Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Scale] [UI] Improvements to handle 200+ nodes

2015-01-20 Thread Julia Aranovich
Can we introduce both form-based and query language-based filter options? Like 'Simple' and 'Advanced' mode on JIRA 'Issues' - 'Search for issues' page. I also like a feature of saving custom user filters. Maybe it's not critical fot the first iteration but I would consider it to the next

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] What does it mean when a network's admin_state_up = false?

2015-01-20 Thread Timur Nurlygayanov
Hi Danny, I know that if we will set admin_state_up= false we will disable DHCP service for this network and new VMs will not get network settings by DHCP. On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Danny Choi (dannchoi) dannc...@cisco.com wrote: Hi, I have a VM with an interface attached to network

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Optional Properties in an Entity

2015-01-20 Thread Chris Dent
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Dean Troyer wrote: Independent of actual implementations in OpenStack, I prefer always including null/empty properties here because it is slightly more self-documenting. Having spent the morning chasing down attributes for an API to be named at a later date by looking at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Raw vs Qcow2 images_type in nova/libvirt

2015-01-20 Thread Dmitry Guryanov
On 01/20/2015 12:18 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 19/01/15 20:41, Michael Still wrote: Mostly. qcow2 can do a copy on write layer, although it can be disabled IIRC. So if COW is turned on, you get only the delta in the instance directory when using qcow2. Cheers, Michael On Tue, Jan 20, 2015

[openstack-dev] Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Given that the agenda docket is pretty slim this week, I'd like to skip this cross-project meeting and have the next one on Jan 27. sigmavirus24 posted the Cross-project DevRef akin to Nova's item but I'd prefer if we discussed it on the mailing-list first (not certain it requires

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Raw vs Qcow2 images_type in nova/libvirt

2015-01-20 Thread Dmitry Guryanov
On 01/19/2015 11:41 PM, Michael Still wrote: Mostly. qcow2 can do a copy on write layer, although it can be disabled IIRC. So if COW is turned on, you get only the delta in the instance directory when using qcow2. It seems you have to set images_type=raw (or use_cow_images=false) to disable

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Optional Properties in an Entity

2015-01-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 1/20/15, 04:13, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Dean Troyer wrote: Independent of actual implementations in OpenStack, I prefer always including null/empty properties here because it is slightly more self-documenting. Having spent the morning chasing down

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] What does it mean when a network's admin_state_up = false?

2015-01-20 Thread Erhan Ekici
Hi, There was a discussion about the behaviour of admin_state_up. You can take a look at the following link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1237807 Changing admin_state_up from True to False will break dhcp. it will remove dhcp service ports from the network but dhcp agent will be

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] RAID interface - backing disk hints

2015-01-20 Thread Ramakrishnan G
Hi All, This is regarding the RAID configuration spec that was posted for review some time back: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135899/ This review consists of a generic RAID interface currently proposed jointly by Redhat (for DRAC hardware) and HP (for iLO hardware). This spec defines a

[openstack-dev] [neutron] iptables routes are not being injected to router namespace

2015-01-20 Thread Xavier León
Hi all, we've been doing some tests with openstack kilo and found out a problem: iptables routes are not being injected to the router namespace. Scenario: - a private network NOT connected to the outside world. - a router with only one interface connected to the private network. - a vm instance

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 1/70

2015-01-20 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jan 20, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote: Note, I expect we’ll spend most of the time talking about 1. If we can come to agreement on that BP I’ll be ecstatic. And if we can't, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to get the spec freeze

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Weekly subteam status report

2015-01-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi all, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (As of Mon, 19 Jan, 11:00 UTC) Open: 122 (-11). 4 new (-10), 31 in progress (-1), 0 critical (-1), 14 high (+1) and 6

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][client] Keeping Nailgun's log after running tests

2015-01-20 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
+1 for this option. I use log while creating new tests sometimes. Aleksey Kasatkin On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko m...@romcheg.me wrote: Hi folks, at the moment run_test.sh script removes Nailgun's log file after running. The question is whether it is necessary to add

[openstack-dev] [all] private symbols in Oslo libraries

2015-01-20 Thread Doug Hellmann
tl;dr: The Oslo team differentiates between public and private parts of Oslo libraries using _ as a prefix in private names. Code using private symbols is going to break as we move things around in the libraries, so it should be changed to avoid those symbols. The Oslo team has been working over

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] RAID interface - backing disk hints

2015-01-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 07:28:46PM +0530, Ramakrishnan G wrote: Hi All, This is regarding the RAID configuration spec that was posted for review some time back: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135899/ This review consists of a generic RAID interface currently proposed jointly by Redhat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

2015-01-20 Thread Erlon Cruz
Thanks Deepak! Mike is also sending the announce to the vendors in the mail accounts listed in the CI Status page[1]. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Yuck ! its Mar. 19, 2015 (bad copy

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][oslo] plan till end-of-Kilo

2015-01-20 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Kyle/all, (we were going to walk thru that on Mon, but since US is on vacation today, sending it via email to openstack-dev@.) Great, thanks Ihar! So I've talked to Doug Hellmann from oslo, and here is what

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Weekly subteam status report

2015-01-20 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:41:50AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: Hi all, Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) (As of Mon, 19 Jan, 11:00 UTC) Open: 122 (-11). 4 new (-10), 31 in

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] Can we require kernel 3.8+ for use with StrongSwan IPSec VPN for Kilo?

2015-01-20 Thread Paul Michali
Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146508/ is adding support for StrongSwan VPN, which needs mount bind to be able to specify different paths for config files. The code, which used some older patch, does a test for /proc/1/ns/net, instead of /proc/1/ns/mnt, because it stated that the latter

[openstack-dev] [neutron] CentOS and PID file deletion - any solutions?

2015-01-20 Thread Paul Michali
For review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147852/, a workaround was created to resolve an issue with deleting a PID file. It adds a slash to the parent directory and then the ownership is correct and it works. Does anyone know of a permanent solution for this issue? Thanks! PCM (Paul

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila]Rename driver mode

2015-01-20 Thread Valeriy Ponomaryov
We have come to decision with it: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/manila/2015/manila.2015-01-15-15.02.log.html https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-driver-modes-discussion https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/rename-driver-modes Here is change that implements this decision:

[openstack-dev] [gantt] ad-hoc IRC meeting Wed, 1500UTC

2015-01-20 Thread Dugger, Donald D
We'll try and have an IRC meeting tomorrow so finalize the review for: Remove direct nova DB/API access by Scheduler Filters - https://review.opernstack.org/138444/ We'll start out on #openstack-nova and then create a new channel if needed (#openstack-gantt has a nice ring to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] 10Gbe performance issue.

2015-01-20 Thread Tomasz Napierala
On 20 Jan 2015, at 17:14, Piotr Korthals piotr.korth...@intel.com wrote: Hi, I am facing issue with performance of 10 Gigabit Ethernet. Environment 2 hosts each: - 2 * Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 - Intel 82599ES 10Gb Ethernet - 128GB RAM System: - Centos 6.5 delivered by fuel

[openstack-dev] Call for Testing: Ubuntu OpenStack Kilo-1 development milestone

2015-01-20 Thread James Page
Hi Folks! The Ubuntu Server Team is pleased to announce the general availability of the first development milestone of the OpenStack Kilo release in Ubuntu 15.04 development and for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS via the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. Ubuntu 14.04 LTS For now, you can enable the

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] 10Gbe performance issue.

2015-01-20 Thread Piotr Korthals
Hi, I am facing issue with performance of 10 Gigabit Ethernet. Environment 2 hosts each: - 2 * Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 - Intel 82599ES 10Gb Ethernet - 128GB RAM System: - Centos 6.5 delivered by fuel 6.0 iperf during test of network performance over single stream report 2,5-3Gbps (when

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Optional Properties in an Entity

2015-01-20 Thread Brian Rosmaita
From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack. From the standpoint of the nova API (with which I am the most familiar), I am not aware of any property that is ever omitted from

[openstack-dev] oslo.rootwrap 1.5.0 released

2015-01-20 Thread Doug Hellmann
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of: oslo.rootwrap 1.5.0: Oslo Rootwrap The primary reason for this release is to move the code out of the oslo namespace package as part of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo-incubator/+spec/drop-namespace-packages For more details, please see

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

2015-01-20 Thread Mike Perez
On 13:53 Tue 20 Jan , Erlon Cruz wrote: Thanks Deepak! Mike is also sending the announce to the vendors in the mail accounts listed in the CI Status page[1]. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/third-party-ci-status I've actually gone through each volume driver file and

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Question on functional tests

2015-01-20 Thread Numan Siddique
Hello, I am working on a bug [1] on neutron vpnaas and submitted the patch here [2]. The test code to test the fix does the following - creates a namespace - creates a veth pair and add one interface into the namespace - configures the interface with an ip address and - adds a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Health Monitor association with pool

2015-01-20 Thread Brandon Logan
Hmm that is for lbaas v2 docs which shouldn't be in the docs yet because it is not ready. We will need to file a bug with the docs team to get the v1 docs back in until v2 is ready to be used (which should be relatively soon). Thanks for letting us know! Thanks, Brandon On Tue, 2015-01-20 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Pool member status 'ACTIVE' even on health check failure

2015-01-20 Thread Brandon Logan
Yeah before we get those stats in we'll need to finalize v2 because that will affect how the API shows those types of stats to the user. On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 22:33 -0800, Varun Lodaya wrote: Hey Brandon, Thanks for the response. My bad. Seems there is a small bug in horizon. The moment you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Horizon] User self registration and management

2015-01-20 Thread David Chadwick
Hi Brad in your scenario the users are already registered - in your corporate LDAP. So this is not too dissimilar to the federation case, where the users are already registered in a remote IDP. You get the user to present his LDAP credentials, which are validated by LDAP. Federation gets the

[openstack-dev] [Rally] New awesome Rally Docs available on ReadTheDocs now!

2015-01-20 Thread Mikhail Dubov
Hi stackers, on behalf of the Rally team, I am happy to announce that we have completely redesigned our Rally documentation in ReadTheDocs http://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/. The docs have now received a simpler structure and have become much easier to get through! One of the nicest new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Horizon] User self registration and management

2015-01-20 Thread Brad Pokorny
At Symantec, we provide a simple signup button on the Horizon login page for self registration. Our goal is to not only make it easy for the user to register but to also set up some basic things to make it easy for them to start using OpenStack services. We don't use federated Keystone, so users

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] ad-hoc IRC meeting Wed, 1500UTC

2015-01-20 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 20/01/2015 17:53, Dugger, Donald D a écrit : We’ll try and have an IRC meeting tomorrow so finalize the review for: Remove direct nova DB/API access by Scheduler Filters - https://review.opernstack.org/138444/ We’ll start out on #openstack-nova and then create a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] 10Gbe performance issue.

2015-01-20 Thread Aaron Rosen
If you can get 9Gbps with multiple connections I'm guessing it's because of latency and the buffer size of your sockets. If you change the sending and receiving window size you should be able to fully saturate the link with one connection (though there are several reasons for not doing that). On

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] ad-hoc IRC meeting Wed, 1600UTC

2015-01-20 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Sorry guys, my time issues strike again. Yes, this will be at 1600 UTC (8AM PST). -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 From: Dugger, Donald D [mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 9:54 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] static files handling, bower/

2015-01-20 Thread Matthew Farina
Radomir, maybe you can help me better understand where this would go. I have a few questions. First, can you point me to a time when horizon used system packages successfully for JavaScript libraries? When I looked through the Debian and Ubuntu packages I couldn't find the libraries horizon is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Question on functional tests

2015-01-20 Thread Kevin Benton
I don't believe we have any unit tests that create namespaces or veth pairs. This sounds like it belongs with functional tests. On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Numan Siddique numan.siddi...@enovance.com wrote: Hello, I am working on a bug [1] on neutron vpnaas and submitted the patch here

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [adv-services] Question on functional tests

2015-01-20 Thread Mathieu Rohon
FYI, numan created a bug [1] about being able to run functional test job in neutron-vpnaas CI I've proposed a patch [2] which simply add neutron-dsvm-functional job in check and gate queue of neutron-vpnaas. Unfortunately, as discussed with marun on IRC, this won't be enough, since this job

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] static files handling, bower/

2015-01-20 Thread Richard Jones
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 7:00:12 AM Matthew Farina m...@mattfarina.com wrote: Radomir, maybe you can help me better understand where this would go. I have a few questions. First, can you point me to a time when horizon used system packages successfully for JavaScript libraries? When I looked

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Question on functional tests

2015-01-20 Thread Paul Michali
My question is whether the tests proposed should be unit tests or functional tests. They only test one method, and it's not a complete piece of functionality - like creating a VPN connection. If that one system call is mocked, these could all be treated as unit tests. So I'm wondering if there is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] iptables routes are not being injected to router namespace

2015-01-20 Thread Brian Haley
On 01/20/2015 09:20 AM, Xavier León wrote: Hi all, we've been doing some tests with openstack kilo and found out a problem: iptables routes are not being injected to the router namespace. Scenario: - a private network NOT connected to the outside world. - a router with only one

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Health Monitor association with pool

2015-01-20 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com wrote: Hmm that is for lbaas v2 docs which shouldn't be in the docs yet because it is not ready. We will need to file a bug with the docs team to get the v1 docs back in until v2 is ready to be used (which should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-20 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/20/2015 01:30 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On Jan 20, 2015, at 05:23, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, Given that the agenda docket is pretty slim this week, I'd like to skip this cross-project meeting and have the next one on Jan 27. sigmavirus24 posted the

[openstack-dev] [trove] Confused about nova_proxy_admin_* settings

2015-01-20 Thread Mark Kirkwood
I've been looking at how the 3 nova_proxy_admin_* settings are used. I'm coming to the conclusion that I'm confused: E.g I note that a standard devstack (stable/juno branch) with trove enabled sets these as follows: nova_proxy_admin_pass = nova_proxy_admin_tenant_name = trove

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][python-clients] More freedom for all python clients

2015-01-20 Thread Clark Boylan
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015, at 04:50 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/14/2015 03:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 13/01/15 14:31 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/13/2015 02:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/13/2015 12:39 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 13/01/15 10:01, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-01-13

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

2015-01-20 Thread Jay Bryant
Mike, Thanks for the diligent efforts to get the word out! Jay On Jan 20, 2015 12:30 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 13:53 Tue 20 Jan , Erlon Cruz wrote: Thanks Deepak! Mike is also sending the announce to the vendors in the mail accounts listed in the CI Status

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Moving tempest clients to tempest-lib (was Meeting Thursday January 8th at 22:00 UTC)

2015-01-20 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:20:12AM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi David, As we told today, I tried Neutron service client migration to tempest-lib. but I found some blocking thing for it and I'd like to share it. I thought that the base service_client module and neutron service client

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Moving tempest clients to tempest-lib (was Meeting Thursday January 8th at 22:00 UTC)

2015-01-20 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi David, As we told today, I tried Neutron service client migration to tempest-lib. but I found some blocking thing for it and I'd like to share it. I thought that the base service_client module and neutron service client are migrated to tempest-lib without other service clients as the first

[openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Jan 20, 2015, at 05:23, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, Given that the agenda docket is pretty slim this week, I'd like to skip this cross-project meeting and have the next one on Jan 27. sigmavirus24 posted the Cross-project DevRef akin to Nova's item but

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Question on functional tests

2015-01-20 Thread Kevin Benton
Is the test asserting things about interactions with the system, or does it just happen to use a system call as a side effect of one of the setups? On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Paul Michali p...@michali.net wrote: My question is whether the tests proposed should be unit tests or functional

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][python-clients] More freedom for all python clients

2015-01-20 Thread Robert Collins
On 21 January 2015 at 10:21, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: ... This ml thread came up in the TC meeting today and I am responding here to catch the thread up with the meeting. The soft update option is the suggested fix for non openstack projects that want to have most of their

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Cross-project DevRef Was Re: Skipping Cross-Project meeting today

2015-01-20 Thread Jay Bryant
+2 This topic had come up in Cinder I believe as well. Having a common devref for common content would be good and would make it easier to keep the documentation current. Jay On Jan 20, 2015 4:05 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/20/2015 01:30 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: On Jan 20,

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Magnum's First Release

2015-01-20 Thread Eric Windisch
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Hello, The Magnum community is pleased to announce the first release of Magnum available now for download from: https://github.com/stackforge/magnum/releases/tag/m1 Congratulations to you and everyone else that

[openstack-dev] some questions about neutron

2015-01-20 Thread wujiangtaoh...@163.com
hi,all: I have some questions about neutron: 1、how many compute nodes can be supported by one neutron-server ? 2、If one neutron-server can't support two many nodes , for example 1000 servers, can two neutron-servers work together in active-active mode ? Thans a lot !

[openstack-dev] [Telco][NFV] Use case documentation and review

2015-01-20 Thread Steve Gordon
Hi all, Based on the discussion last week during our first use case deep dive I have created etherpads for each use case and linked them from the wiki in the hope that this might provide a better mechanism for recording feedback in lieu of moving to a e.g. gerrit for these: