Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Nikhil Komawar for glance core

Thank you all for the support. I intend to help the Glance community flourish, again. cheers On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com > wrote: > Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil > Komawar as a glance co

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Does glance_store swift driver support range requests ?

I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be configured to store objects in different configurations. I guess the next question would be, what is your underlying problem -- multiple build requests or is this for retry for a single download? If the image is in image cache

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Image encryption

Hey, the feature still exists. you may read about it more on https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/doc/source/user/signature.rst , https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/liberty/image-signing-and-verification-support.html for future references, please look/search at

[openstack-dev] [glance] stepping down from glance core and other related groups

I am thankful to the community for such amazing experience over the past few years. For the changes required for glance personnel in the active cycle, I would like to step down from core as I cannot commit as much time upstream. I was hanging out to help in general but even that time commitment

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

This is a good move. I appreciate strong decisions as these are much needed now. On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'm nominating Abhishek Kekane (abhishekk on IRC) to be a Glance core > for the Pike cycle. Abhishek has been around the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Mike Fedosin for glance core

This is great news. Always +2 for Mike, he's been great (dev, glancer, stacker ..) all the years. Let's not wait so long for reinstatement if folks are on-board, as having another core will only help. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > As

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

ny other Upstream Institute questions! > > - Kendall(diablo_rojo) > > [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017- > January/110788.html > [2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016- > November/108084.html > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping Down

Dharini, Thanks for your good work. It's been good working with you on Glance. All the best! Cheers On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Chandrasekar, Dharini < dharini.chandrase...@intel.com> wrote: > Hello Glancers, > > > > Due to a change in my job role with my employer, I unfortunately do not

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Stepping Down

Hemanth, sorry to see you step down here. Thanks for your astute input all along. All the best! Cheers On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Hemanth Makkapati wrote: > Glancers, > Due to a significant change to my job description, I wouldn't be able to > contribute to Glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][openstack-ansible] Moving on

Sorry to see you go, Steve. Your code, feedback and all the work has always been super helpful so thank you very much. You shall be an asset to any team you work on. All the best! On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Steve Lewis wrote: > It is clear to me now that I won't be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

Project: Glance Attendees: ~15 What was done: We started by introducing the core team (or whatever existed then), did a run down of Glance API documentation especially for developers, other references like notes for ops, best practices. We went through the architecture of the project. A few

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] please approve test patch to fix glanceclient

thanks (for your work and to Flavio for the other +2). this is done as well. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Eric Fried <openst...@fried.cc> wrote: > Thanks Nikhil. This one is also needed to make py35 pass: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396816/ > > E > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] please approve test patch to fix glanceclient

thanks for bringing it up. this is done. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > python-glanceclient patches have been failing for at least a week due to > a requests change. The fix was posted 5 days ago - > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466385 > > It would be

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling glance v1 by default in devstack

Thanks Matt. Yes please, lets all start getting rid of glance v1 in our tests and then on.. On 3/3/17 2:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I've got a change proposed to disable glance v1 by default in devstack > for Pike [1]. > > The glance v1 API has been deprecated for awhile now. Nova started >

Re: [openstack-dev] artifacts code removed from the glance codebase in Pike

Great move. Let's get this merged asap. Thanks! best, -Nikhil On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > If you've never deployed, packaged, or used the Artifacts API supplied > by Glance or Glare, you can safely disregard this message. > > There's

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] user survey question results

This info is excellent. Exactly the kind of context we need to get the discussion on import refactor rolling. best, -Nikhil On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > The responses to the Glance user survey question are in the following > etherpad to

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] revising the core list

nued to serve during > the Ocata cycle: > - Erno Kuvaja > - Fei Long Wang > - Flavio Percoco > - Hemanth Makkapati > - Ian Cordasco > - Nikhil Komawar > > Finally, the following people are dropped from the Glance core list due > to inactivity during Ocata. On behalf of

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance rolling upgrades database strategy implementation

Dmitry, thanks for your interest and appreciate your enthusiasm to work on it. We've a few folks who are actively contributing to the same and were able to release significant work, though experimental, in Ocata. Please join the team on #openstack-glance or show up at one of our meetings, reach

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Propose Dharini Chandrasekar for Glance core

+1 She does good work and I will be happy to see this happen. I am not so sure about the argument part :) (jk) On 1/24/17 8:36 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I'd like to propose Dharini Chandrasekar (dharinic on IRC) for Glance > core. She has been an active reviewer and contributor to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections][TC] TC Candidacy

I noticed a good statement, marked it inline. On 9/28/16 7:24 AM, John Davidge wrote: > Hi Zane, > > Thanks for pointing this out! My interpretation of the StackForge > Retirement page[1] was wrong on that point. I've updated the blog post to > reflect that (without removing the original

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] newton rc-2 deadline

Added notes: For all the bugs that are identified likely candidates need to be tagged *newton-rc-potential*. This tag has been added to the official glance bug tags list and can also be used as a filter to view all of the potential rc bugs. References:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

I empathize with you Erno. I think this is a case of sheer mis-understanding and probably (I think) the mention of that instance / situation in this email is only for referential purposes. There are some critical deadlines one sub-set of people have to met and there are other priorities other

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Cores using -2 votes

thanks Ian, this is great info. Just a side question, do you have example for -Workflow , say in cases when I'd +2ed but to keep a check on process and approve after the freeze -W'ed it? Nonetheless, I have been using the labels and owner/reviewer/project field to good advantage so would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][congress][searchlight] projects in danger of being left out of newton

I think searchlight went right ahead into 1.0.0 so, I doubt if we will have rc1. (this is just initial info, I will defer the details to the project lead). On 9/19/16 9:55 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We have not had RC1 tags for congress or searchlight, and the project > leads aren't responding

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements] fixing contraints urls in stable/newton

Hi, There are many reviews pending on Glance's side for the u-c updates [1, 2, 3] given the u-c file for stable/newton doesn't exist yet [4]. However, I have observed that many reviews for u-c have been merged [5]. The former email in this thread says that merge is expected after the

[openstack-dev] [glance] Glance stable/newton cut and ready for Ocata; lift your -2s/-Ws

Hi team, Glance Newton rc1 is available, if you did not get a chance [1]. This also means that all further Newton specific fixes need to first merge in master and then backported to stable/newton branch (only stable maint team has core rights on that branch [2]). The master branch is open for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

ee your hard work for Glance during these cycles. I > have learned a lot from your review suggestion. Thanks very much!!! > And it's great to know that you still work on Glance. Best wishes. > > 2016-09-13 13:33 GMT+08:00 Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com > <mailto:nik.k

Re: [openstack-dev] [Searchlight] PTL Non-candidacy

Hi Travis, Firstly, I would like to congratulate you for such an amazing piece of work that you've lead to create. Even though not very hands on over the last few months, I've kept myself updated with the new developments in the projects and seen the team grow. So, I am glad to say that you've

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

Thank you Fei Long. It's always a pleasure working with you! On 9/13/16 12:59 AM, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Nikhil, > > Thanks for your hard work as Glance PTL, you did a great job. And > happy to know you will still work in OpenStack, see you around ;) > > On 12/09/16 18:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

e to > help :) > > Thank you, > > Abhishek > > -----Original Message- > From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:39 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Gla

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Periodically checking Glance image files

ackend is. That's why I thought, in some circumstances, it would be > useful to have some sort of background service checking that image > files haven't been corrupted or gone missing altogether. > > Sergio > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

lan to continue working with Glance. > > cheers, > brian > > On 9/12/16, 2:08 AM, "Nikhil Komawar" <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi team, >> >> >> Just wanted to share my decision for not running for PTL for Glance. >> It's be

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Bug days next week

Just a gentle reminder, the bug days start Tuesday September 13th. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-sept-bug-days P.S. In some parts of the world, this day has already started. On 9/7/16 3:54 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi all, > > > I would like to propose bug day

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Periodically checking Glance image files

Hi Sergio, Thanks for reaching out. And this is an excellent question. Firstly, I'd like to mention that Glance is built-in (and if deployed correctly) is self-resilient in ensuring that you do NOT need an audit of such files. In fact, if any operator (particularly large scale operator) needs

[openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

Hi team, Just wanted to share my decision for not running for PTL for Glance. It's been great serving the community in this role however, there are some personal and family matters that I need to attend to over the next couple of months or so. I think the Glance team has done great and we've

Re: [openstack-dev] [architecture] First meeting happened -- Regularly scheduled Thursdays at 1900

Thanks for this email Clint! I added a courtesy reminder section where people who wish to join and be notified prior to start of the meeting can do so. I encourage everyone to consider adding their nicks and the meeting chair to ping them. This will help everyone avoid maintain another meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 9/9/16 4:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > John Griffith wrote: >> ​I think Sean Dague made some really good points and I'd tend to lean >> that way. Honestly charters, bylaws, governance etc shift or are >> rewritten fairly often. Why not just change when we do elections to >> correspond with

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [all] Regarding string freeze and back ports involving translatable strings

I have had some questions offline so, I think documenting the theory, interpretations and POC will be helpful in our release schedule pages to get this practice consistent across projects. If not required (or if the process is subjective) we do not necessarily have to enforce strict process, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 9/9/16 11:32 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> [...] >> One interesting side-effect is that since the timing of the election >> period (for PTL and TC positions) is defined in the TC charter[3] >> relative to the *Summit*, it means that (unless we change this) we'll >> now

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

On 9/8/16 7:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/08/2016 05:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Sean Dague wrote: > >> So... the difference between your proposal and mine is: you force the >> PTL to be the release steward (rather than having a choice there), and >> introduce a delay between election

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for future elections & "Release stewards"

Good comment and I have an answer inline. On 9/8/16 2:41 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] >> Sent: September-08-16 5:00 AM >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for

[openstack-dev] [glance] Newton RC reviews and releases

Hi team, The RC period for a release spans multiple weeks, see Newton schedule here [1]. There are about 4 more weeks in Newton when potential RC releases could take place. The RC1 is bound to happen next week and there will most likely be a RC2 with translations. If there are more critical

[openstack-dev] [glance] Bug days next week

Hi all, I would like to propose bug days for Glance next week Tuesday 13th September and Wednesday 14th September (during your work hours / in your time zone). We've a plenty of bugs to address [1, 2, 3] and looks like the the right time in the cycle when we would get a good benefit of these

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] proposing adding Tony Breeds to "Release Managers" team

+1. def. I have always found his reviews quite detailed and constructive. On 9/6/16 11:36 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Team, > > I would like to add Tony Breeds to the "Release Managers" team in > gerrit. This would give him +2 permissions on openstack-infra/release-tools > and on

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Query on image signing support

Good questions. Please ask them here [1]. I think we will get answers and be able to document them at the same time. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314718/ On 9/5/16 9:09 AM, White, Darren wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if signed images in Glance will be supported in these use >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Newton-3 released and RC-1 phase start

There are a few more details around critical fixes, libraries and their releases based on critical fixes, stable branches, dates, etc. here http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-September/102829.html On 9/2/16 12:03 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi all, > > > Thi

[openstack-dev] [glance] Newton-3 released and RC-1 phase start

Hi all, This is a email notice being sent to let all know that Newton 3 for Glance has been released yesterday [1]. The RC-1 phase has begun and at this time we are respecting all the freezes that are introduced as per the release schedule [2]. Refresher (to those who are already familiar):

[openstack-dev] [glance] Reviews in queue for newton-3

Hi all, I've proposed a release patch up [1] where I am collecting all the reviews that are in queue and you'd like them in Newton 3. Please leave a comment up there and I will try to get to reviewing it soon. Based on the progress, time available, freeze, etc. a determination about the

[openstack-dev] [glance] store and client stable branches for newton

Hi, The stable/newton has been cut and respective commits have merged for both store and client [1]. Please feel free to merge any commits on master that were pending however, note that we won't be releasing any libraries out until R-0 when the freeze on libraries stops. Let me know if there are

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Barcelona summit space requirements and session planning etherpad

and then came back. Hopefully, this plan works for the majority this time. On 8/29/16 6:43 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Just a friendly reminder that I will be sending the final summit > planning request for slots for Glance first thing tomorrow. So, please > cast your vote if haven't alread

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Barcelona summit space requirements and session planning etherpad

nge. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-glance-summit-planning On 8/25/16 11:58 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi, > > > Just wanted to point out to those who haven't been to Glance meetings in > the past couple of weeks that we've to submit space requirements for the > Ba

[openstack-dev] [glance] Priority reviews for the upcoming n-3 release next week

Hi, In today's weekly meeting, I've listed some of the priority reviews that the reviewers, especially glance-cores, should focus on the coming few days for the Newton-3 release next week [1]. We will be evaluating the reviews that are likely to merge or otherwise in the next few days and should

[openstack-dev] [glance] Barcelona summit space requirements and session planning etherpad

Hi, Just wanted to point out to those who haven't been to Glance meetings in the past couple of weeks that we've to submit space requirements for the Barcelona design summit early next week. I've listed the constraints poised in front of us in the planning etherpad [1]. Please see the top

[openstack-dev] [glance] [osc] an important regression related to python-glanceclient 2.4.0

Hi, Recently a bug [1] was discovered affecting openstack client that resulted into python-glanceclient not being compatible with the later. As this issue contains complexity more than what meets the eye a revert [2] to a commit that recently introduced this bug has been proposed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] versioning the api-ref?

I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micro or in case of Glance minor version bump when required. The API isn't drastically different, there are new and old elements as shown in the Nova api ref linked. On 8/12/16 5:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/11/2016 06:02 PM,

[openstack-dev] [glance] Last store and client releases for Newton

Hi all, It's that time in the release cycle when we need to wrap things up. The non-client libraries are lined up to be released for final version in R-6 and the client one along with n-3 in R-5. However, these libraries need some time to be tested in gate and for us to determine a stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] snapshots are broken by default with newton and glance v2

. http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-image-v2.html#image-schemas-v2 On 7/27/16 4:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/20/2016 7:01 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > >> Thanks Matt. The bug looked very descriptive so, I commented my thoughts >> >> there https://bugs.launchpad.net/

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [glare] Glance virtual midcycle recordings

feature. On 7/27/16 5:15 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-07-27 13:08:35 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote: > [...] >> There have been some noted instances where people either inadvertently >> or otherwise have updated the etherpad, thus removing the text. Please >> be

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance developers and operators midcycle sync -- recordings

Hi all, We'd a midcycle sync last month with the glance development team and operators team where different individuals from across varied time zones participated. While the scheduling was a challenge and some had to join too early or too late, the event was pretty successful. We'd a ton of

[openstack-dev] [glance] [glare] Glance virtual midcycle recordings

Hi all, The Glance virtual midcycle was last month and we were able to record the event and write meeting notes. Please see the "Recordings" (line 30 now) sub-title for audio/visual updates and meeting notes at the near bottom of the etherpad linked below.

[openstack-dev] [glance] [glance_store] Removing the S3 driver

Hi all, Just wanted to follow up on the deprecation of S3 driver that Flavio started [1], we are now in the phase of removing the S3 driver from glance_store tree [2]. I've added some documentation to the release notes but have a feeling that operators may be using more than that to read up on

[openstack-dev] [glance] [oslo] configs help text for glance_store

Hi all, There was a intricate issue [1] when using help text with additive strings for translations, when passed through oslo.config. The error could not be seen on your local test environment or on glance_store docs visibly as it reflected only on glance docs gate. (Well, unless you tested the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][Tacker][Murano][App-Catalog] [Glance] How to validate your binary data in OpenStack

Thanks for your nice message Mikhail. I, however, wanted to address a small correction to avoid any further presumptions about Glare, Glance and Images API with the tags associated in the email subject herewith. (also adding Glance tag to the list to ensure we reach the appropriate Images

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][summit] Responding to questions on submitted summit talk?

I think this may be the wrong place to ask such info because all the process on summit presentation is being handled by folks who are not necessarily openstack developers. Please follow: https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/call-for-presentations/selection-process and send email to

[openstack-dev] [glance] [docs] WADL migration achieved

Hi all, I wanted to share my rejoice with you all that after persistent effort from Brian Rosmaita, we've (Glance) managed to accomplish another priority for this cycle the WADL migration, along with a good number of updates to the api-ref docs. For those unaware, this was the request from the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] snapshots are broken by default with newton and glance v2

Thanks Matt. The bug looked very descriptive so, I commented my thoughts there https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/1596602 On 7/20/16 4:18 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/18/2016 4:41 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Nikhil Komawar >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] selecting project mascot

11:24 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi, > > > Please find this etherpad [1] for helping collaboratively choose Glance > project mascot. All the information needed to help understand the > process is in the etherpad. > > > There are quite a few proposals already. Please no

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] snapshots are broken by default with newton and glance v2

For those needing this release soon, watch out for the announcement. Ref: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343708 On 7/18/16 12:19 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Thanks Matt. I've scheduled for a release of the client this week. > > On 7/16/16 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance] snapshots are broken by default with newton and glance v2

Thanks Matt. I've scheduled for a release of the client this week. On 7/16/16 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > This is more of a heads up than anything. > > Our internal CI is running Tempest with images that don't have > kernel_id or ramdisk_id properties set. > > We're running from master so

[openstack-dev] [glance] selecting project mascot

Hi, Please find this etherpad [1] for helping collaboratively choose Glance project mascot. All the information needed to help understand the process is in the etherpad. There are quite a few proposals already. Please note the poll closes Monday July 18th so please cast your votes as soon as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Proposal: Architecture Working Group

+1 , great idea. if we can add a mission/objective based on the nice definitions you added, will help a long way in cross-project architecture evolution. moreover, I'd like this to be a integration point for openstack projects (and not a silo) so that we can build the shared understanding we

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal of a virtual mid-cycle instead of the co-located

Please note the details on the midcycle event are updated here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Glance_Virtual_midcycle_sync We will be using the etherpad (given in the link above) as a live wiki for central place of updated info. On 6/8/16 9:52 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

and give us time to fix any issues you may face. On 6/7/16 11:51 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi all, > > > Thanks a ton for the feedback on the time and thanks to Kris for adding > items to the agenda [1]. > > > Just wanted to announce a few things here: > > > The fi

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal of a virtual mid-cycle instead of the co-located

This event is confirmed, more details will be out soon. On 5/29/16 11:15 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hello, > > > I would like to propose a two day 4 hour sessions each of Glance virtual > mid-cycle on June 15th Wednesday & 16th Thursday, 1400 UTC onward. This > is a rep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016=6=9=11=30=0=881=196=47=22=157=87=24=78=283=1800 [3] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Glance_and_Operators_mid-cycle_sync_for_Newton Cheers On 5/31/16 5:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][qa] Test plans for glance v2 stack

On 6/7/16 4:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I tested the glance v2 stack (glance v1 disabled) using a devstack > change here: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325322/ > > Now that the changes are merged up through the base nova image proxy > and the libvirt driver, and we just have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

w > timeanddate suggestions is 6/7 of June. > > Belmiro > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com > <mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hey, > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback. 0800UTC is 4am EDT for some o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

Nikhil, > > 2000UTC might catch a few kiwis, but it's 6am everywhere on the east > coast of Australia, and even earlier out west. 0800UTC, on the other > hand, would be more sociable. > > On 26 May 2016 at 15:30, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Focus for week R-18 May 30-June 03

:-) ). I am sorry if this has been hurtful to some. On 5/29/16 9:50 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi team, > > > The focus for week R-18 is as follows: > > > * Mon, part of Tues: Reviews that look good enough to be merged and > suitable for newton-1 release, any reviews that help

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] Proposal to add Ian Cordasco to glance-stable-maint

This has been done. Thanks! On 5/25/16 5:12 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hi all, > > > I would like to propose adding Ian to glance-stable-maint team. The > interest is coming from him and I've already asked for feedback from the > current glance-stable-maint folks, which

[openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal of a virtual mid-cycle instead of the co-located

Hello, I would like to propose a two day 4 hour sessions each of Glance virtual mid-cycle on June 15th Wednesday & 16th Thursday, 1400 UTC onward. This is a replacement of the Glance mid-cycle meetup that we've cancelled. Some people have already expressed some items to discuss then and I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Thanks Sam. We purposefully chose that time to accommodate some of our > community members from the Pacific. I'm assuming it's just your case > that's not working out for that time? So, hopefully other Australian/NZ > friends can join. > > > On 5/26/16 1

[openstack-dev] [glance] NOTICE: Glance Soft Spec freeze R-16 approaching

Hi all, As stated in my email [1], we will be having the soft spec freeze for glance-specs on June 17th R-16 [2]. As a part of this freeze we will be evaluating the already proposed specs for their possibility of getting done in Newton based on the

[openstack-dev] [glance] Focus for week R-18 May 30-June 03

Hi team, The focus for week R-18 is as follows: * Mon, part of Tues: Reviews that look good enough to be merged and suitable for newton-1 release, any reviews that help fixing important bugs or those that possibly need further testing later in the release. Please keep any eye on the gate to

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

ple from the Large Deployment Team can come along. It’s > not a good time for me in Australia but hoping someone else can join in. > > Sam > > >> On 26 May 2016, at 2:16 AM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> F

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

tomorrow (Thursday May 26). On 5/20/16 6:00 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Hello all, > > > I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May > 26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work [1] ongoing in > Glance. We are making a few updat

[openstack-dev] [glance] [stable] Proposal to add Ian Cordasco to glance-stable-maint

Hi all, I would like to propose adding Ian to glance-stable-maint team. The interest is coming from him and I've already asked for feedback from the current glance-stable-maint folks, which has been in Ian's favor. Also, as Ian mentions the current global stable team isn't going to subsume the

[openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync -- Thanks, Nikhil Komawar Newton PTL for OpenStack Glance __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

Yes, downside indeed. We will rely on community being civil about this and me kicking people out for those who did not care to RSVP (if we need free slots). On 5/25/16 10:24 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 25/05/16 09:53 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> Thanks Flavio, Erno. >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

d, May 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com > <mailto:fla...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On 20/05/16 18:00 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > Hello all, > > > I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week > Thu

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] when are your mid-cycle meetups?

On 5/23/16 5:57 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 05/23/2016 05:36 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> FYI, >> >> Glance one was cancelled (so can't put on the wiki), as we are >> preferring the virtual one for more participation. >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/piper

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] when are your mid-cycle meetups?

FYI, Glance one was cancelled (so can't put on the wiki), as we are preferring the virtual one for more participation. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/095591.html On 5/23/16 5:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We are trying to help the organizers of the community bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Unable to set metadata_encryption_key

Thanks! On 5/22/16 8:46 AM, Djimeli Konrad wrote: > Hello Nikhil, > > I have submitted a prototype solution to the problem > https://review.openstack.org/319659 . I know it is not very exhaustive > or efficient, but I would like to get your review and option on the issue. > > Thanks > Konrad >

[openstack-dev] [glance] Focus for week R-19 May 23-27

Hi team, The focus for week R-19 is as follows: * Mon-Wed: please focus on reviewing specs and lite-specs. Remember the soft-spec freeze is approaching (R-16), this is when we decide what specs are likely to be merged in Newton. So, keep reviewing specs. And I have pointed out to many of your

[openstack-dev] [glance] Best practices for glance weekly team meetings

Hi team, I have noticed it lately that people were being reluctant on paying attention to the agenda proposed; either there were too many proposals or one too many last minute additions. We also did not have any process to effectively manage the agenda already proposed. So, as discussed at this

[openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

Hello all, I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May 26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work [1] ongoing in Glance. We are making a few updates to the spec; so it would be good to have everyone on the same page and soon start merging those spec

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [VMT] [Security] Proposal to add Brian Rosmaita to the glance-coresec team

On 5/20/16 5:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-20 16:47:50 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote: > [...] >> Please note, however, after talking with Brian and Hemanth, Hemanth has >> signed up to be Glance liaison to the VMT team along with me. I've >> up

[openstack-dev] [glance] [VMT] [security] NOTICE: Current structure of the glance-core-sec team

* Hemanth Makkapati * Kairat Kushaev * Nikhil Komawar The current Glance liaisons to the VMT team have been updated here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Vulnerability_management . -- Thanks, Nikhil

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [VMT] [Security] Proposal to add Brian Rosmaita to the glance-coresec team

On 5/12/16 5:38 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > Comments, alternate proposal inline. > > > > On 5/12/16 8:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-05-11 23:39:58 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote: >>> I would like to propose adding add Brian to the team. >> [.

[openstack-dev] [glance] NOTICE: Glance midcycle meetup for Newton CANCELLED

Hi, Please note that the Glance midcycle meetup for Newton has been cancelled as per the agreement [1] at the Glance weekly meeting that happened Thursday May 19th. The meetup agenda [2] etherpad has been updated to reflect the same. Note to wiki moderators: The Sprints wiki [3] has been

  1   2   3   4   >