Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] [vitrage] Mascot

2016-07-25 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Thanks for the heads up. I checked briefly for logos on Google just to see what's around when I had the idea, but it seems I should've done a deeper/wider search... :) :( Cheers, Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] > Sent: July 25, 2016 14:30 >

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cancellation of this week's Cinder-Nova meeting

2016-07-25 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, As we had a session about the Cinder-Nova API changes in progress last week during the mid-cycles of these two modules we cancel the today's meeting. You can find meeting logs on this etherpad starting from line 50: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-newton-midcycle Best Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Mascot

2016-07-21 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
I had the Meerkat [1] in mind as Telemetry has a "family" of services and meerkat lives in bigger groups too and a few of them stand sentry and listen to any event or danger, etc. and "send alarms" to the others. From the previous options I like Fennec too. /Ildiko [1]

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Today's Cinder-Nova API changes meeting is cancelled

2016-07-04 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, The today's meeting is cancelled due to the holiday in the U.S. The next meeting will be held next Monday (July 11th), 1700 UTC on #openstack-meeting-cp. Thanks and Best Regards, /Ildikó __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s)

2016-06-29 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Andreas, Thanks for the clarification on this. We will consider the options. Best Regards, Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:a...@suse.com] > Sent: June 28, 2016 20:44 > To: Ildikó Váncsa; openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org > Cc

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s)

2016-06-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
016 18:46 > To: Ildikó Váncsa; 'Spyros Trigazis'; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not > for usage questions); openstack- > d...@lists.openstack.org > Subject: RE: [OpenStack-docs] [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh > install guide(s) > > snip > > > > D

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s)

2016-06-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
', etc.? Thanks and Best Regards, /Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:a...@suse.com] > Sent: June 28, 2016 15:12 > To: Ildikó Váncsa; openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org > Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-docs] [tel

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s)

2016-06-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
outham [mailto:goutham.r...@netapp.com] > Sent: June 28, 2016 15:32 > To: Ildikó Váncsa; openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org > Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-docs] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s) > > Hi Ildikó, > > Please take

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s)

2016-06-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
a good proposal for structuring things? Thanks, /Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Spyros Trigazis [mailto:strig...@gmail.com] > Sent: June 28, 2016 17:18 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Ildikó > Váncsa; openstack-d...@lists.openstack.or

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] Ceilometer and Aodh install guide(s)

2016-06-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, I'm currently working on to move the Install Guide for Ceilometer [1] and Aodh [2] under the project trees. I faced with a few difficulties so far about which I would like to ask your opinion. First of all these two projects are under the Telemetry umbrella, so they are not completely

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-06-13 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Regards, /Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Ildikó Váncsa [mailto:ildiko.van...@ericsson.com] > Sent: May 31, 2016 20:57 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly > IRC meetings > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-05-31 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
, /Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Ildikó Váncsa [mailto:ildiko.van...@ericsson.com] > Sent: May 20, 2016 18:31 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly > IRC meetings > > Hi All, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-05-20 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, We have now the approved slot for the Cinder-Nova interaction changes meeting series. The new slot is __Monday, 1700UTC__, it will be on channel __#openstack-meeting-cp__. Related etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-nova-api-changes Summary about ongoing items:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-05-16 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] > Sent: May 17, 2016 02:23 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly > IRC meetings > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-05-16 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, We will have the Cinder-Nova interaction changes meetings in a new slot starting from this week. The new slot is __Tuesday, 1700UTC__. We will also move it to another channel, which is the __#openstack-meeting-alt__. Related etherpad:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-05-11 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perez [mailto:m...@openstack.org] > Sent: May 11, 2016 23:52 > To: Ildikó Váncsa > Cc: 'D'Angelo, Scott <scott.dang...@hpe.com> (scott.dang...@hpe.com)'; > 'Walter A. Boring IV'; 'John Griffith > <john.griffi...@gmail.

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Multi-attach/Cinder-Nova weekly IRC meetings

2016-05-11 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, We will continue the meeting series about the Cinder-Nova interaction changes mostly from multiattach perspective. We have a new meeting slot, which is __Thursday, 1700UTC__ on the #openstack-meeting-cp channel. Related etherpad:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] What's Up, Doc? 6 May 2016

2016-05-07 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
> -Original Message- > From: Andreas Jaeger [mailto:a...@suse.com] > Sent: May 07, 2016 20:51 > To: Ildikó Váncsa; 'Matt Kassawara' > Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List; enstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-docs] What's Up, Doc? 6 May 2016 > > On 05/07/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] What's Up, Doc? 6 May 2016

2016-05-07 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
kassaw...@gmail.com] > Sent: May 07, 2016 00:55 > To: Ildikó Váncsa > Cc: Lana Brindley; enstack.org; OpenStack Development Mailing List; > openstack-i...@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [OpenStack-docs] What's Up, Doc? 6 May 2016 > > One significant advantage of central docum

Re: [openstack-dev] What's Up, Doc? 6 May 2016

2016-05-06 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Lana, Thanks for the summary, it's pretty good reading to catch up what happened recently. I have one question, I might missed a few entries, so please point me to the right document in this case. We had a docco session with the Telemetry team and we agreed on moving back the documentation

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Austin summit nova/cinder cross-project session recap

2016-05-05 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
or the > abstracted volume idea. > > 2. Cinder would work on adding a volume migration test to Tempest to be > run in the multi-node gate job (this needs to happen regardless). Scott > D'Angelo is going to work on this. > > 3. Ildikó Váncsa was going to work on the Nova volume disc

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

2016-04-18 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, We are having the last Cinder-Nova API interactions meeting before the Summit this Wednesday __20th April 2100UTC__, on the #openstack-meeting-cp channel. You can find the information about the recent discussions here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-nova-api-changes This week

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][vitrage] Joint design sesssion in Austin

2016-04-14 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Julien, First of all big +1. :) The 16:10-16:50 slot looks better for me. Thanks, /Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] > Sent: April 14, 2016 11:07 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][vitrage] Joint

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

2016-04-11 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, It's a friendly reminder we're having the next Cinder-Nova API interactions meeting this Wednesday __13th April 2100UTC__, on the #openstack-meeting-cp channel. You can follow up the recent activities here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-nova-api-changes Our current focus is

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

2016-04-04 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Best Regards, /Ildikó > -Original Message- > From: Ildikó Váncsa > Sent: March 24, 2016 10:01 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting > > Hi All, > > As it was discussed several times on this mailing list there

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Rescheduling IRC meetings

2016-03-31 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
ise it better with priority and incentive. I had the Roadmap page in mind as well partially, we could highlight the plans/tasks from that page and also track progress. Thanks, /Ildikó > > On 31/03/2016 7:14 AM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > +1 on the on demand

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Rescheduling IRC meetings

2016-03-31 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, +1 on the on demand meeting schedule. Maybe we can also have some news flash mails week to summarize the progress in our sub-modules when we don't have the meeting. Just to keep people up to date. Will we already skip the today's meeting? Thanks, /Ildikó > -Original Message-

[openstack-dev] [elections][tc] TC Candidacy

2016-03-30 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, I would like to throw my hat in the ring to be part of the OpenStack Technical Committee. I'm working at Ericsson, where I'm coordinating the OpenStack related activities across the company. I started to contribute to OpenStack more than two years ago by adding rich query functionality

[openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

2016-03-24 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, As it was discussed several times on this mailing list there is room for improvements regarding the Cinder-Nova interaction. To fix these issues we would like to create a cross-project spec to capture the problems and ways to solve them. The current activity is captured on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-12 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Walt, Thanks for describing the bigger picture. In my opinion when we will have microversion support available in Cinder that will give us a bit of a freedom and also possibility to handle these difficulties. Regarding terminate_connection we will have issues with live_migration as it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-11 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, As far as I can see volume attachments are handled on attachment level today as opposed to host level in Cinder. How the volume is exposed to a host technically is another question, but conceptually Cinder is the ultimate source of truth regarding how many attachments a volume has and what

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

2016-02-09 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
.disconnect_volume > > On 02/09/2016 02:04 PM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > > Hi Walt, > > > > Thanks for starting this thread. It is a good summary of the issue and the > > proposal also looks feasible to me. > > > > I have a quick, hopefully not too wil

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] How will nova advertise that volume multi-attach is supported?

2016-01-15 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, I wonder whether we could provide an interface on the API where these kind of capabilities can be retrieved? I know we have a support matrix in the documentation that's good to have. I asked the question, because here we have a base functionality, which is attaching a volume that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova] Trunk port feature (VLAN aware VMs)

2015-10-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, We will have a chat about the feature regarding design and next steps at the contributors' meet-up on Friday at 10am. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-neutron-unplugged-track Best Regards, Ildikó (IRC: ildikov) > -Original Message- > From: Ildikó

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach volume help needed

2015-10-27 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
lt > > >> On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Ildikó Váncsa <ildiko.van...@ericsson.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> The work has been ongoing for a while now to implement the feature to >> support attaching a single volume to multiple VM ins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova] Trunk port feature (VLAN aware VMs)

2015-10-22 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Cc: Bence Romsics; Petr Savelyev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova] Trunk port feature (VLAN aware > VMs) > > > > On 21 October 2015 at 15:40, Ildikó Váncsa <ildiko.van...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > &

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach volume help needed

2015-10-21 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Folks, The work has been ongoing for a while now to implement the feature to support attaching a single volume to multiple VM instances. This work impacts both Nova and Cinder. We are in quite good shape with the implementation, but it is still far for completion and we temporarily ran out

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova] Trunk port feature (VLAN aware VMs)

2015-10-21 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Folks, During Liberty we started the implementation of the VLAN aware VMs blueprint (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94612/). We had quite a good progress, although we could use some extra hands on Neutron side and some thoughts on the Nova-Neutron interaction aspect of the feature. The

[openstack-dev] {Blazar]{Nova] Tokyo meetup and next steps

2015-10-21 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, The upcoming OpenStack Summit in Tokyo is a great opportunity to discuss open questions, like resource management and resource reservation. The Promise project in OPNFV is working on to identify the use cases and find a solution to this missing piece. For further information about this

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meeting cancelled for this week

2015-10-21 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, I would like to inform you that we cancel the Ceilometer meeting for this week in favor of Summit travels and preparation. We finished to organize our sessions for next week, you can find the schedule here: https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/ceilometer The etherpads for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Anyone interested?

2015-09-01 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
eresting project. > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Pierre > Riteau > <prit...@uchicago.edu<mailto:prit...@uchicago.edu>> wrote: > Hello, > > The NSF-f

[openstack-dev] [Blazar] Anyone interested?

2015-08-28 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, The resource reservation topic pops up time to time on different forums to cover use cases in terms of both IT and NFV. The Blazar project was intended to address this need, but according to my knowledge due to earlier integration and other difficulties the work has been stopped. My

Re: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] Minutes for Monasca mid-cycle meetup

2015-08-16 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
consider setting up a separate time to cover this topic or move the Monasca meeting the following week. Regards --Roland On 8/14/15, 6:57 AM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.com wrote: Hi, I will try to join if I can, I have an overlapping meeting on Tuesdays. In general I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] Minutes for Monasca mid-cycle meetup

2015-08-16 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] Minutes for Monasca mid-cycle meetup Ildikó, I think you are correct on the time. The meeting is at 3:00 PM UTC, which is 9:00 AM MDT. Sorry, the time I mentioned was incorrect. Regards --Roland On 8/16/15, 7:42 AM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Monasca] Minutes for Monasca mid-cycle meetup

2015-08-14 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, I will try to join if I can, I have an overlapping meeting on Tuesdays. In general I think it would be really good to start a closer collaboration, the componentization work in Ceilometer gives a really good opportunity as Chris described. Best Regards, Ildikó -Original Message-

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] VLAN aware VMs: Current status?

2015-08-05 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Kyle, First of all, sorry for the late response. We are working on the design and implementation, the first patches are planned to be up by the end of this week. We could surely use more hands as it is quite a large amount of work that this blueprint requires. If there are any Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps

2015-06-30 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
wanted to double check. Ildikó Sent from my iPad On 30 Jun 2015, at 14:18, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Tue, Jun 30 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: Will this be accessible in the same way as currently or it needs changes on client side? You may just need to pass more options

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps

2015-06-29 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, I think removing options from the API requires version bump. So if we plan to do this, that should be introduced in v3 as opposed to v2, which should remain the same and maintained for two cycles (assuming that we still have this policy in OpenStack). It this is achievable by removing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting

2015-06-15 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Kyle, -Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: June 15, 2015 04:26 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Ildikó Váncsa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting

2015-06-15 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
-Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: June 15, 2015 15:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.com

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting

2015-06-12 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, Since we reopened the review for this blueprint we've got a large number of comments. It can be clearly seen that the original proposal has to be changed, although it still requires some discussion to define a reasonable design that provides the desired feature and is aligned with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-06-01 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead On 06/01/2015 04:34 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 31/05/15 18:12 +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: Hi All, I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar][all] Zaqar will stay... Lots of work ahead

2015-05-31 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, I would like to ask about the user-facing notifications part of the list. Do you have a roadmap for this? Is this driven by the Zaqar team? What are the next steps? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó -Original Message- From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: May 27,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Anyone looking at support for VLAN-aware VMs in Liberty?

2015-05-12 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, Thanks for showing interest in this feature proposal. Some additional info to what Erik mentioned below: The blueprint patch will soon be updated to target the Liberty release: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94612/ There will also be a design summit session about this topic on

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] time based auto scaling

2015-05-03 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, I like the base idea to trigger scaling based on other information than what we have from the current Ceilometer alarms. Although I think this functionality should live somewhere else than under the responsibility of Ceilometer. This type of scaling is usually based on trend analysis and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meters vs. Metrics

2015-03-25 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, Thanks for the heads up regarding to this inconsistency of terms in the docs. I will open a bug for it and target both Ceilometer and OS Manuals to get it corrected everywhere. Best Regards, Ildikó -Original Message- From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Dina Belova to ceilometer-core

2014-09-11 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, +1 from me too, thanks for all the hard work so far. Best Regards, Ildikó -Original Message- From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:25 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Dina Belova to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Nejc Saje to ceilometer-core

2014-09-10 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, +1 from me, and thanks for the nice work so far. Best Regards, Ildikó -Original Message- From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:35 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Nejc Saje to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][WSME] Sphinx failing sporadically because of wsme autodoc extension

2014-08-22 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, I couldn’t reproduce this issue either. I’ve tried on precise and on a fresh trusty too, everything worked fine… Cheers, Ildikó From: Dina Belova [mailto:dbel...@mirantis.com] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 11:40 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Test Ceilometer polling in tempest

2014-07-25 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
here :) Thanks! Dina On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.com wrote: Hi Folks, We’ve faced with some problems during running Ceilometer integration tests on the gate. The main issue is that we cannot test the polling mechanism, as if we

[openstack-dev] [qa] Test Ceilometer polling in tempest

2014-07-16 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Folks, We've faced with some problems during running Ceilometer integration tests on the gate. The main issue is that we cannot test the polling mechanism, as if we use a small polling interval, like 1 min, then it puts a high pressure on Nova API. If we use a longer interval, like 10 mins,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]Collector's performance

2014-03-11 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Nadya, You mentioned multiple DB backends in your mail. Which one did you use to perform these tests or did you get the same/similar performance results in case of both? Best Regards, Ildiko From: Nadya Privalova [mailto:nprival...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:05 PM To:

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Complex query API design

2014-01-24 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Ceilometer guys, We are implementing a complex query functionality for Ceilometer. We got a comment to our implementation that using JSON in a string for representing the query filter expression, is probably not the best solution. The description of our current API design can be found here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-dev] [OSTF][Ceilometer] ceilometer meters and samples delete

2014-01-17 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, In my opinion it would be better to let the user to define a ttl value for his/her own samples. I do not see the use case, where it is needed to delete samples, also if the user is able to randomly delete some data, then the statistics functions will not generate a valid output for that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-08 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, I've started to work on the idea of supporting a kind of tenant/project based configuration for Ceilometer. Unfortunately I haven't reached the point of having a blueprint that could be registered until now. I do not have a deep knowledge about the collector and compute agent services, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-08 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Doug, Answers inline again. Best Regards, Ildiko On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Ildikó Váncsa ildiko.van...@ericsson.commailto:ildiko.van...@ericsson.com wrote: Hi, I've started to work on the idea of supporting a kind of tenant/project based configuration for Ceilometer. Unfortunately I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-08 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, (You didn't Cc the list, not sure if it was on purpose. I'm not adding it back to not break any confidentiality, but feel free to do so.) Sorry that was just a mistake. The point is to configure the data collection configuration for the currently existing meters differently for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-08 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi, My idea was just about providing the possibility to configure the data collection in Ceilometer differently for the different tenants, I didn't mean to link it to an API or at least not on the first place. It could be done by the operator as well, for instance, if the polling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Dynamic Meters in Ceilometer

2014-01-08 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi Doug, OK, so like I said, we did not design the system with the idea that a user of the cloud (rather than the deployer of the cloud) would have any control over what data was collected. They can ask questions about only some of the data, but they can't tell ceilometer what to collect.

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Complex query BP implementation

2013-12-16 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi guys, The first working version of the Complex filter expressions in API queries blueprint [1] was pushed for review[2]. We implemented a new query REST resource in order to provide rich query functionality for samples, alarms and alarm history. The future plans (in separated blueprints)

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Extended query filtering feature

2013-11-21 Thread Ildikó Váncsa
Hi All, As a resumption of the Improving Ceilometer API query filtering session of the HK Design Summit, I created a document about supporting complex query filters in Ceilometer. The document contains a brief summary of the previously suggested idea. The second part of the etherpad discuss