists servers which projects belong to
the given domain
GET
Hi,
Can i have some UML Diagrams for the Ceilometer Project??
Or even diagrams for Keystone too
Sincerly ,
Chraiti Hachem
software engineer
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hello stackers!
Thanks for taking part in our meeting - meeting minutes are:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-03-28-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-03-28-15.00.txt
Log:
Currently, when you delete a tenant that has 1 or more running instances, the
tenant will be deleted
without warning and the running instance(s) will be left in place. Should there
be a warning
and should the admin be allowed to do this? Or should it be left be?
Thanks,
-Ryan Hallisey
FWIW, that issue is tracked here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/967832
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Ryan Hallisey rhall...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently, when you delete a tenant that has 1 or more running instances,
the tenant will be deleted
without warning and the running
On 28 March 2014 14:38, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the
taskflow persistence backend.
Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a persistence
method for most usages) and then after this works
On 03/28/2014 10:07 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute (Nova) PTL position.
Awesome. :-)
Dan has been doing an amazing job in many areas of Nova. He has been a
prolific contributor and code reviewer. He has emerged as one of the
top technical
Hi all,
I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
Technical Lead (PTL).
I have been working on OpenStack upstream documentation since September
2010, and am currently serving in this role. I recently summarized the many
community and collaboration methods we use to create
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 01:29 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I would like to run for the QA Program PTL position.
I'm currently a core reviewer on the Tempest and elastic-recheck projects and
a
member of the stable maint team. I have been working on Tempest and on
improving
overall
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 02:29 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing to announce my candidacy for the Documentation Program
Technical Lead (PTL).
I have been working on OpenStack upstream documentation since September
2010, and am currently serving in this role. I recently summarized
FYI, you can avoid the #1 problem ATCs have when redeeming codes if you
look at this first:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/durn7bgi3jatjeq/HowToUseCode_AtlantaSummit.png
Don't be that stacker who forgets to put the promo code in the right box
at the beginning :)
Mark
-- Forwarded message
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 13:56 +0100, Belmiro Moreira wrote:
+1 for Phil comments.
I agree that VMs should spread between different default avzs if user
doesn't define one at boot time.
There is a blueprint for that feature that unfortunately didn't make
it for icehouse.
Hi.
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute PTL position as well.
I have been an active nova developer since late 2011, and have been a
core reviewer for quite a while. I am currently serving on the
Technical Committee, where I have recently been spending my time
liaising with the board
On 03/28/2014 01:29 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I would like to run for the QA Program PTL position.
I'm currently a core reviewer on the Tempest and elastic-recheck projects and
a
member of the stable maint team. I have been working on Tempest and on
improving
overall OpenStack quality
+2 =)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
Hi.
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute PTL position as well.
I have been an active nova developer since late 2011, and have been a
core reviewer for quite a while. I am currently serving on the
confirmed
On 03/28/2014 03:21 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
I would like to run for the OpenStack Compute PTL position as well.
I have been an active nova developer since late 2011, and have been a
core reviewer for quite a while. I am currently serving on the
Technical Committee, where I
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 11:01 +, Day, Phil wrote:
Personally, I feel it is a mistake to continue to use the Amazon concept
of an availability zone in OpenStack, as it brings with it the
connotation from AWS EC2 that each zone is an independent failure
domain. This characteristic of EC2
- Original Message -
Hi, all
Currently openstack can support SR-IOV device pass-through (at least there
are some patches for this), but the prerequisite to this is both IOMMU and
SR-IOV must be enabled correctly, it seems there is not a robust way to
check this in openstack, I have
Jay Pipes wrote:
I'm proposing getting rid of the host aggregate hack (or maybe evolving
it?) as well as the availability zone concept and replacing them with a
more flexible generic container object that may be hierarchical in
nature.
Is the thing you're proposing to replace them with something
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 19:38 +, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Jay Pipes wrote:
I'm proposing getting rid of the host aggregate hack (or maybe evolving
it?) as well as the availability zone concept and replacing them with a
more flexible generic container object that may be hierarchical in
nature.
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 18:16 +, Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 28 March 2014 14:38, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the
taskflow persistence backend.
Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a
Sean, please see my comment in bug regarding 0.7. Unfortunately I have
nothing to suggest here. If distributive contains only 0.7 we cannot work
with HBase through happybase. And I don't see any solutions.
But anyway if you change requirements for happybase (I guess we need to get
0.7 back, no?)
On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
-happybase=0.4,=0.6
+happybase=0.8
Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
know so that shouldn't be a problem.
--
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker
// http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hi,
the more I think about your use case, the more I think you should
create a BP to have tenant network based on interfaces created with
VDP protocol.
I'm not a VDP specialist, but if it creates some vlan back interfaces,
you might match those physical interfaces with the
On 03/28/2014 05:01 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote:
On 27 March 2014 20:52, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com
mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote:
It'd be nice to be able to do a heat template where you could
specify things like put these three servers on separate hosts from
That'd work to, allowing for trying out/deploying/using this feature in
different ways if it's wanted.
Hopefully not to many issues, if so, u know where to find us ;-)
-Josh
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.commailto:jaypi...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
So how did Ceilometer get into this situation? Because the ceilometer
requirements are happybase=0.4,=0.6
So we told distributions at Feature Freeze that was adequate version for
ceilometer, and now we're telling them it's not at RC. And that's
honestly too late for most of them.
So I remain -1
Hi,
I have a VM that I start up outside of OpenStack (as a short term solution,
until we get it working inside a Nova VM), using KVM. It has scrips associated
with the three interfaces that are created, to hook this VM into Neutron. One
I/F is on br-ex (connected to the “public network for
Hi all,
We are scheduled to publish the 2013.2.3 release on Thursday April 3 for
Ceilometer, Cinder, Glance, Heat, Horizon, Keystone, Neutron and Nova.
The list of issues fixed so far can be seen here:
https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/2013.2.3
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
So how did Ceilometer get into this situation? Because the ceilometer
requirements are happybase=0.4,=0.6
Is this a case where testing minimums might have helped?
-Jim
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Even in the neutron/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py: create_network()
passes network object:
911
http://www.xrefs.info/neutron-icehouse-3/xref/neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py#911
*def* create_network
This is the approach mentioned by linux-kvm.org
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/How_to_assign_devices_with_VT-d_in_KVM
3. reboot and verify that your system has IOMMU support
AMD Machine
dmesg | grep AMD-Vi
...
AMD-Vi: Enabling IOMMU at :00:00.2 cap 0x40
AMD-Vi: Lazy IO/TLB
Hi, Duncan:
Thanks for your advice.
About the summit session you mentioned, what things can I do for it ?
--
zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Best Regards
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 12:43 AM
- Original Message -
This is the approach mentioned by linux-kvm.org
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/How_to_assign_devices_with_VT-d_in_KVM
3. reboot and verify that your system has IOMMU support
AMD Machine
dmesg | grep AMD-Vi
...
AMD-Vi: Enabling IOMMU at
- Original Message -
On 28/03/14 14:00, Takazawa Shiori wrote:
Hello
I would like to add document abount Sheepdogfor Commodity Storage Back-end
Technologies. Will this work for users?
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-ops/content/storage_decision.html
In
80 matches
Mail list logo
