On 23/04/15 17:14 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try...
This cycle's TC elections didn't come with a set of prepackaged
questions and though the self-nomination messages have included some
very interesting stuff I think it would be useful to
Thanks to Sergey and Joshua, gerrit is up again!
All changes that were done today between around 2:50 UTC and 8:15 UTC,
need to be requeued.
We've just run those manually for all jobs where a check event was
missing, so this should cover all new uploads. If not, add recheck to
trigger this
Thanks Evgeniy.
From: Evgeniy L [mailto:e...@mirantis.com]
Sent: 24 April 2015 16:39
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Joe Marshall
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] What should go in
environment_config.yaml when no additional attributes are desired
Thanks for your comments on the patch I see what you are trying to do
now, I think.
However, still a bit concerned about the unit tests, but its probably
easier to discuss that in gerrit.
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
On 24 April 2015 at 04:25, Rui Chen chenrui.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all:
I'm
Hi all,
As you probably know CIS was expanded from Juno metadefs work this cycle based
on spec [1] provided. The implementation was merged in quite a rush just before
feature freeze.
During the spec review [2] for client functionality for CIS it came to our
attention that the implementation
I see these changes as really important.
We need to establish good patterns other SDKs can copy.
On 24 April 2015 at 12:05, Alex Xu sou...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-04-24 18:15 GMT+08:00 Andrey Kurilin akuri...@mirantis.com:
When user execute cmd without --os-compute-version. The nova client
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2015-04-27 17:32:12 +0100:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
For outgoing communication, during Kilo (and possibly Juno) we tried
blogging meeting summaries. Did folks notice? Were the posts useful?
Is there a TC specific blog place of
On Apr 27, 2015, at 14:35, Christopher Aedo ca...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
Oh, I should actually mention which way I think we should go with.
RegionOne should be the convention.
This came up in January[1][2]
Excerpts from Richard Raseley's message of 2015-04-27 12:55:11 -0700:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
I think we chose blog posts for their relative permanence, and
retweetability. Maybe we should post to the mailing list instead,
if the contributor community follows the list more regularly than
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Ajaya Agrawal ajku@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
wrote:
Not to speak for Brant, but i think the confusion here is why you are
doing this. From my perspective you should never be in a position where
On 04/22/2015 02:19 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
a) Adopt these as repositories under the Neutron project team.
In this case, I would see them operating with their own review teams as
they do today to avoid imposing additional load on the neutron-core or
neutron-specs-core teams. However, by
On 2015-04-27 17:07:56 -0400 (-0400), Ronald Bradford wrote:
[...]
Specifically, the following two code snippets have become SOP (Standard
Operating Procedure) jumping around VMs and projects and I suspect if you
are a developer of this project, something you are very familiar with.
[...]
Hi,
We would like to expand the core team and developers that can participate. Our
current 2000 UTC meeting time is not ideal for APAC participants.
I am considering moving the meeting to alternating schedules of 1600 UTC and
200 UTC. If you would like to attend the Kolla IRC meeting please
Doug Hellmann wrote:
I think we chose blog posts for their relative permanence, and
retweetability. Maybe we should post to the mailing list instead,
if the contributor community follows the list more regularly than
blogs?
I like blog posts for the reasons you mentioned.
Perhaps sending a
Hello.
I have a question concerning the creation and retrieval of a secret.
I used the orders resource to request a key to be generated of type
text/plain.
However, I cannot retrieve it of type text/plain. It appears I can only
retrieve it of
type octet-stream.
I just wanted to clarify this is
Hi All,
I have recently become involved in OpenStack development. After installing
a few devstacks (and buying some H/W for my own physical cloud) I settled
into learning, reviewing and debugging the Python OpenStack Client (seemed
an easy access point). I even published a blog post just 7 days
In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design
summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical
multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance,
where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility
Thanks for your suggestion, George. But when I looked into python-cinderclient
(not very deep), I can not find the “wrapper around the python-cinderclient”
you have mentioned.
Could you please give me a little more hint to find the “wrapper”?
Thanks,
Liu
发件人: George Peristerakis
Hi folks,
I've just restarted review.openstack.org gerrit to fix issue with sending
events. It means that some of your patches needs to be rechecked to receive
votes from CI.
3rd party CIs maintainers, you probably should restart your Zuul service to
ensure it reconnected after gerrit restart.
Gerrit has been restarted and it works ok now.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Andreas Jaeger a...@suse.com wrote:
Our CI system is currently not processing any events. This means that no
new check or gate jobs get started.
Uploading new patches and reviewing is working fine.
But new
Team,
We decided to cancel today’s meeting because a number of key members won’t be
able to attend.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
I believe German is referring to the case where a user performs an
operation on behalf of some other project to whom it bears no relationship.
In this case the user performing the operation authenticates with keystone
with a project_id which is not the one for which the operation is being
This is a problem of dependency resolution rather than an issue of
keystoneclient specifically. You can see that glanceclient has a cap on
keystoneclient that the installed version doesn't meet.
python-keystoneclient=1.1.0,1.4.0 is requirement on
python-glanceclient stable/kilo branch,
while
Hi everyone,
Thanks to the efforts of the Release team (special thanks to Doug
Hellmann and Sean Dague) and Jeremy Stanley from the Infra team, we
finally fixed the stable/kilo and master requirements gate. The
following freezes are therefore lifted:
- No more DepFreeze[1], master requirements
The latter. If you look at Jenkins results for 168115, it shows that there
is an invalid config file at /etc/neutron/rootwrap.conf. However, it should
be accessing
/opt/stack/new/neutron-vpnaas/.tox/dsvm-functional-sswan/etc/neutron/rootwrap.conf.
The deploy_rootwrap.sh call in tox.ini should
Alex,
Any scratch of the solution you plan to propose?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM, liuxinguo liuxin...@huawei.com wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion, George. But when I looked into
python-cinderclient (not very deep), I can not find the “wrapper around the
python-cinderclient” you have
Hi,
Isn't CHAP iscsi-specific ?
Jordan
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have been curious as to which Cinder drivers support
authentication. It seems that only a subset do. I wondered, is this
something that would be useful on the
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-04-27 08:52:01 +0200:
On 23/04/15 17:14 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try...
This cycle's TC elections didn't come with a set of prepackaged
questions and though the self-nomination messages
Hi,
I'm responsible for the spec for supporting CIS in the glanceclient, as well as
the comments which brought some fuss, so would like to clarify some things.
1) That's right - following scenario hasn't been included at the `Security
Impact` section. That's because there is no real
@ttx, +1 from me.
-- dims
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
In summary, here is the proposed Liberty common schedule:
liberty-1: June 25th
liberty-2: July 30th
liberty-3: September 3rd
final release: October 15th
Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
In summary, here is the proposed Liberty common schedule:
liberty-1: June 25th
liberty-2: July 30th
liberty-3: September 3rd
final release: October 15th
Let me know if you see issues with it, like crazy holidays somewhere
that would ruin it.
No feedback, so
Hi,
Recently I have been curious as to which Cinder drivers support
authentication. It seems that only a subset do. I wondered, is this
something that would be useful on the CinderSupportMatrix wiki page?
Thanks
--
Kind Regards,
Dave Walker
Yes
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Jordan Pittier jordan.pitt...@scality.com
wrote:
Hi,
Isn't CHAP iscsi-specific ?
Jordan
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Dave Walker em...@daviey.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have been curious as to which Cinder drivers support
authentication. It
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
wrote:
Not to speak for Brant, but i think the confusion here is why you are
doing this. From my perspective you should never be in a position where
the admin has to enter a raw project id like that.
Sometimes you have to do
On 24/04/15 09:32 +1200, Fei Long Wang wrote:
On 24/04/15 06:02, Richard Raseley wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
I think getting operators to adopt it is key to getting other openstack
projects to also adopt it. There is something of a chicken and the egg
problem
with the integration. Some of
On 27/04/15 08:46 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-04-27 08:52:01 +0200:
On 23/04/15 17:14 +0100, Chris Dent wrote:
This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try...
This cycle's TC elections didn't come with a set of prepackaged
Chris, apologies for the late reply. No real excuse other than I wanted
to hear what the other candidates had to say and listen a bit before I
responded.
On 04/23/2015 12:14 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
Here's the question:
What can and should the TC at large, and you specifically, do to ensure
Thanks for your response Kamil,
I think the first lesson learnt (again) is when there is =1 non-native
speakers involved make sure you understand the message as it's meant to, not as
it has been written or you apprehend it. I'm happy I did not write what I had
in my mind at Thu night or Fri
Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions.
-Nikhil
From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2015-04-27 10:36:57 -0700:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/04/15 19:02, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone use Zookeeper[1], Memcache[2] Nova ServiceGroup Driver ?
If yes how has been your experience with it. It was noticed that most of
the deployment try to use the default Database driver[3]. Any experiences
with Zookeeper, Memcache driver will be helpful.
-Vilobh
[1]
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I believe all of the posts were on the main OpenStack foundation blog
under the technical committee tag [1], and they also went to
planet.openstack.org for folks who subscribe to the entire community
feed.
Ah. Some things about that:
* in the right
On 27/04/15 13:38, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
AFAICT there's two options:
1. Update the stack.Stack so we store now at every transition (e.g in
state_set)
2. Stop trying to explicitly control updated_at, and just allow the oslo
Hi All,
I’ll be out the next few days and will be missing our meetings. Specifically
the cross-project meeting [1] and our API WG meeting [2].
On the plus side I got to my action items from the last meeting and “froze” the
3 guidelines up for review and proposed a cross-project session [3]
On 27 April 2015 at 09:09, Rossella Sblendido rsblend...@suse.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am working at the blueprint Restructure the L2 agent [1] .
One of the work item of this blueprint is to modify the port_update
message to include the attributes of the ports that were modified. This
is
Excerpts from Kevin L. Mitchell's message of 2015-04-27 15:38:25 -0700:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 21:42 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
I consider it an unfortunate oversight that those files weren't
deleted a very, very long time ago.
Unfortunately, there's one problem with that: you can't tell
Any project that fails to meet the criteria later can be dropped at any
time. For example, if some repo is clearly unmaintained, it can be
removed.
If we open the door to excluding projects down the road, then wouldn't we
need to take into account some form of 3rd party CI validation as
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:06 AM, loy wolfe loywo...@gmail.com wrote:
It's already away from the original thread, so I start this new one,
also with some extra tag because I think it touch some corss-project
area.
Hi
I'm working on a custom middleware which will place on swift-proxy
pipeline, just before the latest proxy-logging.
how can I force devstack to install my middleware just as I run ./stack.sh?
#The point is that I'm looking for a mature and standard to do it, so I'm
not going to just edit the
+1
BR, Eli(Li Yong)Qiao
From: David Lyle [mailto:dkly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:57 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] TC Candidacy
I'm announcing my candidacy for the Technical Committee elections.
I have been contributing to OpenStack since
Hi,
All Puppet OpenStack jobs (lint, syntax, unit and beaker) are quite
often affected by rubygems.org downtimes and make all jobs failing
randomly because it can't download some gems during the bootstrap.
This is something that really affect our CI and we would really
appreciate
Geoff,
Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned.
As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs
hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what
the desired path forward is with regard to domains?
Thanks,
Travis
On 4/27/15, 7:16
Good points. I’ll add some details. I’m sure the Reseller guys will have some
comments.
Geoff
On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions.
-Nikhil
From: Geoff
On 27 April 2015 at 18:16, YAMAMOTO Takashi yamam...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
On 27 April 2015 at 09:09, Rossella Sblendido rsblend...@suse.com
wrote:
Hello all,
I am working at the blueprint Restructure the L2 agent [1] .
One of the work item of this blueprint is to modify the
On 27 April 2015 at 09:09, Rossella Sblendido rsblend...@suse.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am working at the blueprint Restructure the L2 agent [1] .
One of the work item of this blueprint is to modify the port_update
message to include the attributes of the ports that were modified. This
is
On 23 April 2015 at 09:14, Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com wrote:
This might be a bit presumptuous, but why not give it a try...
This cycle's TC elections didn't come with a set of prepackaged
questions and though the self-nomination messages have included some
very interesting stuff I think
I'm assuming you are using LBaaS V2. With that assumption, I'm not sure how
you are having to select subnet on the pool. It's not supposed to be a field
at all on the pool object. subnet_id is required on the member object right
now, but that's something I and others think should just be
On 4/23/15 11:41 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
That change works on the dataset. However I was referring to the
db/object api (which I have no real knowledge of) that it should be able
to get_by_uuid unmigrated instances and in my case I got the traceback
given in that paste. It's possible I'm just
We are jazzed to announce the (KIlo) release of:
python-ceilometerclient 1.0.14: OpenStack Telemetry API Client Library
For more details, please see the git log history below and:
https://launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+milestone/1.0.14
Please report issues through launchpad:
A friendly reminder that KVM Forum 2015 accepts proposal submissions
until this coming Friday.
Thanks on behalf of the KVM Forum 2015 Program Committee.
Daniel
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:51:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
=
Hi all,
I've been looking into $subject recently, I raised this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1448155
Basically we've got some historically weird and potentially inconsistent
behavior around updated_at, and I'm trying to figure out the best way to
proceed.
Now, we selectively
On 04/27/2015 12:09 PM, Rossella Sblendido wrote:
Hello all,
I am working at the blueprint Restructure the L2 agent [1] .
One of the work item of this blueprint is to modify the port_update
message to include the attributes of the ports that were modified. This
is implemented in this patch
The Keystone development team is happy to announce the 1.3.1 release of
python-keystoneclient. Barring any last minute bugs, this release will be
the keystoneclient release that coincides with the Kilo release of
OpenStack.
This release can be installed from the following locations:
*
On 4/27/15, 05:39, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all,
As you probably know CIS was expanded from Juno metadefs work this cycle
based on spec [1] provided. The implementation was merged in quite a rush
just before feature freeze.
During the spec review [2] for client functionality for
Hello all,
I am working at the blueprint Restructure the L2 agent [1] .
One of the work item of this blueprint is to modify the port_update
message to include the attributes of the ports that were modified. This
is implemented in this patch [2] .
The client side of the RPC is in AgentNotifierApi
On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
= Have a monthly Feedback from Operators conversation =
Dedicate part or all of one TC IRC meeting time per month to discuss operator
feedback. Invite the operator community to come and tell us what has
improved, what needs
On 03:42 Apr 27, Ryan.Chiang(江明哲) wrote:
Dear Sirs,
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#When_thirdparty_CI_voting_will_be_required.3F
--
Mike Perez
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
The Keystone development team is happy to announce the 1.5.1 release of
keystonemiddleware. Barring any last minute bugs, this release will be the
keystonemiddleware release that coincides with the Kilo release of
OpenStack.
This release can be installed from the following locations:
*
Hi,
Tomorrow is our weekly meeting.
Please look at the agenda [1].
Feel free to bring new topics and reviews/bugs if needed.
Also, if you had any action, make sure you can give a status during the
meeting or in the etherpad directly.
See you tomorrow,
[1]
On 04/22/2015 08:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
* shell testing: yes because it's the way we wrote our providers.
We don't necessary need to shell out, but instead implement resources
for Serverspec which will use openstackclient to test Keystone/Nova/...
resources. I'm currently in process of
Hi All,
Deploying Kubernetes(k8s) cluster on any OpenStack based cloud for container
based workload is a standard deployment pattern. However, auto-scaling this
cluster based on load would require some integration between k8s OpenStack
components. While looking at the option of leveraging Heat
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
For outgoing communication, during Kilo (and possibly Juno) we tried
blogging meeting summaries. Did folks notice? Were the posts useful?
Is there a TC specific blog place of interest? I sometimes stumble
on blog postings from people I know are TC
2 sounds right to me, but does the in-memory representation get updated or are
we forced into a refetch at every change?
On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been looking into $subject recently, I raised this bug:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 21:42 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
I consider it an unfortunate oversight that those files weren't
deleted a very, very long time ago.
Unfortunately, there's one problem with that: you can't tell tox to use
a virtualenv that you've built. We need this capability at
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (9:00AM MDT)
1) Liberty specs (tracking page - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/liberty
)
2) Vancouver design summit - more thoughts?
3) Opens
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
On 2015-04-27 17:38:25 -0500 (-0500), Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
Unfortunately, there's one problem with that: you can't tell tox to use
a virtualenv that you've built. We need this capability at present, so
we have to run tests using run_tests.sh instead of tox :( I have an
issue open on tox
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:45:10PM +, Randall Burt wrote:
2 sounds right to me, but does the in-memory representation get updated or
are we forced into a refetch at every change?
Yeah, we probably would be, digging some more there's historical context
here:
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly
meeting on Tuesday April 28th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
Hi Clinton,
I think there are two main parts that are needed to automatically mount
Manila shares. One is the share discovery model, and the other is enabling the
virtual machine to mount the share. I think the only benefit to using zeroconf
would be as a standard way to broadcast
Hi,
Currently we have some parts of OpenStack that use regionOne while
others use RegionOne
Now, I know that consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds[1], but
I think in this situation it's worth going through and settling on one
way. I've pushed a patch to the install guide fixing the
Hi,
I was recently hit with a couple of Jenkins -1 votes due to underlying failures
in the test framework which never even completed the installation of the test
framework.
In circumstances like this I wonder if it might make sense to have Jenkins
abstain rather than mark it -1. We could
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
AFAICT there's two options:
1. Update the stack.Stack so we store now at every transition (e.g in
state_set)
2. Stop trying to explicitly control updated_at, and just allow the oslo
TimestampMixin to do it's job and update
Now that raises a question: do we really need sorting based on arbitrary
keys in our API (e.g. listing images, volumes, instances)? If we have this
feature in our API, we're bound to run into problems by creating or not
creating indexes, at large volumes -- hurts our motive to be
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/04/15 20:00, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov
mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Notification might be a good way to integrate with nova. Individual
Oh, I should actually mention which way I think we should go with.
RegionOne should be the convention.
--
Sean M. Collins
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/04/15 19:02, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
I'd like my first action as Zaqar's PTL to be based on
So when I use Haproxy for LBaaS for Juno, there is a subnet mandatary field
that I need to fill in when creating a pool, and later on when I add members, I
can use a different subnet(or simply just enter the ip of the member), when
adding vip, I can still select a third subnet. So what is the
Hey everyone!
Per moving to the OpenStack namespace[1] the OpenStack Chef community has moved
from our Google Group[2] to this mailing list.
This is just a notification to the wider audience that this has happened.
-JJ Asghar
[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175000/
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
Oh, I should actually mention which way I think we should go with.
RegionOne should be the convention.
This came up in January[1][2] relating to case sensitivity in MySQL,
Keystone and TripleO, and there's a bug
At the very least, an index on the default sort column (created_at)
would be appropriate, IMO.
Best,
-jay
On 04/27/2015 01:42 PM, Rushi Agrawal wrote:
Now that raises a question: do we really need sorting based on arbitrary
keys in our API (e.g. listing images, volumes, instances)? If we have
On 2015-04-27 11:38:09 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote:
[...]
In circumstances like this I wonder if it might make sense to have Jenkins
abstain rather than mark it -1. We could then have a job that went around
and re-ran Jenkins tests for cases where it abstained previously.
[...]
In a
On 4/27/15, 05:39, Kuvaja, Erno kuv...@hp.com wrote:
The spec bluntly states that
there is no security impact from the implementation
and the concerns should have been brought up so reviewers would have had
better chance to catch possible threats.
I would like you to look back into those
92 matches
Mail list logo
