Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova] Issues syncing latest db changes

2014-02-06 Thread Victor Sergeyev
Hello Joe. Thanks for pointing this issue. We will investigate this situation and fix it. In the future in such cases you can just create a bug on launchpad. Also feel free to ping me (and another db maintainers) in IRC. Thanks, Victor On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Joe Gordon

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming

2014-02-06 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 02/06/2014 07:42 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 02/05/2014 06:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com To: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [ML2] l2-pop bugs review

2014-02-06 Thread Édouard Thuleau
Hi all, Just to point 2 reviews [1] [2] I submitted to correct l2-pop mechanism driver into the ML2 plugin. I had some reviews and +1 but they doesn't progress anymore. Could you check them ? I also like to backport them for stable Havana branch. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63917/ [2]

[openstack-dev] [nova] Making periodic tasks config consistent.

2014-02-06 Thread Matthew Gilliard
Hello everyone. wrt these bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1276203 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1272830 - I'd just like to make sure that the approach I'm planning makes sense. To summarise: Currently there are a number of methods in compute/manager.py that use the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress [for appliances]

2014-02-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800: From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] vmware minesweeper

2014-02-06 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, The following patches will really help minesweeper: 1. Treat exceptions that are caused by parallel tests. This enables us to run parallel jobs (we have very promising results of running 8 parallel test jobs): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70137/

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Weekly meeting 06.02.2014

2014-02-06 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi, Let's discuss lbaas progress and plans in #openstack-meetings 14-00 UTC today. Meeting agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/LBaaS Thanks, Eugene. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Image caching aging

2014-02-06 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, It has come to my attention that this blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-image-cache-management) has been deferred to the next milestone series. The blueprint ensures that the driver has aging for cached images. This is a critical issue for the driver and is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Making periodic tasks config consistent.

2014-02-06 Thread Michael Still
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Matthew Gilliard matthew.gilli...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone. wrt these bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1276203 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1272830 - I'd just like to make sure that the approach I'm planning makes sense. To

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread victor stinner
Hi, Joshua Harlow: Any mysql DB drivers (I think the majority of openstack deployments use mysql?). I don't know. Here are some asynchronous clients for MySQL: https://github.com/PyMySQL/PyMySQL/ https://launchpad.net/myconnpy https://github.com/hybridlogic/txMySQL

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread victor stinner
Sean Dague wrote: First, very cool! Thanks. This is very promising work. It might be really interesting to figure out if there was a smaller project inside of OpenStack that could be test ported over to this (even as a stackforge project), and something we could run in the gate. Oslo

[openstack-dev] [nova] bp: glance-snapshot-tasks

2014-02-06 Thread Alexander Gorodnev
Hi, A blue print was created and Joshua even wrote quite huge text. Right now this BP in Drafting stage, so I want to bring this BP to life and continue working on the topic. I even tried to make some changes without approvement (only just as experiment) and got negative feedbacks. These steps I

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion

2014-02-06 Thread Florent Flament
Vish: +1 for hierchical IDs (e.g: b04f9ea01a9944ac903526885a2666de.c45674c5c2c6463dad3c0cb9d7b8a6d8) (names used for clarity of explanations). Chris: +1 for hierarchical /project flavors, images, and so on .. Vinod, Vish: Starting new Thread [openstack-dev][keystone] Centralized policy rules

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling the gantt scheduler in devstack

2014-02-06 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni
Small correction inline s/filter_shceduler/filter_scheduler in SCHEDULER environment variable. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.comwrote: Now that a preview version of the new gantt scheduler is available there is the problem of configuring devstack to

[openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

2014-02-06 Thread Matthew Booth
There's currently an effort to create a common internal API to the vSphere/ESX API: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/vmware-api I see there's some code already in place which essentially copies what's currently in Nova. Having spent some time digging in this code recently, I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Repositoris re-organization

2014-02-06 Thread Serg Melikyan
Hi, Alexander, In general I am completely agree with Clint and Robert, and as one of contributors of Murano I don't see any practical reasons for repositories reorganization. And regarding of your proposal I have a few thoughts that I would like to share below: This enourmous amount of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

2014-02-06 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are taking working code and moving it to the common library, not doing any rewrites and using the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Making periodic tasks config consistent.

2014-02-06 Thread Matthew Gilliard
If there is agreement that it's a change worth making, then I expect something like: 1/ Add a warning for users who use period of 0 or use the default. Both in the literal sense of log.warning() and in the documentation. 2/ wait for a full release-cycle 3/ make the actual change in Juno. Does

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] RFC - Suggestion for switching from Less to Sass (Bootstrap 3 Sass support)

2014-02-06 Thread Jiri Tomasek
Hey, Switching to SASS/Compass seems to me like a nice idea. Although reading Compass docs on using it in django/python projects [1], they recommend to serve compiled css in as output for production, so the production servers don't have to carry ruby/compass gems dependencies. Also in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

2014-02-06 Thread Matthew Booth
On 06/02/14 11:24, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are taking working code and moving it to the common library,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

2014-02-06 Thread Gary Kotton
On 2/6/14 1:58 PM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/02/14 11:24, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are

Re: [openstack-dev] why do we put a license in every file?

2014-02-06 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 05/02/14 17:46, Jay Pipes wrote: On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:29 +, Greg Hill wrote: I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code in our projects. Meh, probably just habit and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] RFC - Suggestion for switching from Less to Sass (Bootstrap 3 Sass support)

2014-02-06 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 05/02/14 17:32, Jaromir Coufal wrote: [snip] Other concern will be with compilers. So far I've found 3 ways: * rails dependency (how big problem would it be?) * https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scss/0.7.1 * https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SassPython/0.2.1 * ... (other suggestions?) The first of

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Integrating with 3rd party DB

2014-02-06 Thread Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
Hello stackers, We have a database with tables users, projects, roles, etc. Is there any reference implementation or best practices to make keystone use this DB instead of its own? I have been reading https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Keystone/Federation/Blueprint but I could not find a open

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI pass-through SRIOV binding of ports

2014-02-06 Thread Sandhya Dasu (sadasu)
Hi Bob and Irena, Thanks for the clarification. Irena, I am not opposed to a SriovMechanismDriverBase/Mixin approach, but I want to first figure out how much common functionality there is. Have you already looked at this? Thanks, Sandhya On 2/5/14 1:58 AM, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming

2014-02-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 02/05/2014 06:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: In this case, we are talking about documentation that is produced and distributed with the integrated release to cover the Core OpenStack Project and the “modules that are distributed together with the Core OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC: Generate API sample files from API schemas

2014-02-06 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi, I'd like to propose one idea that autogenerates API sample files from API schema for Nova v3 API. We are working on API validation for v3 API, the works require API schema which is defined with JSONSchema for each API. On the other hand, API sample files of v3 API are autogenerated from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
Russell Bryant wrote: Perhaps going through this process for a single project first would be helpful. I agree that some clarification is needed on the details of the expected result. At this point, I think we can break their request into two separate questions. The first one is high level,

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mark Washenberger wrote: I don't have any issue defining what I think of as typical extension / variation seams in the Glance code base. However, I'm still struggling to understand what all this means for our projects and our ecosystem. Basically, why do I care? What are the implications of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Governance] Integrated projects and new requirements

2014-02-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
Dina Belova wrote: Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled. Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly

Re: [openstack-dev] Modularity of generic driver (network mediated)

2014-02-06 Thread Swartzlander, Ben
Raja, this is one of a few workable approaches that I've thought about. I'm not convinced it's the best approach, but it does look to be less effort so we should examine it carefully. One thing to consider is that if we go down the route of using service VMs for the mediated drivers (such as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming

2014-02-06 Thread Anne Gentle
We're looking for answers and a response on this thread from the Foundation/board. Just wanted to be sure you all know I'm following up and getting clarity is a priority. Thanks, Anne From: Steve Gordon [sgor...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 04,

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: (This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one integrated project) The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the Technical Committee yesterday about which code

Re: [openstack-dev] [Governance] Integrated projects and new requirements

2014-02-06 Thread Dina Belova
I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, so that we give this new review's process some mileage. +1, good idea On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Dina

Re: [openstack-dev] [Governance] Integrated projects and new requirements

2014-02-06 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Probably all PTLs could be asked to prepare initial report for requirements like it was done last time for graduating projects. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote: I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I propose we start with projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
Dolph Mathews wrote: I'm curious about the level of granularity that's envisioned in each definition. Designated sections could be as broad as keystone.* or as narrow as keystone.token.controllers.Auth.validate_token_head(). It could be defined in terms of executables, package paths, or line

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Russell Bryant wrote: Perhaps going through this process for a single project first would be helpful. I agree that some clarification is needed on the details of the expected result. At this point, I think we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Dolph Mathews wrote: I'm curious about the level of granularity that's envisioned in each definition. Designated sections could be as broad as keystone.* or as narrow as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Scheduler] Policy Based Scheduler and Solver Scheduler

2014-02-06 Thread Gil Rapaport
Mike, exactly: we would like to allow flexibility complexity at the Advisor level without it affecting the placement computation. Advisors are expected to manifest complex behavior as suggested by these BPs and gather constraints from multiple sources (users and providers). The idea is indeed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming

2014-02-06 Thread Anne Gentle
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote: On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com To: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] Enabling the gantt scheduler in devstack

2014-02-06 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Swapnil- Tnx (dyslexics of the world Untie :) -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 From: Swapnil Kulkarni [mailto:swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 3:26 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
I have just tagged WSME 0.6. It is now on PyPI, and should be picked up automatically by gate jobs as soon as the mirror updates. Changes since the 0.5b6 release we have been using: $ git log --format=oneline 0.5b6..0.6 e26d1b608cc5a05940c0b6b7fc176a0d587ba611 Add 'readonly' parameter to wsattr

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Maintaining support for the Tail-f NCS mech driver in Icehouse

2014-02-06 Thread Luke Gorrie
Howdy! My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with Icehouse. In particular, our attempt to fulfill the 3rd party testing requirements

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Extending] Binding/Restricting subnets to specific hosts more

2014-02-06 Thread Joe Harrison
Hi, (Scroll down for tl;dr) Unfortunately due to networking constraints I don't have the leisure of a large and flat layer two network. As such, different compute nodes and network nodes will be in separate distinct subnets on the same network. There will be hundreds if not thousands of

Re: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Thanks Doug, 2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com: cdf74daac2a204d5fe77f4b2bf5a956f65a73a6f Support dynamic types f191f32a722ef0c2eaad71dd33da4e7787ac2424 Add IntegerType and some classes for validation Doug Do you know when the docs will be updated ?

Re: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Doug, 2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com: cdf74daac2a204d5fe77f4b2bf5a956f65a73a6f Support dynamic types f191f32a722ef0c2eaad71dd33da4e7787ac2424 Add IntegerType and

[openstack-dev] [Swift] meeting time updated

2014-02-06 Thread John Dickinson
Historically, the Swift team meetings have been every other week. In order to keep better track of things (and hopefully to get more specific attention on languishing reviews), we're moving to a weekly meeting schedule. New meeting time: every Wednesday at 1900UTC in #openstack-meeting The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] meeting time updated

2014-02-06 Thread Luse, Paul E
What a corporate thing to do :) Good call though John -Paul -Original Message- From: John Dickinson [mailto:m...@not.mn] Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:16 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Swift] meeting time updated

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Designating required use upstream code

2014-02-06 Thread Jonathan Bryce
On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: I'm curious about the level of granularity that's envisioned in each definition. Designated sections could be as broad as keystone.* or as narrow as keystone.token.controllers.Auth.validate_token_head(). It could be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming

2014-02-06 Thread Jonathan Bryce
On Feb 6, 2014, at 2:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: Should other OpenStack projects adjust, e.g. Horizon shows Orchestration. I guess this is fine - isn't it? Yes, Horizon’s usage is fine, and in my opinion preferred for clarity. Jonathan

Re: [openstack-dev] olso.config error on running Devstack

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 2014-02-05 10:58, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.comwrote: On 2014-02-05

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [ML2] l2-pop bugs review

2014-02-06 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Feb 6, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Édouard Thuleau thul...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Just to point 2 reviews [1] [2] I submitted to correct l2-pop mechanism driver into the ML2 plugin. I had some reviews and +1 but they doesn't progress anymore. Could you check them ? I also like to backport

[openstack-dev] Ready to import Launchpad Answers into Ask OpenStack

2014-02-06 Thread Stefano Maffulli
Hello folks, we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A script will import all questions, answers, comments (and data abou user accounts) from LP into Ask, tag them as the project of origin (nova, swift, etc). You can see the results of the test runs on

Re: [openstack-dev] Ready to import Launchpad Answers into Ask OpenStack

2014-02-06 Thread John Dickinson
Sounds like a good plan. My only concern with the import is that the users are matched up, and it looks like that's being handled. The only reason I've wanted to keep LP Answers open is to not lose that content, and this takes care of that. Thanks for doing it, and lgtm. --John On Feb 6,

Re: [openstack-dev] Ready to import Launchpad Answers into Ask OpenStack

2014-02-06 Thread Steven Dake
On 02/06/2014 10:07 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: Hello folks, we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A script will import all questions, answers, comments (and data abou user accounts) from LP into Ask, tag them as the project of origin (nova, swift, etc). You can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Replication Contract Verbiage

2014-02-06 Thread Craig Vyvial
Daniel, Couple questions. So what happens if/when the volume is different on the nodes in the replication cluster? If you need to resize the volume larger to handle more data are you required to resize all the nodes individually? It makes sense that maybe all the instances could have a different

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress [for appliances]

2014-02-06 Thread Steven Dake
On 02/06/2014 02:19 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800: From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Yuriy Taraday
Hello. On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:38 PM, victor stinner victor.stin...@enovance.comwrote: I would like to replace eventlet with asyncio in OpenStack for the asynchronous programming. The new asyncio module has a better design and is less magical. It is now part of python 3.4 arguably becoming

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC: Generate API sample files from API schemas

2014-02-06 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:38 AM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose one idea that autogenerates API sample files from API schema for Nova v3 API. We are working on API validation for v3 API, the works require API schema which is defined with JSONSchema

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Has there been any investigation into heat. Heat has already used parts of the coroutine approach (for better or worse). An example: https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/heat/engine/scheduler.py#L230 Decorator for a task that needs to drive a subtask. This is essentially a

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Its a good question, I see openstack as mostly like the following 2 groups of applications. Group 1: API entrypoints using [apache/nginx]+wsgi (nova-api, glance-api…) In this group we can just let the underlying framework/app deal with the scaling and just use native wsgi as it was intended.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] bp: glance-snapshot-tasks

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi alex, I think u are referring to the following: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/glance-snapshot-tasks Can u describe the #2 part in more detail. Do some of the drivers already implement these new steps? The goal I think u are having is to make the snapshot functionality resume

[openstack-dev] [Glance] delayed delete and user credentials

2014-02-06 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Hi, guys: I looked briefly at a bug/fix, which looks exceedingly strange to me: https://review.openstack.org/59689 As much as I can tell, the problem (lp:1238604) is that pending delete fails because by the time the delete actually occurs, Glance API does not have proper permissions to talk to

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Yuriy Taraday
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote: Its a good question, I see openstack as mostly like the following 2 groups of applications. Group 1: API entrypoints using [apache/nginx]+wsgi (nova-api, glance-api…) In this group we can just let the

Re: [openstack-dev] Ready to import Launchpad Answers into Ask OpenStack

2014-02-06 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/06/2014 12:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: Hello folks, we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A script will import all questions, answers, comments (and data abou user accounts) from LP into Ask, tag them as the project of origin (nova, swift, etc). You

Re: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Renat Akhmerov
I guess it should be but just in case… Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:58, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Doug, 2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Doug, is it backwards compatible with 0.5b6? Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:58, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Doug, 2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Kevin Conway
There's an incredibly valid reason why we use green thread abstractions like eventlet and gevent in Python. The CPython implementation is inherently single threaded so we need some other form of concurrency to get the most effective use out of our code. You can import threading all you want but it

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Clint Byrum
All due respect to Zane who created the scheduler. We simply could not do what we do without it (and I think one of the first things I asked for was parallel create ;). IMO it is the single most confusing thing in Heat whenever one has to deal with it. If we could stick to a threading model

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Centralized policy rules and quotas

2014-02-06 Thread Raildo Mascena
Hello, Currently, there is a blueprint for creating a Domain in New Quota Driver who is waiting approval, but that is already implemented. I believe that is worth checking out. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/domain-quota-driver Any questions I am available. Regards, Raildo

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Jesse Noller
On Feb 6, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Kevin Conway kevinjacobcon...@gmail.com wrote: There's an incredibly valid reason why we use green thread abstractions like eventlet and gevent in Python. The CPython implementation is inherently single threaded so we need some other form of concurrency to get

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Yuriy Taraday
Hello, Kevin. On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Kevin Conway kevinjacobcon...@gmail.comwrote: There's an incredibly valid reason why we use green thread abstractions like eventlet and gevent in Python. The CPython implementation is inherently single threaded so we need some other form of

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [HA] blueprint: Provide agent service status which can be queried via init.d script or parent process

2014-02-06 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
During the design of HA deployments for Neutron, I have found that agent's could run into problems, and they keep running, but they have no methods to expose status to parent process or which could be queried via an init.d script. So I'm proposing this blueprint,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Integrating with 3rd party DB

2014-02-06 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda noo...@noorul.com wrote: Hello stackers, We have a database with tables users, projects, roles, etc. Is there any reference implementation or best practices to make keystone use this DB instead of its own? What's the problem

Re: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.comwrote: Doug, is it backwards compatible with 0.5b6? Yes, it should be. If you find otherwise, let me know so we can address the problem. Doug Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:58, Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

2014-02-06 Thread Shawn Hartsock
Hi folks, Just following up on what we were talking about in IRC. The BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-soap-session-management Is supposed to capture some of this work/discussion. Earlier in Icehouse we had thought that having some kind of pseudo transaction that could

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
+1 lots of respect for zane in doing this :) I'm still very much interested in seeing how we can connect taskflow in to your model. I think the features that you guys were wanting (remote workers) are showing up and hopefully will be all they can be! It helps (imho) that taskflow doesn't

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Devstack for IPv6 in the Comcast lab

2014-02-06 Thread Collins, Sean
Hi, During our last meeting, there was an action item to share the Devstack configuration that we have in the lab. Anthony Veiga, Paul Richie, and other members of the infrastructure team did the majority of the work involved in setting up the lab, while I was given the easier task of just

[openstack-dev] Taskflow 0.1.3 released

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi all, Taskflow 0.1.3 we released today (0.2.0 to arrive soon). It was a minor patch release to help fix the unicode/str() issue we discovered in cinder. It also includes a few other changes around testing, comments, utility functions and zookeeper backends. Full git changes: $ git log

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Support for multiple provider networks with same VLAN segmentation id

2014-02-06 Thread Vinay Bannai
Hello Folks, We are running into a situation where we are not able to create multiple provider networks with the same VLAN id. We would like to propose a solution to remove this restriction through a configuration option. This approach would not conflict with the present behavior where it is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC: Generate API sample files from API schemas

2014-02-06 Thread Rochelle.RochelleGrober
+1 Really lots more than just +1 This leads to so many more efficiencies and increase in effectiveness. --Rocky -Original Message- From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 10:17 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC: Generate API sample files from API schemas

2014-02-06 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:38:22 + Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose one idea that autogenerates API sample files from API schema for Nova v3 API. We are working on API validation for v3 API, the works require API schema which is defined with

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

2014-02-06 Thread Sukhdev Kapur
Hi Jay, Thanks for bringing this up. I have been trying to make the recheck work and have not had much success. Therefore, I agree that we should go with option a) for the short term until b) or c) becomes available. I would prefer b) because we have already invested a lot in our solution and it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] A new VMwareAPISession

2014-02-06 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Shawn, We are waiting on this infra review to pass - to create the oslo.vmware git repo. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70761/ -- dims On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Shawn Hartsock harts...@acm.org wrote: Hi folks, Just following up on what we were talking about in IRC. The BP:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC: Generate API sample files from API schemas

2014-02-06 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi Chris, -Original Message- From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 8:53 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC: Generate API sample files from API schemas On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:38:22 +

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Zane Bitter
On 06/02/14 13:22, Joshua Harlow wrote: Has there been any investigation into heat. Heat has already used parts of the coroutine approach (for better or worse). An example: https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/heat/engine/scheduler.py#L230 Decorator for a task that needs to

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Zane Bitter
On 04/02/14 13:53, Kevin Conway wrote: On 2/4/14 12:07 PM, victor stinnervictor.stin...@enovance.com wrote: The purpose of replacing eventlet with asyncio is to get a well defined control flow, no more surprising task switching at random points. I disagree with this. Eventlet and gevent

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sofware Config progress [for appliances]

2014-02-06 Thread Prasad Vellanki
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800: From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Integrating with 3rd party DB

2014-02-06 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com writes: On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda noo...@noorul.com wrote: Hello stackers, We have a database with tables users, projects, roles, etc. Is there any reference implementation or best practices to make keystone use

Re: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released

2014-02-06 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi Doug, -Original Message- From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:55 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released I have just tagged WSME 0.6. It is now on PyPI, and should be picked

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova] Re: Hierarchicical Multitenancy Discussion

2014-02-06 Thread Adam Young
On 02/06/2014 05:18 AM, Florent Flament wrote: Vish: +1 for hierchical IDs (e.g: b04f9ea01a9944ac903526885a2666de.c45674c5c2c6463dad3c0cb9d7b8a6d8) Please keep names and identifiers separate. Identifiers should *NOT* be hierarchical. Names can be. Think of the operating system

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp: nova-ecu-support

2014-02-06 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi Alex, -Original Message- From: Alex Glikson [mailto:glik...@il.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 7:01 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Oomichi, Kenichi Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp: nova-ecu-support Similar capabilities

[openstack-dev] http://www.xrefs.info: OpenStack source code cross reference and browse

2014-02-06 Thread xrefs.info Admin
hello, I made http://www.xrefs.info available to open source community in the hope of make open source developers more productive. The site hosts many open source code projects' cross references based on OpenGrok, which is a very fast cross reference tool, and easy to use. OpenStack is a big

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Joshua Harlow
+1 To give an example as to why eventlet implicit monkey patch the world isn't especially great (although it's what we are currently using throughout openstack). The way I think about how it works is to think about what libraries that a single piece of code calls and how it is very hard to

[openstack-dev] [heat] non-trivial example - IBM Connections

2014-02-06 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Thanks to work by several colleagues, I can share a non-trivial Heat template for a system that we have been using as an example to work. It is in the TAR archive here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BypF9OutGsW3Z2JqVTcxaW1BeXc/edit?usp=sharing Start at connections.yaml. Also in the

Re: [openstack-dev] Asynchrounous programming: replace eventlet with asyncio

2014-02-06 Thread Chris Behrens
On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: +1 To give an example as to why eventlet implicit monkey patch the world isn't especially great (although it's what we are currently using throughout openstack). The way I think about how it works is to think