I have updated the blueprint for this feature, and approved the direction for
the v0.1 milestone:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/solum/+spec/command-line
The specification for the CLI is not intended to be complete at this stage. It
only specified what I expect we will need for v0.1.
Great work!
Now the test cases in Tempest are well-stocked so it's a good time to
rearrange the design of test codes.
I checked mailing lists, IRC log and etherpads relating to this topic.
Let me leave my 5 thoughts below.
How to handle:
1. Data type (e.g, int, bool)
2. Specific value or
Dear list,
This year I was working on the idea of building an android cloud on top of
openstack.
I call it it droidstack hereby. A typical usage could be using android apps
without downloading them.
For example, playing 3d games remotely.
The implementation is thought to be consisted of
Hi,
Declaring Exceptions in Openstack projects is quite straightforward and
identical for most of the projects : all of them are defined in a global
exception.py module called each time a specific exception must be handled.
I recently received a -1 for that, so I would like to come back to
On 21/11/13 16:14 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
So I would really appreciate any comments or pieces of advice.
Is it sufficient to include just the short form of the original commit message,
along with the commit id in the oslo-incubator repository for reference?
I've done this and alse
Hi,
We add the new feature of PCI passthrough in Nova enables assigning a PCI
device to an instance in openstack.
Now we want to add integration tests in Temptest to cover our module. We come
up with several ideas like fade device or QEMU IOMMU emulator, but they are not
possible. We talk
On Fri, Nov 22 2013, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Declaring Exceptions in Openstack projects is quite straightforward and
identical for most of the projects : all of them are defined in a global
exception.py module called each time a specific exception must be handled.
No. Ceilometer doesn't have any
Greetings,
Based on the recent discussion that came out about not having enough
information in the commit message when syncing oslo-incubator modules,
I was thinking that besides encouraging people to write better commit
messages, we could also improve the script we use to sync those
modules.
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
changes don't impact any supported release of OpenStack.
Right -- the trick is what does supported mean in that case.
When the client libraries were first established as separate
deliverables, they
Mark Washenberger wrote:
My question is, is there a correct way to stage breaking changes in
Gerrit? Has some other team already dealt with this problem?
[...]
It sounds like a case where we could use a feature branch. There have
been a number of them in the past when
Tim Bell wrote:
Can we make sure that the costs for the end users are also considered as
part of this ?
- Configuration management will need further modules
- Dashboard confusion as we get multiple tabs
- Accounting, Block Storage, Networking, Orchestration
Russell Bryant wrote:
[...]
I'm not thrilled about the prospect of this going into a new project for
multiple reasons.
- Given the priority and how long this has been dragging out, having to
wait for a new project to make its way into OpenStack is not very appealing.
- A new project
Great initiative!
I would certainly be interested taking part in this -- although I wouldn't
necessary claim to be among people with the know-how to design and
implement it well. For sure this is going to be a painful but exciting
process.
Regards,
Alex
From: Robert Collins
Dmitri,
If you intend to make this middleware generic and reusable between
different OpenStack services, your best shot, to my understanding, will be
to propose a new library in oslo-incubator.
--
Best regards,
Oleg Gelbukh
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Dmitri Zimin(e) | StackStorm
I will start reading documentation in order to integrate node in development,
we also want to integrate its testing into the existing ones. I think a
blueprint will be necessary.
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Tomasek jtoma...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent:
I'd very much like to take part in the discussions. Depending on the
outcome of said discussion, I may or may not want to participate in
the implementation :)
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
In particular, has there been a decision made about whether it will
definitely be deprecated in some (as yet unspecified) future release, or
whether it will continue to be supported for the foreseeable future?
We want
On 19 November 2013 11:40, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
I've updated the Nova review check list with some details for reviewing V3
API changesets and started a bit of a style guide for the API.
Checklist:
Maxime Vidori maxime.vid...@enovance.com wrote:
Hi all, I know it is pretty annoying but I have to resurrect this subject.
With the integration of Angularjs into Horizon we will encounter a lot of
issues with javascript. I ask you to reconsider to bring back Nodejs as a
development platform.
Gregory Holt z-launch...@brim.net wrote on 20/11/2013 05:46:41 PM:
From: Gregory Holt z-launch...@brim.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 20/11/2013 05:49 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] Server Side
On 11/21/2013 01:55 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi,
Regarding less, I don't really care what compiler we use as long as it
works. And if we need to provide uncompiled less for production, then
let's use Lesscpy.
There is at least one bug open against Ubuntu[1], asking to install
On 11/22/2013 11:10 AM, Maxime Vidori wrote:
I will start reading documentation in order to integrate node in development,
we also want to integrate its testing into the existing ones. I think a
blueprint will be necessary.
Since it was such a pain to get rid of nodejs, I'd love to see
But what if I want to update some module that consists of ten or even more
files (like rpc or db) and each of these files has quite a long change log?
In that case the commit message may turn out to be really long even if only
commit ids and names are included.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:37 PM,
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:03:57 -0500
Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/19/2013 08:21 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
Related BP:
Create a unified request identifier
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id
I interested in cross-service-request-id because it
2013/11/22 John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com:
Another approach to help with (1) is in Icehouse we remove the
features from nova-network that neutron does not implement. We have
warned about deprecation for a good few releases, so its almost OK.
You want to motivate Neutron developers by
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:25:51AM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
In particular, has there been a decision made about whether it will
definitely be deprecated in some (as yet unspecified) future release, or
whether it
On Friday 22 November 2013 13:13:29 Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:55 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi,
Regarding less, I don't really care what compiler we use as long as it
works. And if we need to provide uncompiled less for production, then
let's use Lesscpy.
There is at
There is at least one bug open against Ubuntu[1], asking to install
python-lesscpy as well, as customers often need to re-create or change
stylesheets.
This would imply nodejs in a production environment, when going back to
less.
As long as the css will be the only one included into the package,
On 11/22/2013 04:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:25:51AM +, John Garbutt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
In particular, has there been a decision made about whether it will
definitely be deprecated in some (as yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/22/2013 02:19 PM, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
On Friday 22 November 2013 13:13:29 Matthias Runge wrote:
On 11/21/2013 01:55 PM, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi,
Regarding less, I don't really care what compiler we use as
long as it works. And if we
Meeting logs from the latest meeting:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_lbaas/2013/neutron_lbaas.2013-11-21-14.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_lbaas/2013/neutron_lbaas.2013-11-21-14.00.txt
Log:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
changes don't impact any supported release of OpenStack.
Right -- the trick is what does supported mean in that case.
On 2013-11-22 03:11, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Based on the recent discussion that came out about not having enough
information in the commit message when syncing oslo-incubator modules,
I was thinking that besides encouraging people to write better commit
messages, we could also improve
On 11/22/2013 02:49 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote:
It seems a bit crazy to me to introduce NodeJS as a dependency just for
the sake of an easy way to run jslint. There are other options
available that run without NodeJS as a dependency.
Sadly, the only solutions which try to implement jslint in pure
Hi Avishay, lbaas folks,
I've reviewed the wiki and have some questions/suggestions:
1) Looks like L7Policy is lacking 'name' attribute in it's description.
However i see little benefit of having a name for this object
2) lbaas-related neutron client commands start with lb-, please fix this.
3)
Russell,
First, thank you for the whiteboard input regarding the blueprint for
FreeBSD hypervisor nova driver:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/freebsd-compute-node
We were considering libvirt support for bhyve hypervisor as well, only
wouldn't want to do this as the first approach for
On 11/22/2013 10:43 AM, Rafał Jaworowski wrote:
Russell,
First, thank you for the whiteboard input regarding the blueprint for
FreeBSD hypervisor nova driver:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/freebsd-compute-node
We were considering libvirt support for bhyve hypervisor as well,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Can we make sure that the costs for the end users are also considered as
part of this ?
- Configuration management will need further modules
- Dashboard confusion as we get multiple tabs
-
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sam Alba sam.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish we can make a decision during this meeting. Is it confirmed for
Friday
I'm still a newbie here, so can not claim my Nova skills are even
modest. But I'd like to track this, if nothing more.
Thanks,
Mike___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
To add to the screams of others removing features from nova-network to
achieve parity with neutron is a non starter, and it rather scares me
to hear it suggested.
I do try not to rant in public, especially about things I'm not
competent to really help fix, but I can't really contain this one any
On 22 November 2013 12:27, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote:
But what if I want to update some module that consists of ten or even more
files (like rpc or db) and each of these files has quite a long change log?
In that case the commit message may turn out to be really long even if only
On 11/22/2013 11:17 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
To add to the screams of others removing features from nova-network to
achieve parity with neutron is a non starter, and it rather scares me
to hear it suggested.
-1 from me too, so everyone can take a deep breath on this. :-)
Providing feature
On 22 November 2013 14:59, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
One other thought I had was to add the ability to split one Oslo sync up
into multiple commits, either one per module, or even one per Oslo commit
for some really large module changes (I'm thinking of the 1000 line db sync
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:24:18AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 11/22/2013 11:17 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
To add to the screams of others removing features from nova-network to
achieve parity with neutron is a non starter, and it rather scares me
to hear it suggested.
-1 from me
I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint with the
outcomes from the face2face meetings, and drafted a specification that captures
the discussion so far. The spec is centered around the core idea of
transitioning base images into deployable images (that can be stored
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-11-22 01:50:39 -0800:
Tim Bell wrote:
Can we make sure that the costs for the end users are also considered as
part of this ?
- Configuration management will need further modules
- Dashboard confusion as we get multiple
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote on 11/22/2013 11:32:59
AM:
A good example is the current discussion around a new scheduling
service. There have been lots of big ideas around this. Robert
Collins
just started a thread about a proposal to start this project but with
a
very
Dear all,
I'm very interested in this subject as well. Actually there is also a
discussion of the possibility of an independent scheduler in the mailisg list:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-November/019518.html
Would it be possible to discuss about this subject in the
Maxime Vidori maxime.vid...@enovance.com wrote:
There is at least one bug open against Ubuntu[1], asking to install
python-lesscpy as well, as customers often need to re-create or change
stylesheets.
This would imply nodejs in a production environment, when going back to
less.
As long as
Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:49 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote:
It seems a bit crazy to me to introduce NodeJS as a dependency just for
the sake of an easy way to run jslint. There are other options
available that run without NodeJS as a dependency.
Sadly, the only
On 11/21/13, 7:51 PM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
So i've a feeling that this was proposed and dismissed once before. I
don't remember why.
So my concern with barbican is that i'm under the impression that
barbican was going to be an 'overcloud' service. That's a really bad way
Nachi,
I'm sorry to have missed this meeting. In my jet-lagged state, I
somehow got it on my calendar for last night rather than last Tuesday
night (my local time, MST). I have an interest in the dynamic routing
area of neutron and I would like to be involved.
Will this meeting be weekly?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 November 2013 12:27, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote:
But what if I want to update some module that consists of ten or even
more
files (like rpc or db) and each of these files has quite a long change
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Based on the recent discussion that came out about not having enough
information in the commit message when syncing oslo-incubator modules,
I was thinking that besides encouraging people to write better
Starting from the existing code also makes migration for production
environments currently using the code much easier.
Support those of us running production OpenStack clouds needs to be one of the
major development concerns as people reflect on refactoring along with making
sure we don't make
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 November 2013 14:59, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
One other thought I had was to add the ability to split one Oslo sync up
into multiple commits, either one per module, or even one per Oslo commit
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Gordon Chung chu...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
In all cases, these are free string fields. `user_id' and `project_id'
map to Keystone _most of the time_,
i'm sort of torn between the two -- which is why i brought it up i guess.
i like the flexibility of having
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Support those of us running production OpenStack clouds needs to be one of
the major development concerns as people reflect on refactoring along with
making sure we don't make OpenStack more difficult to
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:33:22PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
of libvirt 0.9.6.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:55:48PM -0500, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Support those of us running production OpenStack clouds needs to be one of
the major development concerns as people reflect on refactoring along with
On 22/11/13 12:06 -0500, Julie Pichon wrote:
I don't think Selenium is going away, and efforts have started around
using it as well for our integration tests [0]. Looking at the current
AngularJS patch up for review, it is testable without requiring
NodeJS.
While the Angular modules are
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder: We are meting in about 15 minutes on #openstack-meeting channel.
I wasn't able to make it. Was meeting-bot triggered? Is there a log of
today's discussion?
Thank you,
Eric Windisch
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 11:04 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Russell Bryant wrote:
[...]
I'm not thrilled about the prospect of this going into a new project for
multiple reasons.
- Given the priority and how long this has been dragging out, having to
wait for a new project to make its
I would definitely like to take part in this discussion and also
contribute where I can. I was part of the scheduler sessions in the
recent summit along with Debo Dutta, Gary Kotton, and Mike Spreitzer and
we had proposed sessions on smart resource placement, and also the
instance group API work
Hey guys, just starting out with Ironic, had a silly question.
Can we attach bootable or non bootable plain cinder volumes during either
provisioning of the baremetal instance or after provisioning the baremetal
instance?
I have seen a attach_volume method in the LibvirtVolumeDriver of the
nova
On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder: We are meting in about 15 minutes on #openstack-meeting channel.
I wasn't able to make it. Was meeting-bot triggered? Is there a log of
On 2013-11-22 08:59:16 + (+), Tan, Lin wrote:
[...]
Our module only works on the compute node that enables VT-d and
contains special PCIs which support the SR-IOV.
So is it possible to
1. setup compute node which enables pci passthrough.
2. modify the testing schedule logic
That is a fact all client side development is based on javascript, Node allow
us to easily execute javascript without a browser. Every time we will have a
reflexion on the client side, Node will show up, what we are doing is just
delaying something inevitable and wasting our forces in
On 2013-11-20 03:50:03 + (+), Tom Fifield wrote:
Just confirming that the documentation for Ubuntu sets users up
with the Cloud Archive. In Havana, Libvirt is 1.1.1 and qemu is
1.5.0. I've added a row to the table.
There's a change currently up for review to (yet once more) try
using
On 11/22/2013 12:55 PM, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch
mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Support those of us running production OpenStack clouds needs to be
one of the major development concerns as people reflect on
On 11/22/2013 02:29 PM, Krishna Raman wrote:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.com
mailto:e...@cloudscaling.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Krishna Raman kra...@gmail.com
mailto:kra...@gmail.com wrote:
Reminder: We are meting in about 15 minutes on
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a long time, taking on a wide range
of tasks. He writes good code. He's very engaged with the development
community. Most importantly, he provides good code reviews and
+1
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a long time, taking on a wide range
of tasks. He writes good code. He's very engaged
Please respond with +1/-1, or any further comments.
+1 from me -- Matt has been helping a lot lately.
--Dan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 22 November 2013 22:31, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
changes don't impact any supported release of OpenStack.
Right -- the trick is what does supported mean in that case.
When the
+1
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
Please respond with +1/-1, or any further comments.
+1 from me -- Matt has been helping a lot lately.
--Dan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
+1
On 11/22/13 at 03:53pm, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a long time, taking on a wide range
of tasks. He writes good code. He's very engaged with the development
community.
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 9:56:41 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 11/3/2013 5:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Nov 1, 2013 6:46 PM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com
mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 29 October 2013 16:11, Eddie Sheffield
eddie.sheffi...@rackspace.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Authenticated users are able to update passwords without providing
their current password
- ---
### Summary ###
An authenticated user is able to change their password without
providing their current password. This allows compromised
authentication
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 15:53 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a long time, taking on a wide range
of tasks. He writes good code. He's very engaged with the development
De : Robert Collins [robe...@robertcollins.net]
Date d'envoi : jeudi 21 novembre 2013 21:58
À : OpenStack Development Mailing List
Objet : [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest
proposal for an external scheduler in our
Hello all,
I would like to kickoff the Git integration discussion. Goal of this subgroup
is to go through the git-integration blueprint [1] and break it up into smaller
blueprints that we can execute on.
We have to consider 2 workflows:
1) For Milestone 1, pull based git workflow where user
+1
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a long time, taking on a wide range
of tasks. He writes good code. He's very engaged
+1
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.comwrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review
team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
...
21:51:42 dolphm i just hope that the version discovery mechanism is
smart enough to realize when it's handed a versioned endpoint, and happily
run with that
...
21:52:00 dolphm (by calling that endpoint and
The breakout meeting schedule poll is published here (dates will be published
here once they are selected):
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/BreakoutMeetings#Language_Pack_Working_Group_Series
If you would like to join the working group, please:
1) Subscribe to the lang-pack blueprint:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
On 22 November 2013 22:31, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
changes don't impact any supported release of
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-11-22 10:34:40 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
It can be created on request by release management members (or
infra-core team). I /think/ that by default it would get tested against
master in other
+1
Solid reviewer!
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 22, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to propose adding Matt Riedemann to the nova-core review team.
Matt has been involved with nova for a long time, taking on a wide range
of tasks. He
On 11/22/2013 06:55 PM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 22 November 2013 22:31, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert
From: Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:24 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Adrian Otto
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] git-Integration working group
On 11/22/2013 05:37 PM, Krishna Raman wrote:
Hello all,
On 11/22/2013 09:57 AM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
I don't understand why branches would be needed here *if* the breaking
changes don't impact any
Monty,
On Nov 22, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
wrote:
On 11/22/2013 05:37 PM, Krishna Raman wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to kickoff the Git integration discussion. Goal of this
subgroup is to go through the git-integration blueprint [1] and break it
up into
On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint
with the outcomes from the face2face meetings, and drafted a
specification that captures the discussion so far. The spec is
centered around the core idea of transitioning base
On 11/20/2013 07:04 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
I know it was brought up on the list a number of times, but...
If we're talking about storing commit ids for each module and writing
some shell scripts for that, isn't it a chance to reconsider using git
submodules?
No. They're too complex.
On 11/22/2013 01:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:33:22PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
Currently the Nova libvirt driver is
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-11-20 03:50:03 + (+), Tom Fifield wrote:
Just confirming that the documentation for Ubuntu sets users up
with the Cloud Archive. In Havana, Libvirt is 1.1.1 and qemu is
1.5.0. I've added a row to
On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint
with the outcomes from the face2face meetings, and drafted a
specification that captures the
Excerpts from Clayton Coleman's message of 2013-11-22 21:43:40 -0800:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 11/22/2013 11:34 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote:
I have updated the language pack (name subject to change) blueprint
with the outcomes from
100 matches
Mail list logo
