Thanks everybody!
Onward :-)
On 24 July 2014 19:41, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 07/24/2014 01:18 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:19:13AM EDT, Luke Gorrie wrote:
I test after i change nova-resize code.
configuration:
controler:1
computenode:3
storage: nfs,
before nova resize is changed
Task fdc67dfe-b182-4450-8e85-10085626acab is finished.
On 24 July 2014 20:38, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
The resize code as written originally did the simplest possible thing. It
converts and copies the whole file so that it doesn’t have to figure out
how
to sync backing files etc. This could definitely be improved,
Now in L3 API, we can create a router with external gateway, while enable_snat
setting to false.
Now in DVR code, all cenral NS processing is related with snat, so does it
still support NS central gw without snat?
Also, is it possible to separate the scheduling of NS central gateway and
But right now, we trigged resize by flavor changed. Do you mean we can split
the resize by cpu, by memory, or by disk?
在 2014-07-25 03:25:46，Jesse Pretorius jesse.pretor...@gmail.com 写道：
On 24 July 2014 20:38, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
The resize code as written
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 11:06 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:32:44PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
*) vhost-scsi doesn't support migration
Since it's initial merge in QEMU v1.5, vhost-scsi has a migration blocker
set. This is primarily due to requiring
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 11:06 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:32:44PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
*) vhost-scsi doesn't support migration
Since it's initial merge in QEMU v1.5, vhost-scsi has a migration blocker
set. This is primarily due to requiring
Hi,
I believe you are looking for stack convergence in Heat. It's not fully
implemented yet AFAIK.
You can check it out here
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/convergence
Hope it will help you.
Ladislav
On 07/23/2014 12:31 PM, Howley, Tom wrote:
(Resending to properly start new
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the reply, please see my comments inline.
Best Regards,
Ildiko
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 6:19 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
On 24 July 2014 17:09, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
I've received a lot of emails lately, mostly private, from people who
feel they are being left out of the Neutron process. I'm unsure if
other projects have people who feel this way, thus the uniquely worded
subject above. I
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 04:01:39PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/24/2014 12:40 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
==Future changes==
===Fixing Faster===
We introduce bugs to OpenStack at some constant rate, which piles up
HiHere,there is a problem to discuss with you.Problem: a volume may leave over
when we delete an instance Description:Here, two scenes may cause that a
volume is legacy when we delete instance whose task_state is
block_device_mapping .The first scene is that using the boot volume created by
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:18:33AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 11:06 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:32:44PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
*) vhost-scsi doesn't support migration
Since it's initial merge in QEMU v1.5,
On 25 July 2014 09:50, Li Tianqing jaze...@163.com wrote:
But right now, we trigged resize by flavor changed. Do you mean we can
split the resize by cpu, by memory, or by disk?
No, what I mean is that if the source and target flavor have the same root
and ethereal disk size, then check if the
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:09:52AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Ok, I am going to take Daniel and Dan's comments as agreement that
this spec freeze exception should go ahead, so the exception is
approved. The exception is in the form of another week to get the spec
merged, so quick iterations
Hey Stefan,
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 21:50 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand this work, vhost-scsi provides massive perf improvements
over virtio, which makes it seem like a very valuable addition. I’m
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
What do you think about allowing some text after the words recheck no
bug?
I think this is a good idea; I am often away from a change for a bit,
something happens in-between and Jenkins fails it, but
There's a review in progress for a generic event format for
PaaS-services which is a move with the right spirit: allow various
services to join the the notification party without needing special
handlers.
See: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101967/
--
Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:38:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
What do you think about allowing some text after the words recheck no
bug?
I think this is a good idea; I am often away from a change for a
On 07/25/2014 06:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:38:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
What do you think about allowing some text after the words recheck no
bug?
I think this is a
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:09:56AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 06:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:38:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
What do you think about allowing
Hi,
I have several concerns about password changing.
Default password can be changed via UI or via fuel-cli. In case of
changing password via UI or fuel-cli password is not stored in any file
only in keystone
It's important to change password in /etc/fuel/astute.yaml
otherwise it will be
On 07/25/2014 07:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:09:56AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 06:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:38:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 July 2014 12:36
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment
Would that still allow us to only trigger 3rd party CI ? eg if we do
'recheck xenserver' I
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:35:52AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 07:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:09:56AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 06:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:38:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On
I'm trying to track object server GET errors using statsd and I'm not seeing
them. The test I'm doing is to simply do a GET on an non-existent object. As
expected, a 404 is returned and the object server log records it. However,
statsd implies it succeeded because there were no errors
On 07/25/2014 07:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 July 2014 12:36
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment
Would that still allow us to only trigger 3rd party CI ?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jay S. Bryant
jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
Josh,
I agree that the mailing list is a hard place to provide such guidance
and direction. I find mailing lists intimidating. Had taken me some
time to be comfortable submitting here.
After my response
Anne Gentle writes:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Jay S. Bryant
jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
Josh,
I agree that the mailing list is a hard place to provide such guidance
and direction. I find mailing lists intimidating. Had taken me some
time to be comfortable submitting
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your 5c.
Some clarification – I don’t want to change the networking classes so much as
how they’re invoked. Currently, Instance.deploy() creates and pushes the heat
fragments necessary to create a network (if it’s the first instance to be
deployed). This means that
Coming back to this.
I have updated the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90134/ so
that it passing CI for ubuntu (obviously failing on fedora) and I am
happy with it. In order to close this off my plan is to getting
feedback on the mysql element in this review. Any changes that people
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Kerrin, Michael michael.ker...@hp.com
wrote:
Coming back to this.
I have updated the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90134/ so that
it passing CI for ubuntu (obviously failing on fedora) and I am happy with
it. In order to close this off my plan is to
On Jul 25, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 5:43 PM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Doug Hellmann
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:59 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Kerrin, Michael michael.ker...@hp.com
wrote:
Coming back to this.
I have updated the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90134/ so
that it passing CI for ubuntu
Even as a core contributor for several years, it has never been clear
what the scope of these tests should be.
As we move forward with the necessity of moving functional testing to
projects, we need to answer this question for real, understanding that
part of the mission for these tests now is
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
snip
* Put the burden for a bunch of these tests back on the projects as
functional tests. Basically a custom devstack environment that a
project can create with a set of services that they minimally need
to do their
On 07/25/2014 10:01 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
snip
* Put the burden for a bunch of these tests back on the projects as
functional tests. Basically a custom devstack environment that a
project can create with a set of
Le 23/07/2014 22:31, Duncan Thomas a écrit :
Hi
I'm looking for a maintainer email address for the cinder coraid
driver. http://stackalytics.com/report/driverlog?project_id=openstack%2Fcinder
just lists it as Alyseo team with no contact details.
Thanks
Hi,
Alyseo team details are here :
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:46 PM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote:
Collins, Sean wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:06:06AM EDT, Xu Han Peng wrote:
I would like to request one Juno Spec freeze exception for Support Stateful
and Stateless DHCPv6 by dnsmasq BP.
The spec is under review:
On 07/25/2014 10:01 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
snip
* Put the burden for a bunch of these tests back on the projects as
functional tests. Basically a custom devstack environment that a
project can create with a set of
That is indeed my aim, and thanks for following up
On 25 July 2014 15:29, Yacine Kheddache yac...@alyseo.com wrote:
Le 23/07/2014 22:31, Duncan Thomas a écrit :
Hi
I'm looking for a maintainer email address for the cinder coraid
driver.
Excuse my ignorance here, but I'm hearing that dvr l3 agent will run
in two different modes - and that a typical deployment will want some
running in each: in a scaled all-in-one setup - say 3 nodes, galera,
rabbit, all our APIs, and nova-compute on each - would we then want to
run *two* l3 agents
On 25/07/14 11:18, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 10:01 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
snip
* Put the burden for a bunch of these tests back on the projects as
functional tests. Basically a custom devstack environment that a
Excerpts from John Griffith's message of 2014-07-25 06:59:38 -0700:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Kerrin, Michael michael.ker...@hp.com
wrote:
Coming back to this.
I have updated the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90134/ so that
it passing CI for ubuntu (obviously failing
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:59 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
The LIO versus Tgt thing however is a bit troubling. Is there a reason that
TripleO decided to do the exact opposite of what the defaults are in the
rest of OpenStack here? Also any reason why if there was a
On 07/25/2014 08:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 07:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 July 2014 12:36
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment
Would that still
In the lead up to the next round of the GNOME Outreach Program for Women
(application deadline 10/22/2014), the group is hosting a series of
meetups around getting involved in free and open source software
development.
Given OpenStack's committment to Outreach Program for Women, we're
looking for
+1
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:34:28 AM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [QA] Proposed Changes to Tempest Core
Hi Everyone,
I would like to propose 2 changes to the Tempest core
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:59 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote:
The LIO versus Tgt thing however is a bit troubling. Is there a reason
that
TripleO decided to do the exact opposite of what the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:03 AM, zhangtralon ztra...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi
Here,there is a problem to discuss with you.
This sounds like a bug. We use https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ to track
bugs and discuss possible solutions etc.
*Problem:* a volume may leave over when we delete an
So all of the current core team members have voted unanimously in favor of
adding Andrea to the team.
Welcome to the team Andrea.
-Matt Treinish
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:32:27PM -0400, Attila Fazekas wrote:
+1
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
Congrats Andrea, well deserved!
2014-07-25 19:37 GMT+02:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org:
So all of the current core team members have voted unanimously in favor of
adding Andrea to the team.
Welcome to the team Andrea.
-Matt Treinish
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 01:32:27PM -0400,
It all depends on how you want services scheduled. If you want to isolate
(centralize) services you can. But if you don't care what services run on
which nodes, you can have all your l3-agents run in dvr_snat mode. The
dvr_snat mode l3-agent will be capable of hosting centralized/legacy
moving the thread to the more appropriate openstack-dev mailing list,
since this conversation is about the 'future'. Get familiar with the
topics of the mailing lists:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingLists#Future_Development
On Fri 25 Jul 2014 06:29:52 AM PDT, Andreas Scheuring wrote:
On Fri 25 Jul 2014 01:25:16 AM PDT, Luke Gorrie wrote:
I have one idea for low-hanging fruit to put new contributors more at
ease: to explain a little about both when and why the Merge button
is finally pressed on a change.
Indeed, communication is key. I'm not sure how you envision to
Gents,
As we discussed at the BP meeting on July 14 - I've created a new BP and
BP wiki to outline the dynamic extension loading using stevedore.
BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/dynamic-extension-loading
Wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Trove/DynamicExtensionLoading
PoC
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/24/2014 05:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
OpenStack has a substantial CI system that is core to its development
process. The goals of the system are to
Hello everyone,
This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in
scope that seems agreeable to a smaller audience. Most recently, we've
discussed this in both the Keystone [1] and Oslo [2] weekly meetings.
tl;dr it seems to make sense to move the PyCADF library from the
On 07/23/2014 11:02 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
I'll let Stefano answer further, but yes, we've discussed a centralized
mentoring program for a year or so. I'm not sure we have enough mentors
available, there are certainly plenty of people seeking and needing
mentoring. So he can elaborate more on
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-07-24 12:09:39 -0700:
On 17/07/14 07:51, Ryan Brown wrote:
On 07/17/2014 03:33 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:31:05AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 16/07/14 23:48, Manickam, Kanagaraj wrote:
SNIP
*Resource*
Status
On 25/07/14 13:50, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-07-24 12:09:39 -0700:
On 17/07/14 07:51, Ryan Brown wrote:
On 07/17/2014 03:33 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:31:05AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 16/07/14 23:48, Manickam, Kanagaraj wrote:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in
scope that seems agreeable to a smaller audience. Most recently, we've
discussed this in both the Keystone [1] and Oslo [2]
Pinging again since I was hoping for some community feedback. I also messed up
a bit in my original mail, the current supported hardware transports are cxgb3i
, cxgb4i (Chelsio), bnx2i (Broadcom/QLogic), qla4xxx (QLogic) and be2iscsi
ocs (Emulex).
-Anish
-Original Message-
From:
+1 to move pycadf to Identity program.
-- dims
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in
- Original Message -
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 07/24/2014 10:05 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Alan Kavanagh wrote:
If we have more work being put on the table, then more Core
members would definitely go a long way with assisting
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:54:38PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/24/2014 05:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:39:47PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
OpenStack has a substantial CI system that is core to its development
process. The goals of the system are to
Sean,
Thanks for making this change!
Jay
On Jul 25, 2014 5:41 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/25/2014 01:18 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
On 07/16/2014 11:15 PM, Alexis Lee wrote:
What do you think about allowing some text after the words recheck no
bug?
I think this is a good
Before we move ahead, I would like to hear from the other current pycadf and
oslo team members, especially Gordon since he is the primary maintainer.
this move makes sense to me. auditing and identity have a strong link and all
of the pyCADF work done so far has been connected to Keystone in
+1 Makes a lot of sense to me as well!!
--Brad
Brad Topol, Ph.D.
IBM Distinguished Engineer
OpenStack
(919) 543-0646
Internet: bto...@us.ibm.com
Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680
From: gordon chung g...@live.ca
To: Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com, OpenStack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Owners of compromised accounts should verify Keystone trusts
- ---
### Summary ###
The Keystone 'trusts' API allows for delegation of privileges to one
user on behalf of another. This API can allow for an attacker of a
compromised account to set up
Hi Fuelers,
it is time to freeze with fixing Low and Medium bugs. Let's postpone those
open to 6.0 release.
As promised, let's do an exception for those patches, which have at least
one +1 from someone. If core dev think that such patch can be landed, let's
merge. Otherwise - please move the bug
Hello,
The recent release of tox 1.7.2 has fixed the {posargs} interpolation
issues we had with newer tox which forced us to be pinned to tox==1.6.1.
Before we can remove the pin and start telling people to use latest tox
we need to address a new default behavior in tox.
New tox sets a random
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 07/24/2014 10:05 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Alan Kavanagh wrote:
If we have more work being put on the table,
Thanks for the deck Jay, that is very helpful.
Also, would it help the process by having some clear
guidelines/expectations around review time as well? In particular, if you
have put a -1 or -2, and the issues that you have identified have been
addressed by an update (or at least the original
On 26 July 2014 08:20, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote:
This is also more of a pragmatic organic approach to figuring out the
interfaces we need to lock down. When one projects breaks depending on
an interface in another project, that should trigger this kind of
contract growth,
On 25 July 2014 10:44, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
So - I know thats brief - what we'd like to do is to poll a slightly
wider set of deployers - e.g. via a spec, perhaps some help from Tom
This one would be a good place for that conversation to start:
On 25 July 2014 11:03, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 07/24/2014 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
So - I know thats brief - what we'd like to do is to poll a slightly
wider set of deployers - e.g. via a spec, perhaps some help from Tom
This one would be a good place for that conversation
On 10 July 2014 16:19, Kumar, Om (Cloud OS RD) om.ku...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
So far, no dissenting opinions. Can we get started with merge proposal to
-infra to setup repositories etc..?
Please do.
On a side note, we are okay with releasing the code under Apache V2 license.
But I could
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Thanks for the deck Jay, that is very helpful.
Also, would it help the process by having some clear guidelines/expectations
around review time as well? In particular, if you have put a -1 or -2, and
the issues that
On 7/25/14, 4:58 AM, Seger, Mark (Cloud Services) wrote:
I’m trying to track object server GET errors using statsd and I’m not
seeing them. The test I’m doing is to simply do a GET on an
non-existent object. As expected, a 404 is returned and the object
server log records it. However, statsd
As we discussed during today’s meeting, we will not hold a meeting next week (1
Aug 2014). A lot of the team is either taking vacation or traveling for other
reasons.
We will resume meeting on 8 Aug.
Doug
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Just tested tox 1.7.2 with swift on my Dev box and tox -epy27 runs fine.
So seems Swift isn't affected by this.
Matt
On Jul 26, 2014 7:44 AM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote:
Hello,
The recent release of tox 1.7.2 has fixed the {posargs} interpolation
issues we had with newer tox
Hi Vish!
Appreciate your feedback! Are there some significant pitfalls that forced
Nova team to decide that?
Currently I'm testing my local nova modifications to get real boot from ISO
functionality like described in the spec. I'm fetching ISO image from
glance into the separate file under the
What would be a good guideline for timely manner? I would recommend
something like 2-3 days unless the reviewer is on vacation or is
indisposed. Is it possible to update gerrit/jenkins to send reminders to
reviewers in such a scenario?
Regards,
Mandeep
-
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:14 PM,
I agree that it's important to set a guideline for this topic.
What if the said reviewer is on vacation or indisposed? Should a fallback
strategy exist for that case? A reviewer could indicate a delegate core
to review its -2s whenever he has no chance to do it.
Thanks,
Ivar.
On Fri, Jul 25,
Hi,
When we do a stack update, I see that there are 2 copies of raw_template
stored in database for each update. For n updates there are 2n + 1
entries of raw_template in database. Is this expected or is it a bug?
When I dug more into it, I see that the deep copy of template is not
copying the
86 matches
Mail list logo
