Hello Joe.
Thanks for pointing this issue. We will investigate this situation and fix
it.
In the future in such cases you can just create a bug on launchpad.
Also feel free to ping me (and another db maintainers) in IRC.
Thanks,
Victor
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Joe Gordon
On 02/06/2014 07:42 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 02/05/2014 06:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com
To: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing
Hi all,
Just to point 2 reviews [1] [2] I submitted to correct l2-pop
mechanism driver into the ML2 plugin.
I had some reviews and +1 but they doesn't progress anymore.
Could you check them ?
I also like to backport them for stable Havana branch.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63917/
[2]
Hello everyone.
wrt these bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1276203
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1272830 - I'd just like to make sure
that the approach I'm planning makes sense.
To summarise: Currently there are a number of methods in
compute/manager.py that use the
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800:
From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Hi,
The following patches will really help minesweeper:
1. Treat exceptions that are caused by parallel tests. This enables us to
run parallel jobs (we have very promising results of running 8 parallel
test jobs):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70137/
Hi,
Let's discuss lbaas progress and plans in #openstack-meetings 14-00 UTC
today.
Meeting agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/LBaaS
Thanks,
Eugene.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi,
It has come to my attention that this blueprint
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-image-cache-management) has
been deferred to the next milestone series. The blueprint ensures that the
driver has aging for cached images. This is a critical issue for the driver and
is
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Matthew Gilliard
matthew.gilli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone.
wrt these bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1276203
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1272830 - I'd just like to make sure
that the approach I'm planning makes sense.
To
Hi,
Joshua Harlow:
Any mysql DB drivers (I think the majority of openstack deployments use
mysql?).
I don't know. Here are some asynchronous clients for MySQL:
https://github.com/PyMySQL/PyMySQL/
https://launchpad.net/myconnpy
https://github.com/hybridlogic/txMySQL
Sean Dague wrote:
First, very cool!
Thanks.
This is very promising work. It might be really interesting to figure
out if there was a smaller project inside of OpenStack that could be
test ported over to this (even as a stackforge project), and something
we could run in the gate.
Oslo
Hi,
A blue print was created and Joshua even wrote quite huge text. Right now
this BP in Drafting stage, so I want to bring this BP to life and continue
working on the topic. I even tried to make some changes without approvement
(only just as experiment) and got negative feedbacks.
These steps I
Small correction inline
s/filter_shceduler/filter_scheduler in SCHEDULER environment variable.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Dugger, Donald D
donald.d.dug...@intel.comwrote:
Now that a preview version of the new gantt scheduler is available there
is the problem of configuring devstack to
There's currently an effort to create a common internal API to the
vSphere/ESX API:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/vmware-api
I see there's some code already in place which essentially copies what's
currently in Nova. Having spent some time digging in this code recently,
I would
Hi, Alexander,
In general I am completely agree with Clint and Robert, and as one of
contributors of Murano I don't see any practical reasons for repositories
reorganization. And regarding of your proposal I have a few thoughts that I
would like to share below:
This enourmous amount of
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into
OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork
lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are taking working code and
moving it to the common library, not doing any rewrites and using the same
If there is agreement that it's a change worth making, then I expect
something like:
1/ Add a warning for users who use period of 0 or use the default. Both in
the literal sense of log.warning() and in the documentation.
2/ wait for a full release-cycle
3/ make the actual change in Juno.
Does
Hey,
Switching to SASS/Compass seems to me like a nice idea. Although reading
Compass docs on using it in django/python projects [1], they recommend
to serve compiled css in as output for production, so the production
servers don't have to carry ruby/compass gems dependencies.
Also in
On 06/02/14 11:24, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into
OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the fork
lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are taking working code and
moving it to the common library,
On 2/6/14 1:58 PM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/02/14 11:24, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed mail. For the first step of moving the code into
OSLO we are trying to be as conservative as possible (similar to the
fork
lift of the scheduler code). That is, we are
On 05/02/14 17:46, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 16:29 +, Greg Hill wrote:
I'm new, so I'm sure there's some history I'm missing, but I find it bizarre
that we have to put the same license into every single file of source code
in our projects.
Meh, probably just habit and
On 05/02/14 17:32, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
[snip]
Other concern will be with compilers. So far I've found 3 ways:
* rails dependency (how big problem would it be?)
* https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scss/0.7.1
* https://pypi.python.org/pypi/SassPython/0.2.1
* ... (other suggestions?)
The first of
Hello stackers,
We have a database with tables users, projects, roles, etc. Is there
any reference implementation or best practices to make keystone use
this DB instead of its own?
I have been reading
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Keystone/Federation/Blueprint but I
could not find a open
Hi Bob and Irena,
Thanks for the clarification. Irena, I am not opposed to a
SriovMechanismDriverBase/Mixin approach, but I want to first figure out
how much common functionality there is. Have you already looked at this?
Thanks,
Sandhya
On 2/5/14 1:58 AM, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 02/05/2014 06:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
In this case, we are talking about documentation that is produced and
distributed with the integrated release to cover the Core OpenStack Project
and the “modules that are distributed together with the Core OpenStack
Russell Bryant wrote:
Perhaps going through this process for a single project first would be
helpful. I agree that some clarification is needed on the details of
the expected result.
At this point, I think we can break their request into two separate
questions.
The first one is high level,
Mark Washenberger wrote:
I don't have any issue defining what I think of as typical extension /
variation seams in the Glance code base. However, I'm still struggling
to understand what all this means for our projects and our ecosystem.
Basically, why do I care? What are the implications of a
Dina Belova wrote:
Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a
review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should set a
specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled.
Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly
Raja, this is one of a few workable approaches that I've thought about. I'm not
convinced it's the best approach, but it does look to be less effort so we
should examine it carefully. One thing to consider is that if we go down the
route of using service VMs for the mediated drivers (such as
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
(This email is mostly directed to PTLs for programs that include one
integrated project)
The DefCore subcommittee from the OpenStack board of directors asked the
Technical Committee yesterday about which code
I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I
propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC,
so that we give this new review's process some mileage.
+1, good idea
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Dina
Probably all PTLs could be asked to prepare initial report for requirements
like it was done last time for graduating projects.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Dina Belova dbel...@mirantis.com wrote:
I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I
propose we start with projects
Dolph Mathews wrote:
I'm curious about the level of granularity that's envisioned in each
definition. Designated sections could be as broad as keystone.* or as
narrow as keystone.token.controllers.Auth.validate_token_head(). It
could be defined in terms of executables, package paths, or line
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Russell Bryant wrote:
Perhaps going through this process for a single project first would be
helpful. I agree that some clarification is needed on the details of
the expected result.
At this point, I think we can
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Dolph Mathews wrote:
I'm curious about the level of granularity that's envisioned in each
definition. Designated sections could be as broad as keystone.* or as
narrow as
Mike, exactly: we would like to allow flexibility complexity at the
Advisor level without it affecting the placement computation.
Advisors are expected to manifest complex behavior as suggested by these
BPs and gather constraints from multiple sources (users and providers).
The idea is indeed
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com
To: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development
Mailing List (not for
I have just tagged WSME 0.6. It is now on PyPI, and should be picked up
automatically by gate jobs as soon as the mirror updates.
Changes since the 0.5b6 release we have been using:
$ git log --format=oneline 0.5b6..0.6
e26d1b608cc5a05940c0b6b7fc176a0d587ba611 Add 'readonly' parameter to wsattr
Howdy!
My name is Luke and I'm helping my friends at Tail-f Systems to
support Neutron with their NCS [1] product. This went really smoothly
for us on the Havana cycle, but lately we're having a harder time with
Icehouse. In particular, our attempt to fulfill the 3rd party testing
requirements
Hi,
(Scroll down for tl;dr)
Unfortunately due to networking constraints I don't have the leisure
of a large and flat layer two network.
As such, different compute nodes and network nodes will be in separate
distinct subnets on the same network.
There will be hundreds if not thousands of
Thanks Doug,
2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com:
cdf74daac2a204d5fe77f4b2bf5a956f65a73a6f Support dynamic types
f191f32a722ef0c2eaad71dd33da4e7787ac2424 Add IntegerType and some classes
for validation
Doug
Do you know when the docs will be updated ?
Historically, the Swift team meetings have been every other week. In order to
keep better track of things (and hopefully to get more specific attention on
languishing reviews), we're moving to a weekly meeting schedule.
New meeting time: every Wednesday at 1900UTC in #openstack-meeting
The
What a corporate thing to do :) Good call though John
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: John Dickinson [mailto:m...@not.mn]
Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2014 9:16 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Swift] meeting time updated
On Feb 6, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious about the level of granularity that's envisioned in each
definition. Designated sections could be as broad as keystone.* or as
narrow as keystone.token.controllers.Auth.validate_token_head(). It could be
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote:
On 2014-02-05 10:58, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.comwrote:
On 2014-02-05
On Feb 6, 2014, at 3:09 AM, Édouard Thuleau thul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just to point 2 reviews [1] [2] I submitted to correct l2-pop
mechanism driver into the ML2 plugin.
I had some reviews and +1 but they doesn't progress anymore.
Could you check them ?
I also like to backport
Hello folks,
we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A
script will import all questions, answers, comments (and data abou user
accounts) from LP into Ask, tag them as the project of origin (nova,
swift, etc). You can see the results of the test runs on
Sounds like a good plan. My only concern with the import is that the users are
matched up, and it looks like that's being handled. The only reason I've wanted
to keep LP Answers open is to not lose that content, and this takes care of
that. Thanks for doing it, and lgtm.
--John
On Feb 6,
On 02/06/2014 10:07 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Hello folks,
we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A
script will import all questions, answers, comments (and data abou user
accounts) from LP into Ask, tag them as the project of origin (nova,
swift, etc). You can
Daniel,
Couple questions.
So what happens if/when the volume is different on the nodes in the
replication cluster? If you need to resize the volume larger to handle more
data are you required to resize all the nodes individually? It makes sense
that maybe all the instances could have a different
On 02/06/2014 02:19 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800:
From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 01/21/2014 02:16 AM
Hello.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:38 PM, victor stinner
victor.stin...@enovance.comwrote:
I would like to replace eventlet with asyncio in OpenStack for the
asynchronous programming. The new asyncio module has a better design and is
less magical. It is now part of python 3.4 arguably becoming
On Feb 6, 2014, at 5:38 AM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose one idea that autogenerates API sample files from API
schema for Nova v3 API.
We are working on API validation for v3 API, the works require API schema
which is defined with JSONSchema
Has there been any investigation into heat.
Heat has already used parts of the coroutine approach (for better or
worse).
An example:
https://github.com/openstack/heat/blob/master/heat/engine/scheduler.py#L230
Decorator for a task that needs to drive a subtask.
This is essentially a
Its a good question, I see openstack as mostly like the following 2 groups of
applications.
Group 1:
API entrypoints using [apache/nginx]+wsgi (nova-api, glance-api…)
In this group we can just let the underlying framework/app deal with the
scaling and just use native wsgi as it was intended.
Hi alex,
I think u are referring to the following:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/glance-snapshot-tasks
Can u describe the #2 part in more detail. Do some of the drivers already
implement these new steps?
The goal I think u are having is to make the snapshot functionality resume
Hi, guys:
I looked briefly at a bug/fix, which looks exceedingly strange to me:
https://review.openstack.org/59689
As much as I can tell, the problem (lp:1238604) is that pending delete
fails because by the time the delete actually occurs, Glance API does
not have proper permissions to talk to
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
Its a good question, I see openstack as mostly like the following 2
groups of applications.
Group 1:
API entrypoints using [apache/nginx]+wsgi (nova-api, glance-api…)
In this group we can just let the
On 02/06/2014 12:07 PM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Hello folks,
we're ready to import the answers from Launchpad into Ask OpenStack. A
script will import all questions, answers, comments (and data abou user
accounts) from LP into Ask, tag them as the project of origin (nova,
swift, etc). You
I guess it should be but just in case…
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:58, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Doug,
2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug Hellmann
Doug, is it backwards compatible with 0.5b6?
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:58, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Doug,
2014-02-06 15:54 GMT+01:00 Doug
There's an incredibly valid reason why we use green thread abstractions
like eventlet and gevent in Python. The CPython implementation is
inherently single threaded so we need some other form of concurrency to get
the most effective use out of our code. You can import threading all you
want but it
All due respect to Zane who created the scheduler. We simply could not
do what we do without it (and I think one of the first things I asked
for was parallel create ;).
IMO it is the single most confusing thing in Heat whenever one has to
deal with it. If we could stick to a threading model
Hello,
Currently, there is a blueprint for creating a Domain in New Quota Driver
who is waiting approval, but that is already implemented. I believe that is
worth checking out.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/domain-quota-driver
Any questions I am available.
Regards,
Raildo
Hello, Kevin.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Kevin Conway kevinjacobcon...@gmail.comwrote:
There's an incredibly valid reason why we use green thread abstractions
like eventlet and gevent in Python. The CPython implementation is
inherently single threaded so we need some other form of
During the design of HA deployments for Neutron, I have found
that agent's could run into problems, and they keep running,
but they have no methods to expose status to parent process
or which could be queried via an init.d script.
So I'm proposing this blueprint,
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
noo...@noorul.com wrote:
Hello stackers,
We have a database with tables users, projects, roles, etc. Is there
any reference implementation or best practices to make keystone use
this DB instead of its own?
What's the problem
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.comwrote:
Doug, is it backwards compatible with 0.5b6?
Yes, it should be. If you find otherwise, let me know so we can address
the problem.
Doug
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 06 Feb 2014, at 07:58, Doug Hellmann
Hi folks,
Just following up on what we were talking about in IRC.
The BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-soap-session-management
Is supposed to capture some of this work/discussion. Earlier in
Icehouse we had thought that having some kind of pseudo transaction
that could
+1 lots of respect for zane in doing this :)
I'm still very much interested in seeing how we can connect taskflow in to
your model.
I think the features that you guys were wanting (remote workers) are
showing up and hopefully will be all they can be!
It helps (imho) that taskflow doesn't
Hi,
During our last meeting, there was an action item to share the Devstack
configuration that we have in the lab. Anthony Veiga, Paul Richie,
and other members of the infrastructure team did the majority of
the work involved in setting up the lab, while I was given the easier
task of just
+1
Really lots more than just +1
This leads to so many more efficiencies and increase in effectiveness.
--Rocky
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 10:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:38:22 +
Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose one idea that autogenerates API sample files from
API schema for Nova v3 API.
We are working on API validation for v3 API, the works require API
schema which is defined with
Hi Jay,
Thanks for bringing this up. I have been trying to make the recheck work
and have not had much success. Therefore, I agree that we should go with
option a) for the short term until b) or c) becomes available.
I would prefer b) because we have already invested a lot in our solution
and it
Shawn,
We are waiting on this infra review to pass - to create the
oslo.vmware git repo.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70761/
-- dims
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Shawn Hartsock harts...@acm.org wrote:
Hi folks,
Just following up on what we were talking about in IRC.
The BP:
On 04/02/14 13:53, Kevin Conway wrote:
On 2/4/14 12:07 PM, victor stinnervictor.stin...@enovance.com wrote:
The purpose of replacing eventlet with asyncio is to get a well defined
control flow, no more surprising task switching at random points.
I disagree with this. Eventlet and gevent
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-02-05 22:17:50 -0800:
From: Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi Doug,
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:55 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released
I have just tagged WSME 0.6. It is now on PyPI, and should be picked
On 02/06/2014 05:18 AM, Florent Flament wrote:
Vish:
+1 for hierchical IDs (e.g:
b04f9ea01a9944ac903526885a2666de.c45674c5c2c6463dad3c0cb9d7b8a6d8)
Please keep names and identifiers separate. Identifiers should *NOT* be
hierarchical. Names can be.
Think of the operating system
hello,
I made http://www.xrefs.info available to open source community in
the hope of make open source developers more productive.
The site hosts many open source code projects' cross references based
on OpenGrok,
which is a very fast cross reference tool, and easy to use.
OpenStack is a big
On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:07 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1
To give an example as to why eventlet implicit monkey patch the world isn't
especially great (although it's what we are currently using throughout
openstack).
The way I think about how it works is to think
81 matches
Mail list logo
