Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][Neutron] Running out of memory on gate for linux bridge job

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 1/18/2017 4:53 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote: > >> To me it looks like the times of 2G are long gone, Nova is using >> almost 2G all by itself. And 8G may be getting tight if additional >> stuff like Ceph is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Jim Meyer wrote: > On Sep 11, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I was reading over the TC IRC logs for this week

Re: [openstack-dev] 9/4 state of the gate

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 9/4/2015 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> There are a few things blowing up in the last 24 hours so might as well >> make people aware. >> >> 1. gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops was failing at a decent rate:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][manila] latest microversion considered dangerous

On Aug 28, 2015 6:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 08/28/2015 09:32 AM, Alex Meade wrote: I don't know if this is really a big problem. IMO, even with microversions you shouldn't be implementing things that aren't backwards compatible within the major version. I thought the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI for reliable live-migration

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 8/26/2015 3:21 AM, Timofei Durakov wrote: Hello, Here is the situation: nova has live-migration feature but doesn't have ci job to cover it by functional tests, only

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/26/2015 04:08 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/26/2015 07:43 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 06/26/2015 01:14 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/16/2015 09:51 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 06/16/2015 08:56 AM, Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

No On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:31

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/24/2015 10:17 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com mailto:kcham...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:02:27AM -0500, Matt Riedemann

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/24/2015 08:38 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: I urge people to reply to this instead of my original email as the writing is more detailed and balanced. OK, I've read what

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

regress. Oops, I didn't mean to say that Specs as a concept should be gone. Sorr for poor phrasing. My question was answred by Joe Gordon with this review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184912/ A bit more context: We discussed the very issue of adjusting the review rules for nova-specs

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: Back

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of slightly odd conditionals inside of grenade and devstack to make it so that if you were very careful, you could just not stop some of the old services on a

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike TrustedFilter)

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote: Hi team, Some discussion occurred over IRC about a bug which was publicly open related to TrustedFilter [1] I want to take the opportunity for raising my concerns about that specific filter, why I dislike it and how I

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 06/24/2015 01:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: Back when Nova first wanted to test

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal of nova-hyper driver

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Peng Zhao p...@hyper.sh wrote: Hi, all, I would like to propose nova-hyper driver: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-hyper. - What is Hyper? Put simply, Hyper is a hypervisor-agnostic Docker runtime. It is similar to Intel’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara] Difference between Sahara and CloudBrak

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Chris Buccella chris.bucce...@verilume.com wrote: I tried (or tried to try) Cloudbreak recently, as I need to deploy a newer version of HDP than Sahara supports. The interface is slick, but lacks the ability to make some choices about your OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

tent. That presentation, I believe, was an attempt to do so. Flavio just giving my fly-on-the-wall view from the other side. On 15/06/2015 6:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: 'The binary nature of the integrated release

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve. Non

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/15/2015 06:20 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside the integrated release failing to get

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

, Adrian On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:25 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve. Non

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

On Jun 19, 2015 1:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500: On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [Stackalytics] Complementary projects

On Jun 19, 2015 3:56 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/19/2015 09:19 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting rid of suds, which is unmaintained, and which we want out of Debian

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/11/2015 11:31 PM, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: Hi Thomas: I just checked and I don't see suds as a requirement for trove. I don't think it should be a requirement for the trove debian package, either. Thanks,

[openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

One of the stated problems the 'big tent' is supposed to solve is: 'The binary nature of the integrated release results in projects outside the integrated release failing to get the recognition they deserve. Non-official projects are second- or third-class citizens which can't get development

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting rid of suds, which is unmaintained, and which we want out of Debian

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/15/2015 11:31 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: Nova itself doesn't depend on suds anymore. A quick grep still shows references to suds (that's in Kilo, but the master branch shows similar results): Your git repo is out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Issue with pymysql

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/12/2015 01:17 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: It is however interesting that both lock wait timeouts and missing savepoint errors occur in operations pertaining the same table - securitygroups in this case. I wonder if

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/10/15, 09:12, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 06/10/2015 12:25 PM, Dave Walker wrote: The initial core reviewers was seeded by representatives of distro's and vendors to get their input on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to SQLAlchemy 1.0.x

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental, and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder what's the state of the project regarding

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][oslo] oslo.middleware release 2.0.0 (liberty)

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 6:14 PM, d...@doughellmann.com wrote: We are excited to announce the release of: oslo.middleware 2.0.0: Oslo Middleware library And this broke the gate, but the fix is already working its way though the system. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1463478 This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Liberty summit: Updates in Glance

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/06/15 13:30 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 1 June 2015 at 13:10, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/06/15 11:57 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 26/05/15 13:54 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: On 5/26/15

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][tc][ptl] Scaling up code review process (subdir cores)

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 3 June 2015 at 10:34, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-06-02 21:59:34 + (+), Ian Cordasco wrote: I like this very much. I recall there was a session at the summit about this that

[openstack-dev] [all] inactive projects

Hi All, It turns out we have a few repositories that have been inactive for almost a year, appear to be dead but don't have any documentation to reflecting that. (And a lot more that have been dead for over half a year) format: days since last updated - name List of stackforge that have not

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] The new Lieutenant system in Neutron

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: As part of the team's continuing effort to scale development in Neutron, we have officially merged the Lieutenant patch [1]. As the codebase continues to grow, this is an attempt to scale the code review load so we can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [TC] Discussion: changing Ironic's release model

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, tl;dr; At the summit, the Ironic team discussed the challenges we've had with the current release model and came up with some ideas to address them. I had a brief follow-up conversation with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][all] Scalable metering

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:03 PM, gordon chung g...@live.ca wrote: hi Tim, we're still doing some investigation but we're tracking/discussing part of the polling load issue here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185084/ we're open to any ideas -- especially from nova api et al experts. So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Using depends-on for patches which require an approved spec

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:57:23PM -0700, Michael Still wrote: Hey, it would be cool if devs posting changes for nova which depend on us approving their spec could use Depends-On to make sure their code

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo.vmware release 0.13.0 (liberty)

a job running source oslo.vmware against nova py27 unit tests. As for in general, is cooking up a plan. thanks, dims On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, I prefer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][oslo] Stepping down from oslo-ironic liaison

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Victor, Nice, yes, Joe was the liaison with Nova so far. Yes, please go ahead and add your name in the wiki for Nova as i believe Joe is winding down the oslo liaison as well.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

effectively. To address this issue we have come up with following solutions: Solution 1: Return tuple containing headers and body from respective clients (also favoured by Joe Gordon) Reference: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156508/6/specs/log-request-id-mappings.rst I like solution 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: Return request-id to caller

this up. To address this issue we have come up with following solutions: Solution 1: Return tuple containing headers and body from respective clients (also favoured by Joe Gordon) Reference: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156508/6/specs/log-request-id-mappings.rst Pros: 1

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo.vmware release 0.13.0 (liberty)

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, I prefer the patched posted by Sabari. The patch has two changes: 1. It fixes unit tests 2. In the even that an instance spawn fails then it catches an exception to warn the admin that the guestId may be

Re: [openstack-dev] [new][app-catalog] App Catalog next steps

-- *From:* Joe Gordon [joe.gord...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, May 27, 2015 3:20 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [new][app-catalog] App Catalog next steps On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Aedo ca...@mirantis.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [new][app-catalog] App Catalog next steps

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Christopher Aedo ca...@mirantis.com wrote: I want to start off by thanking everyone who joined us at the first working session in Vancouver, and those folks who have already started adding content to the app catalog. I was happy to see the enthusiasm and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo] RPC Asynchronous Communication

On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 09:13:59AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2015-05-07 17:43:06 -0700: On May 7, 2015 2:37 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui

Re: [openstack-dev] meeting with the zaqar team at summit; my notes

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Amrith Kumar amr...@tesora.com wrote: I’m posting this to the mailing list to summarize my notes from a meeting at 5pm yesterday at Summit relative to Zaqar and lightweight multi-tenant messaging and how it may be applicable to a number of projects. I’ll

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] gate pep8 jobs broken today

On May 19, 2015 12:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote: On 05/19/2015 09:28 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 05/19/2015 02:54 AM, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, we had a gate outage today for a few hours. http://pad.lv/1456376 The issue was an interaction between the existence of pbr 1.0,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] gate pep8 jobs broken today

Once these land [0], I can cut Hacking 0.8.2 and 0.9.6 to unblock projects still using hacking 0.8.x and 0.9.x respectively [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I77f2b7e661c4de067e39596765d36a4463a2d143,n,z On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On May 19

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][all] Architecture Diagrams in ascii art?

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:52 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 12 May 2015 at 20:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 05/12/2015 01:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-05-12 10:04:11 -0700 (-0700

Re: [openstack-dev] [surge] Introducing Surge - rapid deploy/scale stream processing systems on OpenStack

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Debojyoti Dutta ddu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, It gives me a great pleasure to introduce Surge - a system to rapidly deploy and scale a stream processing system on OpenStack. It leverages Vagrant and Ansible, and supports both OpenStack as well as the local

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][all] Architecture Diagrams in ascii art?

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Sean Dague wrote: They can be modified if you provide source files, or use a source oriented format like SVG, or ISO standard ODG (used by OpenOffice / LibreOffice). There is a reason the spider diagram has ended

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][all] Architecture Diagrams in ascii art?

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:52 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: On 12 May 2015 at 20:33, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 05/12/2015 01:12 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-05-12 10:04:11 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: It's a nice up side. However, as others have pointed

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] A way for Operators/Users to submit feature requests

On May 14, 2015 12:50 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com wrote: I just saw an email on the Operators list [1] that I think would allow a much simpler process for the non-developer community to submit a feature request. I understand that this was raised once upon a time [2] - at least

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] python-novaclient 2.25.0

And openstackclient 1.0.4 broke grenade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1454467 I think we need a 1.1 release for trunk and make sure caps are set so its not used in stable/kilo. Or something like that. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Matt Riedemann

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] python-novaclient 2.25.0

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-05-12 17:40:47 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote: And openstackclient 1.0.4 broke grenade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1454467 I think we need a 1.1 release for trunk and make sure

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] python-novaclient 2.25.0

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-05-12 19:43:21 -0700 (-0700), Joe Gordon wrote: [...] But then we go on to install nova which has the correct cap, and we revert to the right cinderclient for kilo http://logs.openstack.org/92/170492/2

[openstack-dev] [nova][all] Architecture Diagrams in ascii art?

When learning about how a project works one of the first things I look for is a brief architecture description along with a diagram. For most OpenStack projects, all I can find is a bunch of random third party slides and diagrams. Most Individual OpenStack projects have either no architecture

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] global-requirements not co-installable

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 05/08/2015 07:13 AM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 May 2015 at 22:54, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I'm slightly confused how we got there, because we do try to install everything all at once in the test jobs -

Re: [openstack-dev] [be nice] Before doing big non backardcompabitle changes in how gates work make sure that all PTL are informed about that

As a heads up, here is a patch to remove Sahara from the default configuration as well. This is part of the effort to further decouple the 'integrated gate' so we don't have to gate every project on the tests for every project. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/181230/ On Thu, May 7, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][oslo] RPC Asynchronous Communication

On May 7, 2015 2:37 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, The primary point of this expected discussion around asynchronous communication is to optimize performance by reducing latency. For instance the design used in Nova and probably other projects let able

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: periodic developer newsletter?

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 10:45 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: [...] To tackle this I would like to propose the idea of a periodic developer oriented newsletter, and if we agree

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: periodic developer newsletter?

audiences to have one place to look at weekly and skim rapidly to see if they missed something interesting. Over the years I have tried to change it based on feedback I received so this conversation is great to have On 05/04/2015 12:03 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: The  big questions I would like

[openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: periodic developer newsletter?

Before going any further, I am proposing something to make it easier for the developer community to keep track of what other projects are working on. I am not proposing anything to directly help operators or users, that is a separate problem space. In Mark McClain's TC candidacy email he

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] cross project communication: periodic developer newsletter?

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 5 May 2015 at 07:03, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: Before going any further, I am proposing something to make it easier for the developer community to keep track of what other projects are working

[openstack-dev] [Elections] TC Election analysis

As others have done for past elections, here is a brief breakdown of the TC election ballot data. analysis: http://paste.openstack.org/show/213831 source code: http://paste.openstack.org/show/213830 Some highlights are: * 3 people voted but ranked everyone as #19 * 16% of the ballots voted for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Elections] TC Election analysis

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing mais...@maishsk.com wrote: On 04/30/15 21:48, Joe Gordon wrote: As others have done for past elections, here is a brief breakdown of the TC election ballot data. analysis: http://paste.openstack.org/show/213831 source code: http

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Melanie Witt to nova-core

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:30 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote: Hi, I propose we add Melanie to nova-core. She has been consistently doing great quality code reviews[1], alongside a wide array of other really valuable contributions to the Nova project. Please respond with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] A big tent home for Neutron backend code

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Hello! A couple of things I've been working on lately are project governance issues as a TC member and also implementation of a new virtual

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Call for adoption (or exclusion?)

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 24/04/15 20:00, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: Notification might be a good way to integrate with nova. Individual

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Call for adoption (or exclusion?)

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 24/04/15 19:02, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, I'd like my first action as Zaqar's PTL to be based

Re: [openstack-dev] Please stop reviewing code while asking questions

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: On Fri, Apr 24 2015, Joe Gordon wrote: When I get a -1 on one of my patches with a question, I personally treat it as a short coming of the commit message. To often in the past I have looked at a file

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Call for adoption (or exclusion?)

://aws.amazon.com/articles/1464 Thanks, Kevin -- *From:* Joe Gordon [joe.gord...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, April 24, 2015 4:02 PM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Call for adoption (or exclusion

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add config option for real deletes instead of soft-deletes

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Artom Lifshitz alifs...@redhat.com wrote: Hello, I'd like to gauge acceptance of introducing a feature that would give operators a config option to perform real database deletes instead of soft deletes. There's definitely a need for *something* that cleans

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][nova][cinder] Tests that try to detach volumes in use

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Peter Penchev openstack-...@storpool.com wrote: Hi, There are a couple of Tempest volume tests, like test_rescued_vm_detach_volume or test_list_get_volume_attachments, that either sometimes[0] or always attempt to detach a volume from a running instance

Re: [openstack-dev] Please stop reviewing code while asking questions

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Amrith Kumar's message of 2015-04-24 15:02:01 +: There have been many replies on this thread, I'll just reply to this one rather than trying to reply piecemeal. Doug, there's asking a question

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I wrote my spec to Port Nova to Python 3: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176868/ I squashed all my commits into a single commit of my draft port and I pushed it at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, How invasive would the port to python3 be? I squashed all my commits into a single commit of my draft port and I pushed it at: https://github.com/haypo/nova/commit/bad54bc2b278c7c7cb7fa6cc73d03c70138bd89d I

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, It's moving fast. I'm currently working on porting remaining libraries to prepare my spec for nova. Great, I did't realize how close all the dependencies were. oslo.db -- looks like it is almost there I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Introducing the Cloud Service Federation project (cross-project design summit proposal)

for research is going to be the development of a virtual region metadata schema that will allow a tenant (or a broker) to determine the characteristics of virtual regions. (Such a model might be a useful complement to the RefStack work.) Geoff On Apr 16, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Diem Tran diem.t...@oracle.com wrote: Hi Duncan, We totally understand that CI is not a box ticking exercise, it actually serves a purpose, and we are fully on board with the need for CI. We have resources monitoring the CI results and handling failures on

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: For the full list, see the wiki page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3#Core_OpenStack_projects Thanks for updating the wiki page that is a very useful list. From the looks of things, it seems like nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][releases] upcoming library releases to unfreeze requirements in master

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 4/21/2015 2:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-21 13:11:09 -0400: I'm working on releasing a *bunch* of libraries, including clients, from their master branches

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][releases] upcoming library releases to unfreeze requirements in master

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 4/21/2015 2:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-04-21 13:11:09 -0400: I'm working

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 4/16/15, 17:54, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2015-04-16 15:15:01 -0700: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFSSA iSCSI Driver

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Diem It appears the CI failed to pass on any of the 5 reviews you linked to. Are there any examples of the CI passing? I don't see any passing runs in the last 20 comments left by 'Oracle ZFSSA CI'

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Introducing the Cloud Service Federation project (cross-project design summit proposal)

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: I’ve discussed this with the Keystone team, especially the Reseller folks, but not as deeply as we need to. The biggest challenge that I see with doing this inside any existing project is the Aggregator system. It’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3#Dependencies appears to be fairly out of date. You're right. I updated this wiki page. In practice, much more OpenStack clients, Common Libraries and Development Tools are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][pbr] splitting our deployment vs install dependencies

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Right now we do something that upstream pip considers wrong: we make our requirements.txt be our install_requires. Upstream there are two separate concepts. install_requirements, which are meant to document

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][pbr] splitting our deployment vs install dependencies

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Robert Collins wrote: On 13 April 2015 at 22:04, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: How does this proposal affect stable branches ? In order to keep the breakage there under control, we now have stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][pbr] splitting our deployment vs install dependencies

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 13 April 2015 at 12:53, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: What we have in the gate is the thing that produces the artifacts that someone installing using the pip tool would get. Shipping anything with

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][pbr] splitting our deployment vs install dependencies

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Joe Gordon wrote: Upstream there are two separate concepts. install_requirements, which are meant to document what *must* be installed to import the package, and should encode any mandatory version

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient 'stable-compat-jobs-{name}' broken

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 10:02 PM, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The following 'stable-compat-jobs-{name}' build jobs have been broken the past two days, blocking all novaclient patches from passing jenkins checks: gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-src-python-novaclient-icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] eventlet 0.17.3 is now fully Python 3 compatible

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Victor Stinner vstin...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, During the last OpenStack Summit at Paris, we discussed how we can port OpenStack to Python 3, because eventlet was not compatible with Python 3. There are multiple approaches: port eventlet to Python 3, replace

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova Project Priorities for Liberty

Hi All, After moderate success with our Kilo priorities effort and both Nova PTL candidates mentioning they wish to continue the process, its time to start thinking about the new priority list for Liberty. Just like last time [0]: We are now collecting ideas for project priorities on this

Re: [openstack-dev] Fixing the Nova Core Reviewer Frustration [was Re: [Nova] PTL Candidacy]

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:02 AM, James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 11:27 +1000, Michael Still wrote: Additionally, we have consistently asked for non-cores to help cover the review load. It doesn't have to be a core that notices a problem

Re: [openstack-dev] Fixing the Nova Core Reviewer Frustration [was Re: [Nova] PTL Candidacy]

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: -Original Message- From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com] Sent: 07 April 2015 19:03 To: Michael Still Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo][clients] Let's speed up start of OpenStack libs and clients by optimizing imports with profimp

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Boris Pavlovic bo...@pavlovic.me wrote: Jay, Not far, IMHO. 100ms difference in startup time isn't something we should spend much time optimizing. There's bigger fish to fry. I

Re: [openstack-dev] The Evolution of core developer to maintainer?

On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: I cannot speak for all projects, but at least in Nova you

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >