Re: [openstack-dev] Congrats (I think) to the new TC

On 04/30/15 16:40, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/30/2015 09:26 AM, David Medberry wrote: Hey guys, Congrats to the new TC leaders. http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_ef1379fee7b94688 Please reach out to me (and openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [nova] Deadline for submitting Nova Design Summit Session Proposals

Hi, In case you were unable to make yesterday's Nova meeting... If you have a suggestion for a Nova design summit session, please ensure you add it to before the next Nova meeting (7th May): https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-nova-summit-ideas Shortly after that Nova meeting, the (mostly)

[openstack-dev] [nova] Blueprints and Specs for Liberty Deadline

Hi, Just a quick reminder that blueprints and nova-specs need to be approved for liberty, even if they have already been approved for a previous release. I added deadline in the subject mostly just to get your attention. We haven't agreed a deadline for spec and blueprint submissions yet, but exp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

On 05/01/2015 12:54 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, Have we considered cloud-init and qemu guest agent, I remember there was some discussion around this in the prev summit, but i couldn't find any etherpad/notes on that. I had one more question in this regards. Is it possible to do some kind o

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Melanie Witt to nova-core

+1 :) 2015-04-30 20:30 GMT+09:00 John Garbutt : > Hi, > > I propose we add Melanie to nova-core. > > She has been consistently doing great quality code reviews[1], > alongside a wide array of other really valuable contributions to the > Nova project. > > Please respond with comments, +1s, or objec

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Proposal for Madhuri Kumari to join Core Team

Hi All, Thank you for adding me to this team. It will be my pleasure to work with you all together. Till now, everyone has helped me in many or some way. Thank you for all the support and this honor. Looking forward for contributing more. Thanks & Regards Madhuri Kumari On Fri, May 1, 2015 a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

Hmm The cinder volumes dont automount either. /dev/vdx shows up, but you have to format/mount it yourself. Maybe both teams could share a common solution? Im guessing it will have to be an agent... Thanks, Kevin From: Deepak Shetty Sent: Thursday, April 30,

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Eichberger, German < german.eichber...@hp.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am proposing that Octavia is joining the Networking program as a project > under the Services area. > > Octavia is the open scalable reference implementation for Neutron LBaaS V2 > and has always see

[openstack-dev] [all] Change for automatic translation import

Our PO files contain information about location (filename and line numbers) as well as untranslated strings. Dolph suggested to me recently to import into projects only the *translated* strings and I did some investigation and implementation after discussion with the translation team [1] - with

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Are routed TAP interfaces (and DHCP for them) in scope for Neutron?

Thanks for your reply, Kevin, and sorry for the delay in following up. On 21/04/15 09:40, Kevin Benton wrote: Is it compatible with overlapping IPs? i.e. Will it give two different VMs the same IP address if the reservations are setup that way? No, not as I've described it below, and as we've

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Deadline for submitting Nova Design Summit Session Proposals

On 01/05/15 11:44, John Garbutt wrote: Hi, In case you were unable to make yesterday's Nova meeting... I was there, but still a bit shy and retiring... :-) If you have a suggestion for a Nova design summit session, please ensure you add it to before the next Nova meeting (7th May): https://e

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [docs] Scheduler filters documentation

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 04/29/2015 03:41 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Apr 29, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Matt Riedemann >> wrote: >> >> I'd prefer to see the scheduler filter docs be maintained in the >>> nova devref where they are close to the source, versioned, and >>> re

[openstack-dev] [nova-docker] Status update

Anyone still interested in this work? :) * there's a stable/kilo branch now (see http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/nova-docker/). * CI jobs are running fine against both nova trunk and nova's stable/kilo branch. * there's an updated nova-spec to get code back into nova tree (see https://rev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

On 05/01/2015 09:32 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Hmm The cinder volumes dont automount either. /dev/vdx shows up, but you have to format/mount it yourself. Maybe both teams could share a common solution? Im guessing it will have to be an agent... That not really true. If the volume is already

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

?+1 from me From: Kyle Mestery Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 8:53 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Eichberger, German mailto

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

Davanum Srinivas wrote: One concrete suggestion based on my experience working with Kris Lindgren on Heartbeat patch: http://markmail.org/message/gifrt5f3mslco24j I could have added a "Co-Tested-By" (or "Co-Operator" - get it? :) in my commit message which would have signaled a concrete contribu

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

Good stuff. Thanks everyone for your hard work on getting Octavia to this point! Cheers, --Jorge From: Brandon Logan mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] service chaining feature development

Hello everyone, Some of you have reached out to me asking questions about when we will start meeting discussion on the service chaining feature BPs in OpenStack. I have set up a"goto meeting" for an audio meeting discussion so that we can sync up thought and bring everyone on the same page in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] service chaining feature development

Hi Cathy, Thanks for the information. Waiting for the invite. Thanks Swami From: Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 6:17 PM To: adolfo.duar...@hp.com; Vikram Choudhary; Isaku Yamahata; Yamahata, Isaku; Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville); Anand, Rites

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

So this is an interesting idea. Would we require operators co-author/review all patches that land? if not (and that actually strikes me as making uploading patches more difficult unnecessarily), My question is how Operators can easily get involved with that process. If Operators want to get recogn

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] pbr 0.11 released. Must read if you encounter pbr.version.SemanticVersion(XXXX), but target version ... errors

Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-05-01 10:59:49 +1200: > pbr 0.11 is finally released (now that Kilo is out :). > > This brings in more support to ensure that our version numbers are > monotonically increasing. > > Mostly this should be unintrusive (but please do read the docs - > h

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

+1 Governance patch filed: https://review.openstack.org/179417 Thanks, doug > On May 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Jorge Miramontes > wrote: > > Good stuff. Thanks everyone for your hard work on getting Octavia to this > point! > > Cheers, > --Jorge > > From: Brandon Logan

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent

+1 --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Doug Wiegley mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

The subnet_id on the pool specifies what networks to plug when everything is first configured.Iif you add a member to the pool that is outside this subnet, there may not be a route to it, since it is probably on a different network that is not correctly plugged on the LB host. (I hope this is co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mount automation using Zeroconf

Same is true of network shares. If its already listed in fstab, it will just work. But an admin's got to manually add it there. My point is "automation" is not supported in cinder either? Thanks, Kevin From: Ben Swartzlander [b...@swartzlander.org] Sent: Friday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

Excerpts from Adam Lawson's message of 2015-05-01 09:06:20 -0700: > So this is an interesting idea. Would we require operators co-author/review > all patches that land? if not (and that actually strikes me as making > uploading patches more difficult unnecessarily), My question is how > Operators c

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

The spec review process has made it much easier for operators to see what is being proposed and give input. Recognition is a different topic. It also comes into who would be the operator/user electorate ? ATC is simple to define where the equivalent operator/user definition is less clear. I’m

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty MidCycle Meetup

Hi everyone! I'm happy to announce that (due to overwhelming demand from the development team) Keystone will be holding a MidCycle meetup for Liberty. In an effort to get ahead of the curve and ensure everyone has time to put in for travel arrangements, I am sending out the preliminary detail

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][heat] pbr 0.11 released. Must read if you encounter pbr.version.SemanticVersion(XXXX), but target version ... errors

On 2 May 2015 at 04:17, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-05-01 10:59:49 +1200: >> pbr 0.11 is finally released (now that Kilo is out :). >> >> This brings in more support to ensure that our version numbers are >> monotonically increasing. >> >> Mostly this shou

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

On 05/01/2015 02:22 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > The spec review process has made it much easier for operators to see > what is being proposed and give input. > > Recognition is a different topic. It also comes into who would be the > operator/user electorate ? ATC is simple to define where the equiva

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

On Friday, May 1, 2015, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 05/01/2015 02:22 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > > > The spec review process has made it much easier for operators to see > > what is being proposed and give input. > > > > Recognition is a different topic. It also comes into who would be the > > operato

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] 3 API Guidelines up for final review

All 3 API guidelines have merged. Thanks everyone! Everett On Apr 22, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Everett Toews wrote: > Hi All, > > We have 3 API Guidelines that are ready for a final review. > > 1. Metadata guidelines document > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141229/ > > 2. Tagging guidelines > h

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] API working group liaisons and responsibilities

On Apr 30, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hi Stackers, > > OK, so Matthew Gilliard and Alex Xu have volunteered to be the Nova team's > liaisons to the API working group. Big thank you to Matthew and Alex for > volunteering for this important role. > > I've created a wiki page [1] that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

I purposely didn't email the general mailing list since I didn't want to cross-post, hard to have these discussions across verticals and choosing one list = hearing one community - those subscribed to the developer mailing list. So I'm not assuming anything, it seems some are suggesting that Opera

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Adam Lawson wrote: > I purposely didn't email the general mailing list since I didn't want to > cross-post, hard to have these discussions across verticals and choosing > one list = hearing one community - those subscribed to the developer > mailing list. > > So I'

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tc] Who is allowed to vote for TC candidates

Excerpts from Adam Lawson's message of 2015-05-01 14:50:33 -0700: > I purposely didn't email the general mailing list since I didn't want to > cross-post, hard to have these discussions across verticals and choosing > one list = hearing one community - those subscribed to the developer > mailing li

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool?

Thanks Adam! That makes sense to me!Wanjing Xu From: adam.harw...@rackspace.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 16:33:09 + Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Why do we need to select subnet when creating a pool? The subnet_id on the pool specifie

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Status of Beaker jobs

Hi, TL;DR: Please review: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++topic:bug-1444736,n,z I would like to share some progress/feedback about integrating Beaker in our modules. First, everything is updated in the Google Doc [1] My main blockers were related to packaging in UCA, I had sometim

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] service chaining feature development

Hello everyone, Some of you have reached out to me asking questions about when we will start meeting discussion on the service chaining feature BPs in OpenStack. I have set up a"goto meeting" for an audio meeting discussion so that we can sync up thought and bring everyone on the same page in a

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Karma Tests in Horizon

Paging David Lyle! We're trying to nail down exactly what work needs to be done on the Karma patch to get your approval and avoid further frustrating patch churn. Could you take a moment to respond to Matt's question, and/or discuss here what you're looking for? We tried pinging you on IRC, but it

[openstack-dev] [TC][Keystone] Rehashing the Pecan/Falcon/other WSGI debate

Hi all, At around the time Barbican was applying for incubation there was a discussion about "supported" WSGI frameworks. From memory the decision at the time was that Pecan was to be the only supported framework and that for incubation Barbican had to convert to Pecan (from Falcon). Keystone is

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Status of Beaker jobs

On 05/01/2015 05:35 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi, TL;DR: Please review: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++topic:bug-1444736,n,z I would like to share some progress/feedback about integrating Beaker in our modules. First, everything is updated in the Google Doc [1] My main blockers

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Clarification required

Hello, I am playing around with Neutron LBaaS API calls as per Neutron/LBaaS/API 2.0 docs. I have noticed below behavior against working devstack. I would like to clarify on it: 1. I create a loadbalancer using RESTAPI with the attributes - 'vip_subnet_id' and 'admin_state_up' as 'False'. It is g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Melanie Witt to nova-core

+1 From: Alex Xu mailto:sou...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 6:30 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal to add Melanie Witt to nova-core I'm not