Re: [openstack-dev] {openstack-dev][tc] Leadership training proposal/info

On 9 March 2016 at 09:51, Colette Alexander wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: >>> >>> >> >> So is this for only current TC members? What about people that aren't on >> the TC? >> >> I asked in this in

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Proposing Alicja Kwasniewska for core reviewer

Thank you! I really appreciate being a part of Kolla project and now also core reviewers team! It is a pleasure to work with you guys. Thank you all for your support and help (especially for all -1 ;) ), wouldn't be here without you! Kind regards, Alicja PS best present for Women's Day ever!

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

But Jeremy: Atomic Zuul. How cool is that name. So I know I'm going to potentially get yelled at for voicing this, but what are the chances that app-catalog and Horizon are ever installed on the same system? That is, could it have its own xstatic constraints, with the promise that the two

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] unable to see compute.node.cpu.* metrics in ceilometer

On Mar 8, 2016 02:15, Kapil wrote: > Hi > > > I enabled ComputeDriverCPUMonitor in nova.conf on one of the compute > nodes, restarted nova-compute, ceilometer-agent-compute on the compute > node and ceilometer-collector, ceilometer-api, > ceilometer-agent-central,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 2016-03-09 13:57:45 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote: > On 9 March 2016 at 13:07, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-03-08 17:25:41 +1100 (+1100), Richard Jones wrote: > > [...] > >> SOLUTION 6 - make zuul capable of performing atomic cross-repository > >> commits. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog] Nominating Kirill Zaitsev to App Catalog Core

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Christopher Aedo wrote: > I'd like to propose Kirill Zaitsev to the core team for app-catalog > and app-catalog-ui. > Kirill has been actively involved with the Community App Catalog since > nearly the beginning of the project, and more recently has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 9 March 2016 at 13:07, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-08 17:25:41 +1100 (+1100), Richard Jones wrote: > [...] >> SOLUTION 6 - make zuul capable of performing atomic cross-repository >> commits. > > This seems unlikely to happen, as it's very much counter to Zuul's >

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

On 3/8/2016 4:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/8/2016 3:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/8/2016 1:18 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: Matt, See inline below. -amrith -Original Message- From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 2:00 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 9 March 2016 at 14:23, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-09 13:57:45 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote: >> On 9 March 2016 at 13:07, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> > On 2016-03-08 17:25:41 +1100 (+1100), Richard Jones wrote: >> > [...] >> >> SOLUTION 6 -

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] mitaka-3 development milestone

On 2016-03-08 15:13:40 -0500 (-0500), Corey Bryant wrote: [...] > I'm only seeing neutron-vpnaas-8.0.0.0b3.dev1.tar.gz on > https://tarballs.openstack.org/neutron-vpnaas. Do we need an > update there? After some investigation, it appears your tarball jobs were broken up until

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Javascript linting and documentation

Hey all, I started looking into fixing the wall of "npm run lint" warnings today and quickly noticed that about 85% of the "linting" warnings were about jsdoc. We have significant issues around jsdoc anyway and we're supposed to be using Sphinx anyway[1]. Some Horizon folks will know that I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Maksim Malchuk for the fuel-virtualbox-core team

+1 Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 03 Mar 2016, at 17:03, Dmitry Klenov wrote: > > Maksim, good job! +1 from my side though I am not a core. > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Aleksey Zvyagintsev >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 03/08/2016 09:58 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec wrote: On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins wrote: On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh] "aodh alarm list" vs "aodh alarm search"

Thanks for this discussion and the agreement, it sounds good, I will upload related changes. -- Liu sheng 在 2016/3/7 23:42, gordon chung 写道: On 07/03/2016 8:05 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Mar 07 2016, gordon chung wrote: shall we drop 'alarm search' nomenclature and use just 'alarm

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo.messaging dispatching into private/protected methods?

So during this exploration of this code for the above review it made me wonder if this is a feature or bug, or if we should at least close the hole of allowing calling into nearly any endpoint method/attribute (even non-callable ones to?). ... Thoughts? I agree that doesn't make any sense to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

From: Matt Fischer > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Tuesday 8 March 2016 at 20:35 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

> > > I don't think your example is right: "PKI will validate that token > without going to any keystone server". How would it track revoked tokens? > I'm pretty sure that they still get validated, they are stored in the DB > even. > > I also disagree that there are different use cases. Just

Re: [openstack-dev] [L2-Gateway] Install and Configuration issue

Hi Jason, According to the L2GW config, it should be set as in this line: https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw/blob/master/etc/l2gw_plugin.ini#L25 I think it should be working as default setting, but maybe you can try to set this explicitly. Hope it helps, Irena On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Last chance to finish changes affecting DB schema for Mitaka

Henry, i think it's better to fix model vs migration mismatch issues [1] before tagging. how do you think? [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287016/ On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Henry Gessau wrote: > By tomorrow we intend to tag the heads of all the neutron alembic

Re: [openstack-dev] {openstack-dev][tc] Leadership training proposal/info

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Colette Alexander < colettealexan...@gmail.com> wrote: > So I laid out some of the questions I think the community could benefit > from alignment on in the etherpad I started already[0], but one of the > things that really struck me when talking to various members

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Proposal to add Diana Whitten to horizon-core

+1, no questions asked. It is rare to find somebody with the passion that Diana has shown. From: Lin Hua Cheng > Reply-To: OpenStack List > Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Proposal to add Diana Whitten to horizon-core

+1 we need Diana's perspective, knowledge and enthusiasm On 9 March 2016 at 10:03, Tripp, Travis S wrote: > +1, no questions asked. It is rare to find somebody with the passion that > Diana has shown. > > From: Lin Hua Cheng

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][release] Releasing python-neutronclient 4.1.2?

On 8 March 2016 at 15:07, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Armando M.'s message of 2016-03-08 12:49:16 -0700: > > Hi folks, > > > > There's a feature or two that are pending to be delivered in Mitaka > [1,2], > > and those involve changes to both the server and client

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][release] Releasing python-neutronclient 4.1.2?

Excerpts from Armando M.'s message of 2016-03-08 12:49:16 -0700: > Hi folks, > > There's a feature or two that are pending to be delivered in Mitaka [1,2], > and those involve changes to both the server and client sides. Ideally we'd > merge both sides in time for Mitaka RC and that implies that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][app-catalog] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

fyi, we are planning on using the xstatic packages for the app catalog website so we can share as much code as possible with horizon and the app catalog horizon plugin. So it will affect the app catalog too, not just horizon. Thanks, Kevin From: David Lyle

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [horizon] [qa] keystone versionless endpoints and v3

So with the merge of [1] the devstack change [2] to use unversioned endpoints passes gate. From previous experience this should not be considered an extensive test, however the only real way to find out what doesn't work is to merge it and see what fails. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] {openstack-dev][tc] Leadership training proposal/info

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > As I understood it when this course was originally proposed, the > idea was to have a few folks already in leadership positions go > take the training and evaluate it. Then, assuming the evaluation > was good, we

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Mitaka release schedules and priorities - only 30 days left!

Hi Koala Bears! The release candidate schedules are as follows: We are in feature freeze. No new features in Kolla until after Mitaka is released on April 4th-April 8th. We may lag this date a little bit depending on the state of the tarballs repo for build from source, or we may just tag

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR] No Meeting tomorrow

Sorry for the late notice, but I need to cancel the DVR meeting for tomorrow the 9th as a few of us have a conflict. We'll resume again next week on the 16th. -Brian __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2016-03-08 21:22:11 +: > > On 08/03/2016 6:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on > > WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally > > trying to keep things

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Proposal to add Diana Whitten to horizon-core

big +1 from me. She made a lot of contribution in making theming better for horizon and also prevented potential issues through reviews. Thanks for all the hard work, Diana. -Lin On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:06 PM, David Lyle wrote: > I propose adding Diana Whitten[1] to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 2016-03-08 17:25:41 +1100 (+1100), Richard Jones wrote: [...] > SOLUTION 6 - make zuul capable of performing atomic cross-repository > commits. This seems unlikely to happen, as it's very much counter to Zuul's designed-in reliance on serializing changes to test before merging them. -- Jeremy

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Proposal to add Diana Whitten to horizon-core

I propose adding Diana Whitten[1] to horizon-core. Diana is an active reviewer, contributor and community member. Over the past couple of releases, Diana has driven extensive changes around theme-ability in Horizon and drastically increased the standardization of our use of bootstrap. During this

[openstack-dev] [kolla][release] Announcing Kolla Mitaka-3 milestone release \o/

Fellow OpenStackers, The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of Mitaka milestone #3. Angus Salkeld has agreed to be our release manager for the kolla-mesos repository. As an aside, we held our midcycle during mitaka-3 development, for which the notes can be found here:

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] Proposal of Dashboard for TaaS

Thanks Soichi and Kaz for your work on implementing Horizon (dashboard) support for TaaS. The proposal (with screen shots) discussed in our recent IRC meeting look very nice. Here are some additional suggestions for improvement. 1. General a. When a port is being selected (for a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

On 09/03/16 05:41, Johannes Grassler wrote: Hello, On 03/08/2016 04:57 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 08/03/16 10:40, Johannes Grassler wrote: On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins'

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg: Configuration Management tool for Openstack.

Hi, If you just started your journey for OpenStack, I recommend you to try "Packstack". With Packstack, you could deploy your OpenStack cluster simply with an all-in-one mode to play with. If you wish to add more nodes later, by giving the appropriate configurations in the answer file, your

[openstack-dev] [L2-Gateway] Install and Configuration issue

Hi, I am trying to get the L2GW plugin working with my openstack setup. I did the installation from the git repo using setup.py install. I am having trouble getting the Neutron-server to take the plugin though. Here is the config line from the neutron.conf: # Plugins core_plugin =

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me know. IMHO I could -; Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Khayam Gondal wrote: > July 13,2015 to July 15,2015 in Tokyo Japan. > http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan > > Let

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Leadership training proposal/info

On 07/03/16 23:44 -0800, Colette Alexander wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: Current status, btw is 5 TC members as a 'yes' for going on April 21/22  - the Thurs/Fri before the summit. 4 additional people have mentioned they're

[openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed that WSME is _not_ a web framework that we should be encouraging. Though it looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? Also, do we already have clear ideas on where we want to get? While the three points are clear from a general point of view, what does each of those points really mean? Which

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? Best, -jay On 03/08/2016 07:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote: Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? No, that is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? sdague and I were just talking about this and using codesearch.openstack.org the list is something like (but probably not completely accurate): aodh blazar ceilometer cerberus

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg: Configuration Management tool for Openstack.

Hi, Since I think Ansible is the best config management tool, you should try the openstack-ansible installer, or our Ansible based one: https://github.com/DoclerLabs/openstack Br, György > -Original Message- > From: cool dharma06 [mailto:cooldharm...@gmail.com] > Sent: 2016 március 7,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

24 instances as shown by codesearch: http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=%5E(wsme%7CWSME)=nope=%5E.*requirements.txt= -- Dims On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? > > Best, > -jay > > On 03/08/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg: Configuration Management tool for Openstack.

Good post! http://docs.openstack.org/developer/openstack-ansible/install-guide/index.html So ansible?, I'm puppeter though... Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote: > Hi, > > Since I think Ansible is the best config

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Thanks Khayam for the info Shinobu do you have any initial thoughts on what you would like to present ? :) On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me > know. > IMHO I could -; > > Cheers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote: Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? No, that is the biggest reason I'm calling it unmaintained. Neither Lucas nor I have the time nor interest in being the people

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

When? Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Khayam Gondal wrote: > Does anybody from community is attending the tokyo event. Its from Jul 13-15 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [nova] Standardized executable return codes/logging conventions?

I'm working on a fix [1] for bug #1538227, "Failed `nova-manage db sync` returns exitcode of 0" [2]. Having done this, I've noted that there seems to be no consistent policy around (a) what return codes to use (if any), and (b) whether to use logging or printing. Are there any guidelines on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

So this looks like only a database migration, right? -Original Message- From: Eichberger, German [mailto:german.eichber...@hpe.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All] Api development question

Hi all, I am working on a feature for share access in manila. For that lets say for creating the entity, I created client and server counterpart. I am stuck as my client request is not able to reach server resource I have created for it. This is client server log

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

July 13,2015 to July 15,2015 in Tokyo Japan. http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan Let me know if anyone is interested. Especially from Tricircle community. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > When? > > Cheers, > S > > On Tue, Mar 8,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Same with Radware. Hence my proposal. -Original Message- From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 3:42 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1

Re: [openstack-dev] [packstack] Update packstack core list

> Hi, > > [post originally sent on RDO-list but I've been told I should use this > channel] > > I've looked at packstack core-list [1] and I suggest we revisit to keep > only active contributors [2] in the core members list. > > The list seems super big comparing to who is actually active on

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Does anybody from community is attending the tokyo event. Its from Jul 13-15 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Single Sign On integration research

Hi, as you may know currently Keystone supports Single Sign-On (SSO) and as I think it is one of the most interesting features in Keystone. I've done research on Single Sign-On in Keystone. Practically I just tried to set up Keystone in 2 different configuration. As a result of my research I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All] Api development question

"Not found" means API you request is not registered. AFAICS, you register "access_groups", but request "access-groups". Diff in symbols "_" and "-". On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:34 PM, wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am working on a feature for share access in manila. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Performance] Let's have next meeting on March 15th

Just a reminder: we won't have a meeting today! Happy Women's Day! Cheers, Dina On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Dina Belova wrote: > Folks, > > due to the schedule our next meeting > is going to happen > on March

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Standardized executable return codes/logging conventions?

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 06:16 AM, Finucane, Stephen wrote: > I'm working on a fix [1] for bug #1538227, "Failed `nova-manage db > sync` returns exitcode of 0" [2]. Having done this, I've noted that > there seems to be no consistent policy around (a) what return codes to > use (if any), and (b)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Identifying Mitaka release blockers

On 3 March 2016 at 13:10, Markus Zoeller wrote: > We have now 11-15 days left [1] until it is planned to release the first > release candidate. To provide a stable release, we need to identify the > potential release blockers. Bugs which potentially block the release > should

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the wrong usage of 'format' jsonschema keyword in server create API

2016-03-07 21:10 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes : > On 03/07/2016 08:05 AM, Alex Xu wrote: > >> 2016-03-07 19:23 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague > >: >> >> On 03/07/2016 01:18 AM, Alex Xu wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Due to this regression

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] DocImpact in reviews

I don't think we can really expect new contributors to understand all the magic flags. This isn't a typical problem - typically DocImpact is used correctly. But it is the responsibility of the core reviewers to make sure that new contributors aren't needlessly wasting time by triggering

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Single Sign On integration research

Good job Kseniya :) A. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Awesome blogs, Kseniya, thank you for sharing this! :) > -jay > > On 03/08/2016 09:12 AM, Kseniya Tychkova wrote: > >> Hi, >> as you may know currently Keystone supports Single Sign-On (SSO) and as >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

Hello, On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins' add_dependencies() methods] Yes, you're right and this sucks. That's not the only problem we've had in this area recently - for example there was

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Single Sign On integration research

Awesome blogs, Kseniya, thank you for sharing this! :) -jay On 03/08/2016 09:12 AM, Kseniya Tychkova wrote: Hi, as you may know currently Keystone supports Single Sign-On (SSO) and as I think it is one of the most interesting features in Keystone. I've done research on Single Sign-On in

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Single Sign On integration research

Looks great! I only have one suggestion for the ECP blog. We actually have keystoneauth plugins for ECP [1]. Instead of issuing a request in your example, you may be able to just use the federated auth plugin. [1]

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Last chance to finish changes affecting DB schema for Mitaka

By tomorrow we intend to tag the heads of all the neutron alembic branches with the MITAKA label [1][2][3][4]. If you have a patch that adds an alembic migration and you want to get it in Mitaka you must be associated with a targeted BP/RFE/bug [5] and get your code merged by tomorrow (Wednesday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

Hello, On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins' add_dependencies() methods] In the meantime, we need to find and squash every instance of this problem wherever we can like you said. It might also

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2016-03-08 11:25:48 +: > > Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on > WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally > trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed > that

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #73

rrow at 3pm UTC on > #openstack-meeting4. > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/PuppetOpenStack > > As usual, free free to bring topics in this etherpad: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20160308 > > We'll also have open discussion f

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] exception for backporting upgrades to liberty/stable

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sam Yaple wrote: > > Obviously I am +1 on committing to a stable _stable_ branch. And that has > always required Z upgrades. Luckily the work we did in master is also usable > for z upgrades. Without the ability to perform an update after a >

[openstack-dev] Interface detach results in incorrect DHCP6 functioning on higher-index interfaces

I'm using the latest Devstack installed as a standalone, and testing the interface detach functionality through the Horizon GUI. In my case, I have a special Linux image with DHCP and DHCPv6 enabled on all interfaces. Here is my config: - Two separate subnets, 'private', with DHCP enabled, and

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

Keystone supports both tokens and ec2 credentials simultaneously, but as far as I can tell, will only do a single token format (uuid, pki/z, fernet) at a time. Is it possible or advisable to configure keystone to issue multiple token formats? For example, I could configure two keystone

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

On 08/03/16 10:40, Johannes Grassler wrote: Hello, On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins' add_dependencies() methods] In the meantime, we need to find and squash every instance of this problem

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

The basic idea is to let the openstack clients decide what sort of token optimization to use - for example, while a normal client uses uuid tokens, some services like heat or magnum may opt for pki tokens for their operations. A service like nova, configured for PKI will validate that token

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Issue with glancev2 datasource driver

Hi Masahito, The debug log is attached. Thanks, Bryan Sullivan > From: muroi.masah...@lab.ntt.co.jp > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:41:17 +0900 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Issue with glancev2 datasource driver > > Hi Bryan, > > Could you show me

[openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

This is a call for help on resolving bug 1538506 [1] where the proboscis tests randomly fail on the stable branches with something like: TypeError: create() got an unexpected keyword argument 'slave_of' Craig Vyvial has a proposed stable/kilo change [2] but it has some issues, at least from

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

On 03/08/2016 11:06 AM, Matt Fischer wrote: This would be complicated to setup. How would the Openstack services validate the token? Which keystone node would they use? A better question is why would you want to do this? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:45 AM, rezroo

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

This type of configuration is not supported as Matt highlighted. What problem are you trying to solve with having the multiple token formats? Before we discuss if it would be a good idea, we need to know what problem you are solving. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Matt Fischer

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

This would be complicated to setup. How would the Openstack services validate the token? Which keystone node would they use? A better question is why would you want to do this? On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:45 AM, rezroo wrote: > Keystone supports both tokens and ec2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

Hello, On 03/08/2016 04:57 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 08/03/16 10:40, Johannes Grassler wrote: On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins' add_dependencies() methods] In the meantime, we need to find

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Does it work with DVR though? Probably would with Octavia since they are just vm's. Thanks, Kevin From: Eichberger, German [german.eichber...@hpe.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 4:11 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [oslo] oslo.messaging dispatching into private/protected methods?

Hi all, As I was working through https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288719/ for kevin benton to do some things with in neutron it came to my understanding that this code (the dispatcher code that is) can dispatch into nearly arbitrary callables of any object (or that is what it looks like it

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins wrote: >>> On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle wrote: On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Using multiple token formats in a one openstack cloud

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Adam Young wrote: > On 03/08/2016 11:06 AM, Matt Fischer wrote: > > This would be complicated to setup. How would the Openstack services > validate the token? Which keystone node would they use? A better question > is why would you want to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

On 3/8/2016 10:17 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: This is a call for help on resolving bug 1538506 [1] where the proboscis tests randomly fail on the stable branches with something like: TypeError: create() got an unexpected keyword argument 'slave_of' Craig Vyvial has a proposed stable/kilo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

On 08/03/16 08:03, Johannes Grassler wrote: Hello, On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins' add_dependencies() methods] Yes, you're right and this sucks. That's not the only problem we've had in

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

Matt, As I just said in my earlier reply to you, Craig has been away for some time and I'll look into this. I don't know that we need to revert the change or take the route you propose. There may be a much simpler solution. I'll propose a change for your review. -amrith > -Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are we ready?

Excerpts from Samuel Bercovici's message of 2016-03-02 07:06:30 -0800: > 2. HEAT Support - will it be ready in Mitaka? Side note, please remember, Heat is not an acronym. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [horizon] [searchlight] Horizon, Search, and Composability

Hello everybody, At the Horizon mid-cycle we had a lot of discussion on UI composability and searchability. Matt and Tyr provided a short presentation and demo at the mid-cycle. This morning I gave a more detailed presentation and demo via hangouts on air regarding Searchlight and Horizon. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI jobs failures

On 03/08/2016 11:58 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >>> On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins wrote: On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Proposing Alicja Kwasniewska for core reviewer

The vote is unanimous. Welcome to the core reviewer team Alicja! Ping me when you get online next and our timezone overlaps, and I'll walk you through the differences in the gerrit interface you should know. I have made appropriate changes in gerrit. Regards -steve From: Steven Dake

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] exception for backporting upgrades to liberty/stable

Exceptions can always be rationalized which is one reason exceptions are evil among many. The facts however speak for themselves. If we don't have a way to introduce new content in liberty when CVEs are fixed, stable/liberty is just as flawed as the data loss problem which was the original

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

Matt, The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix the tests. Here's why I believe that this is the case. In pertinent part, the backtrace from your bug includes: 2016-01-27 07:02:06.777 | File "/home/jenkins/workspace/periodic-trove-python27-liberty/trove/tests/api/replication.py",

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Yes, it’s Database only — though we changed the agent driver in the DB from V1 to V2 — so if you bring up a V2 with that database it should reschedule all your load balancers on the V2 agent driver. German On 3/8/16, 3:13 AM, "Samuel Bercovici" wrote: >So this looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] exception for backporting upgrades to liberty/stable

Another tricky situation.. Given that changes to Docker were the cause of the first two backports I'd consider those to not be exceptions, but necessary adaptations that Kolla has to deal with. Unfortunately, this case seems more like an exception. But, I'm not opposed to a necessary

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

On 3/8/2016 12:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: Matt, The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix the tests. Here's why I believe that this is the case. In pertinent part, the backtrace from your bug includes: 2016-01-27 07:02:06.777 | File

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][stable] proboscis tests randomly failing in stable branches; bug 1538506

On 3/8/2016 12:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/8/2016 12:35 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: Matt, The correct solution for liberty is that we should fix the tests. Here's why I believe that this is the case. In pertinent part, the backtrace from your bug includes: 2016-01-27 07:02:06.777 |

  1   2   >