I agree with Doug as well. We should update the current patch. Susanne
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> I took a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105331/ and had one
> minor issue which I think can be addressed. Prior to approving we need to
> understand what
Great notes! thanks it helped me catch up after vacation. :)
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Stephen Balukoff
wrote:
> On where to capture notes like this long-term: I would say the wiki is
> more searchable for now. When we make the transition to IRC meetings, then
> the meeting bots will cap
Gang,
I was asked the following questions around our Neutron LBaaS use cases:
1. Will there be a scenario where the “VIP” port will be in a different
Node, from all the Member “VMs” in a pool.
2. Also how likely is it for the LBaaS configured subnet to not have a
“router” and just use the “ext
t;
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Doug Wiegley
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Susanne,
>>
>> While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS that would have good
>> input, you might want to also ask this on the non-dev mailing list, for a
>> larger sample size.
LBaaS team,
As we discussed in the Weekly LBaaS meeting this morning we should make
sure we get the design sessions scheduled that we are interested in.
We currently agreed on the following:
* Neutron LBaaS. we want to schedule 2 sessions. I am assuming that we want
to go over status and also th
With a corrected Subject. Susanne
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne Balle
wrote:
>
> LBaaS team,
>
> As we discussed in the Weekly LBaaS meeting this morning we should make
> sure we get the design sessions scheduled that we are interested in.
>
> We currently ag
Brandon
I am not sure how ready that nova feature is for general use and have asked
our nova lead about that. He is on vacation but should be back by the start
of next week. I believe this is the right approach for us moving forward.
We cannot make it mandatory to run the 2 filters but we can say
Let's use a different email thread to discuss if Octavia should be part of
the Neutron incubator project right away or not. I would like to keep the
two discussions separate.
Susanne
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne Balle
wrote:
>
> LBaaS team,
>
> As we discussed in
we
> want to have that discussion in another thread, or should we use this one?
>
> Stephen
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Susanne Balle
> wrote:
>
>> With a corrected Subject. Susanne
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne
I agree with Michael. We need to use the OpenStack tooling.
Sahara is encountering some of the same issues we are as they are building
up their hadoop VM/clusters.
See
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/sahara/userdoc/vanilla_plugin.html
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/sahara/userdoc/diskim
at the SameHost and DifferentHost filters
> > and that
> > will probably do what we need. Though I was hoping we could
> > do a
> > combination of both but we can make it work with those filters
> >
I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into the
Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be the
reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia belong in
Neutron LBaaS v2 incubator.
The Pros:
* Octavia is in Openstack incubation right away
Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the info
on incubation:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
Susanne
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Susanne Balle
wrote:
> I would like
won't be able to use it. Of course everyone
> working on this project wants to make that happen too, so we're doing
> everything we can to make sure we don't jeopardize that possibility. And
> there are enough voices in this project that want that to happen, so I
> thi
because even though the reference
> driver would then require an additional service to run, what it requires is
> still fully-open-source and (by way of our plan) available as part of
> OpenStack core.
>
> --Adam
>
> https://keybase.io/rm_you
>
>
> From: Susa
gt;> >has already spun out, even easier for us. If we want Octavia to just
>> >become an openstack project all its own then that will be the difficult
>> >part.
>> >
>> >I think the best course of action is to get Octavia itself into the same
>> >c
aS product.
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 10:18 -0400, Susanne Balle wrote:
> > Kyle, Adam,
> >
> >
> >
> > Based on this thread Kyle is suggesting the follow moving forward
> > plan:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) We inc
tack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]
>
> Hi Susanne,
>
> I'm just trying to gain a good understanding of the situation here.
> More comments and questions inline.
>
> Salvatore
>
> On 2 September 2014 16
Just wanted to let you know that sahara has move to server groups for
anti-affinity. This is IMHO the way we should so it as well.
Susanne
Jenkins (Code Review)
5:46 PM (0 minutes ago)
to Andrew, Sahara, Alexander, Sergey, Michael, Sergey, Vitaly, Dmitry,
Trevor
Jenkins has posted comments on th
What I'd like to find out now:
1) who's interested in this topic?
Please include me.
2) who's interested in helping flesh out the guidelines for various log
levels?
Please include me.
3) who's interested in helping get these kinds of patches into various
projects in OpenStack?
4) which project
Cool! Thx
Susanne
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Brandon Logan wrote:
> It's set. We'll be having the meetup on Feb 2-6 in San Antonio at RAX
> HQ. I'll add a list of hotels and the address on the etherpad.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lbaas-kilo-meetup
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On
Kyle
Will the Neutron pod location be a known place to attendees? Will there be
signs, etc?
Thanks Susanne
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Tina TSOU
> wrote:
> > Dear Kyle,
> >
> > Thanks for leading this.
> >
> > We filed a BP per new pr
Thierry
How do I reserve a pod for a specific time and day. I am getting ready to
setup a meeting.
Susanne
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Carl Baldwin wrote:
> > Is there a map, a list, or some other official reference? I may like
> > to use a pod for a cross-project
Hi Advanced Services/LBaaS Stackers,
We are setting up a meeting to discuss if it makes sense to separate the
advanced services (LBaaS, FW, VPNaaS) from Neutron into separate projects.
We want a healthy discussion around the pros and cons of separating the
advanced services from Neutron and its
herpad.openstack.org/p/AdvancedServices_and_Neutron a note
> recalling two technical challenges that do not exists when LBaaS runs as a
> Neutron extension.
>
> -Sam.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 07, 2014 2:45
:
> Reminder that we plan to meet tomorrow
>
> Tuesday May 13 at 2pm at the Neutron pod on level 3.
>
> Susanne
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 7, 2014, at 7:45 AM, "Susanne Balle" sleipnir...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Advanced Services/LBaaS Sta
All,
Thank you for attending the meeting around the Advanced Services and
Neutron yesterday in the Neutron pod.
We had a great meeting. The goal of this session was to discuss how the
current Neutron LBaaS doesn't fit the need of what is now defined as
operators e.g. large scale (private, public)
Great summit!! fantastic to meeting you all in person.
We now have agreement on the Object model. How do we turn that into
blueprints and also how do we start making progress on the rest of the
items we agree upon at the summit?
Susanne
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Brandon Logan
wrote:
>
We have had some discussions around how to move forward with the LBaaS
service in OpenStack. I am trying to summarize the key points below.
Feel free to chime in if I misrepresented anything or if you disagree :-)
For simplicity in the rest of the email and so I can differentiate between
all
We have had some discussions around how to move forward with the LBaaS
service in OpenStack. I am trying to summarize the key points below.
Feel free to chime in if I misrepresented anything or if you disagree :-)
For simplicity in the rest of the email and so I can differentiate between
all
d migrating to Octavia.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Balaji.P
>
>
>
> *From:* Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 21, 2014 4:36 AM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Cc:* Cuddy, Tim; Balle
What was discussed at yesterday's Neutron core meeting?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Brandon Logan
wrote:
> Any core neutron people have a chance to give their opinions on this
> yet?
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 15:28 +, Buraschi, Andres wrote:
> > Thanks, Kyle. Gre
Do we know who has an opinion? If so maybe we can reach out to them
directly and ask them to comment.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Brandon Logan
wrote:
> Well we got a few opinions, but not enough understanding of the two
> options to make an informed decision. It was requested that the co
We are now on: #openstack-lbaas
The #neutron-lbaas is now deprecated.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Dustin Lundquist
wrote:
> Actually the channel name is #neutron-lbaas.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Kyle Mestery
> wrote:
>
>> Also, pop into #openstack-lbaas on Freenode, we have
+1. Count me in. Susanne
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Wong wrote:
> +1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in
> Atlanta would be great.
>
> - Stephen
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
> wrote:
>
>> I think mini summit is no worse t
Looks good, Thanks Susanne
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's the wiki page with a list of terms we're usually operate when
> discussing lbaas object model:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Glossary
>
> Feel free to add/modify/ask questions.
swap the floating ip and update the db, etc. and have a new LB
running.
Regards Susanne
--
Susanne Balle
HP Cloud
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
My apologies if you receive this twice. I seems to have problems with my
gmail account.
Hi Neutron LBaaS folks,
I have been getting up to speed on the Neutron LBaaS implementation and
have been wondering how to make it fit our needs in HP public cloud as well
as as an enterprise-grade load ba
Eugene,
Thanks for your comments,
See inline:
Susanne
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi Susanne,
>
> a couple of comments inline:
>
>
>
>>
>> We would like to discuss adding the concept of "managed services" to the
>> Neutron LBaaS either directly or via a Neutron
ivers that do a lot of similar things but are just
> different enough to warrant a separate driver.
> --
> *From:* Susanne Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 24, 2014 4:59 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [opens
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> That for sure can be implemented. I only would recommend to implement
>>> such kind of management system out of Neutron/LBaaS tree, e.g. to only have
>>> client within Libra driver that will communicate with the management
>>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:26 AM, John Dewey wrote:
>
>> I have a similar concern. The underlying driver may support different
>> functionality, but the differentiators need exposed through the top level
>> API.
>>
> Not r
providers at their own will (no vendor lock-in). The API
> contract is what allows this. The challenging aspect is ensuring different
> drivers support the API contract in the same way. What components should
> drivers share is also and interesting conversation to be had.
>
&
Geoff
I noticed the following two blueprints:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/adv-services-in-vms
This blueprint defines a framework for creating, managing and deploying
Neutron advanced services implemented as virtual machines. The goal is to
enable advanced network services (e
I added two more. I am still working on our HA use cases. Susanne
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> I added our priorities. I hope its formatted well enough. I just took a
> stab in the dark.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> --
> *From:* Eugene Nikanorov [
ts actual usage percentages, or just
> re-vamp the one above? (After all, wish-list can be useful for discovering
> things we're missing, especially if we get people new to the discussion to
> add their $0.02.)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
>
>
Ditto. I am interested in contributing as well.
Does Gant work with Devstack? I am assuming the link will give me
directions on how to test it and contribute to the project.
Susanne
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Henrique Truta <
henriquecostatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Oleg, @Sylvain, @Leand
See inline, Susanne
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Jorge Miramontes <
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> Answers inlined. Thanks for the questions! They forced me to think
> about certain features.
>
> Cheers,
> --Jorge
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development M
I agree that the HA should be hidden to the user/tenant. IMHO a tenant
should just use a load-balancer as a “managed” black box where the service
is resilient in itself.
Our current Libra/LBaaS implementation in the HP public cloud uses a pool
of standby LB to replace failing tenant’s LB. Our LB
Nice diagrams. :-) Thanks. Susanne
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Phillip Toohill <
phillip.tooh...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> Diagrams in jpeg format..
>
> On 10/12/14 10:06 PM, "Phillip Toohill"
> wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >Heres some additional diagrams and docs. Not incredibly detailed, bu
Jorge
I understand your use cases around capturing of metrics, etc.
Today we mine the logs for usage information on our Hadoop cluster. In the
future we'll capture all the metrics via ceilometer.
IMHO the amphorae should have an interface that allow for the logs to be
moved to various backends s
Are we talking about a 5 day Hackathon or 3 day with 2 days (Mon & Fri) for
travel?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Adam Harwell
wrote:
> Any chance it could actually be the week AFTER? Or is that to close to
> the holidays? <_<
> On Nov 6, 2014 7:21 AM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
>
> I have jus
Works for me. Susanne
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brandon Logan wrote:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#LBaaS_meeting
>
> That is updated for lbaas and advanced services with the new times.
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
>
> On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 11:07 +, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> > #open
+1
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Kyle Mestery
wrote:
> We're coming down to the wire here with regards to Neutron BPs in
> Juno, and I wanted to bring up the topic of the flavor framework BP.
> This is a critical BP for things like LBaaS, FWaaS, etc. We need this
> work to land in Juno, as t
+1 to QUEUED status.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Brandon Logan
wrote:
> Hi German,
>
> That actually brings up another thing that needs to be done. There is
> no DELETED state. When an entity is deleted, it is deleted from the
> database. I'd prefer a DELETED state so that should be anot
Hi
I would like to discuss what talks we plan to do at the Paris' summit and
who will be submitting what? The deadline for submitting talks is July 28
so it is approaching.
Also how many "working" sessions do we need? and what prep work do we need
to do before the summit.
I am personally interes
Will take a look :-) Thanks for the huge amount of work put into this.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Avishay Balderman
wrote:
> Hi Brandon
> I think the patch should be broken into few standalone sub patches.
> As for now it is huge and review is a challenge :)
> Thanks
> Avishay
>
>
> -O
The Watcher Newton mid-cycle developer meetup will take place in Hillsboro,
OR on July 19-21 2016
For more details see the wiki [1]
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_newton_mid-cycle_meetup_agenda
Regards Susanne
__
Dear Watcher team
Our weekly IRC meetings on December 23rd and 30th are canceled due to the
holidays. Next meeting will take place on January 6th at the usual time on
#openstack-meeting-4 at 1400 UTC.
The team is atill available to answer questions and help on
#openstack-watcher
Regards Susanne
cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups.
Susanne
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in.
>
> https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb
> as the main
correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next
week's meeting make sense. Susanne
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Susanne Balle
wrote:
> cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups.
>
> Susanne
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:
Make sense to me. Susanne
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Doug Wiegley
wrote:
> Hi lbaas'ers,
>
> Now that lbaasv2 has "shipped", the need for a regular weekly meeting is
> greatly reduced. I propose that we cancel the regular meeting, and discuss
> neutron-y things during the neutron on-demand
Congrats everybody! well deserved.
Jean-Emile thank you for all your hard work!
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Shedimbi, Prudhvi Rao <
prudhvi.rao.shedi...@intel.com> wrote:
> Thank You for giving me this opportunity. I will try to fulfill my role in
> the Core team to the best of my ability.
+1
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Hidekazu Nakamura <
hid-nakam...@vf.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin)
> > [mailto:a.cha...@servionica.ru]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 10:44 PM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>
+1
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Hidekazu Nakamura <
hid-nakam...@vf.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin)
> > [mailto:a.cha...@servionica.ru]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 9:48 PM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Thanks for all the hard work. best of luck,
Susanne
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin) <
a.cha...@servionica.ru> wrote:
> Antoine,
>
> Congratulations to the new step of your life!
> You’ve set high level of project management and this is big honour to me
> to fi
+1
Susanne
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Чадин Александр
wrote:
> +1
>
> ___
> Alexander Chadin,
> Engineer
> Software Solutions Department
> Servionica Ltd.
> Work email: a.cha...@servionica.ru
> Mobile: +7(916)693-58-81
>
>
>
When will we know about the mascot as well as what the design looks like?
Susanne
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Joe Cropper wrote:
> +2 to Jellyfish!
>
> > On Jul 28, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Antoine Cabot
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Watcher team,
> >
> > Last week during the mid-cycle, we came up with a
+1
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Prashanth Hari wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Joe Cropper
> wrote:
>
>> +1 !
>>
>> > On Feb 14, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Vincent FRANÇOISE <
>> vincent.franco...@b-com.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Team,
>> >
>> > I would like to promote Prudhvi Rao Shedim
+1
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Vincent FRANÇOISE <
vincent.franco...@b-com.com> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1
>
> On 14/02/2017 11:27, ? ? wrote:
> > His activity will help Watcher Team to make this project better.
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Hi
We had a super productive summit with many very active participants. Thanks
to everybody who participated.
Detailed minutes are available at:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/watcher-ocata-design-session
We had a talk and 4 Watcher sessions during the summit.
- The *first session* wa
71 matches
Mail list logo
