Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon PTL candidacy

On 11/10/2013 11:45 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Matthias Runge > wrote: > > > Those are my primary targets I'd like to see addressed in Horizon during > the cycle. Another thing I'd like to see addressed is the lack of > lis

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon PTL candidacy

On 11/10/2013 11:53 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > A random off-the-top-of-my-head use case would be to subscribe to > events from creating or changing objects in a particular Swift > account or container. This would allow much more efficient listings > in Horizon for active containers (and may also b

Re: [openstack-dev] Request for review

On 11/09/2013 11:45 AM, Michael Bright wrote: > > Could someone review this please, it's a small patch but has taken a > while ... > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51263/ > It would be very helpful, if you'd mention the project (in this case nova), in the subject line. Matthias __

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Enabling libvirt feature: pass-through of QEMU command line args

Hi all, I'm new to this mailing list :) I am currently working on the Snabbswitch project < https://github.com/SnabbCo/snabbswitch/wiki >. We are developing an OpenStack Neutron plugin (targeting Icehouse release). Snabbswitch makes use of an experimental patch to QEMU (not merged to mainline

[openstack-dev] Request for review ( PCI passthrough API)

Hi,All PCI pass-through support has been added to nova. Now we are doing the apis to support PCI pass-through. Pls review the code :https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:pci-api-support,n,z Thank you very much. Best regards, Tian, Shuangtai __

Re: [openstack-dev] Request for review ( PCI passthrough API)

Hi Tian, A couple of things that came out of the V3 API discussions which are relevant to your patches: - In Icehouse we want to merge the V3 API version of patches either before the V2 one or in the same patch. With yours split its probably easiest to do that by setting the V2 patches dependen

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack] [TROVE] - Difference between Backup and Snapshot

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Daniel Morris Date: 2013/11/7 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [TROVE] - Difference between Backup and Snapshot To: Giuseppe Galeota Giuseppe, I recommend sending these questions on to the openstack-dev list. This may be why you are not seeing res

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Enabling libvirt feature: pass-through of QEMU command line args

On 11/11/2013 03:13 AM, Rahul M R wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to this mailing list :) > > I am currently working on the Snabbswitch project < > https://github.com/SnabbCo/snabbswitch/wiki >. We are developing an OpenStack > Neutron plugin (targeting Icehouse release). Snabbswitch makes use of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum]: Welcome to the community site for Solum !!

On 11/04/2013 08:25 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote: > The community site for Solum has gone live! www.Solum.io > - this is a landing page for all things Solum > related. > > Also check out the blog section on the site. > > The logo: is a placeholder for now. We are working on a

Re: [openstack-dev] Request for review

On 11/11/13 09:07 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: On 11/09/2013 11:45 AM, Michael Bright wrote: Could someone review this please, it's a small patch but has taken a while ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51263/ It would be very helpful, if you'd mention the project (in this case nova), i

[openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Trove] Backups Amazon like

Dear all, the Relational Database service for Amazon talk about: - Automated Backups – Turned on by default, the automated backup feature of Amazon RDS enables point-in-time recovery for your DB Instance. Amazon RDS will backup your database and transaction logs and store both for a us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Enabling libvirt feature: pass-through of QEMU command line args

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:43:59PM +0530, Rahul M R wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to this mailing list :) > > I am currently working on the Snabbswitch project < > https://github.com/SnabbCo/snabbswitch/wiki >. We are developing an OpenStack > Neutron plugin (targeting Icehouse release). Snabbsw

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] User registrations

the most important is the user can get back password, modify own email address. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Lyle, David wrote: > I think there is certainly interest. I do think it will need to be highly > configurable to be useful. The problem, as Dolph points out, is that each > deplo

Re: [openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework

On 02/11/13 21:31 -0700, Tim Hinrichs wrote: Hi OpenStackers, We've been working on an open policy framework for OpenStack that we're calling Congress. We've been talking with OpenStack users and several of our partners to understand the kinds of rules and regulations they envision enforcing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

Hi >Generally mock is supposed to be used over mox now for python 3 support. That is my understanding too >As for when to use mock vs stubs, I think you'll get different opinions from >different people. Stubs are quick and easy and that's what I used early when I >started contributing to the pr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Enabling libvirt feature: pass-through of QEMU command line args

Hi again, Thanks for the quick feedback! FYI we already have a developer working on the QEMU integration and we intend to add support for the feature in libvirt XML (the "right" way :). In the meantime we wanted to avoid having to maintain a separate patch (for Nova) for clients to install and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Trove] Backups Amazon like

For Havana release Trove doesn't support automated backups, it has only backup-on-demand. About restoring, Trove supports restoring only on instance creation. 2013/11/11 Giuseppe Galeota > Dear all, > the Relational Database service for Amazon talk about: > >- Automated Backups – Turned on

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

Hey all, During the summit session on the the VMWare driver roadmap, a topic of validating the passed configuration prior to starting services came up (see [1] for more detail on how it's connected to that specific topic). Several ideas were thrown around during the session mostly documented in [

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Recent change breaks manual control of service enabled / disabled status - suggest it is backed out and re-worked

Hi Folks, I'd like to get some eyes on a bug I just filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1250049 A recent change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52189/9 ) introduced the automatic disable / re-enable of nova-compute when connection to libvirt is lost and recovered. The problem is t

[openstack-dev] Grenade gate test issues

One of my patches for Glance (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46479/) consistently fails to pass the grenade test in the gate. The n-cpu logs show many lines like: 2013-11-06 10:26:41.101 26085 WARNING nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-] URI qemu:///system does not support events: adding cb to list Se

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

I like the idea of a more general config validation phase to help people when first starting out. My worry is that it would slow down the starting back up of servers for people deploying their code using CI, where the have already verified their configuration. But maybe its so fast I don't care, b

[openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

Hi all, While studying Hadoop performance in a virtual environment, I found an interesting problem with Nova scheduling. In OpenStack cluster, we have overcommit policy, allowing to put on one compute more vms than resources available for them. While it might be suitable for general types of work

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

On 11 November 2013 10:27, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi > >>Generally mock is supposed to be used over mox now for python 3 support. > > That is my understanding too +1 But I don't think we should waste all our time re-writing all our mox and stub tests. Lets just leave this to h

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to fix the race condition issue between deleting and soft reboot?

It seems we still agreed that terminate should be able to happen at any time. I thought I remembered some code in the manager that treats InstanceNotFound errors differently. I would rather we ensure InstanceNotFound is raised to indicate we have hit this race condition, and let the compute manag

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

On 11/11/13 12:55, John Garbutt wrote: > I like the idea of a more general config validation phase to help > people when first starting out. > > My worry is that it would slow down the starting back up of servers > for people deploying their code using CI, where the have already > verified their c

Re: [openstack-dev] Grenade gate test issues

That patch changes a value in a config file, and that value change is apparently needed for the new code to work. (I'm guessing, it's not obvious to me that this is the case, but I'm still jet lagged). Upgrade (currently) means you can the grizzly config file generated by devstack on a master envi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

Hi, I think that John has a very valid point. My understanding from the session was that this should be a stand alone tool that will also work across services, that is, if neutron is configured then it will check that the neutron credentials are correct. Thanks Gary On 11/11/13 1:55 PM, "John Garb

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Vendor specific erros

Hi Some of the DB entities in the LBaaS domain inherit from HasStatusDescription With this we can set the entity status (ACTIVE, PENDING_CREATE,etc) and a description for the status. There are flows in the Radware LBaaS

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: reverse the default Gerrit sort order

Hey On 11 November 2013 12:36, Monty Taylor wrote: > In the meantime, I've been making complex search queries in the search > box and then just saving the resulting URL as 'saved search' link. > I got bored enough with maintaining them in the tiny search box, that I quickly whipped up: https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [summit] Youtube stream from Design Summit?

Hi On 5 November 2013 16:28, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > IMO video doesn't really matter as the most critical thing to see is the > etherpad > I think it would be interesting to experiment with having a Hangout up on the projected display. My experience of remote participation at the Ubuntu Deve

[openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to encourage this behavior from them and others, it would be nice that if could gain some visibility as "sponsors" of the patches in

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon PTL candidacy

The two candidates who nominated themselves in time for this election are: * David Lyle * Matthias Runge The election will be set up tomorrow, and will stay open for voting for a week. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Troubleshooting OVS RPC API unit test error

Hi, I'm experiencing an issue where I run the unit tests on my local machine and the unit tests pass, while on the Jenkins system they fail with a very strange error. 2013-11-11 13:16:04.132 | 2013-11-11 13:16:04.132 | Traceback (most recent call last): 2013-11-11 13:16:04.132 | File "/home/

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Team Meeting reminder - October 28

Hi folks This is just a reminder about the regular meeting of Murano-team in IRC. The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-alt channel at 8am Pacific. We'll discuss news from summit, the status of our current deliveries, and the issues which we recently faced with it. The complete agenda o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Team Meeting reminder - October 28

Sorry for the wrong date in the title - our next meeting is today, Nov 11 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Tivelkov wrote: > Hi folks > > This is just a reminder about the regular meeting of Murano-team in IRC. > The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-alt channel at 8am Pacif

Re: [openstack-dev] Request for review

OK, point taken. When I finally get this (nova) fix out the door I'll look to concentrate on reviewing/helping others as this is purely volunteer work. Cheers, Mike. On 11 November 2013 11:16, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 11/11/13 09:07 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: > >> On 11/09/2013 11:45 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Brian Haley wrote: > On 11/08/2013 11:21 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote: >> How about scheduling an IRC meeting in close proximity to the other >> Neutron meetings on Mondays? >> >> * 20:00 to 21:00 UTC, before the Neutron meeting > > +0 > >> OR >> >> * 23:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

+1 for me as well. So have we finalized on the meeting time? Thanks, - Stephen On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Brian Haley wrote: > >> On 11/08/2013 11:21 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote: >>> How about scheduling an IRC mee

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] User registrations

David's questions are good ones. I do like the idea of self-registration, but the admin will almost certainly want some controls over their initial placement in the system (domain, project, roles, etc). I think part of this blueprint should include the specification / editing of these defaults

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

OK - how about Thursdays, 21:00 UTC? -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [rally] Rally nova instances are not shown via console

On 2013-11-11 05:35, Anastasia Sklyankina wrote: > Hello, team! > > I noticed that instances created by rally are displayed only on Horizon (in > active state), but not in CLI. > After test execution (for example, NovaServers.boot_server) there are 7 > active instances on a dashboard but i

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Releases of this week

Hey all, I've closed all the bugs we've released fixes for. I've also created a wiki page [1] describing the process of making new releases. Feel free to update and use it. Roman [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/ReleaseManagement On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Roman Podoliaka wro

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

Hi Nick, On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > Dear TC members, > > Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the > patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to > encourage this behavior from them and others, it woul

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Team Meeting minutes - 11/11

Hi, Thanks everyone who has joined Murano IRC meeting. These are the meeting minutes and the action items: *http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2013/murano.2013-11-11-15.01.html * Complete logs can be foun

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On 2013-11-11 09:57, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hi Nick, On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to encourage thi

[openstack-dev] guest instance and L2 based network failover

I found other posts which deal with the HA topic in general, but I did not find one that strictly discussed the specifics or guidance on guest instance network failover mechanisms. I'm currently developing against neutron Grizzly using the OVS plugin with VLANs and GRE tunnelling. Flooding is wo

[openstack-dev] [oslo][heat] oslo.db session and model_query()

Hi all, I've been digging into our DB API code, aiming to align it more closely with the recommendations in the oslo.db docs. https://github.com/openstack/oslo-incubator/blob/master/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/session.py#L35 However, I'm confused by the references to model_query in the docs,

[openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate needs a new release

Hey all, As you may know, in our global requirements list [1] we are currently depending on SQLAlchemy 0.7.x versions (which is 'old stable' branch and will be deprecated soon). This is mostly due to the fact, that the latest release of sqlalchemy-migrate from PyPi doesn't support SQLAlchemy 0.8.x

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: >> Dear TC members, >> >> Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the >> patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

@Ben, Metrics tools i believe are already using information in the .mailmap file (see nova's for example). -- dims On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 2013-11-11 09:57, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> >> Hi Nick, >> >> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: >>> >

[openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

Hi all, I have just posted the following wiki page to reflect a refined proposal for HOT software configuration based on discussions at the design summit last week. Angus also put a sample up in an etherpad last week, but we did not have enough time to go thru it in the design session. My write-u

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we have some guidelines for mock, stub, mox when writing unit test?

Got it. Thanks. Jay 2013/11/11 Davanum Srinivas > Feedback from some of the Nova sessions were, > > "If you are writing new tests, try to use mock." > "Writing new tests to cover more code (esp drivers) is more preferable > to any effort that just converts from mox to mock" > > -- dims > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On 11/11/2013 11:41 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >> Hi Nick, >> >> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: >>> Dear TC members, >>> >>> Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the >>> patches they missi

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Community meeting minutes - 11/11/2013

Hi, Thanks for coming to the IRC community meeting today at #openstack-meeting. Please also join us next time to be aware of and participate in all the exciting activities. Here’s the full log and minutes of the today’s meeting: Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2013/mistra

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > Dear TC members, > > Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have > the patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order > to encourage this behavior from them and others, it would be nice t

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > >> Dear TC members, > >> > >> Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the > >> p

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On 2013-11-11 10:49, Davanum Srinivas wrote: @Ben, Metrics tools i believe are already using information in the .mailmap file (see nova's for example). Having just been through this process, I'm afraid not. :-) Stackalytics uses https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/def

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On 11/11/2013 12:08 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 11:41 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: >> On 11/11/2013 10:57 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: >>> Hi Nick, >>> >>> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:20 +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encour

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

Mark, Well stated. I think it is important that OpenStack continue to be focussed on individuals contributing to the community and not corporations. There are plenty of metrics already being compiled using e-mail addresses. In fact, I think the visibility of 'sponsors' is already available a

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On 11/11/2013 12:09 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > What about something with attribution in the docs for the feature? Can > we play around with that a while? Attribution is going to have to be > incorporated better into the docs for the CC By licensing anyway. Any > thoughts on docs as placement for "Thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Is this a potential issue

Resend after the HK summit, hope someone can give me hint on it. Thanks --jyh > -Original Message- > From: Jiang, Yunhong [mailto:yunhong.ji...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 5:39 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] Is this a p

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:27:35PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 12:09 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > What about something with attribution in the docs for the feature? Can > > we play around with that a while? Attribution is going to have to be > > incorporated better into the docs for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

I had envisioned this as a standalone tool which would be run after an initial deployment to validate the config. I like the idea of hooking it into an existing framework - but i agree that we certainly don’t want to slow things down. I wonder if we could use some sort of cookie to track when

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 11/11/2013 12:09 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > What about something with attribution in the docs for the feature? Can > > we play around with that a while? Attribution is going to have to be > > incorporated better into the docs for the CC

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: > Dear TC members, > > Our companies are actively encouraging our respective customers to have the > patches they mission us to make be contributed back upstream. In order to > encourage this behavior from them and others, it would b

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Configuration validation

On 11/11/2013 07:38 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote: > On 11/11/13 12:55, John Garbutt wrote: >> I like the idea of a more general config validation phase to help >> people when first starting out. >> >> My worry is that it would slow down the starting back up of servers >> for people deploying their code

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova XML serialization bug 1223358 moving discussion here to get more people involved

Hi all I realised that I sent this request just the Friday before the HK summit, a really bad timing :( Resending, anyone is available to have a look at this thread? Please note that the code change has a -1 and I am not submitting a new patch as we (the reviewer and myself) are stuck in findin

[openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

I have seen a wide variety of -1'ing (and in many cases approving) patches for minor spelling or grammatical errors and think we need a policy about this. Given the large number of contributors for whom English is not their native language, I would be in favor of rejecting spelling errors in va

Re: [openstack-dev] iso8601 filling up nova logs

I didn't see a change yet for this, so I went ahead and submitted one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55882/ -Ben On 2013-11-07 02:00, Davanum Srinivas wrote: +1 - looks like this is where you need to add it [1], if so, the change needs to be in oslo-incubator repo first [2], so please submi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum]: Welcome to the community site for Solum !!

> -Original Message- > From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 3:35 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum]: Welcome to the community site for > Solum !! > > On 11/04/2013 08:25 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

+1. We have great interest to run OpenStack over IPv6 and would love to be a part of the discussion. Please let me know the date and the time. Thanks! Shixiong ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum]: Welcome to the community site for Solum !!

On 11/11/2013 01:05 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote: >> One nit, instead of linking to github, it would be better to link to >> OpenStack's >> git interface since that's what we're trying to provide as the canonical repo >> now. >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/solum >> Russell Bryant > > Rus

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

Excerpts from David Kranz's message of 2013-11-11 09:58:59 -0800: > I have seen a wide variety of -1'ing (and in many cases approving) > patches for minor spelling or grammatical errors and think we need a > policy about this. Given the large number of contributors for whom > English is not thei

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

As long as the -1's include a correction that can be copied and pasted, I think they're OK. I know I would be grateful if someone were to proofread my work, if I had to document in a second-language. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list Op

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:16:43PM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote: > +1. > > We have great interest to run OpenStack over IPv6 and would love to be a > part of the discussion. Excellent - please see the thread I've made in OpenStack-Dev - we're tossing out times for the IRC meeting, that works for e

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Some initial code copying for db/migration

- Original Message - > > 1) Using objects as an abstraction for versioned data: > >This seems like a good direction overall, especially from the > >point-of-view > >of backwards compatibility of consumers of the object. However, after > >looking through some > >of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

I am in favor/favour of the -1 with suggestions on what to change. The more input we can provide on a review the better. Thanks Gary On 11/11/13 8:21 PM, "Collins, Sean (Contractor)" wrote: >As long as the -1's include a correction that can be copied >and pasted, I think they're OK. > >I know I

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

On 2013-11-11 12:19, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from David Kranz's message of 2013-11-11 09:58:59 -0800: I have seen a wide variety of -1'ing (and in many cases approving) patches for minor spelling or grammatical errors and think we need a policy about this. Given the large number of contribut

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

On 2013-11-11 12:21, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote: As long as the -1's include a correction that can be copied and pasted, I think they're OK. I know I would be grateful if someone were to proofread my work, if I had to document in a second-language. +1 to this as well. I figure that as a

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Group-based Policy Sub-team Meetings

Hi folks! Hope everyone had a safe trip back from Hong Kong. Friday afternoon in the Neutron sessions we discussed the "Group-based Policy Abstraction" BP [1]. It was decided we would try to have a weekly IRC meeting to drive out further requirements with the hope of coming up with a list of action

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum]: Welcome to the community site for Solum !!

Congrats! On Monday, November 11, 2013 11:51 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 11/11/2013 01:05 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote: >> One nit, instead of linking to github, it would be better to link to >> OpenStack's >> git interface since that's what we're trying to provide as the canonical repo >> now

Re: [openstack-dev] Shall backward compatibility env. vars be removed from python-clients?

On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 14:14 +0800, Sam Morrison wrote: > I think you need to do option 2 and print deprecation warnings, then the > question becomes for how long. > > I think there is a policy for this and that it is deprecate in N remove in N+1 > Clients are a bit different so maybe keep it for

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

-1 from me as well. When I first started with OpenStack, I probably would have agreed with letting small grammar mistakes and typos slide by. However, I now feel that getting commit messages right is more important. Also keep in mind that with small grammar mistakes, the intent may be obvious to

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

+2 to Clint's comments. As OpenStack gains a wider following in the corporate world and given that the code for OpenStack may be seen by anyone, I think it is very important to get spelling and grammar right. I also think it is important to ensure that the commit messages concisely communicate

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon PTL candidacy

Excerpts from Matthias Runge's message of 2013-11-11 00:04:52 -0800: > On 11/10/2013 11:53 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > A random off-the-top-of-my-head use case would be to subscribe to > > events from creating or changing objects in a particular Swift > > account or container. This would allow mu

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:49 AM, James Slagle wrote: > -1 from me as well. > > When I first started with OpenStack, I probably would have agreed with > letting small grammar mistakes and typos slide by. > > However, I now feel that getting commit messages right is more > important. Also keep in m

Re: [openstack-dev] Horizon PTL candidacy

We all agree on the benefits of an event-driven "push" system, but the basis for this already exists in OpenStack. The RPC notification code exists in Oslo and most of the IaaS projects are using it now. There were (should have been?) conversations about how to leverage this data stream in the H

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Introduction of AngularJS in membership workflow

Hello Horizon! On November 11th, we submitted a patch to introduce AngularJS into Horizon [1]. We believe AngularJS adds a lot of value to Horizon. First, AngularJS allows us to write HTML templates for interactive elements instead of doing jQuery-based DOM manipulation. This allows the JavaScri

Re: [openstack-dev] Bad review patterns

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > Not that I know of. I've considered writing my own gerrit front end > mail service to do just that, because I agree, the current mail volume > and granularity is not very good. If I manage to carve time on it, > I'll do it on stackforge. Joe Go

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

As a speaker of the Queen's English, I find flavor to be incorrect. Does that mean I can -1 any patch that does not use flavour ? At CERN, we are working with 130 countries in a single community. The value of the contribution of non-english speakers far exceeds the occasional misunderstandings

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Reminder no Neuron team meeting Nov 11th

All- I hope everyone had safe travels from the Icehouse summit. As previously discussed, we will not be meeting today (November 11th). We will resume our weekly meetings on November 18th at 2100 UTC. mark ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] Shall backward compatibility env. vars be removed from python-clients?

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell < kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com> wrote: > The thing here is, these environment variables have already been > deprecated for quite some time. The question is, have they been > deprecated long enough that we're clear to drop them entirely? > I say

Re: [openstack-dev] Bad review patterns

> On Nov 11, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > >> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> Not that I know of. I've considered writing my own gerrit front end >> mail service to do just that, because I agree, the current mail volume >> and granularity is not very good. If I

[openstack-dev] Script to operate on trove

Hi, I have to query the network and fetch details of all the hardware devices present in the datacenter and maintain the details in the back-end db. I plan to use trove as the back-end database. I have code written to get the details from the devices, but not sure how to perform operations in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from David Kranz's message of 2013-11-11 09:58:59 -0800: > > I have seen a wide variety of -1'ing (and in many cases approving) > > patches for minor spelling or grammatical errors and think we need a > > policy about this. Given the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Command Line Interface for Solum

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Clayton Coleman wrote: > The implication I heard from the session is the command infrastructure and > client code have or will have a well defined interface from the framework, > although I haven't looked through current state enough to say that's > totally true t

Re: [openstack-dev] Shall backward compatibility env. vars be removed from python-clients?

On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:35 -0600, Dean Troyer wrote: > Related but different are the now-long-undocumented option names with > underscores in them. I've noticed new undocumented ones get added > from time to time alongside the same option with dashes. ??? I discourage those when I catch them i

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

On 2013-11-11 13:28, Tim Bell wrote: As a speaker of the Queen's English, I find flavor to be incorrect. Does that mean I can -1 any patch that does not use flavour ? At CERN, we are working with 130 countries in a single community. The value of the contribution of non-english speakers far excee

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Command Line Interface for Solum

> On Nov 11, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Clayton Coleman >> wrote: >> The implication I heard from the session is the command infrastructure and >> client code have or will have a well defined interface from the framework, >> although I haven'

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

Agreed that any -1's should require a suggestion for a way to resolve the issue. I haven't seen people -1'ing without suggestions for improvement though. I think, generally, people help explain why a change is needed. Jay S. Bryant Linux Developer - OpenStack Enterprise Edition

  1   2   >