Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][all] switch from mysqldb to another eventlet aware mysql client

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014, at 01:59 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 17/08/14 02:09, Angus Lees wrote: > > > > On 16 Aug 2014 06:09, "Doug Hellmann" > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Aug 15, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Ihar Hrachys

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Switching default test node to Trusty for all projects and upgrading tox to version 1.7.2

On Tue, Aug 5, 2014, at 05:04 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > On August 20th the Infra team will be switching the default test node > from Ubuntu Precise to Ubuntu Trusty. This means that `tox -epy27`, `tox > -ecover`, `tox -epep8`, `tox -evenv -- python setup.py build_sphinx

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Non-readonly connection to libvirt in unit tests

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014, at 09:25 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 8/21/2014 10:23 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:14:33AM -0400, Solly Ross wrote: > >> (reply inline) > >> > >> - Original Message - > >>> From: "Daniel P. Berrange" > >>> To: "OpenStack Devel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][WSME] Sphinx failing sporadically because of wsme autodoc extension

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Nejc Saje wrote: > > > Yesterday, doc builds started failing sporadically in Ceilometer gate. > > > > http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJcIkVSUk9SOiBJbnZvY2F0aW9uRXJyb3I6ICcvaG9tZS9qZW5raW5zL3dvc

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] new testtools breaking gate

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014, at 05:55 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi all, > > this week is quite bumpy for unit testing in gate. First, it was > upgrade to new 'tox' version that broke quite some branches. > I did a ton of work to make the tox upgr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [LBaaS] LBaaS v2 API syntax additions/changes

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014, at 06:37 AM, John Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > With the ongoing development of LBaaS v2, support for v2 of LBaaS in > neutronclient is also being developed, as can be seen in [1]. > The current implementation adds a new syntax for v2; Whereas the v1 > syntax is 'neutron lb--', th

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]pylint errors with hashlib

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 06:45 PM, Murali Balcha wrote: > Pylint on my patch is failing with the following error: > > Module 'hashlib' has no 'sha256' > > Cinder pylint already has following exceptions, > > > pylint_exceptions:["Instance of 'sha1' has no 'update' member", ""] > > pylint_except

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [neutron] [tc] Neutron Incubator workflow

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014, at 03:52 PM, Ivar Lazzaro wrote: > Quoting Stefano from a different thread [0]: > > The rationale for the separate repository is that Neutron's code needs a > > lot of love for the *existing* codebase, before new features can be > > added (and before core team can accept mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [neutron] [tc] Neutron Incubator workflow

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014, at 04:05 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, James E. Blair > wrote: > > > Kevin Benton writes: > > > > > From what I understand, the intended projects for the incubator can't > > > operate without neutron because they are just extensions/plugins/drive

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [infra] Alpha wheels for Python 3.x

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote: > Hello. > > Currently for alpha releases of oslo libraries we generate either > universal > or Python 2.x-only wheels. This presents a problem: we can't adopt alpha > releases in projects where Python 3.x is supported and verified in the > ga

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] [infra] Alpha wheels for Python 3.x

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 08:22 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > On Sep 2, 2014, at 3:17 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Yuriy Taraday wrote: > >> Hello. > >> > >> Currently for alpha releases of oslo libraries we generate eit

Re: [openstack-dev] znc as a service (was Re: [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?)

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 07:26 AM, Ryan Brown wrote: > On 09/03/2014 09:35 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > Re: ZNC as a service, I think it's OK provided the implementation is > > open-sourced with openstack-infra repo group, as for Gerrit, Zuul and > > others. > > The only problem I can see is how to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > > Sent: 03 September 2014 13:37 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort req

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [glance] do NOT ever sort requirements.txt

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 01:06 PM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] > > Sent: 03 September 2014 20:10 > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [

Re: [openstack-dev] China blocking access to OpenStack git review push

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Am I dreaming, or is the Chinese government is trying to push for the > cloud, they said. However, today, bad surprise: > > # nmap -p 29418 23.253.232.87 > > Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-09-09 03:10 CST > Nmap scan report

[openstack-dev] PostgreSQL jobs slow in the gate

Hello, Recent sampling of test run times shows that our tempest jobs run against clouds using PostgreSQL are significantly slower than jobs run against clouds using MySQL. (check|gate)-tempest-dsvm-full has an average run time of 52.9 minutes (stddev 5.92 minutes) over 516 runs. (check|gate)-temp

Re: [openstack-dev] PostgreSQL jobs slow in the gate

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014, at 06:37 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 9/17/2014 7:59 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > On 09/18/2014 09:49 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > >> Recent sampling of test run times shows that our tempest jobs run > >> against clouds using PostgreSQL a

Re: [openstack-dev] PostgreSQL jobs slow in the gate

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014, at 06:48 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014, at 06:37 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > > > > On 9/17/2014 7:59 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: > > > On 09/18/2014 09:49 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > >> Recent sampling of test

[openstack-dev] Community Infrastructure Berlin Summit Onboarding Session

Hello everyone, My apologies for cross posting but wanted to make sure the various developer groups saw this. Rather than use the Infrastructure Onboarding session in Berlin [0] for infrastructure sysadmin/developer onboarding, I thought we could use the time for user onboarding. We've got qui

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa] Migrating devstack jobs to Bionic (Ubuntu LTS 18.04)

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Thanks Jens. > > As most of the base jobs are in QA repo, QA team will coordinate this > migration based on either of the approach mentioned below. > > Another point to note - This migration will only target the zuulv3 jobs > not the leg

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, at 4:47 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:37 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Corey Bryant writes: > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM Corey Bryant > > > wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to start moving forward with enabling py37 unit tests for a > > > su

[openstack-dev] OpenDev, the future of OpenStack Infra

Hello everyone, Sorry for another cross post so soon. In the land before time we had Stackforge. Stackforge gave non-OpenStack projects a place to live with their own clearly defined "not OpenStack" namespacing. As the wheel of time spun we realized that many Stackforge projects were becoming

[openstack-dev] The recent gate performance and how it affects you

Joe Gordon has been doing great working tracking test failures and how often they affect us. Post Havana release the failure rate has increased dramatically, negatively affecting the gate and forcing it to run in a near worst case scenario. That is changes are being tested in parallel but the head

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi Joe, > > 2013/11/20 Joe Gordon : >> Hi All, >> >> As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the >> past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open bugs (without pending >> patches, and many recent hits)

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Peter Portante wrote: > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that > the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests > jobs all succeed? > > It seems like they complete so much quicker that folks can fix those > bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate / Check jobs fail fast mode - don't start tempest until docs/pep8/unittests pass?

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Peter Portante >> wrote: >> > Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][qa] How will ironic tests run in tempest?

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:53 PM, David Kranz wrote: > It's great that tempest tests for ironic have been submitted! I was > reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48109/ and noticed that the tests > do not actually run. They are skipped because baremetal is not enabled. This > is not terribly s

Re: [openstack-dev] What should I do for resolving Tempest Failure in jenkins?

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > Unfortunately this approach leads to forcing in code that may increase > the bug in question, which will affect all developers. > > I suggest you evaluate the Jenkins logs carefully, and link to the > timestamp in the logs were the failure occu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Devstack] Why aren't test-requirements.txt installed during test runs?

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hello all, > > When looking at a Solum patch in review [1], I wondered why Georgy needed to > move fixtures, testresources, and httplib2 into requirements.txt [2] instead > of test-requirements.txt, when those aforementioned dependencies are not

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [qa][FWaaS][Neutron]Firewall service disabled on gate

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > Yair, The FWaaS tempest tests were not planned for H release. They are > planned for the current release (hence the blueprint) and some of us were > working towards them. This is also a standing discuss item this during the > the FWaaS sub

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Day, Phil wrote: > I wonder if at least part of the problem is that whilst we have > prioritisation for bugs (via severity) and blueprints (via approval and > target release) that doesn't obviously carry through into gerrit. If it was > easier to see what we'

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Testr] Brand new checkout of Neutron... getting insane unit test run results

On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 7:33 PM, 黎林果 wrote: > I have met this problem too.The units can't be run. > The end info as: > > Ran 0 tests in 0.673s > > OK > cp: cannot stat `.testrepository/-1': No such file or directory > > 2013/12/28 Jay Pipes : >> On 12/27/2013 11:11 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Testr] Brand new checkout of Neutron... getting insane unit test run results

84/ > > Cheers, > Armando > > On 2 January 2014 18:03, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 01/01/2014 10:56 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 7:33 PM, 黎林果 wrote: >>>> >>>> I have met this problem too.The units can't be r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Vertica Storage Driver Testing

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 3 January 2014 14:34, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 3 January 2014 12:40, Herndon, John Luke wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: >>> >> >> >>> I don’t think it would be that hard to get the review or gate jobs to u

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of the > moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were uncovered by it. > This week away from it all helped provide a little perspective on what I > think we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [elastic-recheck] Thoughts on next steps

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of the >> moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were uncovered by it. >> This

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure > has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with > devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does > it interact with infrastruct

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, John Griffith wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Clay Gerrard > wrote: > >> > >> > >> That's a pretty high rate of failure, and really needs investigation. > > > > > > That's a great point, did you look into the logs of any of those jobs? > > Thanks for b

Re: [openstack-dev] MariaDB support

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2014-01-24 11:55:02 -0800: > > > > This is exactly my worry... at what point can I consider moving to MariaDB > > with the expectation that the testing confidence is equivalent to that > > which is curren

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Proposing Sergey Lukjanov for infra-core

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:48 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I'm very pleased to propose that we add Sergey Lukjanov to the > infra-core team. > > He is among the top reviewers of projects in openstack-infra, and is > very familiar with how jenkins-job-builder and zuul are used and > configure

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron py27 test 'FAIL: process-returncode'

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Gary Duan wrote: > Hi, > > The patch I submitted for L3 service framework integration fails on jenkins > test, py26 and py27. The console only gives following error message, > > 2014-02-12 00:45:01.710 | FAIL: process-returncode > 2014-02-12 00:45:01.711 | tags: wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron py27 test 'FAIL: process-returncode'

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Gary Duan wrote: > Hi, Clark, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I thought the same thing at first, but the page by default only shows the > failed cases. The other 1284 cases were OK. > > Gary > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Cl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > "devdatta kulkarni" writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I have been looking at Zuul for last few days and had a question >> about its intended role within Solum. >> >> From what I understand, Zuul is a code gating system. >> >> I have been wondering i

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Unable to run unit test cases

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Henry Gessau wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, at 4:41 am, Akhil Sadashiv Hingane wrote: > >> >> When I try to run the test cases for ceilometer, it fails with >> >> >> >> Trac

Re: [openstack-dev] bug 1203680 - fix requires doc

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 2014-02-21 13:01, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1203680 is literally about Glance > but Nova has the same problem. There is a fix released, but just merging > that fix accomplishes nothing --- we need peop

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] openstack_citest MySQL user privileges to create databases on CI nodes

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:33 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote: > Hi all, > > [1] made it possible for openstack_citest MySQL user to create new > databases in tests on demand (which is very useful for parallel > running of tests on MySQL and PostgreSQL, thank you, guys!). > > Unfortunately, openstack_cit

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The future of nosetests with Tempest

On Feb 26, 2014 7:37 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > > > > On 2/25/2014 7:46 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/12/2014 1:57 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 1/17/2014 8:34 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] tox error

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Collins, Sean wrote: > Shixiong Shang and I ran into this problem with Tox today while we were > pair programming, and I've also seen similar barfs on my DevStack lab > boxes - it's quite a mess. Frankly I've moved to using nosetests as a > workaround, and have ad

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] tox run forever

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Shixiong Shang wrote: > Hi, guys: > > I created a fresh local repository and pulled the most recent Neutron code. > Before I put in my own code, I did TOX run. However, seems like it is stuck > to the following condition for over a hour and didn't go any further.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] how to enable logging for unit tests

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:30 PM, John Dennis wrote: > I'd like to enable debug logging while running some specific unit tests > and I've not been able to find the right combination of levers to pull > to get logging output on the console. > > In keystone/etc/keystone.conf.sample (which is config f

Re: [openstack-dev] Session length on wiki.openstack.org

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014, at 06:26 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2014-12-04 18:37:48 -0700 (-0700), Carl Baldwin wrote: > > +1 I've been meaning to say something like this but never got > > around to it. Thanks for speaking up. > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/1172753 > > I think Ryan

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo.db 1.3.0 released

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > On Dec 15, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > > > > >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:57 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> > >> On 12/15/2014 01:53 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > >>> > On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:50 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][python-clients] More freedom for all python clients

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015, at 04:50 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 01/14/2015 03:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > On 13/01/15 14:31 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 01/13/2015 02:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >>> On 01/13/2015 12:39 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 13/01/15 10:01, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] process problem with release tagging

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:14 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > tl;dr: (1) the current tag names used don't work and we need > something else. (2) Swift (at least) needs to burn a > release number with a new tag > > The current process of release is: > > 1) branch milestone-proposed (hereafter, m-p) from

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Sergey Lukjanov for infra-root

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:42 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure: > contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability > on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with > administrative access). Read all abou

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Joshua Hesketh for infra-core

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:57 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > The Infrastructure program has a unique three-tier team structure: > contributors (that's all of us!), core members (people with +2 ability > on infra projects in Gerrit) and root members (people with > administrative access). Read all abou

[openstack-dev] [All] Disabling Pushes of new Gerrit Draft Patchsets

Hello everyone, Gerrit has long supported "Draft" patchsets, and the infra team has long recommended against using them as they are a source of bugs and confusion (see below for specific details if you are curious). The newer version of Gerrit that we recently upgraded to allows us to prevent peop

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Disabling Pushes of new Gerrit Draft Patchsets

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Gerrit has long supported "Draft" patchsets, and the infra team has long > recommended against using them as they are a source of bugs and > confusion (see below for specific details if yo

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Disabling Pushes of new Gerrit Draft Patchsets

h patches to affect gerrit stream or trigger CIs, but > gerrit could still be used for regular reviewing process. > > Thanks, > Eugene. > > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Sergey Lukjanov > wrote: >> >> Yay! >> >> No more weird CR chains. >> &

Re: [openstack-dev] DevStack hacks requirements.txt et al

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: > I have noticed that lately DevStack has been hacking requirements.txt in > most projects and test-requirements.txt in many. Why is this being done? > > Thanks, > Mike > ___ > OpenStack-dev mailin

Re: [openstack-dev] testr help

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:56 PM, John Dennis wrote: > I've read the following documents as well as the doc for subunit and > testtools but I'm still missing some big picture usage. > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Testr > https://testrepository.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html > > The bigge

Re: [openstack-dev] testr help

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, John Dennis wrote: > On 03/10/2014 02:31 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: >> Fewer logs is hardly ever what you want when debugging a unit test. >> >> I think what John is looking for is a report at the end of each test run >> that just lists the tests that failed instead o

Re: [openstack-dev] testr help

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > Thanks Clark for this great write-up. However, I think the solution to the > problem in question is richer commands and better output formatting, not > discarding information. > > > On 07/03/14 16:30, Clark Boylan wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] testr help

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 10/03/14 16:04, Clark Boylan wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Clark for this great write-up. However, I think the solution to >>> the >>>

[openstack-dev] Jenkins test logs and their retention period

ph_id=717&rra_id=all Thank you, Clark Boylan ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Error while running tox -v -epy27 tests.unit.ml2

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > > Hello; > > I was talking with some people on the openstack-neutron IRC channel, and was > trying to get assistance to root cause why the ml2 unit tests are failing. > I have cloned a fresh neutron tree that I have pegged back to hash: b78eea6

Re: [openstack-dev] [depfreeze] Exception: limit psutil to <2.0.0

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Solly Ross wrote: > What bug tracker should I file under? I tried filing one under the openstack > common infrastructure tracker, > but was told that it wasn't the correct place to file such a bug. > > Best Regards, > Solly Ross > > - Original Message -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Juno open for development

The infrastructure team can update the OSes used by the gate when new versions of the distros we use release, and our cloud providers make those images available to us (or provide us with glance upload access, whichever comes first). That means we can't upgrade Ubuntu to Trusty until Trusty release

Re: [openstack-dev] Unusual behavior on committing a change

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Sharan Kumar M wrote: > Hi all, > > I am getting some weird things when I try to submit a patch for review. > May > be I am doing something wrong. > > I cloned the repo, setup git review and setup my gerrit username in git > config. I updated an image in the doc

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Sean Dague for project-config-core

On September 26, 2014 8:35:18 AM PDT, cor...@inaugust.com wrote: >I'm pleased to nominate Sean Dague to the project-config core team. > >The project-config repo is a constituent of the Infrastructure Program >and has a core team structured to be a superset of infra-core with >additional reviewers w

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Andreas Jaeger for project-config-core

On September 26, 2014 8:35:02 AM PDT, cor...@inaugust.com wrote: >I'm pleased to nominate Andreas Jaeger to the project-config core team. > >The project-config repo is a constituent of the Infrastructure Program >and has a core team structured to be a superset of infra-core with >additional reviewe

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Nominating Anita Kuno for project-config-core

On September 26, 2014 8:34:48 AM PDT, cor...@inaugust.com wrote: >I'm pleased to nominate Anito Kuno to the project-config core team. > >The project-config repo is a constituent of the Infrastructure Program >and has a core team structured to be a superset of infra-core with >additional reviewers w

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] "Sideways" grenade job to test Nova Network to Neutron migration

Hello, One of the requirements placed on Ironic was that they must have a path from Nova Baremetal to Ironic and that path should be tested. This resulted in a "sideways" grenade job which instead of going from one release of OpenStack to another, swaps out components within a release. In this cas

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] API Workgroup git repository

It is a code change :) Everything is a code change around here. You will want to update the projects.yaml file in openstack-infra/project-config [0]. If you add a 'homepage: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group' key value pair to the api-wg dict there the jeepyb tooling should update t

[openstack-dev] Deprecation of Python 2.6 CI Testing

Hello, At the Atlanta summit there was a session on removing python2.6 testing/support from the OpenStack Kilo release [0]. The Infra team is working on enacting this change in the near future. The way that this will work is python26 jobs will be removed from running on master and feature branche

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Nomination for python-jenkins

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Antoine Musso wrote: > Hello, > > The python-jenkins module is a thin wrapper to interact with Jenkins. It > has been migrated from Launchpad to Stackforge a couple months ago to > attract more developers and easily upstream work down being done in over > OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Nominations for jenkins-job-builder core

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Antoine Musso wrote: > Le 23/06/2014 01:47, Jeremy Stanley a écrit : >> On 2014-06-20 14:01:01 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: >>> > The Jenkins Job Builder project [...] core reviewers [...] I would >>> > like to add Darragh Bailey [...] and Marc Abramowitz >

[openstack-dev] [All] Tempest testing for master is now running on Trusty

Hello everyone, The Infra team switched all Tempest testing (really all jenkins jobs with names containing 'dsvm') for the master branch to Trusty slaves today. This means that integration testing has access to new libvirt, new mongodb, and new kernels among other things. Python27 unittesting for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Solum][Mistral] New class of requirements for Stackforge projects

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: > Hello, > > Solum has run into a constraint with the current scheme for requirements > management within the OpenStack CI system. We have a proposal for dealing > with this constraint that involves making a contribution to openstack-infra. >

Re: [openstack-dev] Policy around Requirements Adds (was: New class of requirements for Stackforge projects)

d give serious consideration to adding python-mistralclient to >> > global requirements. I have posted a review[3] for that to get input >> > from the requirements review team. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Adrian >> > >> > [1] https://re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Jenkins gate jobs fails

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:12 PM, stanzgy wrote: > Several jenkins gate jobs failed since some lib packages in ubuntu source > are missing and devstack failed to setup the tempest env. Could there be > someone help to fix this? > I have filed the bug here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][all] switch from mysqldb to another eventlet aware mysql client

Before we get too far ahead of ourselves mysql-connector is not hosted on pypi. Instead it is an external package link. We recently managed to remove all packages that are hosted as external package links from openstack and will not add new ones in. Before we can use mysql-connector in the gate ora

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][all] switch from mysqldb to another eventlet aware mysql client

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 11/07/14 19:20, Clark Boylan wrote: >> Before we get too far ahead of ourselves mysql-connector is not >> hosted on pypi. Instead it is an external p

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fair standards for all hypervisor drivers

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:15:40PM +0200, Sean Dague wrote: >> Recently the main gate updated from Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.04, and in doing >> so we started executing the livesnapshot code in the nova libvirt >> driver. Which fails about 20%

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] MyISAM as a default storage engine for MySQL in the gate

On Jul 21, 2014 8:28 AM, "Roman Podoliaka" wrote: > > Hi all, > > To my surprise I found that we default to using MyISAM in the gate > [1], while InnoDB would be a much more suitable choice, which people > use in production deployments (== we should test it in the gate). This > means, that every t

[openstack-dev] [ALL] Removing the tox==1.6.1 pin

Hello, The recent release of tox 1.7.2 has fixed the {posargs} interpolation issues we had with newer tox which forced us to be pinned to tox==1.6.1. Before we can remove the pin and start telling people to use latest tox we need to address a new default behavior in tox. New tox sets a random PYT

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] so what do i do about libvirt-python if i'm on precise?

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014, at 03:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2014-07-30 13:21:10 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote: > > While forcing people to move to a newer version of libvirt is > > doable on most environments, do we want to do that now? What is > > the benefit of doing so? > [...] > > The only

[openstack-dev] [All] Gate bugs in the real world

Hello, An interesting thing happened today. The Infra team noticed that nodepool was unable to delete a significant number of nodes from the two public clouds we use to test OpenStack. Upon further investigation it was determined that we were hitting https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclien

[openstack-dev] [All] Switching default test node to Trusty for all projects and upgrading tox to version 1.7.2

Hello, On August 20th the Infra team will be switching the default test node from Ubuntu Precise to Ubuntu Trusty. This means that `tox -epy27`, `tox -ecover`, `tox -epep8`, `tox -evenv -- python setup.py build_sphinx` will run on Trusty build nodes intead of Precise nodes. This will not affect py

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate issues - what you can do to help

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > I think that I may have stumbled upon the problem, but need the help from > someone on the infra team. Then again I may just be completely mistaken. > > Prior to the little hiccup we have at the moment VM's that were used for > devstack on

[openstack-dev] Etherpad Upgrade

In an effort to better support the upcoming design summit the Infra team will be upgrading etherpad.openstack.org at 1600UTC Sunday, October 13. There will be a short time period where etherpads are inaccessible as we update DNS records and replicate databases. You might also need to clear your bro

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > One of the efforts that we're working on from the QA team is tooling that > ensures we aren't stack tracing into our test logs during normal tempest > runs. Random stack traces are scary to cloud admins consuming OpenStack > logs, and exception

Re: [openstack-dev] A question about atomicity of repository commits

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Birdsall, Dave wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to the Openstack community. I have what is probably a naïve question. > > Suppose source code for a project is in Git repository A, while the Jenkins > test suite for it is in Git repository B. > > First question: Does this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Dissecting the very first review

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > > Now we have the first patch [1] merged into the repository using > OpenStack review process. I would like to bring into notice some minor > issues. > > First of all I would like to thank [2] Swapnil for fixing the patch. > > 1. Look at pa

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: reverse the default Gerrit sort order

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/mine/important/ >> >> Shows me old changes at the top of the reviewable section. Do you use >> that view at all? > > > That shows me all my own re

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: reverse the default Gerrit sort order

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 11 November 2013 10:06, Monty Taylor wrote: >> >> > >> Not possible now. With gerrit 2.8 (hopefully something we can get >> deployed soonish) we introduce the Custom Dashboards feature. The >> "Important Changes" page will be implemented

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable/havana] gate broken

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Thanks. Looks like something fishy with tempest. When I just run neutron > everything is well and fine. > > On 11/17/13 5:50 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > >> >> >>On Sunday, November 17, 2013 7:46:39 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >>> Hi, >>> The gati

Re: [openstack-dev] [Quantum] Cannot run complete set of unit tests

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Alexander Gorodnev wrote: > Hi, > > I have the same problem with Quantum test. I don't even know what it depends > on, but I get the different result every time I run unittests using "tox > -epy27". > My latest result is: > > Ran 4548 (-721) tests in 205.026s (-63.

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit's Jenkins should stop running tests after first failure

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/18/2013 12:43 PM, Martina Kollarova wrote: >> >> Jenkins keeps running all the tests, even if the basic pep8 test fails, >> and runs all of the (very slow) Tempest Quantum tests, even though >> almost all of them are failing. >> >> I propo

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding a clean shutdown for stop/delete breaks Jenkins

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Day, Phil wrote: > Hi Folks, I can't really speak to the stuff that was here so snip. > > i)Make the default wait time much shorter so that Jenkins runs OK > (tries this with 10 seconds and it works fine), and assume that users will > configure it to a more

  1   2   3   4   >