Hi,
Now the time are in sync , but the issue is still exist.
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:09 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Kamsali, RaghavendraChari [ENGINEERING/IN]; Ritesh Nanda;
+1
29 Мар 2015 г. 20:42 пользователь Sergey Vasilenko
svasile...@mirantis.com написал:
+1
/sv
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Anastasia Urlapova
aurlap...@mirantis.com wrote:
+ 10
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Igor Zinovik izino...@mirantis.com
wrote:
+1
On 26 March 2015 at
Someone from my team had installed the OS on baremetal with a wrong 'date'
When this node was added to the Openstack controller, the logs from the
neutron-agent on the compute node showed - AMQP connected. But the neutron
agent-list command would not list this agent at all.
I could figure out
Since tests can now be removed from Tempest
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/Tempest-test-removal and migrated to
their specific projects.
Does Tempest plan to discover/run these tests in tempest gates? If yes, how
is that going to be done? Will there be a discovery mechanism in Tempest
to
Hi,
Sorry for not replying on [1] comments too long.
I'm almost ready to return to the spec with updates.
The main lack of current zmq-driver implementation is that
it manually implements REQ/REP on top of PUSH/PULL.
It results in:
1. PUSH/PULL is one way directed socket (reply needs another
What does fog do? Is it just a client to the Neutron HTTP API? If so, it
should not have broken like that because the API has remained pretty
stable. If it's a deployment tool, then I could see that because the
configuration options to tend to suffer quite a bit of churn as tools used
by the
Hi,
I want to ask about FWaaS iptables rule implementation.
firewall rule are deployed as iptables rules in network node , and ACCEPT
target is set at second rule(*).
Chain neutron-l3-agent-iv431d7bfbc (1 references)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
Hi,
I have the following scenario. I have an application consisting of multiple VMs
on different compute hosts. The admin puts one of the hosts into maintenance
mode (nova-manage service disable ...) because there will be some maintenance
activity on that host in the near future. Is there a
Hello,
I would like to inform you, that few gating jobs were added to
https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/ Jenkins:
gate-fuel-web
gate-fuel-astute
gate-fuel-library-python
gate-fuel-ostf
gate-fuel-tasks-validator
gate-python-fuelclient
As suggested by Sebastian, those jobs run CI tests on
Hi,
I noticed the we can't use network name under OS::Neutron::Port (only
network_id) as a valid neutron property, and I was wondering why?
I expected it to be like image under OS::Nova::Server:
The property name should be network, and it should accept both id and name
Thanks
Stotland Limor
On 28 March 2015 at 00:41, Steve Wormley openst...@wormley.com wrote:
So, I figured I'd weigh in on this as an employee of a nova-network using
company.
Nova-network allowed us to do a couple things simply.
1. Attach openstack networks to our existing VLANs using our existing
Hi Sahara folks,
please, share your thoughts about about which changes should be included
into the last sahara client release in Kilo to add this version to global
requirements and use it in Heat, Horizon, etc.
Here is an etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-kilo-client
Thanks.
--
- Original Message -
On 03/27/2015 11:48 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/27/2015 05:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
snip
Part of it is corner (or simplified) use cases not being optimally
served by Neutron, and I think Neutron could more
Hello.
There are several bugs and patches on review related to the MySQL with
Galera and HAproxy cluster-check script configuration. Please don't
hesitate to discuss them in this mail thread and in the review.
* MySQL O_DIRECT mode [0] - merged. Do we need some additional
performance test cases
Michal,
All great questions. I have copied the OpenStack mailing list since these
technical questions can benefit everyone.
From: Stachowski, Michal
michal.stachow...@intel.commailto:michal.stachow...@intel.com
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 6:21 AM
To: Steven Dake
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com
wrote:
We plan to dockerize any service needed to deploy OpenStack. We haven’t
decided if that includes ceph, since ceph may already be dockerized by
someone else. But it does include the HA services we need as well as
Hi,
tl;dr: I used the [gantt] tag for this e-mail, but I would prefer if we
could do this for the last time until we spin-off the project.
As it is confusing for many people to understand the difference in
between the future Gantt project and the Nova scheduler effort we're
doing, I'm
On 03/30/2015 07:02 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
My personal opinion for API 2.0 - we should discuss design of all object
and endpoint, review how they are used from Horizon or
python-saharaclient and improve them as much as possible. For example,
it includes:
* get rid of tons of extra optional
if we can get the related driver implementation(s) for these meters ASAP, i'm
ok with supporitng this feature.
cheers,
gord
From: me...@juniper.net
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 00:56:27 +
Subject: [openstack-dev]
Rohan,
In Rally we are going to automate this work extending rally verify command.
You can read here in more details:
http://boris-42.me/rally-verfiy-as-the-control-plane-for-gabbi-tempest-in-tree-functional-tests/
As well, you are welcome to take a part in spec discussion here:
Tl;dr tripleo ci is back up and running, see below for more
On 21/03/15 01:41, Dan Prince wrote:
Short version:
The RH1 CI region has been down since yesterday afternoon.
We have a misbehaving switch and have file a support ticket with the
vendor to troubleshoot things further. We hope to
On 03/30/2015 09:25 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/27/2015 11:48 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/27/2015 05:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
snip
Part of it is corner (or simplified) use cases not being optimally
served by Neutron,
On 03/26/2015 06:31 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
I thought it would be a good idea to send out a status update for the
migration from nova-network to Neutron, as there hasn't been as much
progress as we'd hoped for in Kilo. There are a few issues which have
been slowing progress down.
Hi, Balázs
I have the same scenario with you. AFAIK, notifications in Nova does not
support some thing like service enable/disable action. These APIs do
nothing more than saving new value to database. But I believe supporting
these kind of notifications will not be very complicated.
To the
Hi,
in a few words - we're finding out some places that were designed not very
well (or our vision changed) and so we'd like to update the API to have a
much better interface to work with Sahara. The blueprint you've listed was
created in Atlanta summit timeframe and so it's not actual now.
My
On 25 March 2015 at 15:24, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote:
I would like to nominate Nolan Brubaker (palendae on IRC) for the
os-ansible-deployment-core team. Nolan has been involved with the project
for the last few months and has been an active reviewer with solid reviews.
Hi all!
The patch to open up Liberty specs in neutron-specs has now merged [1], so
we're now accepting specs for Neutron targeting the Liberty release. Please
note the process has changed slightly, as indicated in this patch [2]. If a
patch was submitted for Kilo and didn't make it, I've got a
+1 Sean!
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I've been attempting to clean up the bug tracker, one of the continued
inconsistencies that are in the Nova tracker is the use of 'Triaged'.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage
If the bug contains the
On 03/26/2015 08:58 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/26/2015 06:31 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
I thought it would be a good idea to send out a status update for the
migration from nova-network to Neutron, as there hasn't been as much
progress as we'd hoped for in Kilo. There are a few issues
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:21:18PM +0530, Rohan Kanade wrote:
Since tests can now be removed from Tempest
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/Tempest-test-removal and migrated to
their specific projects.
Does Tempest plan to discover/run these tests in tempest gates? If yes, how
is that
- Original Message -
On 03/30/2015 09:25 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/27/2015 11:48 AM, Assaf Muller wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/27/2015 05:22 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
snip
Part of it is corner (or simplified) use cases
From: Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@chmouel.commailto:chmo...@chmouel.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 6:52 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hey folks,
We got a lot of complaints for folks trying to run Kolla on Ubuntu 14.04 with
3.13 kernel. Most of the problems were related to kernel bugs or docker bugs.
We have worked around them, and now Kolla launches like a champ for me on 14.04.
Regards
-steve
Please join me in welcoming Nolan Brubaker (palendae) to the
os-ansible-deployment core team.
—
Kevin Carter
On Mar 30, 2015, at 06:54, Jesse Pretorius jesse.pretor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2015 at 15:24, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote:
I would like to nominate
Hi All ,
What is the use of the mode attribute ? what does the value of this
attribute signify and what are the possible values of this attribute?
For ex :Consider the order request to create the secret :
POST v1/orders
Header: content-type=application/json
X-Project-Id: {project_id}
{
Hi Neutron folks
(API folks may be interested on this)
We have another discussion on Core vs extension in the subnet pool
feature reivew
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157597/.
We did the similar discussion on VLAN transparency and MTU for a
network model last week.
I would like to share my
Hi,
I'm applying for an FFE for change
https://review.openstack.org/162542 ,
glusterfs_native: negotiate volumes with glusterd.
The change in question is in the grey zone between
a bugfix and a feature. So, having it discussed with
the Manila community and our PTL, Ben Swartzlander,
we decided
Thanks for joining today’s team meeting!
Meeting minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-03-30-16.23.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-03-30-16.23.html
Meeting log:
Any help would be appreciated ?
Thanks in advance !
Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Asha Seshagiri asha.seshag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All ,
What is the use of the mode attribute ? what does the value of this
attribute signify and what are the possible
Hi Asha,
Barbican Orders of type “key” are intended to generate keys suitable for
encryption. The metadata associated with the key order defines the encryption
scheme in which the key will be used. In the example you provided, the order
is requesting a key that is suitable for use in a block
On 03/30/2015 12:21 PM, Csaba Henk wrote:
Hi,
I'm applying for an FFE for change
https://review.openstack.org/162542 ,
glusterfs_native: negotiate volumes with glusterd.
The change in question is in the grey zone between
a bugfix and a feature. So, having it discussed with
the Manila
Hello everyone,
We
http://lp-reports.vm.mirantis.net/custom_report/6.1?status=Newstatus=Incompletestatus=Confirmedstatus=Triagedstatus=In%20Progressimportance=Mediumcurrently
have 500+ medium priority bugs assigned to 6.1 release. Obviously we
won't be able to make a big difference within the
Note: Modifying the subject line to add the tag Fuel as this message
has gone out to the OpenStack Dev mailing list.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Eugene Bogdanov
ebogda...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
We currently have 500+ medium priority bugs assigned to 6.1 release.
Obviously
On 03/30/2015 10:34 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 03/26/2015 08:58 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
To me it comes down to the reasons people don't want to move. I'd like
to dig into exactly why people don't want to use Neutron. If there are
legitimate reasons why nova-network will work better, then
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Jesse Pretorius jesse.pretor...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 March 2015 at 00:41, Steve Wormley openst...@wormley.com wrote:
2. Floating IPs managed at each compute node(multi-host) and via the
standard nova API calls.
2 meant we can't use pure provider VLAN
On 03/30/2015 12:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/30/2015 10:34 AM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 03/26/2015 08:58 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
To me it comes down to the reasons people don't want to move. I'd like
to dig into exactly why people don't want to use Neutron. If there are
legitimate
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the decision about the floating IP have to be based on the use of the
private IP in the original destination, or could you get by with rules on
the L3 agent to avoid NAT just based on the destination being in a
Folks,
If you have received your discount code to OpenStack summit Vancouver,
stop whatever you're doing and
register *now*
Admission prices go up to $900 tomorrow and you'll have to pay the
difference. *There will be absolutely no exceptions*.
If you're in doubt if you
Hi all,
Since the Paris summit the Telco Working Group has been meeting on an
alternating basis at 1400 UTC and 2200 UTC. As discussed in the last two
meetings due to low attendance in the 2200 UTC slot, particularly as DST has
now kicked in for many participants, we are going to trial a
I think it's safe to conclude that we have a strong consensus in
favor. Congratulations Irina!
All that's left is to merge https://review.openstack.org/168182 so
that we can actually assign core reviewers separately for fuel-docs.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Nikolay Markov
I tracked down the cause of the check-grenade-dsvm failure on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167370 . As I understand it, grenade is
taking the previous stable release, deploying it, then upgrading to the
current master (plus the proposed changeset) without changing any of the
config from the
Akihiro,
thanks for sharing this on the mailing list.
I have some answers inline, but from a community process perspective I have
a feeling that a majority of contributors feel like well established
guidelines have been violated. This has been exacerbated by the fact that
these changes are
hi henry,
thanks for this interesting idea. It would be interesting to think about
how external gateway could leverage the l2pop framework.
Currently l2pop sends its fdb messages once the status of the port is
modified. AFAIK, this status is only modified by agents which send
Thanks a lot Douglas for your response. It helped me .
What are the possible values of algorithm attribute? Is AES only supported
algorithm type for Barbican or does it support any other algorithm type?
Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Douglas Mendizabal
Akihiro,
If we go with the empty extension you proposed in the patch will that be
acceptable?
We've got to stop killing new functionality on the very last day like this
. It just kills progress. This proposal isn't new.
Carl
On Mar 30, 2015 11:37 AM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:08 PM, Sebastien Badia wrote:
Hi,
Following our Tuesday meeting, we decided to create a sort of PTL /
Coordinators tasks list with the essence of
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Guide
I list some point here, but feel free to add discuss about them, it's
not (yet)
No thoughts?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone shed some light as to how you upgrade/ applies the
security/back-ported patches?
E.g - let's say i already have a production environment running Icehouse
2014.1 as per the link
On 26/03/15 15:30, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
I attached an example of the template which is hanging right now in my
Juno environment. I believe it hangs because of floating ip stuff and
the way how it is attached to a VM.
It is autogenerated, so please don't be disturbed by strange resource
The Barbican Project Team would like to announce the release of
python-barbicanclient 3.0.3.
The release is available via PyPI
* https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-barbicanclient
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-barbicanclient
For detailed release notes, please visit the milestone page in
I will quickly spin another patch set with the shim extension. Hopefully this
will be all it takes to get subnet allocation merged.
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 2:00 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com
wrote:
A few reasons, I’m sure there are others:
- Broken tests that hardcode something about the ref implementation. The
test needs to be fixed, of course, but in the meantime, a constantly
failing CI is worthless
On 30/03/15 03:51, BORTMAN, Limor (Limor) wrote:
Hi,
I noticed the we can't use network name under OS::Neutron::Port (only
network_id) as a valid neutron property, and I was wondering why?
IIRC it was something weird about how python-neutronclient worked at the
time.
I expected it to be
Hi Carl,
I am now reading the detail from Salvatore, but would like to response
this first.
I don't want to kill this useful feature too and move the thing forward.
I am fine with the empty/shim extension approach.
The subnet pool is regarded as a part of Core API, so I think this
extension can
This may have already been raised/discussed, but I'm kinda confused so
thought I'd ask on the ML here. The whole point of third party CI as I
recall was to run the same tests that we run in the official Gate against
third party drivers. To me that would imply that a CI system/device that
marks
Hi All ,
I would like to know whether Barbican supports asymmetric order request .
Please find the curl command and response for creating the order and
retrieving the order
root@barbican:~# curl -X POST -H 'content-type:application/json' -H
'X-Project-Id: 12345' -d '{type : asymmetric, meta:
A few reasons, I’m sure there are others:
- Broken tests that hardcode something about the ref implementation. The test
needs to be fixed, of course, but in the meantime, a constantly failing CI is
worthless (hello, lbaas scenario test.)
- Test relies on some “optional” feature, like
Hi, everyone,
as a follow-up for discussion [1] we've added per project core groups for
all main fuel-* repositories (see [2]):
fuel-astute-core
fuel-devops-core
fuel-docs-core
fuel-library-core
fuel-main-core
fuel-ostf-core
fuel-plugins-core
fuel-qa-core
fuel-stats-core
fuel-web-core
The
Quick update about OVS vs LB:
Sean M. Collins pushed up a patch that runs CI on Tempest with LB:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168423/
So far it's failing pretty badly.
I haven't had a chance to debug the failures - it is my hope that
perhaps there are just more changes I need to make
On 03/30/2015 06:08 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 30.03.2015 11:28, zhang bo wrote:
On 2015/3/28 18:06, Rui Chen wrote:
snip/
The API virDomainShutdown's description is out of date, it's not correct.
In fact, virDomainShutdown would block or not, depending on its mode. If
it's in
Including Alee and Paul in the loop
Refining the above question :
The consumer resource allows the clients to register with container
resources. Please find the command and response below
POST v1/containers/888b29a4-c7cf-49d0-bfdf-bd9e6f26d718/consumers
Header: content-type=application/json
Hi All-
We'll be freezing the stable/juno branches for integrated Juno projects this
Thursday April 2nd in preparation for the 2014.2.3 stable release on
Thursday April 9th. You can view the current queue of proposed patches
on gerrit [1]. I'd like to request all interested parties review
Thanks for your support, Akihiro. We will get this up for review very soon.
Carl
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Carl,
I am now reading the detail from Salvatore, but would like to response
this first.
I don't want to kill this useful feature
Top posting… I believe the main issue was a problem with snapshots that caused
false negatives for most cinder drivers. But, that got fixed. Unfortunately,
we haven’t yet established a good process to notify third parties when skipped
tests are fixed and should be “unskipped”. Maybe tagging
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:00:44AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
I've been attempting to clean up the bug tracker, one of the continued
inconsistencies that are in the Nova tracker is the use of 'Triaged'.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage
If the bug contains the solution, or a patch,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:26 PM, arkady_kanev...@dell.com wrote:
Another scenario.
The default LVM driver is local to cinder service. Thus, it may work fine
as soon as you go outside controller node it does not.
We had a discussion on choosing different default driver and expect that
Thanks Winson for the summary.
@Lingxian Kong
The context for a task is used
internally, I know the aim for this feature is to make it very easy
and convinient for users to see the details for the workflow exection,
but what users can do next with the context? Do you have a plan to
change
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Rochelle Grober rochelle.gro...@huawei.com
wrote:
Top posting… I believe the main issue was a problem with snapshots that
caused false negatives for most cinder drivers. But, that got fixed.
Unfortunately, we haven’t yet established a good process to notify
Another scenario.
The default LVM driver is local to cinder service. Thus, it may work fine as
soon as you go outside controller node it does not.
We had a discussion on choosing different default driver and expect that
discussion to continue.
Not all drivers support all features. We have a
I actually prefer to use the term Gantt, it neatly encapsulates the discussions
and it doesn't take much effort to realize that Gantt refers to the scheduler
and, if you feel there is confusion, we can clarify things in the wiki page to
emphasize the process: clean up the current scheduler
On 03/26/2015 07:54 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Gary and Kyle, I saw in my IRC backlog that you guys were briefly
talking about testing the Neutron ovn ml2 driver. I suppose it's time
to add some more code to the devstack integration to install the current
ovn branch and set up ovsdb-server to
Hi, All,
When Q_USE_NAMESPACE=False, router id is set by
create_neutron_initial_network
_neutron_configure_router_v4
_neutron_set_router_id
function _neutron_set_router_id {
if [[ $Q_USE_NAMESPACE == False ]]; then
iniset $Q_L3_CONF_FILE DEFAULT router_id $ROUTER_ID
fi
}
Hello,
I am trying to create and type-set some parameters to a volume-type as
follows:
cinder type-create nfs
cinder type-key nfs set volume_backend_name=myNFSBackend
The same thing I want to achieve through python client.
I can create the type as follows:
from cinderclient import client
(Including Adam, who implemented this feature last year to make sure I'm not
misspeaking here :)
Hello Asha,
The consumers feature allows clients/services to register 'interest' in a given
secret or container. The URL provided is unrestricted. Clients that wish to
delete a secret or consumer
Hi, all.
Recently, I have requirement to establish ipsec connection with virtual
tunnel interface(VTI).
But I found the existing vpnaas in neutron does not support ipsec with
virtual tunnel interface.
Do we have plan to let vpnaas support ipsec with vti or gre over ipsec ?
With this feature, we
On 2015/3/31 4:36, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/30/2015 06:08 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 30.03.2015 11:28, zhang bo wrote:
On 2015/3/28 18:06, Rui Chen wrote:
snip/
The API virDomainShutdown's description is out of date, it's not correct.
In fact, virDomainShutdown would block or not,
On 03/27/2015 03:03 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:44 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
To quote John from an earlier email in this thread:
Its worth noting, we do have the experimental flag:
The first header specifies the version number of the API which was
executed. Experimental is only
On 03/30/2015 11:18 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
What does fog do? Is it just a client to the Neutron HTTP API? If so,
it should not have broken like that because the API has remained
pretty stable. If it's a deployment tool, then I could see that
because the configuration options to tend to
As John said, the URI is unrestricted (intentionally so) -- this could be
'mailto:s...@person.com' just as easily as a reference to another OpenStack or
external service. Originally, the idea was that Loadbalancers would need to use
a Container for TLS purposes, so we'd put the LB's URI in
We'll have the weekly EC2 API sub team meeting [1] at 1400UTC in
#openstack-meeting-3 today. We'll likely spend the majority of the
time going over current status along with critical bugs, as well as
covering BPs.
Please feel free to add other items in the agenda [2] section.
Thanks!
Swami
[1]
2015-03-28 4:03 GMT+09:00 Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com:
On 03/27/2015 12:44 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
To quote John from an earlier email in this thread:
Its worth noting, we do have the experimental flag:
The first header specifies the version number of the API which was
Thanks Kevin, and thanks to the other cores for their votes of confidence.
On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Kevin Carter kevin.car...@rackspace.com wrote:
Please join me in welcoming Nolan Brubaker (palendae) to the
os-ansible-deployment core team.
—
Kevin Carter
On Mar 30, 2015, at
Agree with Mike, thx for the link.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:55 PM, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/30/2015 07:02 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
My personal opinion for API 2.0 - we should discuss design of all object
and endpoint, review how they are used from Horizon or
92 matches
Mail list logo
