Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:52:39PM +0300, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Few months ago I've started a discussion on FreeBSD host support for
> > OpenStack. [1] At a result of discussion it was figured out that there
> &g
d have their own place.
Feedback is appreciated,
Thanks
1: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-October/048721.html
2: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpu0F_6bRBdH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 06:39 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 21, 2014, Roman Bogorodskiy
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Joe Gordon >> > wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM,
Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy
> > wrote:
> >>
ping?
Roman Bogorodskiy
pg
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In discussion of this spec proposal:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127827/ it was suggested by Joe Gordon
ntion that a discussion on this topic already
happened on this maillist:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031431.html
Some of the limitations were resolved since then, specifically,
libvirt/bhyve has no limitation on count of disk and ethernet devices
anymore.
Roma
onfiguration.
libguestfs doesn't work on FreeBSD yet. On the other hand, localfs
code in Nova doesn't look like it'd be hard to port.
Roman Bogorodskiy
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi,
Mykola has some problems sending emails to the list, so he asked me to post
a response, here it goes:
---
Remy, I have improved Coraid CI system and added logs of all components of
devstack. Please have a look:
http://38.111.159.9:8080/job/Coraid_CI/164/
According to the requirement
ttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/043274.html
> [2] https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/tree/master/lib/cinder_backends
>
> From: Roman Bogorodskiy [mailto:rbogorods...@mirantis.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2014 8:34 AM
> To: OpenStack
Mykola, thanks for update!
Few additional notes on this. For now, we have to inject two patches to
make it work.
The first patch is a simple bugfix for the Coraid driver itself:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119022/
The second one is for Tempest to allow specification of custom volume type
k
oring
are available in the spec itself.
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpZ5IhFQZXcU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
irt/bhyve support.
I'm planning to start with adding networking support. Unfortunately, it
seems I got late with the spec for Juno though:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95328/
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpkeNEjFWmYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
difications to libvirt, unfortunately, they'll not get it
into the upcoming 1.2.3 as the freeze started already.
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgptY0LlVscTq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi,
Is it the same reason my change fails with turbo-hipster over and over:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54492/ ?
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The purpose of this email to is apologise for some incorrect -1 review
> scores which turbo hipster sent out tod
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Rafał Jaworowski wrote:
> The maintenance aspect and testing coverage are valid points, on the
> other hand future changes would have to go a longer way for us: first
> upstream to libvirt, then downstream to the FreeBSD ports collection
> (+ perhaps some OpenStac
Hello,
Yes, libvirt's qemu driver works almost fine currently, except the fact
that it
needs a 'real' bridge driver, so all the networking configuration like
filtering rules, NAT, etc
could be done automatically, like for Linux now, instead of making user to
perform
all the configuration manually.
I know it was brought up on the list a number of times, but...
If we're talking about storing commit ids for each module and writing
some shell scripts for that, isn't it a chance to reconsider using git
submodules?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Elena Ezhova wrote:
>
> 20.11.2013, 06:18,
Joe, thanks for clarification.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy <
> rbogorods...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been noticing since this morning that the ch
Hi,
I've been noticing since this morning that the check-grenade-devstack-vm
job constantly fails.
https://jenkins01.openstack.org/job/check-grenade-devstack-vm/
You can see that there were no single successful completion for 5 hours in
a raw.
Would could be wrong with that?
Roman
FWIW, I've created a sample project using olso as a submodule:
https://github.com/novel/oslo-helloworld
I spotted some minor difficulties:
1. As olso directory layout is not designed to be used as a submodule, a
symlink has to be created to place code to the proper location
2. sys.path hack has
Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Roman Bogorodskiy > wrote:
>
> > Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > even though Glance, has been pulled out of Nova years ago, Nova still
> > has a
> > > images AP
_
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpMLz8lUv5WT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-d
for new tests.
>
> 2) Use suggestion #2 above to mitigate the Python 3 concern.
>
> 3) Convert tests to mock over time, opportunistically, as tests are
> being updated anyway. (Or if someone *really* wants to take this on as
> a project ...)
>
> --
> Russell Bryant
Roman B
ke any other exception'.
>
> -Rob
Do you mean we need to catch SystemExit in the actual unit test?
The other option I guess is to either move sys.exit() to __main__ block
or just mock it.
I have submitted a change like that for the nec_agent test:
https://review.open
ld be 5000+ tests (e.g. in jenkins logs).
What could be wrong here?
I'm testing on Ubuntu 12.04 BTW.
Roman Bogorodskiy
pgpmWieUYDe54.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openst
25 matches
Mail list logo
