[openstack-dev] [Murano] How to debug a failed deployment?

Hello, I am trying to deploy a hello world HOT package in murano but the deployment runs forever and does not stop (does not succeed or fail). Stan advised me to modify the config setting below to set a timeout: # Time for waiting for a response from murano agent during the # deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

ailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: 11/27/2015 04:04 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an envir

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:07 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) < tony.a.w...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > For the object storage support, does Murano have any plan to support the > auto-uploading function? Murano has plans to support everything applications may need. It is just a matter of

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

questions) Cc: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Hi Tony, Technically your solution is possible. Murano agent can be installed manually. All queue names are in agent's config file. Murano can

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

*Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:12 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* RE: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit > files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral > > > > Alexander, > > > > Than

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

Here is the full story: real YAML that is generated is stored in murano database in packages table. Murano Dashboard obtains form definitions in YAML from API. But to improve performance it also caches them locally. And when it does it stores them in Python pickle format [1] rather then original

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

Thanks Stan for the pointer. I removed the line that referred to the 'name' property and now my application is added to the environment without any errors. However, what I see in ui.yaml still doesn't look like YAML. I'm attaching samples again. Even for HOT packages the content is not YAML.

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application

Hi Tony, We have already implemented commands which allow user to configure and deploy environments via CLI. Please, take a look to this article: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/murano/draft/enduser-guide/deploying_using_cli.html On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:18 AM, WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) <

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application

questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application Hi Tony, We have already implemented commands which allow user to configure and deploy environments via CLI. Please, take a look to this article: http://docs.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

Vahid, I see what is the problem. You are generating UI form that looks like this: Forms: - group0: fields: [] Application: name: $.group0.name ?: type: "io.murano.apps.generated.CsarHelloWorld" Version: 2.2 The problem in in "name: $.group0.name". Previously

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

necessary, I can also send you the plugin python code. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > --Vahid > > > > > From:Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com> > To:"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

. Regards, --Vahid From: Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: 11/25/2015 03:29 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionE

[openstack-dev] [murano] Is it possible to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application

Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to use Murano RESTful API to create and deploy an application. Based on my current understanding, I want to use muranoclient cli as following: 1. "environment-create" to create Murano environment; 2. "environment-session-create" to create

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

Hi Vahid, Forms are rended after app is added to the environment in accordance with the UI definition. UI definition contains yaql expressions and one of your expression is incorrect. Please, share UI yaml so we can find out what's the problem. You can also create a bug that it's not obvious

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

Hi Vahid, you can find generated UI definitions for the package here: /tmp/muranodashboard-cache/apps/.../ui/ui.yaml On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Ekaterina Chernova wrote: > > Hi Vahid, > > Forms are rended after app is added to the environment in accordance with

[openstack-dev] [Murano] 'NoMatchingFunctionException: No function "#operator_." matches supplied arguments' error when adding an application to an environment

Hi, I am working on the TOSCA CSAR plugin for murano and so far am able to successfully import an application definition archive of my CSAR example to murano. However, when I try to add the imported application to an environment I get this error from Murano Dashboard:

[openstack-dev] [murano] let's start using reno

Hello, fellow murano developers. You surely heard about reno [1] — RElease NOtes management tool. I’m happy to say, that it’s configured and ready to be used for murano itself. If you need an example — here is our 1st commit that includes a reno release note 

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

Dear Alexander and Murano developers and testers, Any suggestion for this? ☺ Thanks, Tony From: WANG, Ming Hao (Tony T) Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:12 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

it. Thanks, Tony From: Alexander Tivelkov [mailto:ativel...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral Hi Tony

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

Hi Tony, Probably I am missing something, but why do you need Murano Agent to interact with Mistral? You can call Mistral APIs right from MuranoPL code being executed by Murano Engine. Murano's core library contains the io.murano.system.MistralClient class ([1]) which may be used to upload and

[openstack-dev] [murano]How to use Murano to transmit files to Mistral and execute scripts on Mistral

Dear Murano developers and testers, I want to put some files that Mistral workflow needs into Murano package, and hope Murano can transmit them to Mistral before it calls Mistral workflow. The flow should be as following: 1. User uploads one Murano package which includes both

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [glare] Visibility consistency for packages and images

Thanks for summing this up. We’ve already merged the client patch so I believe we should merge the dashboard one as well, to keep things consistent among GUI and CLI. Anyway your concerns are as relevant for dashboard as they are for client. Keeping dependency graph visibility consistent (i.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] python versions

Hi folks! Can anyone share status of porting muranoclient to Python 3? On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Serg Melikyan wrote: > Stan, +100500 > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Stan Lagun wrote: > > > > I'd rather go with Heat approach (job first)

[openstack-dev] [murano] Visibility consistency for packages and images

Hi all, Ekaterina Chernova suggested last week to discuss the matter of visibility consistency for murano packages and glance images, following my bug report on that subject [1]. The general idea is to make sure that if a murano package is public, it should be really available for all projects,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

On 11 October 2015 at 01:17, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-10-09 18:51:51 + (+), Tim Bell wrote: >> There is a need to distinguish between server side py26 support >> which is generally under the control of the service provider and >> py26 support on the client side.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

On 10/18/2015 04:52 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 11 October 2015 at 01:17, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2015-10-09 18:51:51 + (+), Tim Bell wrote: There is a need to distinguish between server side py26 support which is generally under the control of the service

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

On 19 October 2015 at 10:01, Monty Taylor wrote: > > Maybe a non-voting job that adds the deadsnakes PPA and installs 2.6 in the > job setup and then runs pbr tests with it. > > I say non-voting because we'd be introducing a direct-internet consuming > test, which increases

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

On 2015-10-09 18:51:51 + (+), Tim Bell wrote: > There is a need to distinguish between server side py26 support > which is generally under the control of the service provider and > py26 support on the client side. For a service provider to push > all of their hypervisors and service

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

Hi Vahid, unfortunately we don't plan to remove support for py26 from the python-muranoclient, most of the python-client support py26 in order to work out of the box on different OS including CentOS 6.5 and so on. >So the options are: >1. support py26 in tosca-parser Support for py26 is pretty

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

Serg, Jeremy, Thank you for your response, so the issue I ran into with my patch is the gate job failing on python26. You can see it here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232271/ Serg suggested that we add 2.6 support to tosca-parser, which is fine with us. But I got a bit confused after

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > Serg, Jeremy, > > Thank you for your response, so the issue I ran into with my patch is the > gate job failing on python26. > You can see it here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232271/ > > Serg suggested that we add 2.6 support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

On 2015-10-09 12:22:12 +0300 (+0300), Serg Melikyan wrote: > unfortunately we don't plan to remove support for py26 from the > python-muranoclient, most of the python-client support py26 > in order to work out of the box on different OS including CentOS 6.5 > and so on. [...] Bear in mind that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

> From: Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Date: 10/09/2015 02:00 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

client migration to py27 while requiring the server to move. Tim From: Sahdev P Zala [mailto:spz...@us.ibm.com] Sent: 09 October 2015 20:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 s

[openstack-dev] [Murano] py26 support in python-muranoclient

Hello, I am wondering if there is any near-term plan for removing the py26 support from the client project (python-muranoclient). For the tosca support blueprint python-muranoclient will become dependent on tosca-parser project and expect tosca-parser to support py26 (it currently does not

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] suggestion on commit message title format for the murano-apps repository

lets discuss in more details how it should be I have prepared a draft. please take a look https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229477/ 2015-09-25 13:16 GMT+03:00 Kirill Zaitsev : > Looks reasonable to me! Could you maybe document that on HACKING.rst in > the repo? We could

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Murano code flow for custom development and combining murano with horizon in devstack

Thanks Kirill. Would adding "[murano]” to the subject line suffice or pls let me know if there is a separate mailing list for murano? Let me try to clarify what I am asking over here. So we have all these panels - 'Compute', 'Network', etc on Horizon dashboard. If I add another panel like

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Murano code flow for custom development and combining murano with horizon in devstack

Hi 1) adding [murano] would definitely suffice 2) Seems that you want to combine some of the murano panels under your own dashboard, right? (I do not really see why would you want to do that, but still). I believe that it is possible. You can look at muranodashboard/dashboard.py file. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Outreachy: Interest in contributing to open-source

Hi Yolande, welcome to OpenStack and open source! We gladly introduce you with Murano project! Topic 'Implementation of tagging heat stacks, created by murano' is already taken, but we can offer you another one after talking to you about what you are interesting in. You can go to #murano

Re: [openstack-dev] Murano code flow for custom development and combining murano with horizon in devstack

Hi, murano-dashboard works the same way any other horizon dashboard does. I’m not quite sure, what you meant by «combined and showed under one tab», could you please elaborate? If you’re asking about debugging — you can install murano-dashboard locally and configure it to use remote cloud (i.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

On 09/24/2015 08:18 PM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: I agree that wrong order of arguments misleads while debugging errors, BUT how we can prevent regression? Spell it out and use keyword args? assertEqual(expected="foo", observed=...) is pretty hard to mess up -i

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi 2015-09-29 10:09 GMT+09:00 Ian Wienand : > On 09/24/2015 08:18 PM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: >> >> I agree that wrong order of arguments misleads while debugging errors, BUT >> how we can prevent regression? > > > Spell it out and use keyword args? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Outreachy: Interest in contributing to open-source

Hi Yolande, Welcome! Glad to hear you already have a project/mentor in mind. Ekaterina will help you with your first contribution and on picking a task for your internship application. Please let me know if I can help on how to setup your contributor accounts/development environment, or with the

[openstack-dev] [murano] Outreachy: Interest in contributing to open-source

Hello My name is Amate Yolande from Buea Cameroon. I am new to open source and I am interested in participating in the Outreachy. I would like to work on the "Murano - Implementation of tagging heat stacks, created by murano" project and would like to get some directives on how to familiarize

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [app-catalog] versions for murano assets in the catalog

(not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [app-catalog] versions for murano assets in the catalog On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Serg Melikyan <smelik...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > concern regarding assets versioning in Community App Catalog i

[openstack-dev] Murano code flow for custom development and combining murano with horizon in devstack

Hello, Could anyone let me know if the changes in murano dashboard and horizon's openstackdashboard, both be combined and showed under one tab. i.e. say under Murano tab on the side left panel all the changes done in horizon and murano both appear. If anyone could point me to a link explaining

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] suggestion on commit message title format for the murano-apps repository

Looks reasonable to me! Could you maybe document that on HACKING.rst in the repo? We could vote on the commit itself.  --  Kirill Zaitsev Murano team Software Engineer Mirantis, Inc On 25 Sep 2015 at 02:14:09, Alexey Khivin (akhi...@mirantis.com) wrote: Hello everyone Almost an every

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Kekane > > -Original Message- > From: Bulat Gaifullin [mailto:bgaiful...@mirantis.com] > Sent: 24 September 2015 13:29 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual >

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

+1 > On 24 Sep 2015, at 10:45, Tetiana Lashchova wrote: > > Hi folks! > > Some tests in murano code use incorrect order of arguments in assertEqual. > The correct order expected by the testtools is > > def assertEqual(self, expected, observed, message=''): >

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

(not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual +1 > On 24 Sep 2015, at 10:45, Tetiana Lashchova <tlashch...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > Hi folks! > > Some tests in murano code use incorrect order of arguments in assertEqual

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi! Good catch. Have no objections for fixing it right now. Regards, Kate. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Bulat Gaifullin wrote: > +1 > > > On 24 Sep 2015, at 10:45, Tetiana Lashchova > wrote: > > > > Hi folks! > > > > Some tests in

[openstack-dev] [murano] Fix order of arguments in assertEqual

Hi folks! Some tests in murano code use incorrect order of arguments in assertEqual. The correct order expected by the testtools is def assertEqual(self, expected, observed, message=''): """Assert that 'expected' is equal to 'observed'. :param expected: The

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [app-catalog] versions for murano assets in the catalog

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Serg Melikyan wrote: > Hi Chris, > > concern regarding assets versioning in Community App Catalog indeed > affects Murano because we are constantly improving our language and > adding new features, e.g. we added ability to select existing

[openstack-dev] [murano] suggestion on commit message title format for the murano-apps repository

Hello everyone Almost an every commit-message in the murano-apps repository contains a name of the application which it is related to I suggest to specify application within commit message title using strict and uniform format For example, something like this: [ApacheHTTPServer] Utilize

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [app-catalog] versions for murano assets in the catalog

Hi Chris, concern regarding assets versioning in Community App Catalog indeed affects Murano because we are constantly improving our language and adding new features, e.g. we added ability to select existing Neutron network for particular application in Liberty and if user wants to use this

[openstack-dev] [murano] [app-catalog] versions for murano assets in the catalog

One big thing missing from the App Catalog right now is the ability to version assets. This is especially obvious with the Murano assets which have some version/release dependencies. Ideally an app-catalog user would be able to pick an older version (ie "works with kilo rather than liberty"),

[openstack-dev] [murano] PTL Candidacy

I'd like to continue handling PTL responsibilities for Murano [1] in the Mitaka cycle. I would like to apologize for not being able to focus on my responsibilities in Liberty for full-time. In Mitaka being PTL going to be my full-time job and I feel that it will allow me to finally archive my

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

I believe, that pagination is not broken there, since it works the same way pagination works on glance images page in horizon (the place the filter comes from) Nevertheless +1 from me on the idea of replacing the filter with text-based filter, that would search by name. AFAIK it should be able

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano][merlin] murano APIv2 and murano future ui

Hi Nikolay! Thanks for starting this activity! This is a really hot topic. We also used to have plan to migrate our API to pecan. [1] This also can be discussed. Do we have a blueprint for that? Could you please file it and attach etherpad to a new blueprint. [1] -

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano][merlin] murano APIv2 and murano future ui

Please note that some projects already using pecan+WSME are actually thinking about finding something else, since WSME doesn't have much activity and has its fair share of issues. If you missed it, check out this conversation thread:

[openstack-dev] [murano][merlin] murano APIv2 and murano future ui

Hi all, Yesterday on IRC weekly meeting murano team decided to start collecting ideas about murano APIv2 and murano future ui. We have to etherpads for this purpose: 1) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/murano-APIv2 - for murano API v2 ideas 2)

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 On 09/08/2015 02:28 PM, Stan Lagun wrote: +1 Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Alexander Tivelkov > wrote: +1. Well deserved. -- Regards, Alexander

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano][merlin] murano APIv2 and murano future ui

Kate, This bp is pretty old, but I think it suits our needs [1]. Yeah, I'll attach etherpads to it. The idea about pecan/wsme is really useful. [1]: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/api-vnext Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano][merlin] murano APIv2 and murano future ui

thanks, Stéphane. It's a good notice. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-09-09 15:10 GMT+03:00 Stéphane Bisinger : > Please note that some projects already using pecan+WSME are actually > thinking about finding

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Alexander Tivelkov wrote: > +1. Well deserved. > > -- > Regards, > Alexander Tivelkov > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Victor Ryzhenkin

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

Nikolai, my congratulations! On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Stan Lagun wrote: > +1 > > Sincerely yours, > Stan Lagun > Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Alexander Tivelkov > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

Serg and murano team, thanks. I'll try to do my best for the project. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-09-08 17:55 GMT+03:00 Serg Melikyan : > Nikolai, my congratulations! > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Stan

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

Agreed. Currently, pagination is broken on "Package definitions" page now, so removing that filter will fix it back. Also, 'Other' tab looks unhelpful, admin should indicate to witch tenant this package belongs to. This improvement will be added later. Regards, Kate. On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:06

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

​+1 on this. Filtering by ownership makes sense only on Catalog view (i.e. on the page of usable apps) ​but not on the admin-like console like the list of package definitions. -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Dmitro Dovbii wrote: > Hi

[openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] Remove the owner filter from "Package Definitions" page

Hi folks! I want suggest you to delete owner filter (3 tabs) from Package Definition page. Previously this filter was available for all users and we agreed that it is useless. Now it is available only for admin but I think this fact still doesn't improve the UX. Moreover, this filter prevents the

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Let's minimaze the list of pylint exceptions

If somebody wants to join here is a code for vim plugin which may help you: http://paste.openstack.org/show/444042/ Copy it and save in your vim plugin directory. After that press or and see pylint errors in single file or all pylint errors in current code. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

On 2015-09-01 15:45:22 -0700 (-0700), Vahid S Hashemian wrote: [...] > What is your advice on debugging a PyPi package? I'm modifying the code > for python-muranoclient and would like to be able to debug using eclipse > (in which I'm coding) or any other convenient means. There are possibly

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 2015-09-01 2:24 GMT+03:00 Serg Melikyan : > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Zaitsev > wrote: > >> I’m pleased to nominate Nikolai for Murano core. >> >> He’s been actively participating in development of murano during liberty >>

[openstack-dev] [murano] Let's minimaze the list of pylint exceptions

Hi folks! We have a long list of pylint exceptions in code of Murano (please see example ). I would like to propose you to take a part in refactoring of code and minimization of this list. I've created blueprint

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Let's minimaze the list of pylint exceptions

+1, good initiative Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-09-01 10:30 GMT+03:00 Dmitro Dovbii : > Hi folks! > > We have a long list of pylint exceptions in code of Murano (please see > example >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

Hi Jeremy, Thanks for sharing these tips. What is your advice on debugging a PyPi package? I'm modifying the code for python-muranoclient and would like to be able to debug using eclipse (in which I'm coding) or any other convenient means. Regards, --Vahid

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Dmitro Dovbii wrote: > +1 > > 2015-09-01 2:24 GMT+03:00 Serg Melikyan : > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Zaitsev >> wrote: >> >>> I’m pleased to nominate Nikolai for

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 From: Dmitro Dovbii [mailto:ddov...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 10:03 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core +1 2015-09-01 2:24 GMT+03:00 Serg Melikyan <sme

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 from me ;) --  Victor Ryzhenkin Junior QA Engeneer freerunner on #freenode Включено 1 сентября 2015 г. в 12:18:19, Ekaterina Chernova (efedor...@mirantis.com) написал: +1 On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Dmitro Dovbii wrote: +1 2015-09-01 2:24 GMT+03:00 Serg

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1. Well deserved. -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Victor Ryzhenkin wrote: > +1 from me ;) > > -- > Victor Ryzhenkin > Junior QA Engeneer > freerunner on #freenode > > Включено 1 сентября 2015 г. в 12:18:19, Ekaterina Chernova ( >

[openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

I’m pleased to nominate Nikolai for Murano core. He’s been actively participating in development of murano during liberty and is among top5 contributors during last 90 days. He’s also leading the CloudFoundry integration initiative. Here are some useful links: Overall contribution: 

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposing Nikolai Starodubtsev for core

+1 On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Kirill Zaitsev wrote: > I’m pleased to nominate Nikolai for Murano core. > > He’s been actively participating in development of murano during liberty > and is among top5 contributors during last 90 days. He’s also leading the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Cloud Foundry service broker question

Ok, I belive we can take it in mind as possible resolution. The problem is that it will take it us too long, so we can discuss it while we will plan Mitaka development. However it's not a decision of the problem with service broker API for now. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] public package visibility in Package Definitions UX concern

My vote is for #1. If I remember the problem right it's the best solution. Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-08-20 13:16 GMT+03:00 Kirill Zaitsev kzait...@mirantis.com: On our latest irc meeting I raised a concern about public package

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

Engineer, IBM Cloud Labs From: Victor Ryzhenkin vryzhen...@mirantis.com To: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/26/2015 06:15 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Cloud Foundry service broker question

I would say to extend murano with additional capabilities. Dependency management for composite applications is very important for modern development so, I think, adding additional use-cases could be very benifitial for Murano. On Aug 27, 2015 2:53 PM, Nikolay Starodubtsev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

On 2015-08-27 12:14:29 -0700 (-0700), Vahid S Hashemian wrote: [...] I have a development folder for murano under /home/stack/workspace/murano. If the changes I make involve multiple files I would have to remember each time what files were changes to make sure I copy them over under

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

On 2015-08-27 13:55:16 -0700 (-0700), Vahid S Hashemian wrote: Thank you for your response. What you suggested makes sense. Could you please also confirm - Whether you push your work in progress to review.openstack.org and go to the site and manually mark it as work in progress (so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

Hi Jeremy, Thank you for your response. What you suggested makes sense. Could you please also confirm - Whether you push your work in progress to review.openstack.org and go to the site and manually mark it as work in progress (so reviewers don't assume it's ready for review)? - When you pull

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Cloud Foundry service broker question

Dmitry, Does I understand properly and your recommendation is to change some murano logic? Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-08-24 23:31 GMT+03:00 Dmitry mey...@gmail.com: I think that you can model application dependencies in a way it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

(not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date:        08/25/2015 05:47 PM Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing Hi, Vahid! - Modified /home/stack/workspace/murano/devstack/plugin.sh based on Gosha's suggestion

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

Engineer, IBM Cloud Labs From: Victor Ryzhenkin vryzhen...@mirantis.com To: Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/26/2015 05:28 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

:        OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date:        08/26/2015 05:28 PM Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing Wow! And changed the plugin.sh file back to original. However

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

Engineer, IBM Cloud Labs From:        Vahid S Hashemian/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To:        OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date:        07/10/2015 04:02 PM Subject:        Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing

Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Documentation on how to Start Contributing Thanks Nikolay and Gosha. As Gosha mentioned I'd like to be able to integrate my local changes to Murano into my devstack installation. I figured for UI changes I can probably make the changes directly

[openstack-dev] [murano] Cloud Foundry service broker question

Hi all, Today I and Stan Lagun discussed a question How we can provision complex murano app through Cloud Foundry? Here you can see logs from #murano related to this discussion: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23murano/%23murano.2015-08-24.log.html#t2015-08-24T09:53:01 So, the only way we

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Cloud Foundry service broker question

I think that you can model application dependencies in a way it will allow multi-step provisioning and further maintenance of each component. The example of such modeling could be seen in OASIS TOSCA. On Aug 24, 2015 6:19 PM, Nikolay Starodubtsev nstarodubt...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi all, Today

[openstack-dev] [murano] [dashboard] public package visibility in Package Definitions UX concern

On our latest irc meeting I raised a concern about public package visibility. Here’s the commit that caused my concerns https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213682/ We currently have «catalog» and «package definitions» pages in our dashboard. The former contains packages that the user can add in

[openstack-dev] [murano] new engine is almost here!

This week yaql 1.0.0rc2 has been released  https://pypi.python.org/pypi/yaql/1.0.0.0rc2 This rc2 would most likely become 1.0 release. This also means, that murano is upgrading it’s engine to accommodate changes and improvements to new yaql. If you’re working with upstream/master murano or

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] new engine is almost here!

Hi folks! I would like to share localrc [0] for murano deployment with devstack. Hope this helps you to quickly deploy devstack with murano and perform testing. Before you push the deploy button of devstack, please make sure, that your yaql is on 1.0.0rc2 version. To prevent reinstallation of

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >