Thank you all for the support. I intend to help the Glance community
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com
> Having heard only positive responses, I'm happy to reinstate Nikhil
> Komawar as a glance co
I think it will a rather hard problem to solve. As swift store can be
configured to store objects in different configurations. I guess the next
question would be, what is your underlying problem -- multiple build
requests or is this for retry for a single download?
If the image is in image cache
the feature still exists. you may read about it more on
for future references, please look/search at
I am thankful to the community for such amazing experience over the past
few years. For the changes required for glance personnel in the active
cycle, I would like to step down from core as I cannot commit as much time
upstream. I was hanging out to help in general but even that time
This is a good move. I appreciate strong decisions as these are much needed
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I'm nominating Abhishek Kekane (abhishekk on IRC) to be a Glance core
> for the Pike cycle. Abhishek has been around the
This is great news. Always +2 for Mike, he's been great (dev, glancer,
stacker ..) all the years. Let's not wait so long for reinstatement if
folks are on-board, as having another core will only help.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
ny other Upstream Institute questions!
> - Kendall(diablo_rojo)
>  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-
>  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at
Thanks for your good work. It's been good working with you on Glance. All
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Chandrasekar, Dharini <
> Hello Glancers,
> Due to a change in my job role with my employer, I unfortunately do not
Hemanth, sorry to see you step down here. Thanks for your astute input all
along. All the best!
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Hemanth Makkapati
> Due to a significant change to my job description, I wouldn't be able to
> contribute to Glance
Sorry to see you go, Steve. Your code, feedback and all the work has always
been super helpful so thank you very much. You shall be an asset to any
team you work on. All the best!
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Steve Lewis wrote:
> It is clear to me now that I won't be
What was done:
We started by introducing the core team (or whatever existed then), did a
run down of Glance API documentation especially for developers, other
references like notes for ops, best practices. We went through the
architecture of the project. A few
thanks (for your work and to Flavio for the other +2). this is done as well.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Eric Fried <openst...@fried.cc> wrote:
> Thanks Nikhil. This one is also needed to make py35 pass:
thanks for bringing it up. this is done.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> python-glanceclient patches have been failing for at least a week due to
> a requests change. The fix was posted 5 days ago -
> It would be
Thanks Matt. Yes please, lets all start getting rid of glance v1 in our
tests and then on..
On 3/3/17 2:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> I've got a change proposed to disable glance v1 by default in devstack
> for Pike .
> The glance v1 API has been deprecated for awhile now. Nova started
Great move. Let's get this merged asap.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> If you've never deployed, packaged, or used the Artifacts API supplied
> by Glance or Glare, you can safely disregard this message.
This info is excellent. Exactly the kind of context we need to get the
discussion on import refactor rolling.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Brian Rosmaita
> The responses to the Glance user survey question are in the following
> etherpad to
nued to serve during
> the Ocata cycle:
> - Erno Kuvaja
> - Fei Long Wang
> - Flavio Percoco
> - Hemanth Makkapati
> - Ian Cordasco
> - Nikhil Komawar
> Finally, the following people are dropped from the Glance core list due
> to inactivity during Ocata. On behalf of
Dmitry, thanks for your interest and appreciate your enthusiasm to work
on it. We've a few folks who are actively contributing to the same and
were able to release significant work, though experimental, in Ocata.
Please join the team on #openstack-glance or show up at one of our
She does good work and I will be happy to see this happen.
I am not so sure about the argument part :) (jk)
On 1/24/17 8:36 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I'd like to propose Dharini Chandrasekar (dharinic on IRC) for Glance
> core. She has been an active reviewer and contributor to the
I noticed a good statement, marked it inline.
On 9/28/16 7:24 AM, John Davidge wrote:
> Hi Zane,
> Thanks for pointing this out! My interpretation of the StackForge
> Retirement page was wrong on that point. I've updated the blog post to
> reflect that (without removing the original
For all the bugs that are identified likely candidates need to be tagged
This tag has been added to the official glance bug tags list and can
also be used as a filter to view all of the potential rc bugs.
I empathize with you Erno. I think this is a case of sheer
mis-understanding and probably (I think) the mention of that instance /
situation in this email is only for referential purposes.
There are some critical deadlines one sub-set of people have to met and
there are other priorities other
thanks Ian, this is great info.
Just a side question, do you have example for -Workflow , say in cases
when I'd +2ed but to keep a check on process and approve after the
freeze -W'ed it?
Nonetheless, I have been using the labels and owner/reviewer/project
field to good advantage so would like to
I think searchlight went right ahead into 1.0.0 so, I doubt if we will
have rc1. (this is just initial info, I will defer the details to the
On 9/19/16 9:55 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> We have not had RC1 tags for congress or searchlight, and the project
> leads aren't responding
There are many reviews pending on Glance's side for the u-c updates [1,
2, 3] given the u-c file for stable/newton doesn't exist yet .
However, I have observed that many reviews for u-c have been merged .
The former email in this thread says that merge is expected after the
Glance Newton rc1 is available, if you did not get a chance . This
also means that all further Newton specific fixes need to first merge in
master and then backported to stable/newton branch (only stable maint
team has core rights on that branch ). The master branch is open for
ee your hard work for Glance during these cycles. I
> have learned a lot from your review suggestion. Thanks very much!!!
> And it's great to know that you still work on Glance. Best wishes.
> 2016-09-13 13:33 GMT+08:00 Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com
Firstly, I would like to congratulate you for such an amazing piece of
work that you've lead to create.
Even though not very hands on over the last few months, I've kept myself
updated with the new developments in the projects and seen the team
grow. So, I am glad to say that you've
Thank you Fei Long. It's always a pleasure working with you!
On 9/13/16 12:59 AM, Fei Long Wang wrote:
> Hi Nikhil,
> Thanks for your hard work as Glance PTL, you did a great job. And
> happy to know you will still work in OpenStack, see you around ;)
> On 12/09/16 18:
> help :)
> Thank you,
> -----Original Message-
> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 11:39 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Gla
ackend is. That's why I thought, in some circumstances, it would be
> useful to have some sort of background service checking that image
> files haven't been corrupted or gone missing altogether.
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.
lan to continue working with Glance.
> On 9/12/16, 2:08 AM, "Nikhil Komawar" <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi team,
>> Just wanted to share my decision for not running for PTL for Glance.
>> It's be
Just a gentle reminder, the bug days start Tuesday September 13th.
P.S. In some parts of the world, this day has already started.
On 9/7/16 3:54 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to propose bug day
Thanks for reaching out. And this is an excellent question.
Firstly, I'd like to mention that Glance is built-in (and if deployed
correctly) is self-resilient in ensuring that you do NOT need an audit
of such files. In fact, if any operator (particularly large scale
Just wanted to share my decision for not running for PTL for Glance.
It's been great serving the community in this role however, there are
some personal and family matters that I need to attend to over the next
couple of months or so.
I think the Glance team has done great and we've
Thanks for this email Clint!
I added a courtesy reminder section where people who wish to join and be
notified prior to start of the meeting can do so. I encourage everyone
to consider adding their nicks and the meeting chair to ping them. This
will help everyone avoid maintain another meeting
On 9/9/16 4:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> John Griffith wrote:
>> I think Sean Dague made some really good points and I'd tend to lean
>> that way. Honestly charters, bylaws, governance etc shift or are
>> rewritten fairly often. Why not just change when we do elections to
>> correspond with
I have had some questions offline so, I think documenting the theory,
interpretations and POC will be helpful in our release schedule pages to
get this practice consistent across projects. If not required (or if the
process is subjective) we do not necessarily have to enforce strict
On 9/9/16 11:32 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> One interesting side-effect is that since the timing of the election
>> period (for PTL and TC positions) is defined in the TC charter
>> relative to the *Summit*, it means that (unless we change this) we'll
On 9/8/16 7:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 05:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Sean Dague wrote:
>> So... the difference between your proposal and mine is: you force the
>> PTL to be the release steward (rather than having a choice there), and
>> introduce a delay between election
Good comment and I have an answer inline.
On 9/8/16 2:41 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org]
>> Sent: September-08-16 5:00 AM
>> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Timeframe for
The RC period for a release spans multiple weeks, see Newton schedule
here . There are about 4 more weeks in Newton when potential RC
releases could take place. The RC1 is bound to happen next week and
there will most likely be a RC2 with translations. If there are more
I would like to propose bug days for Glance next week Tuesday 13th
September and Wednesday 14th September (during your work hours / in your
We've a plenty of bugs to address [1, 2, 3] and looks like the the right
time in the cycle when we would get a good benefit of these
I have always found his reviews quite detailed and constructive.
On 9/6/16 11:36 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> I would like to add Tony Breeds to the "Release Managers" team in
> gerrit. This would give him +2 permissions on openstack-infra/release-tools
> and on
Please ask them here . I think we will get answers and be able to
document them at the same time.
On 9/5/16 9:09 AM, White, Darren wrote:
> Does anyone know if signed images in Glance will be supported in these use
There are a few more details around critical fixes, libraries and their
releases based on critical fixes, stable branches, dates, etc. here
On 9/2/16 12:03 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi all,
This is a email notice being sent to let all know that Newton 3 for
Glance has been released yesterday . The RC-1 phase has begun and at
this time we are respecting all the freezes that are introduced as per
the release schedule .
Refresher (to those who are already familiar):
I've proposed a release patch up  where I am collecting all the
reviews that are in queue and you'd like them in Newton 3. Please leave
a comment up there and I will try to get to reviewing it soon. Based on
the progress, time available, freeze, etc. a determination about the
The stable/newton has been cut and respective commits have merged for
both store and client . Please feel free to merge any commits on
master that were pending however, note that we won't be releasing any
libraries out until R-0 when the freeze on libraries stops.
Let me know if there are
came back. Hopefully, this plan works for the majority this time.
On 8/29/16 6:43 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder that I will be sending the final summit
> planning request for slots for Glance first thing tomorrow. So, please
> cast your vote if haven't alread
On 8/25/16 11:58 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Just wanted to point out to those who haven't been to Glance meetings in
> the past couple of weeks that we've to submit space requirements for the
In today's weekly meeting, I've listed some of the priority reviews that
the reviewers, especially glance-cores, should focus on the coming few
days for the Newton-3 release next week . We will be evaluating the
reviews that are likely to merge or otherwise in the next few days and
Just wanted to point out to those who haven't been to Glance meetings in
the past couple of weeks that we've to submit space requirements for the
Barcelona design summit early next week. I've listed the constraints
poised in front of us in the planning etherpad . Please see the top
Recently a bug  was discovered affecting openstack client that
resulted into python-glanceclient not being compatible with the later.
As this issue contains complexity more than what meets the eye a revert
 to a commit that recently introduced this bug has been proposed.
I guess the intent was to indicate the need for indicating the micro or
in case of Glance minor version bump when required.
The API isn't drastically different, there are new and old elements as
shown in the Nova api ref linked.
On 8/12/16 5:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 06:02 PM,
It's that time in the release cycle when we need to wrap things up. The
non-client libraries are lined up to be released for final version in
R-6 and the client one along with n-3 in R-5.
However, these libraries need some time to be tested in gate and for us
to determine a stable
On 7/27/16 4:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 7/20/2016 7:01 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Thanks Matt. The bug looked very descriptive so, I commented my thoughts
>> there https://bugs.launchpad.net/
On 7/27/16 5:15 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-07-27 13:08:35 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> There have been some noted instances where people either inadvertently
>> or otherwise have updated the etherpad, thus removing the text. Please
We'd a midcycle sync last month with the glance development team and
operators team where different individuals from across varied time zones
participated. While the scheduling was a challenge and some had to join
too early or too late, the event was pretty successful. We'd a ton of
The Glance virtual midcycle was last month and we were able to record
the event and write meeting notes. Please see the "Recordings" (line 30
now) sub-title for audio/visual updates and meeting notes at the near
bottom of the etherpad linked below.
Just wanted to follow up on the deprecation of S3 driver that Flavio
started , we are now in the phase of removing the S3 driver from
glance_store tree . I've added some documentation to the release
notes but have a feeling that operators may be using more than that to
read up on
There was a intricate issue  when using help text with additive
strings for translations, when passed through oslo.config. The error
could not be seen on your local test environment or on glance_store docs
visibly as it reflected only on glance docs gate. (Well, unless you
Thanks for your nice message Mikhail.
I, however, wanted to address a small correction to avoid any further
presumptions about Glare, Glance and Images API with the tags associated
in the email subject herewith. (also adding Glance tag to the list to
ensure we reach the appropriate Images
I think this may be the wrong place to ask such info because all the
process on summit presentation is being handled by folks who are not
necessarily openstack developers.
and send email to
I wanted to share my rejoice with you all that after persistent effort
from Brian Rosmaita, we've (Glance) managed to accomplish another
priority for this cycle the WADL migration, along with a good number of
updates to the api-ref docs. For those unaware, this was the request
Thanks Matt. The bug looked very descriptive so, I commented my thoughts
On 7/20/16 4:18 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 7/18/2016 4:41 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Nikhil Komawar
11:24 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Please find this etherpad  for helping collaboratively choose Glance
> project mascot. All the information needed to help understand the
> process is in the etherpad.
> There are quite a few proposals already. Please no
For those needing this release soon, watch out for the announcement.
On 7/18/16 12:19 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Thanks Matt. I've scheduled for a release of the client this week.
> On 7/16/16 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Thanks Matt. I've scheduled for a release of the client this week.
On 7/16/16 4:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> This is more of a heads up than anything.
> Our internal CI is running Tempest with images that don't have
> kernel_id or ramdisk_id properties set.
> We're running from master so
Please find this etherpad  for helping collaboratively choose Glance
project mascot. All the information needed to help understand the
process is in the etherpad.
There are quite a few proposals already. Please note the poll closes
Monday July 18th so please cast your votes as soon as
+1 , great idea.
if we can add a mission/objective based on the nice definitions you
added, will help a long way in cross-project architecture evolution.
moreover, I'd like this to be a integration point for openstack projects
(and not a silo) so that we can build the shared understanding we
Please note the details on the midcycle event are updated here:
We will be using the etherpad (given in the link above) as a live wiki
for central place of updated info.
On 6/8/16 9:52 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote
and give us time to fix any issues you may face.
On 6/7/16 11:51 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi all,
> Thanks a ton for the feedback on the time and thanks to Kris for adding
> items to the agenda .
> Just wanted to announce a few things here:
> The fi
This event is confirmed, more details will be out soon.
On 5/29/16 11:15 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> I would like to propose a two day 4 hour sessions each of Glance virtual
> mid-cycle on June 15th Wednesday & 16th Thursday, 1400 UTC onward. This
> is a rep
On 5/31/16 5:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote
On 6/7/16 4:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> I tested the glance v2 stack (glance v1 disabled) using a devstack
> change here:
> Now that the changes are merged up through the base nova image proxy
> and the libvirt driver, and we just have
> timeanddate suggestions is 6/7 of June.
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com
> <mailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. 0800UTC is 4am EDT for some o
> 2000UTC might catch a few kiwis, but it's 6am everywhere on the east
> coast of Australia, and even earlier out west. 0800UTC, on the other
> hand, would be more sociable.
> On 26 May 2016 at 15:30, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am sorry if this has been hurtful to some.
On 5/29/16 9:50 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi team,
> The focus for week R-18 is as follows:
> * Mon, part of Tues: Reviews that look good enough to be merged and
> suitable for newton-1 release, any reviews that help
This has been done.
On 5/25/16 5:12 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to propose adding Ian to glance-stable-maint team. The
> interest is coming from him and I've already asked for feedback from the
> current glance-stable-maint folks, which
I would like to propose a two day 4 hour sessions each of Glance virtual
mid-cycle on June 15th Wednesday & 16th Thursday, 1400 UTC onward. This
is a replacement of the Glance mid-cycle meetup that we've cancelled.
Some people have already expressed some items to discuss then and I
, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Thanks Sam. We purposefully chose that time to accommodate some of our
> community members from the Pacific. I'm assuming it's just your case
> that's not working out for that time? So, hopefully other Australian/NZ
> friends can join.
> On 5/26/16 1
As stated in my email , we will be having the soft spec freeze for
glance-specs on June 17th R-16 .
As a part of this freeze we will be evaluating the already proposed
specs for their possibility of getting done in Newton based on the
The focus for week R-18 is as follows:
* Mon, part of Tues: Reviews that look good enough to be merged and
suitable for newton-1 release, any reviews that help fixing important
bugs or those that possibly need further testing later in the release.
Please keep any eye on the gate to
ple from the Large Deployment Team can come along. It’s
> not a good time for me in Australia but hoping someone else can join in.
>> On 26 May 2016, at 2:16 AM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
tomorrow (Thursday May 26).
On 5/20/16 6:00 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hello all,
> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May
> 26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work  ongoing in
> Glance. We are making a few updat
I would like to propose adding Ian to glance-stable-maint team. The
interest is coming from him and I've already asked for feedback from the
current glance-stable-maint folks, which has been in Ian's favor. Also,
as Ian mentions the current global stable team isn't going to subsume
Newton PTL for OpenStack Glance
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Yes, downside indeed.
We will rely on community being civil about this and me kicking people
out for those who did not care to RSVP (if we need free slots).
On 5/25/16 10:24 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 25/05/16 09:53 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Thanks Flavio, Erno.
d, May 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com
> <mailto:fla...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> On 20/05/16 18:00 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Hello all,
> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week
On 5/23/16 5:57 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 05/23/2016 05:36 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Glance one was cancelled (so can't put on the wiki), as we are
>> preferring the virtual one for more participation.
Glance one was cancelled (so can't put on the wiki), as we are
preferring the virtual one for more participation.
On 5/23/16 5:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> We are trying to help the organizers of the community bug
On 5/22/16 8:46 AM, Djimeli Konrad wrote:
> Hello Nikhil,
> I have submitted a prototype solution to the problem
> https://review.openstack.org/319659 . I know it is not very exhaustive
> or efficient, but I would like to get your review and option on the issue.
The focus for week R-19 is as follows:
* Mon-Wed: please focus on reviewing specs and lite-specs. Remember the
soft-spec freeze is approaching (R-16), this is when we decide what
specs are likely to be merged in Newton. So, keep reviewing specs. And I
have pointed out to many of your
I have noticed it lately that people were being reluctant on paying
attention to the agenda proposed; either there were too many proposals
or one too many last minute additions. We also did not have any process
to effectively manage the agenda already proposed. So, as discussed at
I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May
26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work  ongoing in
Glance. We are making a few updates to the spec; so it would be good to
have everyone on the same page and soon start merging those spec
On 5/20/16 5:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-05-20 16:47:50 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> Please note, however, after talking with Brian and Hemanth, Hemanth has
>> signed up to be Glance liaison to the VMT team along with me. I've
* Hemanth Makkapati
* Kairat Kushaev
* Nikhil Komawar
The current Glance liaisons to the VMT team have been updated here
On 5/12/16 5:38 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> Comments, alternate proposal inline.
> On 5/12/16 8:35 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2016-05-11 23:39:58 -0400 (-0400), Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>>> I would like to propose adding add Brian to the team.
Please note that the Glance midcycle meetup for Newton has been
cancelled as per the agreement  at the Glance weekly meeting that
happened Thursday May 19th. The meetup agenda  etherpad has been
updated to reflect the same.
Note to wiki moderators: The Sprints wiki  has been
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo