Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do not recheck changes until 422709 is merged

2017-01-19 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
For other failure on "expected_attr" error, we need this to merge - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422323/ on nova side. -gmann > -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriede...@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 January 2017 12:17 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject:

[openstack-dev] [ python-novaclient][ python-glanceclient][ python-cinderclient][ python-neutronclient] Remove x-openstack-request-id logging code as it is logged twice

2017-01-19 Thread Kekane, Abhishek
Hi Devs, In the latest keystoneauth1 version 2.18.0, x-openstack-request-id is logged for every HTTP response. This keystoneauth1 version will be used for ocata. The same request id is also logged in 'request' method of SessionClient class for python-novaclient, python-glanceclient,

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Can we run cinder-volume and cinder-backup on a same host?

2017-01-19 Thread Rikimaru Honjo
Hi Cinder devs, I have a question about cinder. Can I run cinder-volume and cinder-backup on a same host when I using iscsi backend? I afraid that iscsi operations will be conflicted between cinder-volume and cinder-backup. In my understanding, iscsi operations are serialized for each

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Does SFC support chaining of Layer 2 devices?

2017-01-19 Thread Vikash Kumar
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Vikash Kumar < vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com> wrote: > All, > >I am exploring SFC for chaining an IDS device (strictly in L2 mode). As > of now, it looks SFC default supports only L3 devices. SFC APIs doesn't > have any way to specify the nature of device

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Weekly wrap-up

2017-01-19 Thread Richard Jones
Hi folks, We had a relatively brief Horizon meeting this week[1] in which I announced the (planned) Feature Freeze that took place this week. This means that all blueprint-related patches are now put on hold until after the Ocata release of Horizon is done. In the mean time, only bug patches and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do not recheck changes until 422709 is merged

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/19/2017 5:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 1/19/2017 10:56 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: The py35 unit test job is broken for Nova until this patch is merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422709/ So please hold off on the rechecks until that happens. We're good to go again for

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Corey Bryant wrote: > >> >> Added [nova] and [oslo] to the subject. This is also affecting nova and >> oslo.middleware. I know Sean's initial response on the thread was that >> this shouldn't be a priority for ocata

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

2017-01-19 Thread zhu.fanglei
Yes really nice and hard work:) Though because of the reason of different time zone, I don't often have the chance to talk with Kenichi, but I am impressed by his working time, which is almost spreaded to 24 hours:) http://stackalytics.com/report/users/oomichi Original Mail Sender:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Improving Vendor Driver Discoverability

2017-01-19 Thread Mike Perez
On 17:38 Jan 18, Morales, Victor wrote: > Just a FYI, Ankur have been working on have a Feature Classification Matrix > in Neutron[1] which collects some of this information > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/318192/ I actually didn't know Nova also generated this with a script and ini

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Joshua Harlow
Corey Bryant wrote: Added [nova] and [oslo] to the subject. This is also affecting nova and oslo.middleware. I know Sean's initial response on the thread was that this shouldn't be a priority for ocata but we're completely blocked by it. Would those teams be able to prioritize a fix for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-19 Thread Joshua Harlow
Embrace the larger world instead of trying to recreate parts of it, create alliances with the CNCF and/or other companies The CNCF isn't a company... Yes, fair, good point, thanks for the correction. that are getting actively involved there and make bets that solutions there are things

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

2017-01-19 Thread Andrea Frittoli
Thank you Ken for the great work and for your leadership! I'm really glad you'll stay in the team and keep contributing. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:41 AM Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Thanks Kenichi for all your hardwork and nice leadership. > > Its been very good and lot of

[openstack-dev] [qa] PTL Candidacy for Pike

2017-01-19 Thread Andrea Frittoli
Dear all, I’d like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the QA Program for the Pike cycle. I started working with OpenStack towards the end of 2011. Since 2014 I’ve been a core developer for Tempest. I’ve always aimed for Tempest to be able to run against any OpenStack cloud; a lot of my

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

2017-01-19 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks Kenichi for all your hardwork and nice leadership. Its been very good and lot of things we finished under your leadership. You managed all the activities in a very cool and polite way (Japanese style :)). ​-gmann On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Nominating mkarpin for core for the Puppet OpenStack modules

2017-01-19 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey Puppet Cores, > > I would like to nominate Mykyta Karpin as a Core reviewer for the > Puppet OpenStack modules. He has been providing quality patches and > reviews for some time now and I believe he would be a good

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] feature freeze exception request -- nova simple tenant usages api pagination

2017-01-19 Thread Richard Jones
FFE granted for the three patches. We need to support that nova API change. On 20 January 2017 at 01:28, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > I would like to request a feature freeze exception for the following patch: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410337 > > This patch

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Defining Custom Deployment Networks

2017-01-19 Thread Dan Sneddon
I would like to call attention to two patches which Steven Hardy proposed for Ocata to add the ability to create custom deployment networks [1] [2]. This would allow the use of networks other than the built-in 6 networks. These have gotten a little attention, and a couple of alternative methods

Re: [openstack-dev] (dis)Continuation of Neutron VPNaaS

2017-01-19 Thread Armando M.
On 19 January 2017 at 13:41, Bruno L wrote: > Hi, > > November last year the Neutron team has announced that VPN as a Service > will be no longer part of Neutron[1]. > > We run a public cloud based in New Zealand called Catalyst Cloud[2]. Our > customers find the VPN

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature-related changes that need a final +2 (1/18)

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/18/2017 4:43 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Just to bring this to the awareness of other reviewers, here is a list of blueprint-related patches that have a +2 and need a final push: 1. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/ironic-plug-unplug-vifs-update

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do not recheck changes until 422709 is merged

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/19/2017 10:56 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: The py35 unit test job is broken for Nova until this patch is merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422709/ So please hold off on the rechecks until that happens. We're good to go again for rechecks. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc]

2017-01-19 Thread Michael Gale
Hello, Are there updated install docs for sfc? The only install steps for a testbed I can find are here and they seem outdated: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ServiceInsertionAndChaining Also from the conference videos there seems to be some Horizon menu / screens that are

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [glance] [oslo] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Ian Cordasco > wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Corey Bryant >> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Nominating mkarpin for core for the Puppet OpenStack modules

2017-01-19 Thread Alex Schultz
Hey Puppet Cores, I would like to nominate Mykyta Karpin as a Core reviewer for the Puppet OpenStack modules. He has been providing quality patches and reviews for some time now and I believe he would be a good addition to the team. His stats for the last 90 days can be viewed here[0] Please

[openstack-dev] [trove] self-nomination for Trove PTL

2017-01-19 Thread Amrith Kumar
I am writing to submit my candidacy for re-election as the PTL for the Trove project (Pike cycle). I have been an active technical contributor to the Trove project since just before the Icehouse release when Trove was integrated into OpenStack. I have also contributed code[1] and reviews[2] to

[openstack-dev] (dis)Continuation of Neutron VPNaaS

2017-01-19 Thread Bruno L
Hi, November last year the Neutron team has announced that VPN as a Service will be no longer part of Neutron[1]. We run a public cloud based in New Zealand called Catalyst Cloud[2]. Our customers find the VPN service extremely useful to integrate their cloud tenant's with on-premise

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Ubuntu 14.04 support in Newton and on

2017-01-19 Thread Eric K
Hi Jeremy, thank you for the pointers and the background on Newton! On 1/19/17, 7:12 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >On 2017-01-18 15:19:36 -0800 (-0800), Eric K wrote: >> Hi all, Is there any community-wide policy on how long we strive >> to maintain compatibility with Ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > > What are these issues? My original message was to highlight one > particular deployment type which is completely independent of how > things get packaged in the traditional sense of the word > (rpms/deb/tar.gz).

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

2017-01-19 Thread Masayuki Igawa
Thank you for your great effort! I'm very proud of you as a colleague :) -- Masayuki Igawa On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi, > > I will step down as PTL after this Ocata cycle. > I was happy to see new ideas and folks who try making ideas true

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Alex Schultz
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/19/2017 01:18 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> >>> On 01/19/2017 11:25 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM,

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact: portbindings extension moved to neutron-lib

2017-01-19 Thread Boden Russell
A new version (1.1.0) of neutron-lib was recently released. Among other things, this release rehomes the neutron portbindings API extension [1]. A consumption patch to use the rehomed code has been submitted to neutron [2] and once merged will impact consumers who use portbindings constants from

[openstack-dev] [keystone] [ptl] PTL candidacy for Pike

2017-01-19 Thread Lance Bragstad
Greetings, I want to run for keystone PTL to facilitate an environment for others to grow and make meaningful changes so that we continue to build keystone into a more stable, scalable and performant project [0]. January marks my fifth anniversary working with OpenStack. In that time I've had

[openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

2017-01-19 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi, I will step down as PTL after this Ocata cycle. I was happy to see new ideas and folks who try making ideas true in this 2 cycles. Now QA project has a lot of components with many people's effort and we help each other as a community. This experience is very exciting for me, I am proud to

[openstack-dev] [release][ptl] Release countdown for week R-4 (Ocata-3 Milestone), Jan 23-27

2017-01-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
We're rapidly approaching the end of the Ocata cycle. There are several deadlines coming up within the next few weeks, so please review the schedule and make sure you understand how they affect your teams. Focus - This week begins Feature Freeze for all milestone-based projects. No feature

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/19/2017 12:59 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: I think Alex is suggesting something different than falling back to the legacy behaviour. The ocata scheduler would still roll forward to basing its node selection decisions on data provided by the placement API, but would be tolerant of the 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/19/2017 01:18 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/19/2017 11:25 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][mitmstack] initial member of mitmstack groups

2017-01-19 Thread Clark Boylan
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017, at 08:19 AM, Yujun Zhang wrote: > Hi, Infra team, > > Could you please help add me as initial member > in > mitmstack-core > and mitmstack-release >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Alex Schultz
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/19/2017 11:25 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Matt Riedemann >> wrote: >>> >>> Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> >> Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement > >> microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to > >> make > >> requests to the placement API with microversion 1.4 [2] or later for > >> resource provider filtering on specific resource classes like

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/19/2017 11:25 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to make requests to the placement

[openstack-dev] Subject: [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-01-19 Thread Ed Leafe
Greetings OpenStack community, Today's meeting [0] was a relatively quiet one; I attribute it to cdent's absence. :) Most of the meeting was concerned with reviews of existing issues, and those didn't generate much discussion. There was some discussion of cdent's response to the OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 4)

2017-01-19 Thread Attila Darazs
Everybody interested in the TripleO CI and Quickstart is welcome to join the weekly meeting: Time: Thursdays, 15:30-16:30 UTC Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ Here's this week's summary: * There aren't any blockers or bottlenecks slowing down the transition to the Quickstart based

[openstack-dev] [nova] Do not recheck changes until 422709 is merged

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
The py35 unit test job is broken for Nova until this patch is merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422709/ So please hold off on the rechecks until that happens. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 19/01/2017 17:00, Matt Riedemann a écrit : > On 1/19/2017 9:43 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >> >> >> Le 19/01/2017 16:27, Matt Riedemann a écrit : >>> Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement >>> microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Hao Ran HR Hu
Thanks for sharing this. Great news! Hao Ran Hu (Vern) Software Developer Phone: 86-21-60928179 E-mail: huhao...@cn.ibm.com     - Original message -From: Adam Heczko To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Heczko
Major, thanks for sharing this! On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Major Hayden wrote: > On 01/19/2017 10:04 AM, Adam Heczko wrote: > > BTW are you implying that Ubuntu LTS is unstable or not stable enough to > run OpenStack? > > I think that it would be valuable if you could

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Corey Bryant > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: January 19, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Major Hayden
On 01/19/2017 10:19 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: >> I believe this is more about supporting folks who want to run on >> Centos/RHEL, rather than a step to removing Ubuntu support. > That's also correct. OpenStack-Ansible is attempting to support > multiple distros at the same time. =) Correct! The

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Alex Schultz
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement > microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to make > requests to the placement API with microversion 1.4 [2] or later

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Major Hayden
On 01/19/2017 10:04 AM, Adam Heczko wrote: > BTW are you implying that Ubuntu LTS is unstable or not stable enough to run > OpenStack? > I think that it would be valuable if you could share more details in this > regard, point to Ubuntu specific bugs etc. Hey Adam, One of the bigger issues (as

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Monty Taylor Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: January 19, 2017 at 10:22:23 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:  Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Monty Taylor
On 01/19/2017 10:14 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Adam Heczko > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: January 19, 2017 at 10:06:14 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [infra][mitmstack] initial member of mitmstack groups

2017-01-19 Thread Yujun Zhang
Hi, Infra team, Could you please help add me as initial member in mitmstack-core and mitmstack-release ? Thank you. -- Yujun

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Monty Taylor Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: January 19, 2017 at 10:18:20 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:  Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Monty Taylor
On 01/19/2017 10:04 AM, Adam Heczko wrote: > Hi Major, great news indeed. > BTW are you implying that Ubuntu LTS is unstable or not stable enough to > run OpenStack? > I think that it would be valuable if you could share more details in > this regard, point to Ubuntu specific bugs etc. I believe

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Adam Heczko Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: January 19, 2017 at 10:06:14 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Adam Heczko
Hi Major, great news indeed. BTW are you implying that Ubuntu LTS is unstable or not stable enough to run OpenStack? I think that it would be valuable if you could share more details in this regard, point to Ubuntu specific bugs etc. Thanks. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Sean M. Collins

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting Jan 19 is canceled

2017-01-19 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
Nothing is on the agenda [0] this week, so I'm calling to cancel the meeting. If you have anything to discuss please come chat in #fuel or add it to the agenda to discuss next week. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov OpenStack Fuel PTL

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/19/2017 9:43 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 19/01/2017 16:27, Matt Riedemann a écrit : Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to make requests to the placement API with microversion 1.4 [2] or

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Corey Bryant Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: January 19, 2017 at 08:52:25 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 19/01/2017 16:27, Matt Riedemann a écrit : > Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement > microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to > make requests to the placement API with microversion 1.4 [2] or later > for resource provider filtering on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

2017-01-19 Thread Honza Pokorny
Thanks for being on top of this, Julie. Honza Pokorny On 2017-01-19 15:17, Julie Pichon wrote: > On 18 January 2017 at 11:35, Julie Pichon wrote: > > I'm sorry to report we're finding ourselves in the same situation > > again - CI will fail on all the UI patches, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [OSSN-0074] Nova metadata service should not be used for sensitive information

2017-01-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-01-19 09:34:21 -0500 (-0500), Steve Gordon wrote: [...] > Does this configuration directive provide any mitigation for this > issue?: > > "use_forwarded_for = False (BoolOpt) Treat X-Forwarded-For > as the canonical remote address. Only enable this if you have a > sanitizing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [nova] Accessing instance.flavor.projects fails due to orphaned Flavor

2017-01-19 Thread Balazs Gibizer
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Balazs Gibizer wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/12/2017 05:31 AM, Balazs Gibizer wrote: Hi, The flavor field of the Instance object is a lazy-loaded field and the projects

[openstack-dev] [nova] Order of n-api (placement) and n-sch upgrades for Ocata

2017-01-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
Sylvain and I were talking about how he's going to work placement microversion requests into his filter scheduler patch [1]. He needs to make requests to the placement API with microversion 1.4 [2] or later for resource provider filtering on specific resource classes like VCPU and MEMORY_MB.

[openstack-dev] [cinder] "Snapshot-manage imports snapshots with wrong size"

2017-01-19 Thread Mykhailo Dovgal
Hi, folks. Having worked on this bug [0] I could reproduce it with lvm as a backend. And during it further investigation, I found the real problem that triggers it. Here [1] after getting the real snapshot size, we are trying to update 'size' column. But actually snapshot's size is stored in

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] 2017-1-11 policy meeting

2017-01-19 Thread Lance Bragstad
Ruan, Good question! I should clarify that there would be no *default* policy file to maintain in the project source code, like in keystone currently [0]. All policy defaults would be coded into the project. Nova has already taken this approach with their policy file [1], which leaves them with

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

2017-01-19 Thread Julie Pichon
On 18 January 2017 at 11:35, Julie Pichon wrote: > I'm sorry to report we're finding ourselves in the same situation > again - CI will fail on all the UI patches, please don't recheck until > we have a new dependencies package available. > > On the plus side, with the help of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Ubuntu 14.04 support in Newton and on

2017-01-19 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-01-18 15:19:36 -0800 (-0800), Eric K wrote: > Hi all, Is there any community-wide policy on how long we strive > to maintain compatibility with Ubuntu 14.04? For example by > avoiding relying on MySQL 5.7 features. I've had a hard time > finding it on openstack.org and ML discussions.

[openstack-dev] [ironic][ptl] Announcing Ironic PTL candidacy for Pike

2017-01-19 Thread Julia Kreger
Greetings everyone! I would like to nominate myself as a candidate for ironic PTL for the Pike cycle. For those that don't know me, I'm TheJulia. I have been working in the OpenStack community since mid-2014, and ironic since early 2015. I'm likely best known for bifrost and advocating support

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Ci] New keyword for triggering deployment tests

2017-01-19 Thread Dmitry Kaiharodsev
Hi all, please be informed that for re-triggering fuel deployment tests [1] should be used Gerrit reply with keyword 'fuel: redeploy' [2] By implementing this change, we're separating heavy and time-consuming deployment tests from other tests, which gives us much more flexible re-triggering

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Corey Bryant
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Short > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: January 18, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] 2017-1-11 policy meeting

2017-01-19 Thread ruan.he
Hi Lance, Your option 3 is not clear for me. You say that ‘The result would 0 policy files to maintain in tree and everything would be in code.’ Without this file, how can we define policies? Can user configure policies? Ruan From: Lance Bragstad [mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com] Sent: mercredi 18

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [OSSN-0074] Nova metadata service should not be used for sensitive information

2017-01-19 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Luke Hinds" > To: openst...@lists.openstack.org, openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 4:26:24 AM > Subject: [Openstack] [OSSN-0074] Nova metadata service should not be used for > sensitive information > >

[openstack-dev] [horizon] feature freeze exception request -- nova simple tenant usages api pagination

2017-01-19 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
I would like to request a feature freeze exception for the following patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410337 This patch adds support for retrieving the simple tenant usages from Nova in chunks, and it is necessary for correct data given that related patches have been already merged in

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

2017-01-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-01-19 12:48:13 +0300: > Hi Matt! > > This should be discussed, for sure, but there is a lot of potential. In > general, it depends on how far we are willing to go. In the minimum > approximation we can seamlessly replace Glance with Glare and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] "Setup firewall filters only for required ports" bug

2017-01-19 Thread Daniel Alvarez Sanchez
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > I would like your feedback on the mentioned changeset in title[1] > (yes, added since Liberty). > > With this patch, we (should) skip ports with > port_security_enabled=False or with an empty list

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

2017-01-19 Thread Renat Akhmerov
> On 19 Jan 2017, at 19:13, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > > Plus, Swift does not provide data immutability. Where is the guarantee that > user won't change his files in Swift or completely remove them? Glare manages > this behavior and provides full immutability for stored

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Sean M. Collins
That is great news! Congrats! -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Jeremy Liu as core for cloudkitty

2017-01-19 Thread Maxime Cottret
Hi, OK to add Jeremy as core dev for Cloudkitty Regards, -- Maxime Cottret - Consultant Cloud/DataOps @ OBJECTIF-LIBRE Mail : maxime.cott...@objectif-libre.com Tel : 05 82 95 65 36 (standard) Web : www.objectif-libre.com Twitter: @objectiflibre Le 2017-01-19 14:18, Christophe Sauthier a

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] [infra] Proposed new Cinder gate jobs

2017-01-19 Thread Erlon Cruz
Thanks for giving this review Michal. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-01-19 11:10, Michal Dulko wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've seen some confusion around new Cinder CI jobs being proposed to > > project-config in yesterday's IRC scrollback. This

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Major Hayden
Hey folks, Our multi-os work has paid off and I was able to wrap up a CentOS 7 deployment of OpenStack-Ansible's master branch yesterday. My environment only has four physical servers, so I deployed the basics: - keystone - nova - glance - neutron - heat - horizon -

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact: providernet extension moved to neutron-lib

2017-01-19 Thread Boden Russell
A new version (1.1.0) of neutron-lib was recently released. Among other things, this release rehomes the neutron providernet API extension [1]. A consumption patch to use the rehomed code has been submitted to neutron [2] and once merged will impact consumers who use providernet constants from

[openstack-dev] [watcher] PTG preparation

2017-01-19 Thread Antoine Cabot
Hello folks, We already are one month away from the PTG event (mid-cycle) for Watcher. I started a new etherpad [1] to prepare the agenda. Please complete the topics list with all the items you want to discuss. Even if you don't plan to be in Atlanta, I'd like to have all Watcher community plans

[openstack-dev] Proposing Jeremy Liu as core for cloudkitty

2017-01-19 Thread Christophe Sauthier
Hello developers mailing list folks, I'd like to propose that we add Jeremy Liu (liujiong) as an OpenStack cloudkitty core reviewer. He has been a member of our community for many months, contributing very seriously in cloudkitty and cloudkitty-dashboard. He also provided many reviews on

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] monitoring interface

2017-01-19 Thread Liam Young
Hi Brad, Thanks for looking into it. I think things should actually work out of the box as they are now. So, juju deploy nrpe nrpe-glance juju deploy nrpe nrpe-cinder juju deploy nagios juju deploy glance juju deploy cinder juju add-relation nrpe-glance glance juju add-relation nrpe-glance

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ptl] PTL candidacy for Pike

2017-01-19 Thread Emilien Macchi
This is my candidacy for PTL role in the TripleO team for the Pike cycle. https://review.openstack.org/422587 Leading TripleO team during Ocata was tremendous. Together, we have moved forward in how we design, develop, deploy and use TripleO. Though Ocata cycle was too short and I have the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

2017-01-19 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Glare does not compete with Swift, it uses this service as one of the possible backeds. On the whole I should note that in some cases the use of Swift is excessive: for example, for small files (a few kilobytes), it is easier to store them directly in the database. And Glare just let you do this -

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support

2017-01-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
2 2017-01-19 8:50 GMT-03:00 Steven Dake (stdake) : > My vote is for option 2 to deprecate Debian as there has been very little > activity and operators seem uninterested in Debian as a platform. > > We could always add it back in at a later date if operators were to > request

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support

2017-01-19 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
My vote is for option 2 to deprecate Debian as there has been very little activity and operators seem uninterested in Debian as a platform. We could always add it back in at a later date if operators were to request it and the Debian team were interested in maintaining it. Regards -steve

[openstack-dev] [freezer] Freezer PTL Non-candidacy

2017-01-19 Thread Mathieu, Pierre-Arthur
Hello everyone, As I already announced during our IRC meeting, I'm not planning to run for the Pike PTL position. Having held this role for two cycle now and I think it is time for someone else to step in. I'll continue to contribute as a core-team member and will be available to help the new

[openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] Agenda for IRC meeting 0800UTC Jan. 20 2017

2017-01-19 Thread hu.zhijiang
1) Roll Call 2) OPNFV: Daisy CI Progress 3) OPNFV: Daisy Support Escalator 4) OpenStack: Core Code Definition Wind Up 5) OpenStack: Choose Kolla Image Version To Deploy/Upgrade B. R., Zhijiang__ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support

2017-01-19 Thread Eduardo Gonzalez
My vote for option 2 to deprecate Debian images. Since the last deprecation vote nobody tried to maintain Debian images. No gates, not tested and not maintained sound like good reasons to deprecate Debian. Regards 2017-01-19 10:53 GMT+00:00 Christian Berendt : >

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][magnum] Magnum team at Summit?

2017-01-19 Thread Thierry Carrez
Adrian Otto wrote: >> On Jan 18, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> [...] >> Is there going to be a magnum team meeting around OpenStack Summit in >> Boston? >> >> I'm the community manager for Atomic Host, so if you're going to have >> Magnum meetings, I'd like to send

[openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

2017-01-19 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, First and foremost would like to wish you all a successful 2017 ahead and with this I'm announcing my PTL candidacy of the Quality Assurance team for the Pike release cycle. I am glad to work in OpenStack community and would like to thank all the contributors who supported me to

[openstack-dev] [all][tc][swift][designate] New language addition process has been approved

2017-01-19 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, The Technical Committe recently approved a new reference document which describes how new programming languages can be proposed for inclusion as supported languages by OpenStack. The new reference document can be found here[0]. I'd like to take this chance not only to share this new

[openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support

2017-01-19 Thread Christian Berendt
As discussed in one of the last team meetings I want to propose the deprecation (this cycle) and removal (next cycle) of the Debian support in Kolla. More than 1 week ago I sent a pre warning mail to the openstack-operators mailing list, without any reply [0]. Kolla core reviewers, please vote

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][magnum] Magnum team at Summit?

2017-01-19 Thread Ricardo Rocha
Hi. It would be great to meet in any case. We've been exploring Atomic system containers (as in 'atomic install --system ...') for our internal plugins at CERN, and having some issues with runc and selinux definitions plus some atomic command bugs. It's mostly due to the config.json being a hard

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] [infra] Proposed new Cinder gate jobs

2017-01-19 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-01-19 11:10, Michal Dulko wrote: > Hi all, > > I've seen some confusion around new Cinder CI jobs being proposed to > project-config in yesterday's IRC scrollback. This email aims to sum > this up and explain purposes of what's being proposed. Thanks a lot, Michal! That helps me seeing

Re: [openstack-dev] [validations][ui][tripleo] resetting state of validations

2017-01-19 Thread Tomas Sedovic
On 01/18/2017 10:14 PM, Dan Trainor wrote: Hi - Is there a way to reset the state of all the validations that have previously ran, back to the original state they were prior to running? Using the UI, for example, some validations (by design) run as soon as you log in. Others run after

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] [infra] Proposed new Cinder gate jobs

2017-01-19 Thread Dulko, Michal
Hi all, I've seen some confusion around new Cinder CI jobs being proposed to project-config in yesterday's IRC scrollback. This email aims to sum this up and explain purposes of what's being proposed. Background == For a few releases we're aiming to increase our functional and

  1   2   >