Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators] [qa] [berlin] QA Team & related sessions at berlin summit

2018-11-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
2018 11:02:54 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote > Hello everyone, > > Along with project updates & onboarding sessions, QA team will host QA > feedback sessions in berlin summit. Feel free to catch us next week for any > QA related questions or if you need help to c

[openstack-dev] [openstack-operators] [qa] [berlin] QA Team & related sessions at berlin summit

2018-11-08 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hello everyone, Along with project updates & onboarding sessions, QA team will host QA feedback sessions in berlin summit. Feel free to catch us next week for any QA related questions or if you need help to contribute in QA (we are really looking forward to onbaord new contributor in QA).

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-11-08 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. - TC __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa] Migrating devstack jobs to Bionic (Ubuntu LTS 18.04)

2018-11-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 07:07:33 +0900 Clark Boylan wrote > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Thanks Jens. > > > > As most of the base jobs are in QA repo, QA team will coordinate this > > migration based on either of t

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa] Migrating devstack jobs to Bionic (Ubuntu LTS 18.04)

2018-11-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 06:51:32 +0900 Slawomir Kaplonski wrote > Hi, > > > Wiadomość napisana przez Jeremy Stanley w dniu > > 06.11.2018, o godz. 22:25: > > > > On 2018-11-06 22:05:49 +0100 (+0100), Slawek Kaplonski wrote: > > [...] > >> also add jobs like

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][qa] Migrating devstack jobs to Bionic (Ubuntu LTS 18.04)

2018-11-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks Jens. As most of the base jobs are in QA repo, QA team will coordinate this migration based on either of the approach mentioned below. Another point to note - This migration will only target the zuulv3 jobs not the legacy jobs. legacy jobs owner should migrate them to bionic when they

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-11-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 2019 summit during May holidays?

2018-11-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 05:50:03 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, 20:07 Julia Kreger *removes all of the hats* > *removes years of dust from unrelated event planning hat, and puts it on for > a moment* > > In my experience, events of any nature where

Re: [openstack-dev] Sharing upstream contribution mentoring result with Korea user group

2018-10-31 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
That's great job Ian and team. It is really great when local user groups doing so much effort for upstream contribution mentoring. From FirstContact SIG point of view, feel free to let us know any help you need in term of engaging new contributors with their interesting projects team and

Re: [openstack-dev] Neutron stadium project Tempest plugins

2018-10-31 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 05:08:11 +0900 Slawomir Kaplonski wrote > Hi, > > Thx Miguel for raising this. > List of tempest plugins is on > https://docs.openstack.org/tempest/latest/plugin-registry.html - if URL for > Your plugin is the same as Your main repo, You should move Your

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-10-30 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-10-30 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-10-23 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-10-23 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] patrole] Nominating Sergey Vilgelm and Mykola Yakovliev for Patrole core

2018-10-22 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
+1 for both of them. They have been doing great work in Patrole and will be good addition in team. -gmann On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 03:34:51 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C wrote > > Hi, > > I would like to nominate Sergey Vilgelm and Mykola Yakovliev for Patrole > core as

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC office hours is started now on #openstack-tc

2018-10-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 18-42

2018-10-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussed about API extensions works. - Discussed on 2 new bugs which needs more log for further debugging. added bug comments. Planned Features :

[openstack-dev] [tc][all] TC Office hour time

2018-10-16 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, TC office hour is started on #openstack-tc channel & many of TC members (may be not all due to TZ) gather for next 1 hour to discuss any topic from community. Feel free to reach to us for anything you want discuss/input/feedback/help from TC. -gmann

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Call for Volunteers to work on upgrade-checkers stein goal

2018-10-16 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I was discussing with mriedem [1] about idea of building a volunteer team which can work with him on upgrade-checkers goal [2]. There are lot of work needed for this goal[3], few projects which does not have upgrade impact yet needs CLI framework with placeholder only and other

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-26 Update

2018-10-16 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 07:05:53 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > The big update this week is version 0.1.0 of oslo.upgradecheck was > released. The documentation along with usage examples can be found here > [1]. A big thanks to Ben Nemec for getting that done since a few > projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] meetings outside IRC

2018-10-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 06:29:46 +0900 Mohammed Naser wrote > Hi everyone: > > I was going over our governance documents, more specifically this section: > > "All project meetings are held in public IRC channels and recorded." > > Does this mean that all official projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Discussing goals (upgrades) with community @ office hours

2018-10-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 22:04:16 +0900 Mohammed Naser wrote > Hi everyone! > > It looks like we're not going to be able to have a TC meeting every 2 > weeks as I had hoped for, the majority of the TC seems to want to meet > once every month. However, I wanted to ask if the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-10-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
ble. -gmann > Lance > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/606214/ > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:49 AM Lance Bragstad wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:54:01 +0900 Lance Bragstad > wrote >

[openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 18-41

2018-10-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussed on api cleanup spec. - Discussed api extensions work and pending things on this work. Proposed all the pending item for this BP. - Discussed on 2 new

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] assigning new liaisons to projects

2018-10-08 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 23:27:06 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > TC members, > > Since we are starting a new term, and have several new members, we need > to decide how we want to rotate the liaisons attached to each our > project teams, SIGs, and working groups [1]. > > Last

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][qa] Enabling online volume_extend tests by default

2018-10-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 06 Oct 2018 01:42:11 +0900 Erlon Cruz wrote > Hey folks, > Following up on the discussions that we had on the Denver PTG, the Cinder > teamis planning to enable online volume_extend tests[1] to be run by > default. Currently,those tests are only run by some CI systems

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

2018-10-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 22:16:36 +0900 Julia Kreger wrote > +1 to bringing back formal meetings. A few replies below regarding > time/agenda. > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 5:38 AM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Thierry Carrez writes: > > > Ghanshyam Mann wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] bringing back formal TC meetings

2018-10-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 05 Oct 2018 02:47:53 +0900 Jeremy Stanley wrote > On 2018-10-04 13:40:05 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > > TC members, please reply to this thread and indicate if you would > > find meeting at 1300 UTC on the first Thursday of every month > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-10-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:22:46 +0900 Erlon Cruz wrote > > > Em seg, 1 de out de 2018 às 05:26, Balázs Gibizer > escreveu: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-10-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 07:23:30 +0900 Lance Bragstad wrote > Alright - I've worked up the majority of what we have in this thread and > proposed a documentation patch for oslo.policy [0]. > I think we're at the point where we can finish the rest of this discussion > in gerrit if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-10-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
t;> > >> If folks are ok with this, I can start working on some documentation > that explains the motivation for this. Afterward, we can figure out how we > want to track this work. > >> > >> What color do you want the shed to be? > >> > >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-10-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 23:13:02 +0900 Lance Bragstad wrote > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:10 AM Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:43:00 +0900 John Garbutt > wrote > > tl;dr+1 consistent names > > I would make the name

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [infra] [placement] tempest plugins virtualenv

2018-10-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 23:10:06 +0900 Matthew Treinish wrote > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > I'm still trying to figure out how to properly create a "modern" (as > > in zuul v3 oriented) integration test for placement using gabbi and >

[openstack-dev] [PTG][QA] QA PTG Stein Summary

2018-09-27 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Thanks for joining Stein QA PTG and making it successful. I am writing the QA PTG summary and detailed discussion can be found on main PTG etherpad - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-stein-ptg We are continuing the 'owner' for each working item so that we have single point of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [all] Consistent policy names

2018-09-21 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:43:00 +0900 John Garbutt wrote > tl;dr+1 consistent names > I would make the names mirror the API... because the Operator setting them > knows the API, not the codeIgnore the crazy names in Nova, I certainly hate > them Big +1 on consistent naming which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [all][tc] We're combining the lists! (was: Bringing the community together...)

2018-09-20 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 06:46:43 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-09-20 16:32:49 +: > > tl;dr: The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and > > openstack-operators mailing lists (to which this is being sent) will > > be replaced by

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

2018-09-19 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:26:30 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 9/17/2018 9:41 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > > > > > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

2018-09-19 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:29:46 +0900 Monty Taylor wrote > On 09/19/2018 09:23 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 09/19/2018 08:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > >> > >> I have a patch in progress to add some simple integration tests to > >> placement: > >> > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

2018-09-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 02:28:29 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2018-09-18 09:53:45 -0700: > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018, at 9:46 AM, Nate Johnston wrote: > > > Hello python 3.6 champions, > > > > > > I have looked around a little, and I don't see

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

2018-09-17 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and os-instance-action > API stopped accepting the undefined query parameter. > What I'm thinking about is checking all the APIs, add json-query-param > checking with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tc]Global Reachout Proposal

2018-09-17 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 02:49:40 +0900 Zhipeng Huang wrote > Hi all, > Follow up the diversity discussion we had in the tc session this morning > [0], I've proposed a resolution on facilitating technical community in large > to engage in global reachout for OpenStack more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

2018-09-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:05:17 +0900 Lance Bragstad wrote > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-09-12 09:47:27 -0600 (-0600), Matt Riedemann wrote: > [...] > > So I encourage all elected TC members to work directly with the > > various SIGs

Re: [openstack-dev] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

2018-09-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:47:27 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > Rather than take a tangent on Kristi's candidacy thread [1], I'll bring > this up separately. > > Kristi said: > > "Ultimately, this list isn’t exclusive and I’d love to hear your and > other people's opinions about

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3] mixed versions?

2018-09-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:10:48 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2018-09-13 12:23:32 +0200: > > On 09/13/2018 12:52 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > > > On 9/12/2018 12:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > >>> This came up in a Vancouver summit

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Dinner Night

2018-09-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, We have finalized the place and time for QA dinner which is tomorrow night. Here are the details: Restaurant : Famous Dave's - https://goo.gl/maps/G7gjpsJUEV72 Wednesday night, 6:30 PM Meeting time at lobby: 6.15 PM -gmann On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:13:15 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [all] QA Stein PTG Planning

2018-09-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
]. Request all the Topic owner to fill the details on respective Etherpads well before the Topic Schedule. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-stein-ptg [2] https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Stein-PTG-QA-Schedule -gmann On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 17:34:27 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote >

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc] Opinion about 'PTL' tooling

2018-09-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:31:11 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from jean-phili...@evrard.me's message of 2018-09-10 13:15:02 +0200: > > Hello everyone, > > > > In my candidacy [1], I mentioned that the TC should provide more tools to > > help the PTLs at their duties, for

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTG] QA Dinner Night

2018-09-10 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I'd like to propose a QA Dinner night for the QA team at the Dublin PTG. I initiated a doodle vote [1] to choose Tuesday or Wednesday night. NOTE: Anyone engaged in QA activities (not necessary to be QA core) are welcome to join. [1] https://doodle.com/poll/68fudz937v22ghnv

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Team lunch at the PTG next week - ACTION NEEDED

2018-09-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
I am in for Wed lunch meeting. -gmann On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:30:53 +0900 Ildiko Vancsa wrote > Hi Training Team, > > As a couple of us will be at the PTG next week it would be great to get > together one of the days maybe for lunch. > > Wednesday would work the best for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][CI][nova compute] Skipping non-compute-driver tests

2018-09-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 08 Sep 2018 08:28:06 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 9/7/2018 10:25 AM, William M Edmonds wrote: > > The concern that I have with whitelisting in a given CI is that it has > > to be done independently in every compute driver CI. So while I agree > > that it won't be

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][CI][nova compute] Skipping non-compute-driver tests

2018-09-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 04:41:32 +0900 Eric Fried wrote > Jichen- > > That patch is not ever intended to merge; hope that was clear from the > start :) It was just a proving ground to demonstrate which tests still > pass when there's effectively no compute driver in play. >

[openstack-dev] [qa] Canceling next week QA office hours due to PTG

2018-09-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As many of the QA folks will be in PTG, I am canceling the QA office hours for next week. Same will be resumed after PTG on 20th Sept. -gmann __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [openstack-operator] [qa] [forum] [berlin] QA Brainstorming Topic ideas for Berlin 2018

2018-09-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I have created the below etherpad to collect the forum ideas related to QA for Berlin Summit. Please write up your ideas with your irc name on etherpad. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/berlin-stein-forum-qa-brainstorming -gmann

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy

2018-09-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
and consideration. - Ghanshyam Mann (gmann) * Review: http://stackalytics.com/?release=all=marks_id=ghanshyammann_type=all * Commit: http://stackalytics.com/?release=all=commits_id=ghanshyammann_type=all * Foundation Profile: https://www.openstack.org/community/members/profile/6461 * Website

[openstack-dev] [QA] [all] QA Stein PTG Planning

2018-09-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As we are close to PTG, I have prepared the QA Stein PTG Schedule - https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Stein-PTG-QA-Schedule Detail of each sessions can be found in this etherpad - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-stein-ptg This time we will have QA Help Hour for 1 day only which is

[openstack-dev] [QA] Rocky Retrospective Etherpad

2018-09-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, I have started an etherpad for a Rocky cycle retrospective for QA - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-rocky-retrospective This will be discussed in PTG on Tuesday 9.30-10.00 AM, so please add your feedback/comment before that. Everyone is welcome to add the feedback which help us to

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade][osc][rocky]openstack client Rocky does not work with python-cinderclient Rocky

2018-09-03 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 15:27:10 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote > Hi All, > > While doing the grenade setting to test the Rocky upgrade testing [1], i > found osc Rocky version (3.15 or 3.16) does not work with > python-cinderclient Rocky version (>=4.0.0) [

[openstack-dev] [grenade][osc][rocky]openstack client Rocky does not work with python-cinderclient Rocky

2018-09-03 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, While doing the grenade setting to test the Rocky upgrade testing [1], i found osc Rocky version (3.15 or 3.16) does not work with python-cinderclient Rocky version (>=4.0.0) [2]. Failure are due to source_replica arg has been removed from python-cinderclient which went in Rocky

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] trouble setting tempest feature flag

2018-08-31 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:20:37 +0900 Eric K wrote > Ha. Turned out to be a simple mistake in hyphens vs underscores. Thanks for update and good to know it is resolved now. Sorry I could not checked this further due to PTO. -gmann > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:06 PM Eric K wrote:

[openstack-dev] [qa][patrole][neutron][policy] Neutron Policy Testing in OpenStack Patrole project

2018-08-22 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, This thread is to request the neutron team on review help for neutron policy testing in Patrole project. Folks who are not familiar with Patrole, below is the brief background & description of Patrole: - OpenStack Patrole is official project under QA umbrella

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][qa] QA Rocky release status

2018-08-21 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:rocky-branch-devstack-grenade+(status:open+OR+status:merged) [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592277/ [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592276/ [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591804/ -gmann On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:55:12 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote

[openstack-dev] [release][qa] QA Rocky release status

2018-08-16 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, QA has lot of sub-projects and this mail is to track their release status for Rocky cycle. I will be on vacation from coming Monday for next 2 weeks (visiting India) but will be online to complete the below IN-PROGRESS items and update the status here. IN-PROGRESS: 1.

[openstack-dev] [release][qa][devstack][all] Pre-Notifiaction for DevStack branch cut for Rocky

2018-08-15 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, We are in process of cutting the Rocky branch for Devstack[1]. As per process[2], we need to wait for minimum set of project (which needed branch) used by Devstack to be branched first. As dhellmann mentioned on patch, All of the cycle-with-milestone projects are branched and we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] help with tempest plugin jobs against stable/queens

2018-08-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:37:18 +0900 Eric K wrote > I'm adding jobs [1] to the tempest plugin to run tests against > congress stable/queens. The job output seems to show stable/queens > getting checked out [2], but I know the test is *not* run against > queens because it's using

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][qa][congress] tempest test conditioning on release version

2018-08-14 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 06:40:57 +0900 Eric K wrote > Anyone have an example handy of a tempest test conditioning on service > release version (because new features not available in past versions)? > Seems like it could get pretty messy and haphazard, so I'm curious to > see best

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
s should cover the stable branch testing with branchless repo" now i can add 2nd TODO also 2. "Release model & tagging clarification of Tempest Plugins". I do not know the best common place to add those doc but as start i can write those in Tempest doc and later we can refer/mov

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
hes also like Tempest does. That is one item for QA team to help plugins in stein. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-June/131810.html -gmann > > Doug > > > > > Dmitry > > > > On 08/12/2018 10:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > > Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-13 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:35:23 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > Hi, > > The plugins are branchless and should stay so. Let us not dive into this > madness > again please. > > Dmitry > > On 08/12/2018 10:41 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Hi All

[openstack-dev] [releases][rocky][tempest-plugins][ptl] Reminder to tag the Tempest plugins for Rocky release

2018-08-12 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Rocky release is few weeks away and we all agreed to release Tempest plugin with cycle-with-intermediary. Detail discussion are in ML [1] in case you missed. This is reminder to tag your project tempest plugins for Rocky release. You should be able to find your plugins deliverable

[openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 02-08

2018-08-09 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussed on granular policy spec to update that as default roles are present now. - Discussed keypair quota usage bug. and only doc update can be done for now.

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

2018-08-08 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Thanks Victoria for such a great work and well coordinated. You have done remarkable work in internships program. -gmann On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:47:28 +0900 Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote > Hi all, > I'm reaching you out to let you know that I'll be stepping down as >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][api] strict schema validation and microversioning

2018-08-07 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 07:27:06 +0900 Monty Taylor wrote > On 08/07/2018 05:03 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > > Hi Cinder and API-SIG folks, > > > > During reviewing a horizon bug [0], I noticed the behavior of Cinder API > > 3.0 was changed. > > Cinder introduced more strict

[openstack-dev] [opensatck-dev][qa][barbican][novajoin][networking-fortinet][vmware-nsx] Dependency of Tempest changes

2018-08-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Tempest patch [1] removes the deprecated config option for volume v1 API and it has dependency on may plugins. I have proposed the patches to each plugins using that option [2] to stop using that option so that their gate will not be broken if Tempest patch merge. Also I have made

Re: [openstack-dev] Should we add a tempest-slow job?

2018-08-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:14:04 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 5/13/2018 9:06 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > >> +1 on idea. As of now slow marked tests are from nova, cinder and > >> neutron scenario tests and 2 API swift tests only [4]. I agree that >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] tempest-full-py3 rename means we now run that job on test-only changes

2018-08-06 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sun, 05 Aug 2018 06:44:26 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > I've reported a nova bug for this: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1785425 > > But I'm not sure what is the best way to fix it now with the zuul v3 > hotness. We had an irrelevant-files entry in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

2018-07-30 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 04:21:53 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 7/27/2018 2:14 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> From checking the history and review discussion on [3], it seems that > >> it was like that from staring. key_pair quota is being counted when > >> actually creating

[openstack-dev] [QA][PTL][Election] Quality Assurance PTL Candidacy for Stein

2018-07-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi Everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy to continue the Quality Assurance PTL role for Stein cycle. I have served as QA PTL in Rocky cycle and as first time being PTL role, it was great experience for me. I have been doing my best effort in Rocky and made sure that we continued

Re: [openstack-dev] Lots of slow tests timing out jobs

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:22:24 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > On 7/25/2018 1:46 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > yeah, there are many tests taking too long time. I do not know the reason > > this time but last time we did audit for slow tests was mainly due to ss

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 19-25

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 23:53:18 +0900 Surya Seetharaman wrote > Hi! > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > > 5. API Extensions merge work > - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/api-extensions-merge-rock

[openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 19-25

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussion on priority BP and remaining reviews on those. - Discussed keypair quota usage bug. Planned Features : == Below are the API related

[openstack-dev] [nova] keypair quota usage info for user

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, During today API office hour, we were discussing about keypair quota usage bug (newton) [1]. key_pair 'in_use' quota is always 0 even when request per user which is because it is being set as 0 always [2]. From checking the history and review discussion on [3], it seems that it was

Re: [openstack-dev] Lots of slow tests timing out jobs

2018-07-25 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 05:15:53 +0900 Matt Riedemann wrote > While going through our uncategorized gate failures [1] I found that we > have a lot of jobs failing (161 in 7 days) due to the tempest run timing > out [2]. I originally thought it was just the networking scenario tests,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tempest] [patrole] Service client duplication between Tempest and Tempest plugins

2018-07-24 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:27:26 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C wrote > Please see comments inline. > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:22:47 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C > > wrote > > > Hi, > > > > > > ** Intention ** > > > Intention is to expand Patrole testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tempest] [patrole] Service client duplication between Tempest and Tempest plugins

2018-07-23 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 04:22:47 +0900 MONTEIRO, FELIPE C wrote > Hi, > > ** Intention ** > Intention is to expand Patrole testing to some service clients that already > exist in some Tempest plugins, for core services only. > > ** Background ** > Digging through

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron][qa] Should we add a tempest-slow job?

2018-07-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Matt Riedemann > > wrote: > >> The tempest-full job used to run API and scenario tests concurrently, and > >> if > >> you go b

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 12-18

2018-07-18 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === What we discussed this week: - Discussion on priority BP and remaining reviews on those. - picked up 3 in-progress bug's patches and reviewed. Planned Features : == Below are the

[openstack-dev] [qa][ptg] Stein PTG Planning for QA

2018-07-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, As we are close to Stein PTG Denver, I have prepared the etherpad[1] to collect the PTG topic ideas for QA. Please start adding your item/topic you want to discuss in PTG or comment on proposed topics. Even you are not making to PTG physically, still add your topic which you want us

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 5-11

2018-07-11 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === We had more attendees in this week office hours. What we discussed this week: - Discussion on API related BP. Discussion points are embedded inline with BP weekly progress in next section. -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [nova][api] Novaclient redirect endpoint https into http

2018-07-05 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:30:15 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > > > 2018-07-06 10:03 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu : > > > 2018-07-06 2:55 GMT+08:00 melanie witt : > +openstack-dev@ > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 14:50:26 +, Bogdan Katynski wrote: > But, I can not use nova command, endpoint

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 28-4

2018-07-04 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === We have re-started the Nova API discussion in office hour. I have updated the wiki page for more information about office hours: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI What we discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-28 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:05:09 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > On 06/27/2018 03:17 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann > > wrote > > > Excerpts from Matthew Trein

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-28 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:08:35 +0900 Sean McGinnis wrote > > > > There is no issue of backward incompatibility from Tempest and on Gate. > > GATE > > is always good as it is going with mater version or minimum supported > > version > > in plugins as you mentioned. We take

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API Office Hour

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
Hi All, From today, we will be hosting the office hour for Nova API discussions which will cover the Nova API priority and API Bug triage things. I have updated the information about agenda and time in wiki page [1]. All are welcome to join. We will continue this on every Wedneday 06.00 UTC

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
gmann > > And this will also allow them to release a version when their want. > > So I support making release of Tempest and Plugins, but do not support > a coordinated release. > > Regards, > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:18:52PM +0900, Ghanshyam Mann

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 19:12:33 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > On 06/26/2018 11:57 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:37:42 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur > > wrote > > > On 06/26/2018 11:18

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:19:17 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote > ++ operator ML > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:17:33 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann > wrote > > > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
++ operator ML On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 10:17:33 +0900 Ghanshyam Mann wrote > > > > On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann > wrote > > Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-06-26 09:52:09 -0400: > > > On T

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 23:12:30 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2018-06-26 09:52:09 -0400: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:53:21AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Andrea Frittoli's message of 2018-06-26 13:35:11 +0100: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:37:42 +0900 Dmitry Tantsur wrote > On 06/26/2018 11:18 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > In Queens cycle, community goal to split the Tempest Plugin has been > > completed [1] and i think almost all the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest-plugins][release][tc][ptl]: Coordinated Release Model proposal for Tempest & Tempest Plugins

2018-06-26 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 18:28:03 +0900 Luigi Toscano wrote > On Tuesday, 26 June 2018 11:18:52 CEST Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > In Queens cycle, community goal to split the Tempest Plugin has been > > completed [1] and i th

  1   2   3   4   >