Hi all,
PTG is approaching fast and I'm pretty much offline this week for
holidays so will cancel the two next meetings.
We will get together over Wed to Fri in the PTG and have next Glance
weekly meeting the week after.
Safe travels everyone and I'm looking forward to see as many of ye as
possi
Hi all,
We found a critical bug on glance_store release 0.26.0 (the final
release for Rocky) preventing us to consume the multihash work for
Glance Rocky release.
We would like to include https://review.openstack.org/#/c/587098
containing the missing wrappers for the feature to work. And have
re
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Abhishek Kekane wrote:
> I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for Multiple backend support
> (multi-store)
> feature [0]. The only remaining work is a versioning patch to flag this
> feature as
> experimental and should be completed early next week.
>
> [0]
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> I'm asking for a Feature Freeze Exception for the glance-side work for
> the Secure Hash Algorithm Support (multihash) feature [0]. The work
> is underway and should be completed early next week.
>
> cheers,
> brian
>
> [0]
> https://specs
Hi,
Answering inline.
Best,
Erno "jokke" Kuvaja
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia -
HU/Budapest) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I did some work ont he figures and realised, that I have some questions
> related to the alternative options:
>
>
>
> Multiple backends option:
>
> What i
Hi all,
This week is the deadline week for Glance specs for Rocky!
I'd like to get ack (in form of review in gerrit) for open specs [0]
and I will start Workflow -+1 them as appropriate during the week. Thu
meeting will be last call and anything hanging after that will be
considered again for S c
Hi all,
time to see if we could get the glance folks together for dinner and
perhaps some refreshing beverages. If you are interested, please do
contribute to the plans here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/yvr-glance-dinner
- jokke
__
As majority of the team is in Vancouver for the summit we will cancel
next weeks meeting (24th of May). Glance team will have next meeting
in IRC Thu 31st.
Thanks,
Erno "jokke" Kuvaja
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (no
Hi all,
Now when client release is out and milestone 1 is approaching quickly
I'd like to draw your attention to few things in Glance development.
1) reviews of outstanding specs
2) work towards removal of the Images API v1
3) Pending delete rollback ability
Lets get the reviews to specs so we h
Hi all,
Time for the priority update:
The python-glanceclient release was postponed til this week due to
some bugs Brian found and is in process of fixing. Lets review these
and see what we need for the release, so we can get it out this week.
The R-1 Milestone is approaching quickly so I would
Hi all,
Queens is released, we had good and productive PTG so lets get the
ball rolling and start working through our Rocky priorities.
This week I'd like the focus to be, as discussed in our weekly meeting
at Thu, on python-glanceclient for 'web-download' import method and
any specs that still w
Hi all,
At the start of the cycle is good time to have a look of the Glance
reviewers and based on the discussions amongs the group during and
before the PTG I'd like to propose following changes:
1) Adding Sean McGinnis to Glance core. The current active core team
has been very positive about in
Hi all,
After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name
into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the
candidacy patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539196/
I'd like to take the opportunity to thank most recently Brian but also
our other former PTLs from Ma
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Here's an update so we can hopefully, as a community, take a decision
> in the next days or so.
>
>
> * Migration to StoryBoard
>
> Champion: Kendall Nelson
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513875/
> Some projects already migrated, some pr
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have governance review under debate[1] that we need the community's help
> on.
> The debate is over what recommendation the TC should make to the Interop team
> on where the tests it uses for the OpenStack trademark prog
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Over the past year, it has become pretty obvious to me that our
> self-imposed rhythm no longer matches our natural pace. It feels like we
> are always running elections, feature freeze is always just around the
> corner, we
Hi all,
Due to the Thanks giving in US and as no agenda items were added by
the deadline yesterday we will not have glance meeting today. Will
recoup next week 30th of Nov.
Thanks,
Jokke
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Some of you, TC candidates, expressed concerns about diversity and
> inclusiveness
> (or inclusivity, depending on your taste) in your candidacy. I believe this
> is a
> broad, and some times ill-used, topic so, I'd like to kn
r the connection between Glance and the client (that
being user, nova, cinder...) is
>
> Le 28 sept. 2017 6:30 PM, "Erno Kuvaja" a écrit :
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Arnaud MORIN
>> wrote:
>> > Hey all,
>> > So I finally tested your p
ast disks. Do you have any data you can share that
would show us getting the performance boost worth of the overhead
cost? Just remember the connection between Glance and the client (that
being user, nova, cinder...) is single stream anyways.
- jokke
>
> Le 28 sept. 2017 6:30 PM, "Erno Kuv
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Arnaud MORIN wrote:
> Hey all,
> So I finally tested your pull requests, it does not work.
> 1 - For uploads, swiftclient is not using threads when source is given by
> glance:
> https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient/blob/master/swiftclient/service.py#L18
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>
>> Thanks Chris, I wasn't aware of that. What's your opinion - change
>> it to be more strict, or leave it as is?
>
>
> Ideally we'd have true content negotiation and support multiple
> representations w
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 07/13/2017 08:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>>>
>&
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 06:47 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>
>> On 11/07/17 14:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
>
> Third, al
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 20/06/17 09:31 +1200, feilong wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've been a Glance core since 2013 and been involved in the Glance
>> community even longer, so I care deeply about Glance. My situation right now
>> is such that I cannot devote
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> I'm nominating Abhishek Kekane (abhishekk on IRC) to be a Glance core
> for the Pike cycle. Abhishek has been around the Glance community for
> a long time and is familiar with the architecture and design patterns
> used in Glance and its r
Just quick comment here on my day off. I will get proper reply to the
chain itself tomorrow when I'm back.
While I cannot argue with all Mike's points below, I personally cannot
stand behind his proposals here and just want to indicate that this is
view of one member, not the Glance community by w
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:31:42PM -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote:
>
>> I believe you asked in another thread (that I cannot locate) if it was
>> acceptable to the Glance team to not have an 11.0.3 tarball on
>> openstack.org. With Brian on vacation,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> Glancers,
>
> We have the opportunity to submit one question for the upcoming User
> Survey, which launches on or before February 1. We'd receive responses
> in advance of the February PTG, so this would be a good opportunity for
> glancer
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Folks,
>
>
>
> I am in favor of using a new tag called [rdo] such that RDO (or its
> transitive dependencies) can be discussed and filtered by email clients as
> it relates to development topics that affect the broader OpenStack
> ecos
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Brian Rosmaita
wrote:
> I'd like to propose Steve Lewis (stevelle on IRC) for Glance core. Take
> a look at any of his reviews, and you can see that he's thorough and
> comprehensive in his reviewing. He's knowledgeable about Python,
> Glance, and software engin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Hellmann
> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Date: November 10, 2016 at 13:13:02
> To: openstack-dev
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for w
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to backport this bug -
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556
> but review for master is stuck since August -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/
>
My stand on backporting this as I commented to the bug
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few weeks ago, there was a controversy in which a patch had been
> -2'd until other concerns were resolved and then the core who used
> their -2 powers disappeared and could not lift it after those concerns
> had been resolved. T
Hi all,
As it seems by the "Improving help text for *" string of patches like
[0][1] that the Glance core group is willing to get around -2s by
abandoning, reproposing and merging just because not all of us are
around in US office hours, I'd like to propose that we would just
remove the -2 right f
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS
> driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy
> gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I&
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Tripp, Travis S wrote:
> Hello Glance team,
>
>
>
> We’re looking into implementing the Glance Community Image sharing support
> within Searchlight for Newton, but it looks like several patches are
> outstanding. Can you let us know how likely it is that this will
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing.
> Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're
> wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice.
>
> Would 3000 conflict with any oth
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we have a problem again with not enough memory in HA jobs, all of them
>>> constantly fails in CI: http://status-tripl
Hi all,
I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS
driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy
gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to
ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception.
I'm confident t
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity
>> >> [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate
>> >> discussion how Cinder follows, or rather does not follow, the standard
>> >> deprecation pol
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2016-08-11 12:26:59 +0100:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity
>> [1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate
>> discussion how Cinder fol
Hi all,
As follow up on the mailing list discussion [0], gerrit activity
[1][2] and cinder 3rd party CI policy [3] I'd like to initiate
discussion how Cinder follows, or rather does not follow, the standard
deprecation policy [4] as the project has been tagged on the assert
page [5].
I'm not here
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 08:33 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Dickinson
>> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>
>> Date: August 9, 2016 at 13:17:08
>> To: OpenStack Develop
rojects have gotten since the big tent
> was established, that might be an accurate conclusion, but really bad for
> users/operators of OpenStack.
>
> I really would like glance/glare to reconsider this stance. OpenStack
> continuously budding off projects is not a good patt
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>> On 04 Aug 2016, at 19:34, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
>>>>
>>>> O
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Tim Bell's message of 2016-08-04 15:55:48 +:
>>
>> On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:27, Mikhail Fedosin
>> mailto:mfedo...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> > > > after 6 months of Glare v1 API development we have decided to con
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> On 1 August 2016 at 18:14, Adrian Otto wrote:
>>
>> I am struggling to understand why we would want to remove projects from
>> our big tent at all, as long as they are being actively developed under the
>> principles of "four opens". It seems
Kevin,
What do you mean by "Other OpenStack projects don't take it into
account because its not a big tent thing"? I think there is pretty
decent adoption of Ceph across the projects where it would make sense.
Also I doubt none of them would be against 3rd party Ceph gates to
those project if the
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Alexander Tivelkov
wrote:
> I am the one who started the initiative 2.5 years ago, and was always
> advocating the "let's stay in Glance" approach during numerous discussions
> on "where should it belong" for all these years.
> Now I believe that it is time to move
Hi Daniel,
You might want to have look on the Glance Property Protections [0].
I'd assume that would do it for you?
[0] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/glance/property-protections.html
Best,
Erno
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Russell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are running a public
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Thanks Matt. I've scheduled for a release of the client this week.
>
> On 7/16/16 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> This is more of a heads up than anything.
>>
>> Our internal CI is running Tempest with images that don't have
>> kernel_id o
TL;DR
Makes absolutely sense to run file backend on single node undercloud at CI.
Few more comments inline.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote:
>> There's probably some minimal gain in cross compatibility testing to
>> s
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 20/05/16 18:00 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May
>> 26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work [1] ongoing in
>> Glance. We are m
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:58 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 24 May 2016 at 19:03, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Erno Kuvaja
> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >
> > Date: May 24, 2016 at 06:06
Hi all,
Based on the not yet merged spec of categorized config options [0] some
project seems to have started improving the config option help texts. This
is great but I noticed scary trend on clutter to be added on these
sections. Now looking individual changes it does not look that bad at all
in
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Haynes
wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 05:24 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Gregory Haynes
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 07:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > John Dickinson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> So the re
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ian Cordasco
wrote:
> +1
> On May 22, 2016 11:50 PM, "Kairat Kushaev" wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kairat Kushaev
>>
>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Nikhil Komawar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>>
>>> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual
Hi Huangtianhua,
Bit more general pointers here and I respond to your exact cases inline.
OpenStack community has made really clear that we must not expose backend
configuration details of the services to users and we must not rely users
knowing any of those details to operate in the cloud. The l
If there is changes needed and you haven't been editing the wiki pages
before, let us know. Infra does not accept new accounts at the moment due
to huge amount of spamming, so if you haven't registered before, you can't
do it now.
- Erno
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Nikhil Komawar
wrote:
>
I'm not sure why I'm spending one of these very rare sunny Sunday
afternoons on this but perhaps it's just important enough.
Thanks Nikhil and Chris for such a verbal start for the discussion. I will
at least try to keep my part shorter. I will quote both of your e-mails by
name from which one it
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 11:51 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance
>> Registry
>> service and this email is a request for feedback from the overall
>> community
>> before the
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Nikhil Komawar
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> tl;dr;
> I'm writing to request some feedback on whether the cross project Quotas
> work should move ahead as a service or a library or going to a far
> extent I'd ask should this even be in a common repository, would
>
Hi all,
Due to some changes where my focus is needed, I will not have time to keep
driving Glance's stable maintenance nor continue my efforts in Glance
release management.
I hope/believe that this shift of focus is temporary in nature and that I
will still have time to participate on reviews, bu
istry stack using
keystone differently than how v1 api + v1 registry stack uses it?
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Erno Kuvaja <mailto:kuv...@hp.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have been trying to enable functional testing for Glance API v2
using data_api = glance.d
Hi all,
I have been trying to enable functional testing for Glance API v2 using
data_api = glance.db.registry.api without great success.
The current functionality of the v2 api+reg relies on the fact that
keystone is used and our current tests does not facilitate that
expectation.
I do not
Hi Shiva,
You can get into the screen after you have made the changes stop the
process you have changed (ctrl-c on the correct tab) and restart it
(arrow up will give you the last command ran which will be the one that
has started the process by devstack).
- Erno
On 03/04/14 11:47, shiva m
69 matches
Mail list logo