This patch should fix the problem, sorry for the mistakes above.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
On 07/07/2014 05:56 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
Please check to see if this patch fixes the issue:
https://review.openstack.org/1050
It should be:
In current Alarm implementation, Ceilometer will send back Heat an
'alarm' using the pre-signed URL (or other channel under development).
By the other channel, do you mean the trusts-based interaction?
We discussed this at the mid-cycle in Paris last week, and it turns out
there appear to be
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:13:57AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
In current Alarm implementation, Ceilometer will send back Heat an
'alarm' using the pre-signed URL (or other channel under development).
By the other channel, do you mean the trusts-based interaction?
Yes, Sir. Trusts and
Le 04/07/2014 10:41, Daniel P. Berrange a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:53 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Hi,
==
tl; dr: A decision has been made to split out the scheduler to a
separate project not on a feature parity basis with
Alarms in ceilometer may currently only be based on a statistics trend
crossing a threshold, and not on the occurrence of an event such as
compute.instance.delete.end.
Right. I realized this after spending some more time understanding the
alarm-evaluator code. Having 'Statistics'
Hi All,
We have just finished 1st version of Windows Disk Image Builder tool. This tool
is written in PowerShell and uses Batch scripts. Currently, it runs on Windows.
The silent features of the tool are as follows:
1. Uses Windows ISO/user provided WIM files to create VHD file.
2.
Hi, this sounds cool.
I think it would be fine to have this as a TripleO repository; subject
to the usual constraints:
- Apache V2 license
- follows OpenStack coding practices etc
Lets let this sit for a little bit to see if there are dissenting
opinions or whatnot, and then the thing to do
On 7 July 2014 09:57, Kumar, Om (Cloud OS RD) om.ku...@hp.com wrote:
We have just finished 1st version of Windows Disk Image Builder tool.
This tool is written in PowerShell and uses Batch scripts. Currently, it
runs on Windows.
That sounds great! Is there somewhere we we can get the code
Hi all,
Recently I've been adding review comments, and having IRC discussions about
changes to update behavior for CloudFormation compatible resources.
In several cases, folks have proposed patches which allow non-destructive
update of properties which are not allowed on AWS (e.g which would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/07/14 16:54, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:31 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all, at the moment we have several bot jobs that sync contents
to affected projects:
- translations are copied from transifex; -
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to get
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99013/
through Jenkins, but keep failing.
The requirement I'm trying to add is
dbus-python=0.83 # MIT License
The logfile at
From: Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 07/07/2014 10:39
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Update behavior for CFN compatible
resources
Hi all,
Recently I've been adding review comments, and having IRC discussions
about
changes to update behavior for
On 07/07/2014 11:06 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
On 04/07/14 16:54, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:31 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all, at the moment we have several bot jobs that sync contents
to affected projects:
- translations are copied from transifex; - requirements
Hi folks,
Here are the pull requests with the VMware integration. Please review and
merge if it's possible.
*Fuel-web*
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104944/all code on reviewreview code
mergehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/104927/all code on reviewreview code
merge
*Fuel-lib*
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 06:13:30PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
Unscoped tokens are really a proxy for the Horizon session, so lets
treat them that way.
1. When a user authenticates unscoped, they should get back a list
of their projects:
some thing along the lines of:
domains [{ name
On 3 July 2014 19:05, Luke Gorrie l...@snabb.co wrote:
Time to make it start running real tempest tests.
Howdy!
shellci now supports running n parallel build processes and by default
runs each test with devstack+tempest in a one-shot Vagrant VM.
The README is updated on Github:
I think you'd be better of requesting an exception for your spec than
splitting the scheduler immediately. These refactorings need to happen
anyways, and if your scheduler work diverges too far from nova then
we're going to have a painful time getting things back in sync later.
Michael
On Mon,
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:46:19AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Near the end of the Icehouse cycle, there was an attempt to implement
this style of notification-based alarming but the feature did not land.
After realizing 'Statistics' is not the ideal place for extension, I
took a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:28:16AM +0200, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 04/07/2014 10:41, Daniel P. Berrange a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/03/2014 01:53 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
That doesn't mean Gantt will move forward and leave all missing
Hi Om,
Great news! Looking forward for a link to a repo to check it out.
Thanks,
Alessandro
On 07.07.2014, at 11:03, Kumar, Om (Cloud OS RD)
om.ku...@hp.commailto:om.ku...@hp.com wrote:
Hi All,
We have just finished 1st version of Windows Disk Image Builder tool. This tool
is written in
On 07/04/2014 10:54 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:31 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all,
at the moment we have several bot jobs that sync contents to affected
projects:
- translations are copied from transifex;
- requirements are copied from global requirements repo.
We are waiting for the project to get adopted by tripleO. As soon as we have
the new Project, we will start sharing the code.
-Om
From: Jesse Pretorius [mailto:jesse.pretor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 1:41 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On 07/03/2014 05:27 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background
links - basically what I have open in my browser right now thinking
through all of this.
We're
Sure. We can check if release is installed on any cluster and refuse to
remove it.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think we should allow user to delete unneeded releases.
In this case user won't be able to add new nodes to the existing
Hi,
I'm installing and configuring trove(DBaaS) for exisitng openstack setup.
I have openstack setup and able to boot nova instances with following
components:
1. keystone
2. glance
3. neutron
4. nova
5. cinder
Followed below documentation for manual
I suspect that thread didn't get much attention because of missing
[Horizon] tag. Added it.
To me, using signed cookies session backend as default one is not only
prone to security vulnerabilities, but also will someday hit the 4096
bytes cookie-limit per domain. Are there some serious reasons to
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Syed Hussain syed_huss...@persistent.co.in
wrote:
Hi,
I’m installing and configuring trove(DBaaS) for exisitng openstack setup.
I have openstack setup and able to boot nova instances with following
components:
1. keystone
2. glance
3.
Hi
Our debug log file size is getting pretty hugea typical py26 jenkins run
produces a whisker under 50Mb of log - which is problematic for at least the
reason that our current jenkins setup consider the test run a failure if the
log file is 50 Mb. (see
On 07/07/2014 12:33 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/04/2014 10:54 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:31 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all,
at the moment we have several bot jobs that sync contents to affected
projects:
- translations are copied from transifex;
-
Hi,
Le lundi 7 juillet 2014, 12:48:59 Nikola Đipanov a écrit :
When I read all of this stuff and got my head around it (took some time
:) ), a glaring drawback of such an approach, and as I mentioned on the
spec proposing it [1] is that we would not really doing asyncio, we
would just be
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com wrote:
Denis Makogon (dmako...@mirantis.com) writes:
| Those docs are useless, since they are not reflecting significant step –
| creating custom Trove images. You need to create image with Trove
| installed in it, create
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:13:57AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
In current Alarm implementation, Ceilometer will send back Heat an
'alarm' using the pre-signed URL (or other channel under development).
By the other channel, do you mean the trusts-based interaction?
We discussed this at
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Apologies for quoting again the top post of the thread.
Comments inline (mostly thinking aloud)
Salvatore
On 30 June 2014 22:22, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
Some recent ML threads [1] and a
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:46:19AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
Alarms in ceilometer may currently only be based on a statistics trend
crossing a threshold, and not on the occurrence of an event such as
compute.instance.delete.end.
Right. I realized this after spending some more
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Luke Gorrie l...@snabb.co wrote:
On 3 July 2014 19:05, Luke Gorrie l...@snabb.co wrote:
Time to make it start running real tempest tests.
Howdy!
shellci now supports running n parallel build processes and by default
runs each test with devstack+tempest in a
On 07/07/2014 05:39 AM, Marco Fargetta wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 06:13:30PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
Unscoped tokens are really a proxy for the Horizon session, so lets
treat them that way.
1. When a user authenticates unscoped, they should get back a list
of their projects:
some thing
Henry -
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Hi
Our debug log file size is getting pretty hugea typical py26 jenkins
run produces a whisker under 50Mb of log - which is problematic for at
least the reason that our current jenkins setup consider
hi,
speaking of Horizon sessions storage, it seems that all backends have
their pros and cons so I wanted to ask for some feedback.
The available backends are described in the Horizon deployment doc[1].
Given the existing CONTROLSCALE capability we have in TripleO, it seemed
a good approach
Hi,
This is a reminder about another IRC community meeting we will have today at
#openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC.
The agenda for today:
* Review action items
* Current status (quickly by team members)
* Discuss some of questions on the current engine/executor design
* Further plans
* Open
+1 to QUEUED status.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi German,
That actually brings up another thing that needs to be done. There is
no DELETED state. When an entity is deleted, it is deleted from the
database. I'd prefer a DELETED state
Le lundi 7 juillet 2014, 11:26:27 Gordon Sim a écrit :
When we switch to asyncio's event loop, all of this code needs to be
ported to asyncio's explicitly asynchronous approach. We might do:
@asyncio.coroutine
def foo(self):
result = yield from some_async_op(...)
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Steve Kowalik ste...@wedontsleep.org
wrote:
On 07/07/14 13:56, Anne Gentle wrote:
Please check to see if this patch fixes the issue:
https://review.openstack.org/1050
That's a patch (actually against quantum, which is amusing) from 2011, I
think you're
On 7/2/14, 11:00 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 07/01/2014 01:13 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote:
3rd party ci names is currently becoming a bit controversial for what
we're trying to do in cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101013/
The motivation for the above change is to aid
On Jul 4, 2014, at 5:27 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi German,
That actually brings up another thing that needs to be done. There is
no DELETED state. When an entity is deleted, it is deleted from the
database. I'd prefer a DELETED state so that should be
3. Unscoped tokens should be very short lived: 10 minutes.
Unscoped tokens should be infinitely extensible: If I hand an
unscoped token to keystone, I get one good for another 10 minutes.
Using this time limit horizon should extend all the unscoped token
every x min (with x 10). Is
Well, my main thought is that I would prefer to see the gantt split done sooner
rather than later. The reality is that we've been trying to split out the
scheduler for months and we're still not there. Until we bite the bullet and
actually do the split I'm afraid we'll still be here
On 07/07/2014 10:33 AM, Marco Fargetta wrote:
3. Unscoped tokens should be very short lived: 10 minutes.
Unscoped tokens should be infinitely extensible: If I hand an
unscoped token to keystone, I get one good for another 10 minutes.
Using this time limit horizon should extend all the
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/04/2014 10:54 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-04 at 15:31 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Hi all,
at the moment we have several bot jobs that sync contents to affected
projects:
- translations are copied from
On 07/07/2014 03:12 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
The first step is to patch endpoints to add @trollius.coroutine to the methods,
and add yield From(...) on asynchronous tasks.
What are the 'endpoints' here? Are these internal to the oslo.messaging
library, or external to it?
Later we may
Le 07/07/2014 12:00, Michael Still a écrit :
I think you'd be better of requesting an exception for your spec than
splitting the scheduler immediately. These refactorings need to happen
anyways, and if your scheduler work diverges too far from nova then
we're going to have a painful time
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Philipp Marek philipp.ma...@linbit.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to get
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99013/
through Jenkins, but keep failing.
The requirement I'm trying to add is
dbus-python=0.83 # MIT License
The logfile at
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:38:57PM +, Dugger, Donald D wrote:
Well, my main thought is that I would prefer to see the gantt split
done sooner rather than later. The reality is that we've been trying
to split out the scheduler for months and we're still not there. Until
we bite the bullet
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of oslosphinx 2.2.0.0a2.
oslosphinx is the package providing our theme and extension support
for Sphinx documentation
This release includes:
$ git log --abbrev-commit --pretty=oneline --no-merges 2.2.0.0a1..2.2.0.0a2
c144be8 Added a incubating
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Unscoped tokens are really a proxy for the Horizon session, so lets treat
them that way.
1. When a user authenticates unscoped, they should get back a list of
their projects:
some thing along the lines of:
domains [{
Hi Eugene,
My understanding of the flavor framework is the following:
Say I have an F5 load balancer supporting TLS, L7, and standard loadbalancing.
For business reasons I want to offer a Bronze (“standard load balancing”),
silver (“Standard” + TLS), and gold (silver + L7) at different price
On 7/4/14, 4:45 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03 2014, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
We're attempting to take baby-steps towards moving completely from
eventlet to asyncio/trollius. The thinking is for Ceilometer to be the
first victim.
Thumbs up for the plan, that sounds like a good
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of pbr 0.9.0.
pbr (Python Build Reasonableness) is a wrapper for setuptools to make
packaging python libraries and applications easier.
For more details, see https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pbr and
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/
This
Hi,
I'm using openstack icehouse to develop a neutron plugin and I have a issue
with the timeouts the neutronclient gives to nova. For me the create_port
neutron API request takes a lot of time when hundreds of instances are
involved and nova gets a timeout. That's why I tried increasing the
AFAIK, the cloud-init metadata service can currently be accessed only by
sending a request to http://169.254.169.254, and no IPv6 equivalent is
currently implemented. Does anyone working on this or tried to address this
before?
Thanks,
Nir
___
Hi,
For logical objects that were deleted but the backend did not execute on, there
is a PENDING_DELETE state.
So currently there is PENDING_CREATE -- CREATE, PENDING_UPDATE--UPDATE and
PENDING_DELETE--object is removed from the database.
If an error occurred that the object is in ERROR state.
Hi everyone,
Following our Bug Day starting at 1700 UTC, the OpenStack
Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday
July 8th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to
On 07/07/2014 02:58 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 7 juillet 2014, 12:48:59 Nikola Đipanov a écrit :
When I read all of this stuff and got my head around it (took some time
:) ), a glaring drawback of such an approach, and as I mentioned on the
spec proposing it [1] is that we would
On Jul 4, 2014, at 1:09 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
German,
First of all extension list looks lbaas-centric right now.
Actually far from it. SSL VPN should be service extension.
Secondly, TLS and L7 are such APIs which objects should
Thanks for joining us today and having a good discussion at the meeting!
As usually,
Meeting minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-07-07-16.00.html
Meeting log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-07-07-16.00.log.html
The next
Hey Mark,
To add, one reason we have a DELETED status at Rackspace is that certain
sub-resources are still relevant to our customers. For example, we have a
usage sub-resource which reveals usage records for the load balancer. To
illustrate, a user issues a DELETE on /loadbalancers/id but can
On 07/03/2014 03:34 PM, Sumit Naiksatam wrote:
Is this still the right repo for this:
https://github.com/openstack/neutron-specs
No. The right repo is:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-specs/
github is used only as copy for convenience and things may break there.
/stef
--
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:22:44PM -0700, Rafi Khardalian wrote:
Hi All --
It seems as though it would be beneficial to use virDomainSave rather than
virDomainManagedSave for suspending instances. The primary benefit of
doing so would be to locate the save files within the instance's
On Jul 6, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Rafi Khardalian r...@metacloud.com wrote:
Hi All --
It seems as though it would be beneficial to use virDomainSave rather than
virDomainManagedSave for suspending instances. The primary benefit of doing
so would be to locate the save files within the
As one of the original authors of dracut, I would love to see it being used
to build initramfs images for TripleO. dracut is flexible, works across a
wide variety of distros, and removes the need to have special-purpose
toolchains and packages for use by the initramfs.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote:
Henry -
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Hi
Our debug log file size is getting pretty hugea typical py26 jenkins
run produces a whisker under 50Mb of log - which is
Hey folks:
There's nothing to discuss on the BP Agenda for this week and most folks
are busy working on existing BPs and bugs, so I'd like to cancel the
Trove blueprint meeting for this week.
See you guys at the regular Trove meeting on Wednesday.
Thanks,
Nikhil
I haven’t heard of anyone addressing this, but it seems useful.
Vish
On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Nir Yechiel nyech...@redhat.com wrote:
AFAIK, the cloud-init metadata service can currently be accessed only by
sending a request to http://169.254.169.254, and no IPv6 equivalent is
currently
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com
wrote:
To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs, one thing I've noticed is,
there is inconsistency in the 'REST API Impact' section.
To be clear here, I don't mean we shouldn't include what new APIs will be
created, I
On Jul 4, 2014, at 3:11, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
I have a BP (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89650) and the first couple of
bits of implementation (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68942/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99916/) out for review on this very topic ;-)
Great, I'll
So I've been thinking how to respond to this email, and here goes (shields
up!),
First things first; thanks mark and victor for the detailed plan and
making it visible to all. It's very nicely put together and the amount of
thought put into it is great to see. I always welcome an effort to move
What's the use case for an IPv6 endpoint? This service is just for instance
metadata, so as long as a requirement to support IPv4 is in place, using
solely an IPv4 endpoint avoids a number of complexities:
- Which one to try first?
- Which one is authoritative?
- Are both required to be present?
That sounds sensical to me. It actually still saves me work in the long-run, I
think. :)
--Adam
https://keybase.io/rm_you
From: Douglas Mendizabal
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.commailto:douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com
Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 9:02 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
On 2014-07-04 06:05:08 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote:
they should sync automatically, something is wrong on the infra site -
let's tell them.
Yes, it seems someone uploaded a malformed change which Gerrit's
jgit backend was okay with but which GitHub is refusing, preventing
further
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/14 05:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background
links - basically what I have open in my browser right
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 09:28 -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background
links - basically what I have open in my browser right now thinking
through all of this.
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:53 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 07/07/2014 03:12 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
The first step is to patch endpoints to add @trollius.coroutine to the
methods,
and add yield From(...) on asynchronous tasks.
What are the 'endpoints' here? Are these internal to the
On Jul 7, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Angus Salkeld angus.salk...@rackspace.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/14 05:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having today. At the
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 18:11 +, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 03/07/14 05:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background
links - basically what I have open in my
Hi,
Apologies for the short notice on this, but it took us a while to finalise the
details!
We are planing on having our mid-cycle meet for Juno in the HP Seattle office
from the 28th to the 29th of July.
Details for the meet up are here:
On 7 July 2014 10:43, Andrew Mann and...@divvycloud.com wrote:
What's the use case for an IPv6 endpoint? This service is just for
instance metadata, so as long as a requirement to support IPv4 is in place,
using solely an IPv4 endpoint avoids a number of complexities:
- Which one to try
So just to clear this up, my understanding is that asyncio and replacing
PRC calls with taskflow's job concept are two very different things. The
asyncio change would be retaining the RPC layer while the job concept[1]
would be something entirely different. I'm not a ceilometer expert though
so my
Andrew Mann wrote:
What's the use case for an IPv6 endpoint? This service is just for instance
metadata,
so as long as a requirement to support IPv4 is in place, using solely an IPv4
endpoint
avoids a number of complexities:
The obvious use case would be deprecation of IPv4, but the question
To level set, the FWaaS model was (intentionally) made agnostic of
whether the firewall was being subject to the E-W or N-S traffic (or
both). The possibility of having to use a different
strategy/implementation to handle the two sets of traffic differently,
is an artifact of the backend
Hi Folks,
I noticed a couple of changes that have just merged to allow the server group
hints to be specified by name (some legacy behavior around automatically
creating groups).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83589/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86582/
But group names aren't constrained
On 07/07/2014 02:31 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
On 7 July 2014 10:43, Andrew Mann and...@divvycloud.com
mailto:and...@divvycloud.com wrote:
What's the use case for an IPv6 endpoint? This service is just for
instance metadata, so as long as a requirement to support IPv4 is in
place,
On 07/07/2014 02:35 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Folks,
I noticed a couple of changes that have just merged to allow the server
group hints to be specified by name (some legacy behavior around
automatically creating groups).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83589/
On 7 July 2014 11:37, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
When it's on a router, it's simpler: use the nexthop, get that metadata
server.
Right, but that assumes router control.
It does, but then that's the current status quo - these things go on
Neutron routers (and, by extension, are
I just noticed this review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90325/
And gave it some real thought. This will likely break any large scale
usage of signals, and I think breaks the user expectations. Nobody expects
to get a failure for a signal. It is one of those things that you fire and
forget.
Just a update; since I'm the one who recently did a lot of the openstack
adjustments in cloud-init.
So this one line is part of the ipv4 requirement:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cloud-init-dev/cloud-init/trunk/view/head:/cloudinit/sources/DataSourceOpenStack.py#L30
It though can be overriden
Jump on #cloud-init on freenode, smoser and I (and the other folks there) are
both pretty friendly ;)
From: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.commailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com
Date: Monday, July 7, 2014 at 12:10 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/14 08:28, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 18:11 +, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 03/07/14 05:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hey
This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor,
Flavio and I have been having
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Andrew Mann wrote:
What's the use case for an IPv6 endpoint? This service is just for instance
metadata,
so as long as a requirement to support IPv4 is in place, using solely an
IPv4 endpoint
avoids a number of complexities:
The obvious use case
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
Right, but that assumes router control.
In general, anyone doing singlestack v6 at the moment relies on
config-drive to make it work. This works fine but it depends what
cloud-init support your application has.
I think it's also important to
Hi folks,
I will try to respond both recent emails:
What I absolutely don’t want is users getting Bronze load balancers and
using TLS and L7 on them.
My main objection of having extension list on the flavor is that it is
actually doesn't allow you to do what you want to do.
Flavor is the entity
On 07/07/2014 12:35 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Folks,
I noticed a couple of changes that have just merged to allow the server
group hints to be specified by name (some legacy behavior around
automatically creating groups).
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83589/
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
