On 13/11/14 13:59, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm not sure we have the same understanding of AMQP, so hopefully we can
clarify here. This stackoverflow answer echoes my understanding:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17841843/rabbitmq-does-one-consumer-block-the-other-consumers-of-the-same-queue
Not
Sounds like this is tooz[1] ;)
The api for tooz (soon to be an oslo library @
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122439/) is around coordination and
'service-group' like behavior so I hope we don't have duplicates of this in
'oslo.healthcheck' instead of just using/contributing to tooz instead.
Sounds like this is tooz[1] ;)
The api for tooz (soon to be an oslo library @
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122439/) is around coordination and
'service-group' like behavior so I hope we don't have duplicates of this in
'oslo.healthcheck' instead of just using/contributing to tooz instead.
Sounds like this is tooz[1] ;)
The api for tooz (soon to be an oslo library @
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122439/) is around coordination and
'service-group' like behavior so I hope we don't have duplicates of this in
'oslo.healthcheck' instead of just using/contributing to tooz instead.
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
Sounds like this is tooz[1] ;)
The api for tooz (soon to be an oslo library @
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122439/) is around coordination and
'service-group' like behavior so I hope we don't have duplicates
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow in heat (or at least
concept [1]) 'to many code change'.
Both seem like change of similar levels ;-)
What was your metric for determining the code change either would have (out of
curiosity)?
Perhaps u should look at [2],
.
-Vishnu
From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@outlook.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran
visnusaran.muru...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions
over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack lifecycle will be
controlled by worker/observer notifications. This
-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran
visnusaran.muru...@hp.commailto:visnusaran.muru...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions over
RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire
On 13/11/14 06:52, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran
visnusaran.muru...@hp.com mailto:visnusaran.muru...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all,
__ __
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource
actions over RPC for any
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions
over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack lifecycle will be
controlled by worker/observer notifications. This distributed model has
its own advantages and
, November 13, 2014 7:05 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
On 13/11/14 06:52, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran
visnusaran.muru...@hp.com mailto:visnusaran.muru...@hp.com wrote
...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 7:05 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
On 13/11/14 06:52, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran
visnusaran.muru...@hp.com
On 13/11/14 09:31, Jastrzebski, Michal wrote:
Guys, I don't think we want to get into this cluster management mud. You say
let's
make observer...and what if observer dies? Do we do observer to observer? And
then
there is split brain. I'm observer, I've lost connection to worker. Should I
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 05:54:03 -0800:
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions
over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack lifecycle will be
controlled by
: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:49 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
On 13/11/14 09:31, Jastrzebski, Michal wrote:
Guys, I don't think we want to get into this cluster management mud.
You say let's make observer
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 00:45:07 -0800:
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow in heat (or at least
concept [1]) 'to many code change'.
Both seem like change of similar levels ;-)
I've tried a few times to dive into refactoring
On 11/13/2014 09:58 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 05:54:03 -0800:
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
[snip]
3.Migrate heat to use TaskFlow. (Too many code change)
If it's just handling timed triggers (maybe this is closer to #2) and
On 13/11/14 09:58, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 05:54:03 -0800:
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending resource actions
over RPC for any heat-engine to execute. Entire stack
large stack update is still progress. We are looking into
addressing this scenario.
Thanks,
Divakar
-Original Message-
From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:26 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 09:55:43 -0800:
On 13/11/14 09:58, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 05:54:03 -0800:
On 13/11/14 03:29, Murugan, Visnusaran wrote:
Hi all,
Convergence-POC distributes stack operations by sending
On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 00:45:07 -0800:
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow in heat (or at least
concept [1]) 'to many code change'.
Both seem like change of
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 14:01:14 -0800:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 00:45:07 -0800:
A question;
How is using something like celery in heat vs taskflow in heat (or at
On Nov 13, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 14:01:14 -0800:
On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2014-11-13 00:45:07 -0800:
A question;
How is
-Original Message-
From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:00 PM
To: openstack-dev
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-11-13 09:55:43 -0800:
On 13/11/14 09:58
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@outlook.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Using Job Queues for timeout ops
On Nov 13, 2014, at 10:59 AM
26 matches
Mail list logo
