[openstack-dev] Arrivederci

2017-03-22 Thread Ian Cordasco
, or some other method. At the very least, I'll see y'all around PyCon, the larger F/OSS world, etc. -- Ian Cordasco IRC/Git{Hub,Lab}/Twitter: sigmavirus24 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][security] Encryption in Zuul v3

2017-03-22 Thread Ian Cordasco
le system to share a vault key with Zuul. > I don't think that has come up as a suggestion yet, but seems like it > would work. I suppose Barbican doesn't meet those requirements either, then, yes? -- Ian Cordasco __

Re: [openstack-dev] [craton] Nomination of Thomas Maddox as Craton core

2017-03-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
+1. Welcome to the team, Thomas On Mar 21, 2017 3:43 PM, "Jim Baker" wrote: > *I nominate Thomas Maddox as a core reviewer for the Craton project.* > > Thomas has shown extensive knowledge of Craton, working across a range of > issues in the core service, including down to

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Moving Gnocchi out

2017-03-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
ning key for each release cycle that Gnocchi is likely currently signed with when tarballs are released. You may receive complaints that new releases aren't verifiable in the same way, but that and needing a decent MANIFEST.in (assuming you're also dropping your usage of PBR) will probably b

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Moving Gnocchi out

2017-03-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
a lot of process that goes into contributing. Moving this to a friendlier (if not inferior) developer platform makes sense if there is interest from companies not interested in participating in the OpenStack community. -- Ian Cordasco ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat][murano][app-catalog] The future of the App Catalog

2017-03-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
ems like Murano relies on a lot of unstable OpenStack infrastructure. While lots of people have contributed time, energy, sweat, and tears to the project there are still plenty of things that make Murano less than desirable. Perhaps that's why the project has found so few adopters. I'm sure there ar

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the release schedule

2017-03-03 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the release schedule > On 3/2/17 9:45 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Telles Nobrega > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][ptl] Adding docs to the release schedule

2017-03-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
t reviewing all of our documentation. I know projects go sideways all the time. I think this was Glance's first cycle like this in a few cycles. But if we can make a habit of creating excellent release candidates, we can spend the intermediate time on documentation. I thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

2017-03-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
the Release team from having to generate N emails where N is the number of "business-only" lists. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.open

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

2017-02-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
st. Core project teams already occasionally bicker over changes being approved that one half wouldn't have approved. This will introduce yet another place for subjective reasoning between trusted members of the community. I'm not sure there's a great deal of value in those lists considering

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen

2017-02-22 Thread Ian Cordasco
effective immediately. > > Thank you to all of you in the community that I've worked with in IRC, at > summits in Austin > and Barcelona and to all of you who gave your time to review and improve my > contributions. Thank you for all your work on OSA Travis! Your r

[openstack-dev] [stable] [glance] revising the stable-maintenance list

2017-02-22 Thread Ian Cordasco
; again as Glance contributors: > - Kairat Kushaev > - Mike Fedosin > - Louis Taylor On the heels of this removal, I'd like to propose also removing Mike Fedosin from the stable-maintenance team for Glance. -- Ia

Re: [openstack-dev] [governance] Where is project:type documented?

2017-02-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
In openstack/releases in the deliverables directory, e.g., https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/ocata/glance.yaml Please excuse my top-posting and brevity as I am sending this from my phone On Feb 20, 2017 5:01 PM, "Kenny Johnston" wrote: > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][heat] Heat stable-maint additions

2017-02-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
of people. > > I appreciate your guidance and input, but shouldn't we decide our > stable maintainers, the same way we decide cores? The current list > contains at least one person that doesn't contribute anymore, so it's > not like it's super curated. This is how every othe

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] Making the Kitchen Great Again: A Retrospective on OpenStack & Chef

2017-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
ead with my opinions of how corporations will begin to exploit that and invest less directly in OpenStack's development though. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-de

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] Making the Kitchen Great Again: A Retrospective on OpenStack & Chef

2017-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] Making the Kitchen Great Again: A Retrospective on OpenStack & Chef > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > It seems like a lot of people view "developing OpenStack" as more > > attractive

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] Making the Kitchen Great Again: A Retrospective on OpenStack & Chef

2017-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
ankly. If we put our tooling in repo, we'll likely then start collecting RPM/Debian/etc. packaging in repo as well. I think what would help improve willing bidirectional communication between service and deployment/packaging teams would be an understanding that without the deployment/pa

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Do we need service types at all?! (Re: [octavia][sdk] service name for octavia)

2017-02-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
stone is the implementation "Identity" is the thing it does and what you're looking for from a service that is not Keystone. Same goes for clouds that swap out RadosGW for Swift. They're looking for an OpenStack Object Store API. They're not fuzzy matching on project name. -- Ian Cord

Re: [openstack-dev] import urllib3 problem

2017-02-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
exit_trap:511 exit 1 > stack@coritel-VirtualBox:~/devstack$ sudo gedit > /opt/stack/requirements/.venv/local/lib/python2.7/site- > packages/pip/_vendor/requests/packages/__init__.py Hi Carmine, It looks like your virtualenv needs to be recreated. The version of pip inside of it seems to be thor

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
ance team is a good chance to try something new > > and interesting, and of course gain new experience. > > > > I support you in your attempt to have a natural evolution. I think > it's going to be harder and harder the longer you're developing Glare's > features without pushi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
rough an API. Our trademark > interoperability requirements may even guarantee the presence of one > already in any compliant deployment; I'll have to check... ;) Well it's a storage service, so I hope the name doesn't start with "S". ;D -- Ian Cordasco ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
s working on the image-import specifications to make v2 more interoperable. That said, I'm convinced neither Glare nor Glance have learned the scaling issues from the current designs. At best, the last I looked, Glare has learned not to inherit Glance's caching design which has been fre

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] pbr and warnerrors status

2017-02-07 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Feb 7, 2017 5:47 PM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote: Likely just never pulled the trigger. Seems like we should pull it though. Will have to wait until Pike given the library release freeze __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/ceilometer failed

2017-02-01 Thread Ian Cordasco
sed by some newer version of gnocchiclient being used than is actually supported for stable/newton. Cheers! -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/glance failed

2017-01-30 Thread Ian Cordasco
ndencies must be installed before it is installed. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/c

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] new draft logo of the Glance mascot

2017-01-28 Thread Ian Cordasco
I love it! Top-posting from my phone On Jan 28, 2017 3:08 PM, "Brian Rosmaita" wrote: > Hello Glancers, > > Attached is the new draft logo of the Glance mascot. It looks to me > like this draft captures the key features we requested (and is much more > personable

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (01/27-02/02)

2017-01-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
; Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Amy Marrich for core

2017-01-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
g> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Proposing Amy Marrich for core > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 01/27/2017 08:29 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > I would like to propose Amy Marrich for the core team for OpenStack-Ansible

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze In Effect

2017-01-26 Thread Ian Cordasco
of Glance's cores to be a bit more careful. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Ocata-3 Priorities

2017-01-25 Thread Ian Cordasco
-dev/2017-January/110617.html -- Ian Cordasco Your Friendly, But Stern, Neighborhood Release CPL __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Re: [kolla] A new kolla-salt deliverable

2017-01-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
w incoming:) Is Kolla not using openstack/releases to track deliverables? If so, why duplicate that information? -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

2017-01-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
Plus, she's > willing to argue with me (and the other cores) about points of software > engineering. She will be a great addition to the Glance core reviewers > team. > > If you have any concerns, please let me know. I plan to add Dharini to > the core list after this week's Glance mee

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
g> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7! > On 01/19/2017 10:14 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Adam Heczko > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > > > D

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
e is attempting to support multiple distros at the same time. =) -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Ocata deployed on CentOS 7!

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
more details in this > regard, point to Ubuntu specific bugs etc. > Thanks. I think Major may be referring to some serious performance regressions found in Ubuntu 16.04. The default system Python is significantly slower by default. I know he's working with upstream developers to fix it, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7 > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Ian Cordasco > wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chuck Short > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage question

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] webob 1.7

2017-01-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
o 1.7.0 so we can safely fix this without having to deal with incompatibilities between versions. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.or

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS compliance

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
ly be the sort of thing that > would qualify for a backport, so it might take quite a while to see a > real release. > > As you point out, the final version of the upstream API may be > different. With a wrapper in place, we ought to be able to modify the > imple

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
g> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still? > On 01/17/2017 07:57 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: > >> Ian, > >> > >> This is a fascinating conversation.

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
is verbose for good reason. OpenStack's handling of embargoed issues is pretty much as good as it gets for a project the size of OpenStack. It benefits deployers and users by making the issue AND the fix known at the same time which gives deployers the ability to immediately consume the fix.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
a worthwhile goal. Yes Barbican can improve, so can Cinder. So let's keep these discussions constructive, okay? -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] [telemetry] How to handle security bugs

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
es the requirements to attain that tag. Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
against the increasing demand to be able to deploy OpenStack on a FIPS compliant kernel, so now we should all be designing our cryptographic based features in ways that can satisfy both or have fallbacks in the case of FIPS. Cheers -- Ian Cordasco ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
right for their > need, whether that is in the OpenStack community or not, it doesn't really > matter (maybe at one point it did). As long as they're using something secure, that's fine by me. Instead these projects all want to reimplement the same functionality o

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS compliance

2017-01-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
xists, it shall be better to use another algorithms, in terms of > security. > > What do people think about it? I think people should work on the Python patches *first*. Once they're merged, *then* we should potentially create a wrapper (if it's still necessary at that point) to do this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
er-project secret stores, has a solution been > developed that solves both of these? > > > [1] > http://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/key-manager/draft/barbican- > backend.html So there seems to be a consensus that Vault is a good easy and secur

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
e focusing on fixing that instead of haphazardly reimplementing Barbican? -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
f deploying multi-site HSMs. > > * Vault supports HSM deployments also > > [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/castellan/ > [2] https://www.vaultproject.io/ The last I checked, Rob, they also support DogTag IPA which is purely a Software based HSM. Hopefully the Barbican team

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still? > On 16/01/2017 13:38, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > Is the problem perhaps that no one is aware of other projects using > > Barbican? Is the status

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Project Navigator Out of Date?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
ck.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Project Navigator Out of Date? > On 16/01/17 21:55, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > > Third, "Existence and quality of packages for this project in popular > > distributions." it seems Fedora [2], Debian [3], Ubuntu [4],

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Project Navigator Out of Date?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
ll [5]:  https://software.opensuse.org/search?utf8=✓=barbican_devel=false_unsupported=false=openSUSE:Leap:42.2 Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re

[openstack-dev] [all] [barbican] [security] Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?

2017-01-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
are making themselves easier to deploy, if not done properly they are potentially endangering their users and that seems like a bigger problem than deploying Barbican to me. -- Ian Cordasco Glance, Hacking, Bandit, and Craton core reviewer

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tempest][api] community images, tempest tests, and API stability

2017-01-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> Reply: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> Date: January 13, 2017 at 08:12:12 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tempest][api] community images, tempest tests, and API stability

2017-01-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
ot more work to fix for large clouds than fixing some API interactions. In short, the Glance team is ready, willing, and able to own the responsibility for any breakage this causes users and any interoperability problems this will pose.

Re: [openstack-dev] updating to pycryptome from pycrypto

2017-01-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> Reply: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> Date: January 11, 2017 at 11:09:11 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [opens

Re: [openstack-dev] updating to pycryptome from pycrypto

2017-01-11 Thread Ian Cordasco
y so it can move to a better project. If there are no deficits, then we should focus on helping pysaml2 port to cryptography. [1]: I'm verifying this with some people who know better Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenSta

Re: [openstack-dev] STIG Tools

2017-01-09 Thread Ian Cordasco
openstack-ansible-security). I've CC'd one of the cores to grab their attention in case they can help you. Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] Shorter Meetings

2017-01-05 Thread Ian Cordasco
tag should be watched by the OSSP and having the lion's share of the conversation here should allow for shorter, concise, and conclusive discussions in the meetings (if they're necessary at all). Cheers! -- Ian Cordasco __

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/glance failed

2017-01-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
 December 14, 2016 at 00:18:38 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/glance failed > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:46:54AM -0600, Ian Cordasco wrote: > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Using \ for multiline statements

2016-12-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
(Weird, yes, I know. Guido has refused to make this consistent on python-dev several times iirc.) -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Using \ for multiline statements

2016-12-22 Thread Ian Cordasco
ool allows it (or as is usually the case in OpenStack, is configured to allow it). At that point it's subjective and a bit of a waste of people's time to argue over it. From a perspective of personal preference, I prefer ()s but that's jus

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

2016-12-22 Thread Ian Cordasco
ovement for our community. It may not fix a bug or add a feature, but it helps ramp up the people who will do that. So please, let's keep this productive. If you want to discuss ways of ratelimiting patchset contributions or some other nonsense, please start a new thread. Cheers, -- Ian Co

[openstack-dev] [craton] [api] Pagination Specification

2016-12-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
of our last specification, I've put all our options into one place and once we've started to reject them we can move them to the Alternatives section with explanations. Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

2016-12-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects > Hi stackers! > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Ian Cordasco > > wrote: > > > H

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

2016-12-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > On 2016-12-21 16:22, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > [...] > > > That said, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

2016-12-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects > On 2016-12-21 16:22, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > [...] > > That said, I think there are two better places for this information > > that are already standards in OpenStack:

[openstack-dev] [all] Adding CONTRIBUTING.rst files to projects

2016-12-21 Thread Ian Cordasco
the experience for people finding our projects and wanting to collaborate with us. [1]:  https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:zhouyunfeng%40inspur.com+topic:addCONTRIBUTING.rst -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [osc][openstackclient][zun] Collision on the keyword 'container'

2016-12-20 Thread Ian Cordasco
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Ian Cordasco __

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
a has received feedback about those things. And Kolla should work to address that feedback. Unfortunately, all that's happened is that Kolla is defending its practices and stating rather adamantly that it intends to continue these exclusionary practices. Whatever the Kolla team's intenti

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-15 Thread Ian Cordasco
Well I think we all agree that Google Hangouts aren't acceptable as they exclude residents of an entire nation. I don't think anyone's against teams using impromptu video calls to help resolve conversations. I think each team needs to listen to its members, thou

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
for 20 minutes, we decided on this because of reasons a, b, and c. Review: https://review.openstack.org/:review_id has the final code details. Feel free to ping us on irc or the review with further questions." -- Ian Cordasco _

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] respecting glance priorities

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
to enable better request-id tracking: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/352892/ > > This will be nice for operators, let's get it reviewed and merged! > > > > (6) Request for some insights and opinions for bug > > https:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested > On Dec 14, 2016, at 7:45 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > > Taking you to the extreme of your statement, it seems there are several of > > these "ad hoc" > meeti

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl][all] self-service branch management

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl][all] self-service branch management > On 2016-12-14 08:51:29 -0500 (-0500), Ian Cordasco wrote: > [...] > > I do have one question, will creating the branch's end-of-life > > eventually work the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl][all] self-service branch management

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
ts were missed in the recent liberty end of life work. Could we submit a review to do that work so Josh & Tony don't have to or is that something that isn't planned to work through openstack/releases? Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco _

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
abandoned. > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > Cheers, > Josh > > [0] > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt > Glance was late to the party, but it shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc] Video Meetings - input requested

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
inc0's emails, and the rest of this thread, it seems quite clear that kolla isn't obeying one of the 4 opens. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Steve Lewis for Glance core

2016-12-14 Thread Ian Cordasco
+2 from me as well On Dec 14, 2016 3:16 AM, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Brian Rosmaita > wrote: > > I'd like to propose Steve Lewis (stevelle on IRC) for Glance core. Take > > a look at any of his reviews, and you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/glance failed

2016-12-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
wer" than general nodepool nodes? > > > > glance does not use constraints in venv environment. > > > > It can be used since a few months. I'll send a change for master, > > I expect this needs backporting to stable branches - stable or glance > team, please revie

[openstack-dev] [craton] Meetings for 2016 Dec 19, 2016 Dec 26, and 2017 Jan 2 cancelled

2016-12-12 Thread Ian Cordasco
New Years on 2017 Jan 2 (meaning people will still be on vacation). The next meeting will be 2017 Jan 9. Happy New Year and Happy Holidays! -- Ian Cordasco Craton Core Reviewer __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Requirements] [Horizon] upper-constraints shenanigans and development milestones

2016-12-10 Thread Ian Cordasco
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 4:47 PM, Richard Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > We in Horizon land are looking to update to a new version of one of > our dependencies, Angular Bootstrap version 2.2.0. We do this through > xstatic packaging, so the release we'll be making is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] stable/mitaka CI failures (ImportError: No module named vine.five)

2016-12-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
g constraints, you would not run into this problem. As such, what you need to do is wait for the blacklist to pass master and be backported to the stable/mitaka branch in openstack/requirements. The master patch has been approved and is gating as I type this. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] Liberty Periodic Failures (Was: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/glance failed)

2016-12-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
-glance-python27-db-mitaka/404cb23/ > : SUCCESS in 6m 30s > - periodic-glance-docs-newton > http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-glance-docs-newton/c304f7c/ > : FAILURE in 4m 19s > - periodic-glance-python27-db-newton > http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stabl

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

2016-12-07 Thread Ian Cordasco
tings) and just tell > cross-project initiatives to use the regular channels I think there's still value in #openstack-meeting-cp, but I don't feel strongly enough to argue against its removal. -- Ian Cordasco

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

2016-12-05 Thread Ian Cordasco
hat's not the case. > Please help me to bring it to life ;) Please give us more detail and convince us to help you. :) [1]: https://theagileadmin.com/what-is-devops/ -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [qa] Hacking 0.13.0 broken

2016-12-05 Thread Ian Cordasco
we used to) and providing them with clear, unambiguous, narrowly defined use cases that will convince them of the benefits of our feature requests. Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release management team draft logo

2016-12-02 Thread Ian Cordasco
On Dec 2, 2016 3:07 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: > > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Release team, please take a look at the attached logo and let me know > > what you think. > > It's not immediately obvious to me it's a shepherd dog, but then I don't > exactly know how to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo] oslo.log 3.17.0 use_stderr default change

2016-11-28 Thread Ian Cordasco
ttps://review.openstack.org/403775 which does this and adds an upgrade release note to document the change. I don't want it to be merged without appropriate discussion, so I've -1'd the Workflow. -- Ian Cordasco __ Op

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] the alternative of log processing tool

2016-11-27 Thread Ian Cordasco
File beat is maintained be elastic and a part of their product line just like ELK. It's a fantastic tool and quite flexible given its age and size of codebase On Nov 26, 2016 11:59 PM, "Jeffrey Zhang" wrote: > Heka is marked deprecated in Kolla during Newton cycle[0].

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
any know cases of this happening? If so, can those be > publicly documented to quantify how much this issue is hurting > deployments? I too would be very interested in learning about these. > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > Also, instead of creating bugs, I

[openstack-dev] [security] FIPS Compliance (Was: [requirements][kolla][security] pycrypto vs cryptography)

2016-11-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
of MD5 and have a goal for a cycle or two later to completely remove reliance on MD5. Doing this piecemeal via bugs will not be efficient and we'll need community buy-in. -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] important changes to pep8 python jobs

2016-11-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
loser to the date. > > > > If you have any questions, feel free to reply or use #openstack-infra on > > freenode. > > > Greetings all, > > We have just approved this change and it will be live shortly. Again, if you > are > having problems, please join us

[openstack-dev] [release] [glance] Immutability of migrations between beta releases

2016-11-17 Thread Ian Cordasco
for squashing a previous cycle's migrations at the start of a cycle. Help and opinions are appreciated, -- Ian Cordasco Glance Release Liaison __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Flakey functional test (Was: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/glance failed)

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
n upstream version - just cannot reproduce. > Although, the only difference which I see is that my machine is a bit slower, > plus it uses only 2 workers. Okay, we'll start keeping track of where these tests fail. We might be able to i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Craton] NFV planned host maintenance

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
formed like: {base URL}/{host_name} > - Project should have a project specific link to external tool when querying > via Nova servers API. This might be: {base URL}/project/{hostId}. > hostId is exposed to project as it do not tell exact host, but otherwise as > a u

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Flakey functional test (Was: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/glance failed)

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
; Which would result in log entry; if not - please ignore this idea) Thanks for the help though, Tomislav! Did you look for the hash seed that tox was using and try running the tests that way? I've been swamped with other responsibilities this week so I haven't had time to investigate this myself

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable] Usefulness of Weekly Meeting

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
  -Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> Reply: Ian Cordasco <sigmaviru...@gmail.com> Date: November 16, 2016 at 07:06:27 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [open

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
heers, > milan > > > 2016-11-15 13:50 GMT+01:00 Miles Gould : > > > On 14/11/16 20:52, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > >> not_in is nice and explicit while nin and out are a bit, more clever. I > >> think we should avoid trying to be clever.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable] Usefulness of Weekly Meeting

2016-11-16 Thread Ian Cordasco
Date: November 15, 2016 at 16:55:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Stable] Usefulness of Weekly Meeting > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:25:26AM -0800, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > Hi all,

[openstack-dev] [Stable] Usefulness of Weekly Meeting

2016-11-15 Thread Ian Cordasco
week) and if we need to reschedule them to better serve those who plan to attend. Cheers, -- Ian Cordasco __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

  1   2   3   4   >