Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

2016-10-10 Thread Richard Jones
On 11 October 2016 at 08:34, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the > switch; > > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed. > > I agree, I

[openstack-dev] requests-mock

2016-10-10 Thread Clay Gerrard
Greetings! Anyone have any experience to share positive or negative using requests-mock? I see it's been used to replace another dependency that had some problems in many of the OpenStack python client libraries: Added to global requirements -> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104067 Added to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread courage angeh
All the files you specified, i don't have them. i searched using find from root but got nothing On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:13 AM, courage angeh wrote: > Here is the url of the error i get when i run zun --debug create --name > test --image cirros --command "ping -c 4

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Meeting at 20:00 UTC this Wednesday, 12th October

2016-10-10 Thread Richard Jones
Hi folks, The Horizon team will be having our next meeting at 20:00 UTC this Wednesday, 12th October in #openstack-meeting-3 Meeting agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon Anyone is welcome to to add agenda items and everyone interested in Horizon is encouraged to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread courage angeh
Here is the url of the error i get when i run zun --debug create --name test --image cirros --command "ping -c 4 8.8.8.8" : http://paste.openstack.org/show/585268/ On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:28 AM, courage angeh wrote: > Thanks bu i hav No folder zun found under /etc But

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread courage angeh
Thanks bu i hav No folder zun found under /etc But i did find a folder keystone but no log file found in the folder On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Several things to check: > > * Run “zun –debug create …” and check the output > > * Make sure your

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

2016-10-10 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Thanks for pointing this up, Jordan Before removing volume v1 API tests, it is nice to make the v2 API the default of Tempest scenario tests. Now the v1 and v2 is set as True on the default in the configuration[1], and the v1 API is used in the scenario like [2]. So it is better to switch using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread Hongbin Lu
Several things to check: * Run “zun –debug create …” and check the output * Make sure your Keystone is running on 192.168.8.101 * Check the Keystone log * Check the zun-api log * Check the config file under /etc/zun If you cannot figure it out, feel free to send me the outputs/logs above. Best

[openstack-dev] [openstack][nova] Port unbound from active VM

2016-10-10 Thread Ajay Kalambur (akalambu)
Hi There seems to be a corner case bug in nova code. Steps to reproduce it are 1. Create a neutron port 2. Create a VM and launch instance with this port 3. Shutdown nova compute and network agent on compute node 4. Unbind port from VM and delete the VM (offline delete) 5. Now

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum]

2016-10-10 Thread Qiao, Liyong
@Zhangshuai I believe you running Magnum service in China’s server, please be note that K8s would pull images from gcr.io, so please be sure you can reach gcr.io in case of China Firewall blocking it. — Best Regards 此致, 敬礼 Eli Qiao(乔立勇)Intel SSG OTC OpenStack Core Team 发件人: Ton Ngo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread courage angeh
i did source the file before running that command, This are the environment that are set: OS_REGION_NAME=RegionOne OS_PROJECT_NAME=admin OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=2.0 OS_PASSWORD=password OS_AUTH_URL=http://192.168.8.101:5000/v2.0 OS_USERNAME=admin OS_TENANT_NAME=admin OS_VOLUME_API_VERSION=2

[openstack-dev] [Karbor] Questions about algorithm of building resource graph

2016-10-10 Thread zengchen
Hi karbor guys: I have some questions about algorithm of building resource graph. I have described them in the attached file. Any thoughts will be welcomed. Thanks very much! zengchen Questions about algorithm of building resource graph.pptx Description: MS-Powerpoint 2007 presentation

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Suggestions for OOO

2016-10-10 Thread Joe Talerico
Hey all, The past couple of days I have making comments on IRC to discuss some of the issues I have bumped into when scaling Newton to > 30 compute nodes. - `bulk import`, the operation to go from enroll -> manage can take 20-30 minutes to complete. Can we have this be a non-blocking operation

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

2016-10-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Oct 10, 2016 4:35 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch; > > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed. > > I agree, I

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Project for Ruben

2016-10-10 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi Ruben, It's great that you've decided to add a datasource driver for Magnum. A datasource driver is a good place to start. In terms of getting started, if you haven't read thru the docs, start there. The Cloud Services section will give you info on datasources; at the end there is a section

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

2016-10-10 Thread Steve Martinelli
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the > switch; > > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed. > > What do

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Admin guide in-tree?

2016-10-10 Thread Lana Brindley
On 10/10/16 16:25, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2016-10-10 01:37, Steve Martinelli wrote: >> On Oct 9, 2016 6:57 PM, "Lana Brindley" > > wrote: >>> >>> Why the rush? >> >> I think its more eagerness than rush. Project teams made a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday October 11th at 19:00 UTC

2016-10-10 Thread matthew wagoner
Howdy, Some associates of mine would like to show up to the meeting to ask some questions about Zuul v3. I will add an agenda item for such, and hope there is enough time! Thanks, olaph On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

2016-10-10 Thread Eichberger, German
+1 (even if it doesn’t matter) From: Stephen Balukoff Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Monday, October 10, 2016 at 4:39 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [QA] Presence at PTG Atlanta in February

2016-10-10 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi QA team, As you know, the first PTG(Project Teams Gathering) happens at Atlanta 20th-24th February the next year. After Barcelona, OpenStack Summit will be separated into two parts (conferences and design sessions) and PTG is a new format for design sessions for developers(Please see the

[openstack-dev] [ovn][networking-sfc]

2016-10-10 Thread Murali R
Networking-sfc and ovn install guide says "port_security" must be enabled when enabling networkin-sfc (networking-ovn/doc/source/install.rst -- line 165) In my use cases it gets too complicated if I use port-security, so was disabling it. Please let me know if there is any hard requirement that

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

2016-10-10 Thread Brandon Logan
+1 On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 13:06 -0700, Michael Johnson wrote: > Greetings Octavia and developer mailing list folks, > > I propose that we add Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as an OpenStack Octavia > core reviewer. > > His contributions [1] are in line with other cores and he has been an > active member

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

2016-10-10 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:42:48AM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I think it would also make sense to *release* on the boundary of the switch; > so that it’s clear which phase a release followed. I agree, I don't really have a mechanism for do that though. I didn't state this but my plan was

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ansible][fuel][kolla][puppet][tripleo] proposed deadlines for cycle-trailing projects

2016-10-10 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Doug, We've finally fixed the blockers and tagged RC1 for all our repos. We're going to have final RC this Friday (Oct14). Could I ask you to create stable/newton branches for repos: - openstack/fuel-agent - openstack/fuel-astute - openstack/fuel-library - openstack/fuel-main -

[openstack-dev] Event notification descriptors/schemas (? swagger ?)

2016-10-10 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hi folks, At godaddy we are looking to consume the various events emitted by [nova, neutron, glance, ...] and for a while we have been having some python code to handle these and parse them and turn the ones we care about back into useful objects. At the current time though we are expanding

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

2016-10-10 Thread Stephen Balukoff
I agree whole-heartedly with johnsom's assessment of diltram's contributions. +1 from me! On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Michael Johnson wrote: > Greetings Octavia and developer mailing list folks, > > I propose that we add Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as an OpenStack Octavia

[openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

2016-10-10 Thread Michael Johnson
Greetings Octavia and developer mailing list folks, I propose that we add Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as an OpenStack Octavia core reviewer. His contributions [1] are in line with other cores and he has been an active member of our community. He regularly attends our weekly meetings, contributes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread Hongbin Lu
Courage, As suggested by Denis in another reply, you might need to source the credential before issuing the command. If it doesn’t help, please feel free to ping us in the IRC channel (#openstack-zun). Best regards, Hongbin From: courage angeh [mailto:couragean...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

2016-10-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/10/2016 7:47 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: If we can get them running on cinder patches via a different job, then removing them from the common job afterwards seems reasonable. There's no strong will to remove them, several libraries still use them, and given we're now supporting /all/ other

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-10-10 11:51:36 -0500: > On 10/10/2016 8:59 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:37:53AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >>> > >> > >> We had a lot of feedback that the unstructured discussion time from > >> the Friday "meetups" at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Ed Leafe
On Oct 10, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: >> I'd certainly appreciate a follow-up email towards the end of the voting >> period (i.e. it wouldn't even necessarily need to be a re-sending of the >> ballot link - finding that again is generally no problem). I wanted to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2016-10-10 10:49:12 +1100: > Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the TC. > > Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) > Emilien Macchi (emilienm) > Jeremy Stanley (fungi) > Monty Taylor (mordred) > Sean Dague (sdague) > Steve Martinelli

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2016-10-10 11:10:53 -0400: > On 09/10/16 19:58, Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:49:12AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > >> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the TC. > >> > >> Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) > >> Emilien

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [libvirt] Debugging blockRebase() - "active block copy not ready for pivot"

2016-10-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/10/2016 6:26 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: Also, maybe you have noticed, given Eric's reply on this thread (and the upstream libvir-list), it is agreed that virDomainGetBlockJobInfo() should be fixed "to quit reporting cur==end when ready:false". This allows the existing Nova code work

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/10/2016 8:59 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:37:53AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: We had a lot of feedback that the unstructured discussion time from the Friday "meetups" at the summits were the most productive time for teams, but I'm sure there are quite a few cases

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] How To Review tripleo-validations

2016-10-10 Thread Tomas Sedovic
Hey everyone! During the Newton cycle, we have added a new repository: tripleo-validations. This is a little guide on how to review the patches there. All the validations are YAML files under the `validations` directory. They can optionally add files in `validations/library` (for Ansible

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management Meeting

2016-10-10 Thread Duarte Cardoso, Igor
Hi Common Classifier and OVS Flow Management community, Feel free to add topics to the next meeting's agenda at: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier=edit=5 Time, location and recurrence are unchanged, so the next meeting will be tomorrow (11th October) at

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday October 11th at 19:00 UTC

2016-10-10 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday October 11th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting Anyone is welcome to to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [rpm-packaging][chef][puppet][salt][openstack-ansible][HA] Schema proposal for config file handling for services

2016-10-10 Thread Alex Schultz
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote: > Hi, > > in the rpm-packaging project we started to package the services and are > currently discussing a possible schema for configuration files and > snippets used by the systemd .service files (but this would also

[openstack-dev] [acceleration][dpacc] Work session and Meetups in Barcelona Summit

2016-10-10 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi all, For those of you (all cc'ed here) who have expressed interests in building an OpenStack acceleration service, you are more than welcomed to participate in the discussion we are now planning for Barcelona Summit. As could be found here [1], we will have a work session on Friday for Nomad

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][API WG] How does one best express a time interval as an API filtering query?

2016-10-10 Thread milanisko k
FYI The patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383862/ Cheers, milan pá 7. 10. 2016 v 10:13 odesílatel milanisko k napsal: > Guys, > > thanks for the suggestions! I like the coma separation as well, it's the > closest to the ISO style. > Let me propose the update. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

2016-10-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Erno Kuvaja Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: October 10, 2016 at 10:32:46 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [magnum] Subjects to discuss during the summit

2016-10-10 Thread Spyros Trigazis
Hi Sergey, I have seen the session, I wanted to add more details to start the discussion earlier and to be better prepared. Thanks, Spyros On 10 October 2016 at 17:36, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Hi Spyros, > > AFAIK we already have special session slot related with your

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Standardization of Keystone authtoken

2016-10-10 Thread Iury Gregory
Hello everyone, *tl;dr: *We will be removing all old parameters to configure the keystone_authtoken section that was deprecated during the Newton Cycle. In Ocata you will need to use the authtoken class for each module, except for some modules that do not provide the support yet, for more details

[openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #93

2016-10-10 Thread Iury Gregory
Hi Puppeteers! We'll have our weekly meeting tomorrow at 3pm UTC on #openstack-meeting-4 Here's the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20161011 Feel free to add topics, and any outstanding bug and patch. See you tomorrow! Thanks --

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

2016-10-10 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 10/10/16, 11:31 AM, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: >On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov >wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I want to backport this bug - >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556 >> but review for master is stuck since August - >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [magnum] Subjects to discuss during the summit

2016-10-10 Thread Sergey Kraynev
Hi Spyros, AFAIK we already have special session slot related with your topic. So thank you for the providing all items here. Rabi, can we add link on this mail to etherpad ? (it will save our time during session :) ) On 10 October 2016 at 18:11, Spyros Trigazis wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

2016-10-10 Thread Erno Kuvaja
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote: > Hi, > > I want to backport this bug - > https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556 > but review for master is stuck since August - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/ > My stand on backporting this as I

Re: [openstack-dev] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread Denis Makogon
Hello Courage. It may appear that you didn't set authorization environment variables to your OpenStack (i assume you're running devstack). So just do *source $PATHTODEVSTACKREPO/keystone.rc* Kind regards, Denis Makogon 2016-10-10 17:39 GMT+03:00 courage angeh : > i

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] Adding calbers to openstack-chef-core

2016-10-10 Thread Samuel Cassiba
Hi, Given as there have been no objections, I have added calbers to openstack-chef-core. With that, we reinstate a 2x +2 rule for changes. Congrats Christoph! Best, -sc On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 1:02 AM, j.kl...@cloudbau.de wrote: > Hi, > > sounds good, +1 from me. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Zane Bitter
On 09/10/16 19:58, Tony Breeds wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:49:12AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the TC. Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) Emilien Macchi (emilienm) Jeremy Stanley (fungi) Monty Taylor (mordred) Sean Dague (sdague) Steve

[openstack-dev] [heat] [magnum] Subjects to discuss during the summit

2016-10-10 Thread Spyros Trigazis
Hi heat and magnum. Apart from the scalability issues that have been observed, I'd like to add few more subjects to discuss during the summit. 1. One nested stack per node and linear scale of cluster creation time. 1.1 For large stacks, the creation of all nested stack scales linearly. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

2016-10-10 Thread Andrey Pavlov
Hi, I want to backport this bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556 but review for master is stuck since August - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/ On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Ian

[openstack-dev] [kolla] We plan to be in PTG

2016-10-10 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
Everyone, Kolla plans to be part of PTG in Atlanta. I hope to see you all there! Regards, inc0 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] ERROR: Not Authorized

2016-10-10 Thread courage angeh
i have problems running zun. When i try to run comaands lik: zun start test or zun create --name test --image cirros --command "ping -c 4 8.8.8.8" I get the error: ERROR: Not Authorized Futher searching it seem like i cann't connect to http://192.168.8.101:5000/v2.0 Please can someone help me?

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the next two weeks

2016-10-10 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On 10/10/16, 6:01 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >Hey Brian, > >Thanks for sending the summary out. Top-posting since it's kinda >unrelated to >the list of topics below. > >Are the cycle priorities going to be documented as we did in Mitaka? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from John Davidge's message of 2016-10-10 13:24:18 +: > On 10/10/16, 5:36 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > >It's really nice to see that we had an increase in turnout percentage > >even in the face of having our largest electorate yet. > > > >Thanks for all your great work!!! > > > >Monty

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/10/2016 10:13 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2016-10-10 09:23:43 -0400: >> On 10/10/2016 08:37 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> >>> We had a lot of feedback that the unstructured discussion time from >>> the Friday "meetups" at the summits were the most

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2016-10-10 09:23:43 -0400: > On 10/10/2016 08:37 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > We had a lot of feedback that the unstructured discussion time from > > the Friday "meetups" at the summits were the most productive time > > for teams, but I'm sure there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

2016-10-10 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 03:47:39PM +0300, Duncan Thomas wrote: > If we can get them running on cinder patches via a different job, then > removing them from the common job afterwards seems reasonable. > > There's no strong will to remove them, several libraries still use them, > and given we're

[openstack-dev] [new][ironic] ironic-lib 2.1.1 release (newton)

2016-10-10 Thread no-reply
We are grateful to announce the release of: ironic-lib 2.1.1: Ironic common library This release is part of the newton stable release series. Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ironic-lib For more details, please see below. Changes in ironic-lib 2.1.0..2.1.1

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:37:53AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > We had a lot of feedback that the unstructured discussion time from > the Friday "meetups" at the summits were the most productive time > for teams, but I'm sure there are quite a few cases like what you > describe. Maybe the

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Cancelling team meeting - 10/10/2016

2016-10-10 Thread Deja, Dawid
Hi, We decided to cancel today’s team meeting because most people are either busy with release activities or on holidays. You can share your status as a reply for this mail. My status: I have uploaded spec for workflow preconditions[1], please take a look when you have free time. Thanks,

[openstack-dev] [new][murano] murano-pkg-check 0.2.0 release

2016-10-10 Thread no-reply
We are high-spirited to announce the release of: murano-pkg-check 0.2.0: Murano package validator tool The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/murano-pkg-check Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/murano-pkg-check Please report issues

[openstack-dev] [new][ironic] ironic-lib 2.2.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-10 Thread no-reply
We are excited to announce the release of: ironic-lib 2.2.0: Ironic common library This release is part of the ocata release series. Download the package from: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ironic-lib For more details, please see below. Changes in ironic-lib 2.1.0..2.2.0

[openstack-dev] [new][keystone] keystoneauth1 2.13.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-10 Thread no-reply
We are chuffed to announce the release of: keystoneauth1 2.13.0: Authentication Library for OpenStack Identity This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/keystoneauth Download the package from:

[openstack-dev] [new][keystone] keystonemiddleware 4.10.0 release (ocata)

2016-10-10 Thread no-reply
We are stoked to announce the release of: keystonemiddleware 4.10.0: Middleware for OpenStack Identity This release is part of the ocata release series. The source is available from: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/keystonemiddleware Download the package from:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/10/2016 08:37 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We had a lot of feedback that the unstructured discussion time from > the Friday "meetups" at the summits were the most productive time > for teams, but I'm sure there are quite a few cases like what you > describe. Maybe the solution is to schedule

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread John Davidge
On 10/10/16, 5:36 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: >It's really nice to see that we had an increase in turnout percentage >even in the face of having our largest electorate yet. > >Thanks for all your great work!!! > >Monty +100 Thank you as well to all the candidates and standing TC members who took

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

2016-10-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco Reply: Ian Cordasco Date: October 7, 2016 at 08:47:19 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:  [Glance] [stable] Bug backports > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] gerrit branch

2016-10-10 Thread Gary Kotton
Thanks! That worked. Much appreciated On 10/10/16, 3:39 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: Excerpts from Gary Kotton's message of 2016-10-10 12:26:24 +: > Hi, > Maybe someone can help out here. We are trying to create an initial release for vmware-nsxlib. I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

2016-10-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
If we can get them running on cinder patches via a different job, then removing them from the common job afterwards seems reasonable. There's no strong will to remove them, several libraries still use them, and given we're now supporting /all/ other API versions indefinitely, keeping them around

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] Telemetry presence at PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi team, I'd like to know if members and supporters of the Telemetry team would like to request a space in February 2017 during the next PTG¹ in Atlanta. It may be hard to schedule enough in advance, but if you got a feeling whether you'll be there and want to discuss some things, it's time to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] gerrit branch

2016-10-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Gary Kotton's message of 2016-10-10 12:26:24 +: > Hi, > Maybe someone can help out here. We are trying to create an initial release > for vmware-nsxlib. I am following the instructions on > http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html > When I try and push the tag I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2016-10-10 14:47:12 +0300: > On 7 October 2016 at 19:53, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > My hope was that it would be "the summit without the noise". Sounds like > > it will be "the summit without the noise, or the organization". > > > >

[openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

2016-10-10 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi, I'd like to reduce the duration of a full Tempest run and I noticed that Cinder tests take a good amount of time (cumulative time 2149sec vs 2256sec for Nova, source code [0]) So I'd like to not run the Cinder v1 tests anymore, at least on the master branches. I remember that Cinder v1 is

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] gerrit branch

2016-10-10 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Maybe someone can help out here. We are trying to create an initial release for vmware-nsxlib. I am following the instructions on http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html When I try and push the tag I get: gkotton@ubuntu:~/vmware-nsxlib$ git push gerrit 0.1.0 fatal: 'gerrit'

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI, nova plans to have a room at the PTG in February

2016-10-10 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 7 October 2016 at 19:53, Clint Byrum wrote: > > My hope was that it would be "the summit without the noise". Sounds like > it will be "the summit without the noise, or the organization". > > I'd really like to see time boxes for most if not all of it, even if many > of the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] weekly meeting

2016-10-10 Thread Emilien Macchi
Greetings, We'll have our weekly meeting tomorrow at 2pm UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt (freenode). This is our regular agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TripleO#Regular_agenda If you have anything outstanding to discuss, please add it to this etherpad:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [libvirt] Debugging blockRebase() - "active block copy not ready for pivot"

2016-10-10 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 03:32:14PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/6/2016 7:58 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > - > > We expose the state of the copy job in the XML and forward the READY > > event from qemu to the users. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Schedule Instances according to Local disk based Volume?

2016-10-10 Thread Erlon Cruz
Kevin, Now that you had a first feedback about the idea, as Jay said, the next steps is to write a blueprint/spec so other folks in Cinder can better understand/suggest/vote on what you are proposing. Erlon On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > So

[openstack-dev] [rpm-packaging][chef][puppet][salt][openstack-ansible][HA] Schema proposal for config file handling for services

2016-10-10 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Hi, in the rpm-packaging project we started to package the services and are currently discussing a possible schema for configuration files and snippets used by the systemd .service files (but this would also affect OCF resource agents). This affects packagers, endusers and config management

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Getting the UI to talk with Undercloud API service endpoints

2016-10-10 Thread Julie Pichon
On 7 October 2016 at 20:30, Dan Sneddon wrote: > Do you know how awesome it would be if you put this idea into a Blueprint at > http://blueprints.launchpad.net? That would be super-awesome. > File it under tripleo-ui project here if you have a few minutes: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 10/10/16 00:36 -0400, Monty Taylor wrote: On 10/09/2016 07:58 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:49:12AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the TC. Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) Emilien Macchi (emilienm) Jeremy Stanley

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the next two weeks

2016-10-10 Thread Flavio Percoco
Hey Brian, Thanks for sending the summary out. Top-posting since it's kinda unrelated to the list of topics below. Are the cycle priorities going to be documented as we did in Mitaka? https://github.com/openstack/glance-specs/tree/master/priorities I'd personally advice for this. It'd be

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] How to retrieve volume_driver

2016-10-10 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 07/10, cr...@interia.pl wrote: > Hi Erlon. > > Thank you for the reply. I need to collect this information to generate sort > of overview of drivers used in given environment. Obviously, it potentially > is a multiple backed one. This information does not need to be pulled from > the cinder

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] ML2 plugin for Ironic needs

2016-10-10 Thread Vasyl Saienko
Hello Community, Ironic and Neutron projects have become integrated even closer with multitenancy implementation in Ironic. There are 2 bugs that require separate ML2 driver specifically for Ironic needs: - Booting ironic instance, Neutron port remains in down state [0] - Ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Getting DetachedInstanceError from sqlalchemy on instance.get_by_uuid()

2016-10-10 Thread Michał Dulko
On 10/07/2016 11:04 PM, Beliveau, Ludovic wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In kilo (yeah I know it’s an old release, but still :)), I was getting > a nova errors for DetachedInstanceError on instance.get_by_uuid(). > > > > > > Has anybody seen this issue before or something similar ? > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

2016-10-10 Thread Maish Saidel-Keesing
I would also like to add my deepest gratitude for all your hard work that goes into this process every six months. Thank you, all of you for all the hard work that goes on behind the scenes to make this possible Congratulations to all the re-elected and newly elected members of the TC. --

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] Presence at PTG Atlanta

2016-10-10 Thread Sripriya Seetharam
Hi Tackers, As you all know, the first PTG meetup (Pike cycle) is happening at Atlanta, Feb 20-24, 2017. This is as per the new format starting after Barcelona conference, where design summit happens in between two OpenStack conferences. Please read [1] for more details. I believe our

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stable] Moving stable/mitaka to Phase-II and liberty to Phase-III

2016-10-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, Now that newton is out I'd like to moves stable/mitaka and stable/liberty into the next support phase. * Phase I: stable/newton ;P * Phase II: stable/mitaka * Phase III: All other stable branches[2] For more details refer to [1]. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Admin guide in-tree?

2016-10-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2016-10-10 01:37, Steve Martinelli wrote: > On Oct 9, 2016 6:57 PM, "Lana Brindley" > wrote: >> >> Why the rush? > > I think its more eagerness than rush. Project teams made a lot of head > way with the API ref and install guides