Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

2016-12-05 12:51 GMT-06:00 Paul Belanger : > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:15AM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote: >> On Friday, 2 December 2016 14:42:31 CET Matt Riedemann wrote: >> > But like we recently talked about the stable team meetings, we don't >> > really need to be in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [third-party][ci] devstack failures

Thanks Lenny and Ian. ** Cinder Team ** At Tintri, we are looking at the issue and would try to pursue workarounds for this problem. But due to holiday schedule resource crunch we may not be able to fix it until new years. I will update the status on Tintri CI when we have a breakthrough. Please

[openstack-dev] [heat] On allowing null as a parameter default

Any parameter in a Heat template that has a default other than None is considered optional, so the user is not required to pass a value. Otherwise, however, the parameter is required and creating the stack will fail pretty immediately if the user does not pass a value. I've noticed that this

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

-Original Message- From: Andrey Grebennikov Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: December 5, 2016 at 12:22:09 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Dev Digest November 26 to December 2

On 2016-12-05 20:45:08 + (+), Kendall Nelson wrote: [...] > Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers [10] >- >Option 1: https://review.openstack.org/403834 - Proprietary driver dev >is unlevel >- >Option 2: https://review.openstack.org/403836 - Driver development

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

I put myself in Boris' camp on this one. This can open up the opportunity for negative user-experience, purely based on where I authenticate and which token I happen to authenticate with. A token would no longer be something I can assume to be properly validated against any node in my deployment.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

The ability to specify IDs at project creation time was proposed as a specification last summer [0]. The common theme from the discussion in that thread was to use shadow mapping [1] to solve that problem. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323499/ [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

On 05-Dec 15:14, Lance Bragstad wrote: > I put myself in Boris' camp on this one. This can open up the opportunity > for negative user-experience, purely based on where I authenticate and > which token I happen to authenticate with. A token would no longer be > something I can assume to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

Hi, On 12/05/2016 09:20 PM, Andrey Grebennikov wrote: > Hi keystoners, > I'd like to open the discussion about the little feature which I'm > trying to push forward for a while but I need some > feedbacks/opinions/concerns regarding this. > Here is the review I'm talking > about

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement][ironic] Progress on custom resource classes

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Ironic colleagues, heads up, please read the below fully! I'd like your > feedback on a couple outstanding questions. > > tl;dr > - > > Work for custom resource classes has been proceeding well this cycle, and > we're at

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Dev Digest November 26 to December 2

Hello All! HTML Version: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14bijOMZOWBISKovCq-p0-TdvyrVZHGp8p-ybVYXaqAA/edit Updates - Nova Resource Providers update [2] - Nova blueprints update [16] - OpenStack-Ansible deploy guide live! [6] The Future of OpenStack Needs You [1] -

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

Hi keystoners, I'd like to open the discussion about the little feature which I'm trying to push forward for a while but I need some feedbacks/opinions/concerns regarding this. Here is the review I'm talking about https://review. openstack.org/#/c/403866/ What I'm trying to cover is multi-region

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

I'm OK with the agreed approach in the patch, we restrict the ID being specified to 32 character UUID4 string. And it only works on project create, not update. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Andrey Grebennikov < agrebenni...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi keystoners, > I'd like to open the

[openstack-dev] Console-based calendaring and reminders (was: Creating a new IRC meeting room)

On 2016-12-05 13:51:19 -0500 (-0500), Paul Belanger wrote: [...] > This could be fixed if I could figure out have to run a calendar > notifications via console. I use the remind utility and the console-based frontend wyrd: https://www.roaringpenguin.com/products/remind/

[openstack-dev] [qa] Hacking 0.13.0 broken

Hi all, I would normally have brought this up at the QA team meeting but those meetings are usually either quite late at night or quite early in the morning for me and thus unattendable for me. In the last couple weeks we've merged and released broken code that had an underspecified use-case

[openstack-dev] [keystone]

Hi keystoners, I'd like to open the discussion about the little feature which I'm trying to push forward for a while but I need some feedbacks/opinions/concerns regarding this. Here is the review I'm talking about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403866/ What I'm trying to cover is multi-region

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are dumbfounded to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. portgroup:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Hacking 0.13.0 broken

On Mon, Dec 05 2016, Ian Cordasco wrote: Hi Ian, > In the last couple weeks we've merged and released broken code that > had an underspecified use-case ostensibly because we all want to help > each other be more productive. That said, as one of the few people who > understands the interactions

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:15AM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote: > On Friday, 2 December 2016 14:42:31 CET Matt Riedemann wrote: > > But like we recently talked about the stable team meetings, we don't > > really need to be in a separate -alt room for those when we have the > > channel and anyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

> > Just to clarify, the reason you want custom project IDs is so that when > you create a project in one region, you can create it again with the same > ID in another? Isn't that just manual replication though? > > What happens when there are projects in only one region? Or if that isn't > meant

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrey Grebennikov < agrebenni...@mirantis.com> wrote: > -Original Message- >> From: Andrey Grebennikov >> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> >> Date:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

> > Hi, > > On 12/05/2016 09:20 PM, Andrey Grebennikov wrote: > > Hi keystoners, > > I'd like to open the discussion about the little feature which I'm > > trying to push forward for a while but I need some > > feedbacks/opinions/concerns regarding this. > > Here is the review I'm talking > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph

I just realized that probably we create images from individual snapshots of that consistency group and add those images to the new consistency group. Am I correct? On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Victor Denisov wrote: > Or probably when we clone a consistency group from a

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finish test job transition to Ubuntu Xenial

Clark, for Trove, I'm in the process of finishing this and there is a change [1] that is currently up for review (I have to incorporate changes to reflect Andreas' comments). If you find something amiss with the Trove jobs (trove, trove client, trove-integration or dashboard), please let me know

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

> > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Grebennikov > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: December 5, 2016 at 12:22:09 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

Just to clarify, the reason you want custom project IDs is so that when you create a project in one region, you can create it again with the same ID in another? Isn't that just manual replication though? What happens when there are projects in only one region? Or if that isn't meant to happen,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

> > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrey Grebennikov < > agrebenni...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> -Original Message- >>> From: Andrey Grebennikov >>> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph

Or probably when we clone a consistency group from a snapshot we should clone all the images in this consistency group? On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Victor Denisov wrote: > Hi Xing, > > One more question. You mentioned that there is an operation: create > consistency

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] Finish test job transition to Ubuntu Xenial

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, at 01:48 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > The infra team would really like to get the Ubuntu Xenial for testing > transition completed early this cycle. We are planning to switch any > jobs that remain on Ubuntu Trusty but should be on Ubuntu Xenial on > December

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

On 12/06/2016 01:46 AM, Andrey Grebennikov wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/05/2016 09:20 PM, Andrey Grebennikov wrote: > > Hi keystoners, > > I'd like to open the discussion about the little feature which I'm > > trying to push forward for a while but I need some > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] consistency groups in ceph

Hi Xing, One more question. You mentioned that there is an operation: create consistency group from a snap shot. Does it mean that an image can be a member of several consistency groups? Thanks, V. On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:21 AM, yang, xing wrote: > You cannot remove a

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

On 06/12/16 12:15, Andrey Grebennikov wrote: > > Just to clarify, the reason you want custom project IDs is so that > when you create a project in one region, you can create it again > with the same ID in another? Isn't that just manual replication > though? > > What happens

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tricircle]DVR issue in cross Neutron networking

Hello, Brian, Thank you for your comment, see inline comments marked with [joehuang]. The ASCII figure is not good in the plain text mail, you can check it at the browser: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-December/108447.html Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

Re: [openstack-dev] [gate][congress] subunit.parser failures in pythonXX gate job

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016, at 04:15 PM, Eric K wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know what could be causing these subunit.parser failures in > some pythonXX check jobs (they do not show up on my local setup). I > vaguely remember seeing them before, but can't remember what they were. > And haven't been

[openstack-dev] [gate][congress] subunit.parser failures in pythonXX gate job

Hi all, Does anyone know what could be causing these subunit.parser failures in some pythonXX check jobs (they do not show up on my local setup). I vaguely remember seeing them before, but can't remember what they were. And haven't been able to find relevant info online or in lists. Thanks so

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Andrey Grebennikov < agrebenni...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrey Grebennikov < >> agrebenni...@mirantis.com> wrote: >> >>> -Original Message- From: Andrey Grebennikov Reply:

[openstack-dev] [karbor] Karbor weekly irc meeting

Hi guys, Karbor today's weekly irc meeting will be held at 09:00 UTC #openstack-meeting. Weclome to add your agenda at [1] and welcome to join the meeting. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Karbor Best Regards, edison xiang

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Custom ProjectID upon creation

> > > > I'm surprised any AD administrator let Keystone write to it. I've always > hear the inverse that AD admins never would allow keystone to write to it, > therefore it was never used for Projects or Assignments. Users were > likewise read-only when AD was involved. > > I have seen normal LDAP

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tricircle]DVR issue in cross Neutron networking

On 12/5/16 3:03 AM, joehuang wrote: Hello, Hi Chaoyi, Comments inline below. Tricircle plans to provide L2 network across Neutron to ease supporting high availability of application: For example, in the following figure, the application is consisted of instance1 and instance2, these

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [ci]

Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > I wanted to send a status update on the quickstart based containerized > compute ci. > > The work is here: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393348/ > > I had two passes on the morning of Nov 30 in a row, then later that day the > deployment started to

[openstack-dev] [devstack] About installing devstack on Ubuntu

Hi, All, I failed installing devstack on Ubuntu. The detailed info of local.conf and error is pasted in http://paste.openstack.org/show/591493/. BTW, python2.7 is installed in Ubuntu, and Python.h can be found under /usr/include/python2.7. stack@stack-VirtualBox:~$ locate Python.h

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Is it possible that creating a port and binding it with 2 IPs

Hi Neutrons, As my observation from the flow table, every created port seems bound with only one IP address. I was wondering is neutron support this function which can bind a port with two IPs? For example, a VNF load balancer, which has a VIP and a real IP. And this VNF receives packets with

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Is it possible that creating a port and binding it with 2 IPs

Hi Vincent, as far as I know, Neutron supports trunk ports[1] now. You can create a parent port and add one or more subports on it. Every subport has its own IP address. [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/TrunkPort Thanks Zhi Chang 2016-12-06 14:42 GMT+08:00 Vincent.Chao

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Use ExtensionDescriptor from neutron-lib

Hi, Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398113/ has landed. This plugins using tap-as-a-service. Can someone please approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398143 Thanks Gary __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] Meeting at 20:00 UTC this Wednesday, 7th December

Hi folks, The Horizon team will be having our next meeting at 20:00 UTC this Wednesday, 7th December in #openstack-meeting-3 Meeting agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon If we have spare time this meeting I think we should look into getting some patches reviewed

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tap-as-a-service] Use ExtensionDescriptor from neutron-lib

Sorry hit send prior to posting trace. 2016-12-06 03:43:02.554832 | Failed to import test module:

[openstack-dev] [devstack][neutron-lbaas][octavia] About installing Devstack on Ubuntu

Hi, All, I failed installing devstack on Ubuntu. The detailed info of local.conf and error is pasted in http://paste.openstack.org/show/591493/. BTW, python2.7 is installed in Ubuntu, and Python.h can be found under /usr/include/python2.7. stack@stack-VirtualBox:~$ locate Python.h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Blazar weekly teem meeting starts again

Le 05/12/2016 05:45, Masahito MUROI a écrit : > Hi Stackers, > > I'm happy to announce it in openstack-dev ML that weekly Blazar team > meeting is going to start again from 6th Dec. > > Some of folks who are interested in resource reservation feature met > together in Barcelona summit and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Allowing Teams Based on Vendor-specific Drivers

Armando M. wrote: > That's when I came up with the proposal of defining the neutron stadium > as a list of projects that behave consistently and adhere to a common > set of agreed principles, such as common backporting strategies, testing > procedures, including our ability to claim the entire

Re: [openstack-dev] [Blazar] Blazar weekly teem meeting starts again

> On 5 Dec 2016, at 10:36, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > > Le 05/12/2016 05:45, Masahito MUROI a écrit : >> Hi Stackers, >> >> I'm happy to announce it in openstack-dev ML that weekly Blazar team >> meeting is going to start again from 6th Dec. >> >> Some of folks who are

[openstack-dev] [mistral] No team meeting today - 12/05/2016

Renat Akhmerov @Nokia __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Question about config cinder volume

> On 2 Dec 2016, at 14:49, Jason HU wrote: > 1. Will Glance use Cinder volume as storage automatically when I enable > Cinder? The default store for Glance is “file" when not using Ceph.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Upgrades meeting canceled for today

Hi all, all candidates to chair the meeting are overbooked today and won’t be able to lead it; we will cancel the meeting. We will meet the next week at usual time. Sorry for late notification, Ihar __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tricircle]DVR issue in cross Neutron networking

Hello, Tricircle plans to provide L2 network across Neutron to ease supporting high availability of application: For example, in the following figure, the application is consisted of instance1 and instance2, these two instances will be deployed into two OpenStack. Intance1 will provide

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

On Friday, 2 December 2016 14:42:31 CET Matt Riedemann wrote: > But like we recently talked about the stable team meetings, we don't > really need to be in a separate -alt room for those when we have the > channel and anyone that cares about stable enough to be in the meeting > is already in that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] core and driver teams attrition

+100 :) We got hit pretty hard by some unfortunate company decisions that took contributors away but we still have lots of contributors to promote to core and get back on track. On Dec 1, 2016 23:36, "Armando M." wrote: Hi Neutrinos, By now a few of us have noticed

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

On 2016-12-05 08:43:38 +0100 (+0100), Andreas Jaeger wrote: [...] > Accessbot is just permissions - this is not relevant. [...] To clarify, our accessbot never joins any channels at all. It only connects to the server and interacts with ChanServ to configure permissions for the channels listed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Creating a new IRC meeting room ?

On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 8:49 PM Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:35:05AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > There has been a bit of tension lately around creating IRC meetings. > > I've been busy[1] cleaning up unused slots and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] POC patch for using tripleo-repos for repo setup

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 11/22/2016 08:18 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> Even if I was part of those who approved this feature, I still have >> some comments, inline: >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alex Schultz

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI scenarios design - how to add more services

Giving few updates here: - we implemented option 1.a), which means that we moved the tripleo CI scenarios environments and pingtests into tripleo-heat-template. - we created tripleo-scenarioXXX-puppet jobs that run on some modules. Some Example: - puppet-gnocchi now runs tripleo-scenario001,

[openstack-dev] [neutron] trunk api performance and scale measurments

Hi, I measured how the new trunk API scales with lots of subports. You can find the results here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Trunk_API_Performance_and_Scaling Hope you find it useful. There are several open ends, let me know if you're interested in following up some of them.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] trunk api performance and scale measurments

On 12/05/2016 10:59 AM, Bence Romsics wrote: Hi, I measured how the new trunk API scales with lots of subports. You can find the results here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Trunk_API_Performance_and_Scaling Hope you find it useful. There are several open ends, let me know if you're

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] trunk api performance and scale measurments

On 5 December 2016 at 08:07, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 12/05/2016 10:59 AM, Bence Romsics wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I measured how the new trunk API scales with lots of subports. You can >> find the results here: >> >>