Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Change VIP address via API

Igor, > For VIP allocation we should use POST request. It's ok to use PUT for setting (changing) IP address. My proposal is about setting IP addresses for VIPs only (auto and manual). No any other allocations. Do you propose to use POST for first-time IP allocation and PUT for IP re-allocation?

[openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Resigning TelcoWG core team

Hello TelcoWG, Due to personal reasons I have to resign my TelcoWG core team membership. I will remove myself from the core reviewer group. Thanks for all the support! Regards Marc __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] DevStack errors...

On 02/11/15 23:56, Thales wrote: I'm trying to get DevStack to work, but am getting errors. Is this a good list to ask questions for this? I can't seem to get answers anywhere I look. I tried the openstack list, but it kind of moves slow. Thanks for any help. Regards, John In case it

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

Hi, Trying to get more attention to this ... We had our driver removed by commit: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/f0ab819732d77a8a6dd1a91422ac183ac4894419 due to no CI. Pls let me know if there is something wrong so we can fix it asap so we can have the driver back in M. The CI is

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Specifications to support High Availability Active-Active configurations in Cinder

On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 20:17 +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > Hi, > > We finally have ready for review all specifications required to support > High Availability Active/Active configurations in Cinder's Volume nodes. > > There is a Blueprint to track this effort [1] and the specs are as follow: >

Re: [openstack-dev] About the response parameters of the API List volumes

Absolutely an oversight as far as I can tell - probably similar problems in the admin --all-tenants view of various other cinder resources. Patch welcome once we get micro-versions landed, in the meantime it would be great if you could file a bug, and ideally check any other views (snaps, backups,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][library] CI gate for regressions detection in deployment data

Hi, let me try to rephrase this a bit and Bogdan will correct me if I'm wrong or missing something. We have a set of top-scope manifests (called Fuel puppet tasks) that we use for OpenStack deployment. We execute those tasks with "puppet apply". Each task supposed to bring target system into

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Reviving the thread. On the design summit session dedicated to agent and plugin extensions [1] the following was stated for l2 agent extensions (I appreciate if someone checks me on the following though): - current l2 agent extensions mechanism lacks insight into agent details like

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] [RFC] split pip line of functional testing

hi Magnum hackers: Currently there is a pip line on project-config to do magnum functional testing [1] on summit, we've discussed that we need to split it per COE[2], we can do this by adding new pip line to testing./ / /- '{pipeline}-functional-dsvm-magnum{coe}{job-suffix}':/ coe could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

Hi Have you posted a review to re-add the driver? I can't see one, though I might be missing it. If you have a review posted, please add a link here, but you are in good shape to make the M release. If you don't yet have a review posted, please prepare and submit one using the normal gerrit

[openstack-dev] [all][glance] No mid-cycle meetup for Mitaka

Greetings At the Mitaka summit, we discussed whether having a mid-cycle summit was worth it for Mitaka. The outcome is that we should skip it this time. Some reasons below: 1. We've a well defined, narrow, list of priorities that need to be worked on. 2. Based on the above, there won't be

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. > > I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are supported > by Marathon, so probably it's much less problematic for us than Kubernetes > at this

[openstack-dev] [Nova] live migration sub-team meeting

Hi all, Live migration was confirmed as a Nova priority for the Mitaka cycle and a sub-team section can be found on the priorities tracking page [1]. Most team members expressed they would like a regular IRC meeting for tracking work and raising blocking issues. Looking at the contributors

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

Hi Duncan, here is the review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241174 Thanks, Eduard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [all][glance] Summary from the Mitaka summit

Greetings, As usual, here's my summary from the summit. This time, it's limited mostly to Glance as I wasn't able to spread myself on other rooms as I normally do. Before I get into the details, I'd like to recommend folks to do the same and write their own summaries (especially PTLs). It's nice

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migration by python scripts

Zhi Chang wrote: Hi, all Now, I should make some database model definitions if I want to upgrade db. And a database migration script will generated when I run "neutron-db-manage revision -m "description of revision" --autogenerate". The database will upgraded

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

Here's a Devstack review for zookeeper in support of this initiative: https://review.openstack.org/241040 Thanks, Dims On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Thanks robert, > > I've started to tweak https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209661/ with regard >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] weekly bug status + bug tag contacts

Le 03/11/2015 12:53, Markus Zoeller a écrit : Hey Nova folks, this is your bug lord speaking. You may have noticed that we have around 3 bugs open ... just kidding, it's above 1000 and keeps growing. During the summit, we concluded that the "fix all the crap" action item was a bit too

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply. What do you mean a review? Should i resubmit the driver code to the cinder repo? Do i need also the driver certification tests? Thanks, Eduard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Service chain node creation fails

Hi Sumit, As you mentioned I used the AWS template format and now able to create a service chain successfully. But I dont see any firewall and lb created in my network. Am I missing anything here? Regards, Naresh. On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:42 PM, NareshA kumar wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migration by python scripts

Hi, all Now, I should make some database model definitions if I want to upgrade db. And a database migration script will generated when I run "neutron-db-manage revision -m "description of revision" --autogenerate". The database will upgraded when run "neutron-db-manage upgrade head".

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migration by python scripts

You can create new migration using "neutron-db-manage revision -m 'desc' --expand/--contract" depends in what changes do you want to do in migration expand - add something, contract - delete or modify. More information - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/devref/alembic_migrations.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migrationby python scripts

Thanks for your reply. There is an error when I run migration cmd: stack@devstack:~/neutron/neutron/db/migration$ neutron-db-manage revision -m 'desc' --contract usage: neutron-db-manage [-h] [--config-dir DIR] [--config-file PATH] [--core_plugin CORE_PLUGIN]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migrationby python scripts

Your installed neutron is not current. When developing new db migrations you should be working with the master branch. Fast forward your repo and re-run devstack to get the latest neutron-db-manage. On Tue, Nov 03, 2015, Zhi Chang wrote: > Thanks for your reply. >

[openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] weekly bug status + bug tag contacts

Hey Nova folks, this is your bug lord speaking. You may have noticed that we have around 3 bugs open ... just kidding, it's above 1000 and keeps growing. During the summit, we concluded that the "fix all the crap" action item was a bit too unspecific, so let's try another thing. Beginning by end

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

Le 02/11/2015 19:40, Brant Knudson a écrit : (...) by typing something like: $ bandit-conf-generator --disable try_except_pass --out bandit.yaml oslo.messaging ~/openstack/bandit/bandit/config/bandit.yaml (...) we should have a config file for bandit-conf-generator... but then why not

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][ThirdPartyCI]CloudFounders OpenvStorage CI - request to re-add the cinder driver

Hi Yes, you should resubmit the code to cinder. There is no need to do the certification tests, they are replaced by the CI. On 3 November 2015 at 12:10, Eduard Matei wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > What do you mean a review? Should i resubmit the

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating puppet-keystone-core and proposing Richard Megginson core-reviewer

He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of keystone and puppet. Thank you Richard for your help. +1 Emilien Macchi writes: > At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team. > We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our > modules

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][db][migration] Neutron db migrationby python scripts

Do you have the lasted code of Neutron? Change [1] that allows this was merged on the 22d of October. [1] - https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/9d069c48aed3a087c5c51366c8e70b29f339e794 On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Zhi Chang wrote: > Thanks for your reply. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC Use Case

Hi Sumit, Thanks for your quick help. I think I am almost done. I am able to successfully create sfc chain spec with aws template. I have also created group members and able to ping between them. But I dont see any firewall or loadbalancer namespaces created. Am I missing something here? Thanks in

[openstack-dev] [api][nova] Handling lots of GET query string parameters?

Hi all, A spec [1] that proposes adding a new server_ids query string parameter to the existing GET /servers/detail URI resource has highlighted an interesting issue. The point of the spec is to add an ability to filter the results for the GET /servers/detail API call to a specified set of

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #57

On 11/02/2015 08:02 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hello! > > Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC > in #openstack-meeting-4: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151103 > > Feel free to add any ite

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

On 11/03/2015 10:50 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, I don't like very long command lines, it's hard to document them or comment them. I prefer configuration files. But bandit.yaml, the "template", is already a configuration file!? Yes, the config file provided by bandit is some kind of "enable

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

Hello everyone, I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in reviews lately. Thus, I think we could benefit greatly by adding him

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

On 11/02/2015 07:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: If we can add this command directly in our tox.ini and entirely avoid having the bandit.yaml would that be even better? Why not, but it'd have some drawbacks as well: - should the conf generator be broken for some reason, the gate may end up

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo

Hi Cyril, This is a really cool idea. It should be fairly easy to implement and can only help make Bandit more usable. To be honest enhancing the way we're using the 'bandit.yaml' file has been on our list for a while. A tool like this seems like it would be a nice intermediate solution until

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

On 11/02/2015 07:40 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: We could use something like this in keystone since we've got a few repositories. There should be a way to document why the test was skipped since otherwise we'll have to figure it out every time we update the file. Putting a comment on the command

[openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, on fwaas design session in Tokyo it was pointed out that for new fwaas API we may want to use service groups [1] that were approved but never merged. As far as I can tell, service groups are designed to catch several criteria to describe a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

This plan makes a lot of sense to me. With the staggering number of sub-projects in neutron it is impossible for the stable team to cope with the load. Delegation and decentralisation is a must and both sub-project maintainers and the stable team will benefit from it. Also, since patches can

[openstack-dev] Neutron DVR Subteam Meeting Resumes from Nov 4th 2015.

Hi Folks, We would like to resume the Neutron DVR Subteam Meeting starting November 4th 2015. If you are an active technical contributor in openstack and would like to discuss any DVR related items feel free to join the meeting. Here are the meeting details. IRC channel:

[openstack-dev] [release] process changes for mitaka releases

Release liaisons, At the summit we discussed some of the process changes we are putting in place for the Mitaka cycle. This email thread is the official notification of those changes for folks who weren't able to be in the room for the discussion, and the reminder for those who were. The biggest

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

Hi Ihar, This sounds good. I actually had a draft e-mail that I've been saving until I got back, that may be relevant. Some contributors met on Friday to discuss the packet classification framework, mostly centered around just building a reusable library that can be shared among multiple

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

Egor, I don't have much experience with Aurora, but as far as I see, it doesn't support mounting volumes from host yet: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1107 In my opinion we should try to investigate currently existing frameworks which meets our main criteria before making

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

Thanks for all your efforts Sean. I was actually thinking a separate IRC for this effort would be great and will help all the interested people to come together and develop. Any thoughts on this? Thanks Vikram On Nov 3, 2015 11:54 PM, "Sean M. Collins" wrote: > I made a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

+1 On 11/03/2015 09:25 AM, Gregory Haynes wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the > diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of > contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

Excerpts from Gregory Haynes's message of 2015-11-03 07:25:27 -0800: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the > diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of > contributions for some time to the project, and has been a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

On 11/03/2015 04:16 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki wrote: Hi, +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. I'd like to add that these 3 things (pid=host, net=host, -v) are supported by Marathon, so probably it's much less

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bandit] Handling bandit configuration files in Oslo.

Excerpts from Cyril Roelandt's message of 2015-11-03 16:46:25 +0100: > On 11/02/2015 07:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > If we can add this command directly in our tox.ini and entirely avoid > > having the bandit.yaml would that be even better? > > Why not, but it'd have some drawbacks as

[openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

Hi all, We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We would like to contribute it. However, We would like this change to land in the next maintenance release of Kilo. Is it possible? What should be the process

[openstack-dev] [release] stable branch release process changes

As we discussed at the summit, we are going to be changing the way we handle releases from stable branches, starting with stable/liberty this cycle. In the past the release team and stable maintenance team have coordinated stable releases of all projects at specific times during the life cycle of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] should we open gate for per sub-project stable-maint teams?

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > currently we have a single neutron-wide stable-maint gerrit group that > maintains all stable branches for all stadium subprojects. I believe > that in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

On 15:26 Nov 03, Robert Collins wrote: > Hi, at the summit we had a big session on distributed lock managers (DLMs). > > I'd just like to highlight the conclusions we came to in the session ( > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cross-project-dlm > ) Also Cinder will be spearheading

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

Michal/Steve, could you elaborate about choosing Marathon vs Aurora vs custom scheduler (to implement very precise control around placement/failures/etc)? ‹ Egor On 11/2/15, 22:44, "Michal Rostecki" wrote: >Hi, > >+1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. > >I'd like

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] about $::os_service_default

What is the issue with logging? Can someone other than Yanis look into this? On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I'm seeing a lot of patches using the new $::os_service_default. > > Please stop trying to using it at this time. The feature is not stable >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][qos][fwaas] service groups vs. traffic classifiers

I made a very quick attempt to jot down my thoughts about how it could be used. It's based off what I proposed in https://review.openstack.org/238812, and is my attempt to take that review and use SQLAlchemy to make it actually work.

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Michal Rostecki wrote: > On 11/03/2015 04:16 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Michal Rostecki >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 to what Steven said about Kubernetes. >>> >>> I'd like to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 18:57 +0100, Michał Dubiel wrote: > Hi all, > We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with > vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We > would like to contribute it. > However, We would like this change to land in the next

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

+1 Doug On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and > constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those > written down before we start approving any changes. > > Doug > >

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] Auto discovery extension for Ironic Inspector

Hi all, For auto-setting driver options on enrollment, I would vote for option 2 with default being fake driver + optional CMDB integration. This would ease managing a homogeneous pool of BMs, but still (using fake driver or data from CMDB) work reasonably well in heterogeneous case. As for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

On 03/11/15 15:25, Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in reviews lately. Thus, I

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Enabling and Reading notifications

Hello, I was looking for guidance as to how to enable notifications in heat and if there is already a tool that can read those events? Looking through the code, it gives somewhat conflicting information as to the extent to which notifications are supported. e.g. [1] says its not supported, but

[openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

Hi stackers, Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, Images, ..) in the next way: >>> resource = api.resouce_do_some_stuff() >>> while api.resource_get(resource["uuid"]) != expected_status >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul Murray is interested as well. I went to make a doodle, but then realised the only non-terrible timeslot for Australia / UK / US Central is 8pm UTC (7am Australia, 8pm London, 2pm Central US). So what do people think of that time slot?

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

With the spec that Angus proposed, a read/write bind mount volume is not a requirement as the configuration comes from the central data store (etcd or zookeeper). Just pid=host and net=host are hard requirements. Nova will not work without net=host, atleast on RPM based distributions. Sam Yaple

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

Hi Javeria, Try to use 'master' in 'role' field. Example: - role: 'master' stage: pre_deployment type: shell parameters: cmd: echo all > /tmp/plugin.all timeout: 42 Let me know if you need additional help. Thanks, Igor P.S: Since Fuel 7.0 it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating puppet-keystone-core and proposing Richard Megginson core-reviewer

Sorry I replied to this right away but used the wrong email address and it bounced! > I've appreciated all of richs v3 contributions to keystone. +1 from me. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Question about Microsoft Hyper-V CI tests

Hello, I'm now working on patch to neutron to add QoS in linuxbridge: https:// review.openstack.org/#/c/236210/ Patch is not finished yet but I have some "problem" with some tests. For example Microsoft Hyper-V CI check are failing. When I checked logs of this tests in

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

Matthew, There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/ There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/ Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog those updates thanks, Dims On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Matthew Thode

[openstack-dev] [tripleO] appropriate location for docker image uploading

I'm looking at introducing the ability for tripleoclient to upload docker images into a docker registry (planning for it to be installed in the undercloud [1]). I wanted to make sure something like this would be accepted or get suggestions on an alternate approach. Ultimately may end up looking

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Role for Fuel Master Node

Hey everyone, I've been working on a fuel plugin and for some reason just cant figure out how to run a task on the fuel master node through the tasks.yaml. Is there even a role for it? Something similar to what ansible does with localhost would work. Thanks, Javeria

[openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

Are these constraints locked in place for the entire release cycle? It doesn't look like the stable/liberty version has been updated since release and it'd be nice if newer versions of the packages were tested, specifically babel in my case (as we have to have users mask the newer, stable

[openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

As we discussed at the summit, the release management team is modifying our change management tracking tools and processes this cycle. This email is the official announcement of those changes, with more detail than we provided at the summit. In past cycles, we have used a combination of Launchpad

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

On 11/03/2015 01:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Matthew, > > There's a failure in grenade - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232918/ > There's a fix in progress - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240371/ > > Once that gets released in oslo.reports. We should be able to unclog > those updates

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO] appropriate location for docker image uploading

Excerpts from Jeff Peeler's message of 2015-11-03 11:54:24 -0800: > I'm looking at introducing the ability for tripleoclient to upload > docker images into a docker registry (planning for it to be installed > in the undercloud [1]). I wanted to make sure something like this > would be accepted or

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those written down before we start approving any changes. Doug Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2015-11-03 14:57:01 -0500: > Matthew, > > There's a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

On 04/11/15 02:25, Gregory Haynes wrote: > Current cores - Please respond with any approvals/objections by next Friday > (November 13th). +1 from me as well. -- Steve "...In the UNIX world, people tend to interpret `non-technical user' as meaning someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] new change management tools and processes for stable/liberty and mitaka

Hi Doug, Thanks for posting this. I'm working on this for Zaqar now and there is a question. As for the stable/liberty patch, where does the "60fdcaba00e30d02" in [1] come from? Thanks. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241322/1/releasenotes/notes/60fdcaba00e30d02-start-using-reno.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On Nov 3, 2015 4:29 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 14:20:10 -0800: > > Hi stackers, > > > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

Clint, Morgan, I totally agree that the pub/sub model is better approach. However, there are 2 great things about polling: 1) it's simpler to use than pub/sub (especially in shell) 2) it has really simple implementation & we can get this in OpenStack in few days/weeks What about just supporting

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance] Summary from the Mitaka summit

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:48 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > [...] > Glance Artifacts REpository (Glare) > === > > Do you remember the Glance *EXPERIMENTAL* Glance V3 API? We had that > famous discussion again, the one we had in Vancouver, Paris and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns only status? Thoughts? not sure i understand the resource status by UUID, could you explain that a

[openstack-dev] [tacker] Summary from the Mitaka summit

Here are the notes related to OpenStack Tacker project from Tokyo summit. Tacker Developer Meetup --- Rough notes are captured in the tacker design summit etherpad [1]. As discussed in the previous irc meeting [2] the team discussed possible new irc meeting slots for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] notification subteam

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Michael Still wrote: > I'd be interested in being involved with this, and I know Paul Murray is > interested as well. > > I went to make a doodle, but then realised the only non-terrible timeslot > for Australia / UK / US Central is 8pm UTC (7am

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 14:20:10 -0800: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, > Images, ..) in the next way: > > >>> resource =

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][glance][murano][app-catalog] Summary from the Mitaka summit

+1. I think we all had a great experience coming together, finding common ground, and coming up with a solid plan to move forward that helps everyone make progress. Thanks everyone for not skipping over a potentially unpleasant conversation and getting together to talk it through. I think we

[openstack-dev] [openstack] [nova] Instance snapshot creation locally and Negative values returned by Resource Tracker

Hi All, I see negative values being returned by resource tracker, which is surprising, since enough capacity is available on Hypervisor (as seen through df -ha output [0]). In my setup I have configured nova.conf to created instance snapshot locally and I *don't have* disk-filter enabled. Local

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

+1 to Georgy, we may need a framework on top of Mesos to enable Mesos manage long running services and have the capability of scaling, ha etc and Marathon is a good choice. Thanks. On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov < gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Thank

[openstack-dev] [all][ironic] How to proceed about deprecation of untagged code?

Hi, The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from ironic that has not been released in any tag yet. At first, we from the team who has written the patch thought that, as it has not been part of any release, we could do backwards incompatible changes on that part

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Hi stackers, > > Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool > that works with OpenStack are working with resources (e.g. VM, Volumes, > Images, ..) in the next way: > > >>> resource =

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-powervm] Please create networking-powervm on PyPI

I'm reaching out to whoever owns the networking-powervm project [1]. I have a review out [2] which updates the PyPI publishing jobs so we can push releases for networking-powervm. However, in looking at PyPI, I don't see a networking-powervm project, but instead a neutron-powervm project. Is there

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:57 PM, michael mccune wrote: > On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > >> What if we add new API method that will just resturn resource status by >> UUID? Or even just extend get request with the new argument that returns >> only status? >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] updating upper-constraints for stable branches

On 4 November 2015 at 09:28, Doug Hellmann wrote: > lifeless had some proposals about managing stable requirements and > constraints that he presented during the summit. We should get those > written down before we start approving any changes. The tl;dr is that we'd make a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tripleo] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

On 02/11/15 18:33, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Blame the core team :) I suspect you will end up retrying a lot of patterns we tried and failed with Kubernetes. Kubernetes eventually was found to be non-viable by the delivery of this 2 week project: https://github.com/sdake/compute-upgrade

[openstack-dev] Upgrading elasticsearch cluster Monday 11/9

Hello, The infrastructure team will be upgrading the Elasticsearch cluster used by Logstash and elastic-recheck on Monday November 9th starting at about 1700UTC. Because we are upgrading from 0.90.9 to 1.7.3 this will require a full cluster restart. During the cluster restart you will not be

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding a new feature in Kilo. Is it possible?

On 11/3/2015 11:57 AM, Michał Dubiel wrote: Hi all, We have a simple patch allowing to use OpenContrail's vrouter with vhostuser vif types (currently only OVS has support for that). We would like to contribute it. However, We would like this change to land in the next maintenance release of

Re: [openstack-dev] Learning to Debug the Gate

On 11/02/2015 12:39 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 10/29/2015 10:42 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 10/29/2015 08:27 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: >>> On 10/28/2015 12:14 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 10/27/2015 4:08 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > Learning how to debug the gate was identified as a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]L2/L3 switching between SR-IOV ports

all,i would like to check if there is a Neutron driver or agent supporting switching between SR-IOV ports on the same server.the wiki mentions 802.1Qbg for switching in the server NIC (VEB), or by hairpinning the pkts in the nexthop physical TOR (VEPA). i wanted to check if this is a supported

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

John, The main point here is to reduce amount of data that we request from DB and that is process by API services and sent via network and make SQL requests simpler (remove joins from SELECT). So like if you fetch 10 bytes instead of 1000 bytes you will process 100 times less and it will scale

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Migration state machine proposal.

Hi all, Just FYI, the WIP patch-set is now available here: https://review.openstack.org/241476 https://review.openstack.org/241477 https://review.openstack.org/241478 https://review.openstack.org/241479 https://review.openstack.org/241480 Thanks. On 10/14/2015 10:05 AM, Tang Chen wrote: Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-11-03 17:32:43 -0800: > Clint, Morgan, > > I totally agree that the pub/sub model is better approach. > > However, there are 2 great things about polling: > 1) it's simpler to use than pub/sub (especially in shell) I envision something like this:

  1   2   >